world

May's Brexit deal under fire as legal advice stiffens opposition

3 Comments
By William James and Elizabeth Piper

Prime Minister Theresa May's Brexit deal came under fire from allies and opponents alike on Wednesday after the government was forced to publish legal advice showing the United Kingdom could be locked indefinitely in the European Union's orbit.

After a string of humiliating parliamentary defeats for May the day before cast new doubt over her ability to get a deal approved, U.S. investment bank J.P. Morgan said the chances of Britain calling off Brexit altogether had increased.

As investors and allies tried to work out the ultimate destination for the world's fifth-largest economy, the Northern Irish party which props up May's government said legal advice about the deal was "devastating."

May was forced by parliament to publish advice from the government's top lawyer about the fallback mechanism, or backstop, to prevent the return of border controls between British-ruled Northern Ireland and the EU-member Irish Republic.

"Despite statements in the Protocol that it is not intended to be permanent and the clear intention of the parties that it should be replaced by alternative, permanent arrangements, in international law the Protocol would endure indefinitely until a superseding agreement took its place," the advice said.

"In the absence of a right of termination, there is a legal risk that the United Kingdom might become subject to protracted and repeating rounds of negotiations."

Brexit, the United Kingdom's biggest economic and political shift since World War Two, has repeatedly plunged British politics into crisis since the shock 2016 vote to leave the EU.

Now May is trying to get her deal approved by a parliament which shows every sign of striking it down in a vote on Dec. 11. It is unclear what happens if the deal is rejected as Britain is due to leave on March 29.

Senior EU diplomats said they might be able to help May by making small changes to the deal she agreed with other EU leaders last month before she tries again to get support in parliament.

Nigel Dodds, deputy leader of the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party, confirmed the DUP intended to vote against May's plan next week but it would continue to support her government.

"Having achieved our aim, trying to get to a better deal, it would be a bit illogical to turn around the next day and say, right, let's get the government out," Dodds told ITV television.

A group of lawmakers who want a more definitive break from the EU than envisaged by May's plan said the government had invited senior lawmakers to a briefing on Thursday at its emergency planning body on the impact of a no-deal Brexit.

A source from within the group dismissed the move as an attempt to spook senior parliamentarians.

On Wednesday, one of May's chief party enforcers listened to the concerns of eurosceptics in her governing Conservative Party and DUP.

On Tuesday, just hours before the start of a five-day debate in the British parliament on May's Brexit deal, a top law official at the European Court of Justice (ECJ) said Britain could pull back its formal divorce notice.

"The UK now appears to have the option of revoking unilaterally and taking a period of time of its own choosing to decide what happens next," J.P. Morgan economist Malcolm Barr wrote in a note to clients.

He placed a 10 percent probability on a no-deal Brexit, down from 20 percent, and a 50 percent probability on an orderly Brexit, down from 60 percent. The chance of no Brexit at all doubled to 40 percent from 20 percent, in a sign of perhaps the biggest shift in perception since the 2016 vote to leave.

Britain's pro-Brexit trade minister Liam Fox said it was now possible that Brexit would not happen. There was a real danger that parliament would try to "steal" Brexit from the British people, Fox told a parliamentary committee on Wednesday.

Sterling, which has seesawed on Brexit news since the referendum, traded well off the 17-month lows it hit on Tuesday, lifted by suggestions that Britain may opt not to leave the EU after all.

In the June 23, 2016 referendum, 17.4 million voters, or 52 percent, backed Brexit while 16.1 million, or 48 percent, backed staying in the bloc.

If parliament rejects her deal, May has warned Britain could leave without a deal or that there could be no Brexit at all.

Supporters of Brexit have said that if Brexit is reversed, the United Kingdom will be thrust into a constitutional crisis as what they say the financial and political elite will have thwarted the democratic will of the people.

While May's Conservatives and the main opposition Labour Party both say they respect the 2016 vote to leave, a growing number of backbench lawmakers say the only solution may be a new referendum giving voters an option to stay in the EU.

If the deal is voted down, some members of parliament from both main parties have said they would act to stop a Brexit with no agreement, which business chiefs and investors fear would weaken the West, spook financial markets and block trade.(

© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2018.

©2018 GPlusMedia Inc.

3 Comments
Login to comment

May was forced by parliament to publish advice from the government's top lawyer about the fallback mechanism, or backstop, to prevent the return of border controls between British-ruled Northern Ireland and the EU-member Irish Republic.

Just wait and see the outcome of a return to a border between the Republic and the occupied 6 counties.

Are they really willing to risk it?

Nigel Dodds, deputy leader of the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party, confirmed the DUP intended to vote against May's plan next week but it would continue to support her government.

Don't trust the fanatical dinosaurs, one bit. These are the crowd who piteously whinge about not being treated differently to the rest of the UK, whilst at the same preventing the introduction of abortion and same-sex marriages in NI. Both of which have been introduced to the rest of the UK.

Still. All this mess could result in a 32 county nation once again. So, not all bad.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Brexit needs to be hard.

If it's reversed the UK becomes a sideline in Europe, a joker - not to be trusted.

If it ploughs ahead with Brexit, then it has to deal with the difficult issues as too Europe. The current plan leaves us all in limbo and is bad for all. Minds need to be focused upon both sides as everyone has lots to loose if not. The Smarter persons in the Tory Government saw this immediately upon reading through the documents, and resigned, now... it's slowly coming out as to the reasons why they did so... they were right.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

@Toasted Heretic - look, I dont mind your fenian background, (hey I even enjoy the Wolfe Tones for their folk music), it's "mostly" all historical, and one day things will sort themselves out, but...the UK has always been the bell weather of problems in Europe, it's always distanced itself - for good reasons, and now, more-so than ever, seems - for those of us, even with foresight, to be a good enough reason - if not, only to force upon Change within the current structure of the EU. The Brexit issue has brought a lot of these issues that have been bubbling in the background finally to the foreground to be addressed. And indeed, even Merkel has decided that it's a good time to leave rather than fight on.... so draw your own conclusions.

But let's look at matters right now, even if N. I. joined Europe outside of Britain, that would still pose issues - it's not just like simply flipping a junction in a railway track. The old saying "The Devils is in the Details" will spring out again, and ... unfortunately catch you, as we're seeing now with Brexit. I know this, from experience as Ireland (sorry the South) is actually currently treated differently from the rest of Europe, so if you have a non-EU passport, your visa to Europe is not valid to the South of Ireland.... (Equal partners eh?), perhaps that would change if the North were to be assimilated with the South, but .. that is not something that would happen overnight.

The Brexit issue has been a no-win situation for everyone from the Start. I have to feel sorry for Ms May, as although she has the conviction of a strong leader, she lacks the charisma and persuasive ability to run with such a difficult Political issue and has been doomed from the start. That said, anyone else trying to play to both sides would also face the same issue - which is why we are seeing the American style "flip-flop" allegiance runs. She will, however, become a more notable Leader, if she goes forward with the Brexit, and navigates the subsequent issues (IMHO). Sadly, otherwise, she's a flunk case. That is, Politics, and trying to be too Politically subservient to others has its price.

We all have our own opinions on matters, and it's good to talk about them in order to learn from each other and to accommodate each. This latter aspect however, appears to be an ongoing issue within the current EU framework. And, it is unlikely to be resolved at present.

My view, is that the EU should fall back upon what is Common to each of its member states, and build upon that from the inside, rather than to try and impose an ideology from the outside inwards.... but, that's just my "uneducated view upon things"....

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites