The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2019.European powers back U.S. in blaming Iran for Saudi oil attack
By John Irish and Kylie MacLellan UNITED NATIONS©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
30 Comments
Chip Star
Germany and France agreeing that Iran perpetrated the attacks gives the accusation credibility it lacked when only Donny was mouthing off about it being Iran.
Strangerland
Very true. American claims cannot be trusted without outside third-party verification
SuperLib
So how's that new nuclear deal coming along?
SimondB
"The time has come for Iran to accept negotiation on a long-term framework for its nuclear program"
What happened to the one they had? Oh yes, now I remember.
kurisupisu
Since Saudi Arabia has decimated Yemen with attack after attack after attack; is it really implausible to assume that the Houthis would NOT counter attack?
Iran has denied the attack but the Houthis admitted to it.
And Iran gets the blame-strange...
bass4funk
Funny, as if it could have been someone else, any sensible person knows the attacks were staged by Iran, even with absence of caffeine it’s quite clear that they were responsible, there was never any doubt....oh, wait...The liberal media needed another ratings boost, bad few weeks for them again...
PTownsend
Wouldn't it be great if Trump could get this to happen:
and
to resolve some of the issues with Iran.
If he could, it would justify President Obama having been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Wallace Fred
Didn't the same clowns sign off on the iraq debacle? Give me a break. Iran is not iraq. If they make the mistake of attacking it, it will be countless body bags heading back to the irrespective aggressor state. This is fact.
Strangerland
Any sensible person cannot ignore the fact that the USA invaded Iraq, a sovereign nation who were complying with UN demands, based on lies that they assured us were fact. Any sensible person has also seen Trump repeatedly speak falsehoods over the past four years at an alarming rate.
So no, any sensible person could not take the claims of Trump’s USA at face value. Independent third party verification is a requirement to believe American claims.
Unfortunately Republican presidents this century have destroyed America’s word. No longer can the benefit of the doubt be given.
Strangerland
Nope. The USA unilaterally invaded Iraq. There was no sign off by anyone before they did it.
bass4funk
Iraq did not allow U.N. inspectors full and unfettered access to every single site.
Hmmm...I disagree. Slow ratings month for the liberal media, but I get it pandemonium sells.
Democrat Presidents destroyed not only the credibility, but gave the world impression that America will run cowardly, apologize capitulate for God knows what and sit by while or adversaries gobble up our allies.
Strangerland
Hans Blix, the head inspector, said they had received full and unfettered access to every single site.
But you would have me believe you over him. Yeah, right.
Well that kind of makes my point doesn’t it. I said any sensible person. You are the most biased person on this site. Bias destroys sensibility.
bass4funk
Specifically, the resolution noted that Iraq had failed to comply on many scores by concealing activities, not providing access, and not making full disclosures as required. The resolution stated that Iraq’s failures put it in “material breach of its acceptance of the relevant provisions of resolution 687 which established a cease-fire and provided the conditions essential to the restoration of peace and security in the region.” The implication of this language was that if Iraq was in violation of its obligations of the cease-fire resolution, then military operations against Iraq might be resumed.
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2002-09/features/inevitable-failure-inspections-iraq
No, I just don’t and refuse to dwell in the fantasy world of “if only”
serendipitous1
Pathetic Johnson brown-nosing Trump by saying Trump would be the one to get a better deal with Iran. Dream on Boris and Donald!
Strangerland
Hans Blix comments:
And:
And:
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/feb/14/iraq.unitednations1
So, I'll take the word of Blix over far-right American propaganda.
rlperez@hotmail.com.au
Did anyone expect the Western Wimps to do anything else?
Where is the evidence that it was Iran, not the "almost certain, possibly, most likely". The hard solid evidence? Why has this solid evidence been published?
Is this the same type of evidence that was used to invade Iraq?
Seem more like the same, an attempt by the US to gather an alliance of the "willing".
Serrano
Germany and France agreeing that Iran perpetrated the attacks gives the accusation credibility it lacked when only Donny was mouthing off about it being Iran.
So Donny was right. No credit where credit is due? Jeez...
So how's that new nuclear deal coming along?
it's not. The Iranians refuse to negotiate. Maybe you can convince them to get with the program.
Strangerland
So it turns out he didn't lie this time. He doesn't get credit for not lying. That's like giving someone credit for not getting thrown in jail, or giving them credit for paying their rent.
The Iranians negotiated an agreement that six nations agreed to. They have shown they are clearly willing to negotiate.
The US on the other hand ripped up the agreement, put crippling sanctions on Iran, and have demanded... um... actually, they haven't demanded anything. Trump and his team simply whine that Iran isn't doing something that no one has laid out what they should do.
Iran: Iraq 2, the debacle repeats.
Serrano
Iran: Iraq 2, the debacle repeats.
Iran is not going to be Iraq 2. There's not going to be any U.S. troops on the ground in Iran.
arrestpaul
Iran attacked the Saudi oil facilities. Iran denied they attacked the oil facility. Iran lied.
Raw Beer
Time for the citizens of Britain, Germany, France, and the United States to get rid of their zionist puppets...
arrestpaul
It appears that the current sanctions against Iran are effective, and Britain, Germany and France will be increasing that pressure. Iran can stomp it's feet, launch drones, fire missiles, and hold it's collective breath until it turns blue, but that will only prove to other nations that world pressure on Iran should be increased. Eventually, Iran will see that it is in it's own best interest to stop attacking, and harassing, it's neighbors.
Chip Star
Says a poster from Australia, which is part of the West.
Then negotiate some sort of truce and receive sanctions relief only for the US to back about again when republicans give us their next gem of a president? Not everyone is as self-deluding as Trumpophiles.
bass4funk
The Council reminded Iraq of its obligations under the Geneva Protocol and to unconditionally remove and destroy all chemicaland biological weapons and ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150km. As part of this demand, the Council requested Iraq submit, within 15 days, a report declaring all locations of all the aforementioned weapons and agree to urgent, on-site inspections. It then established the United Nations Special Commission relating to inspections and set provisions for it, and asked Iraq to abide by its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, agreeing not to develop nuclear weapons and submitting a report to the Secretary-General and International Atomic Energy Agency within 15 days. The resolution noted that these actions "represent steps towards the goal of establishing in the Middle East a zone free from weapons of mass destruction and all missiles for their delivery and the objective of a global ban on chemical weapons".
Which they didn’t do. But at least we got Saddam and he’s no more, what a great relief.
I will take that any day over bending over appeasing or capitulation to any enemy. No Saddam and No Gaddafi, thanks Hillary and Obama on that one good thing they accomplished.
Chip Star
You must be furious at Donny for bending over, appeasing and capitulating to Kim.
Strangerland
Yep. And Iraq was fully compliant with the weapons inspectors. But Bush and his cronies claimed 'we can't find the WMDs we know they are hiding, so we must invade, as the inspections are not working', then going against the UN, and ignoring the full compliance of Iraq towards the weapons inspectors, the US decided to, based on lies, unilaterally invade a sovereign nation who was complying with the demands of the UN.
And your response to that:
Yes, at least you got a guy who was complying, and was no longer a danger. It only resulted the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis, hundreds of American military members, the birth of ISIS, and a power vacuum that has destroyed the region.
Seems justified right.
Raw Beer
That is very much the problem. They control most (all?) Western leaders through blackmail (remember Epstein?) and bribes.
Chip Star
Thousands of American military members died in Iraq. Some of them very good friends of mine.