The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2018.17 states, DC sue Trump on immigrant families, as Congress quarrels
By Richard Cowan and Jonathan Stempel WASHINGTON/NEW YORK©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
39 Comments
Login to comment
Black Sabbath
Since the Republicans seems to want to die on this hill, I say let them.
cla68
Based on today’s SCOTUS decision, this lawsuit is a lost cause. And polls are showing that a majority of Americans support the administration’s actions to stop the illegal influx.
bass4funk
Oh, you mean that debunked media lie.
http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/17/media/media-trump-animals-immigrants/index.html
katsu78
The conservative mindset: justice is decided by team affiliation, not principle.
Laguna
Unfortunately, SCOTUS just ruled in the travel ban case that motivation doesn't matter.
Still, Trump's got an unsolvable problem: his promise to lock 'em all up and prosecute them is impossible even given massive expansion of detention facilities on military land. Families should be released and monitored as they wait their day in court, which is what the Boarder Patrol is now doing out of necessity.
SuperLib
We can continue to watch the GOP only bills go down in flames, or we can vote on the bipartisan bills and have immigration reform.
Not much more to say than that.
Blacklabel
So Trump couldn’t just fix this with executive order as we said to begin with? This requires legislation which Dems are unwilling to do. So as I anticipated they go with “lawsuit” as their response.
Strangerland
The 'Dems' worked with the GOP to create a biparsitan immigration plan. The GOP leadership refuses to vote on that. Any unwillingness is with the GOP leadership. You can try and reframe reality to pretend that the Democratic party is the bottleneck, but reality shows otherwise.
theFu
Let's make a deal that
closes the border to illegal immigrants,
helps asylum seekers entering at border crossings,
keeps asylum families together,
provides a path to citizenship for children brought to the USA before age 13,
allows farm workers to enter and leave with the seasonal work, so they can leave their families back home, but travel to see them multiple times a year for months,
allows prosecution for anyone crossing the borders NOT at official border crossings,
doesn't provide amnesty to economic immigrations in the USA illegally,
and
we need an amendment to the US Constitution to require at least 1 parent to be in the USA legally to convey citizenship to a child born in the USA.
Simple.
bass4funk
The Democrats never had any intentions on permanently ceiling the border, their version of what they called bipartisan is to continue the process of allowing open borders, it doesn’t address the issue of permanently closing all the loopholes, it doesn’t address a complete into chain migration or the ending of the visa lottery program and it doesn’t address the funding and emding sanctuary cities.
SuperLib
Democrats would never agree to ending the diversity lottery system, and they will never agree to a merit based system.
We need more border patrol agents and more tech like drones. A wall isn’t the answer.
Chain migration isn’t what you think it is, but I can’t educate you on everything.
Blacklabel
Democrats are the minority party yet are unwilling to concede anything. Like this example from the article:
On Monday, Democratic Senator Dick Durbin told reporters:"Eliminating the Flores agreement removes humanitarian standards on the treatment of the children ... we are not going to water that down."
Laguna
Problem is, Tea party Repubs will never agree to that.
Kaishu
Bass
Probably the one and only time I will agree with you. But, you have to have a look at Trump's record with his treatment of blacks, his comments about people from SH countries ......and so on.
CrazyJoe
Why are Republicans against chain migration? Mrs Trump III has gotten green cards for her parents, as well as her sister. Seems like it works fine for some.
Republicans negotiating with other Republicans and leaving Democrats out of the loop isn't a compromise. That is lunacy.
Kaishu
Blacklabel
Just as the Repub's did under Obama's watch. What goes around, comes around.
Schopenhauer
Illegal immigrants are illegal immigrants. They must be sent back. Learn from the Japanese immigration control policy if U.S. economy gets in trouble in short of menial labor. Let them enter U.S. with time limitations and they have to return to their countries when the period of time expires. I do not have any qualm about what Trump does. He is only turning U.S. to the right a little bit too much in a hurry which was swung too much to the left by Obama.
Texas A&M Aggie
-- Chuck Schumer, 2009.
wtfjapan
President Trump:"These aren't people. These are animals." https://youtu.be/aib5Ts2cDI8
FAKE FAKE this is a Trump impersonator, Trump would never say such a thing , he loves Mexicans
move along nothing to see here.
Yuko Maeda
They are not immigrants. Immigrants apply for status, wait, and enter when granted it. Anyone else is illegal.
Dango bong
first of all, they are not immigrants they are illegal aliens. secondly, suing on behalf of whom? The US courts are not for non-citizens. Thirdly, there is a proper process to apply for visas, you should not be rewarded for skirting it. Lastly, Dems should spend more time representing american citizens not illegals who can not vote.
Tokyo-Engr
I agree with posters on "both sides of the fence" here.
@Crazy - Agreed. Trump's family has engaged in undeniable "chain migration" yet he wants to deny this to others. Typical elitist attitude. Trump also exploited working visas for his restaurants and did not hire local folks. He is hypocritical on this issue.
@Schopenhauer and Yuko and Dango as well - Agree with you also. There is a constant effort to blur the lines (or eliminate the difference) between legal and illegal immigrants. Dango your point is one I have (and I am a liberal). There is plenty of poverty in the neglected inner cities in the U.S. The resources should be spent and used there.
This is all getting ugly faster and faster and the hot summer is coming. I am liberal, not progressive. For a glimpse into the future, have a read of the article below. The article is interesting but for a true glimpse into what hatred is, read the comments. The hatred is being spewed by both left and right.
https://splinternews.com/[object%20Object]
Texas A&M Aggie
Now would be a great time for AG Sessions to take advantage of this situation by ordering DNA tests be taken on all adults who are now being held with "the children". If there are any mismatches, automatically deny their asylum request and instead charge them with child trafficking.
Toasted Heretic
Perhaps they should be branded as well.
Meanwhile, the madness continues as the caged and abused children are forced to recite the pledge of allegiance.
http://www.businessinsider.com/separated-migrant-children-forced-to-site-the-pledge-of-allegiance-2018-6
Shame on America. Shame on those who allowed this fascism to occur.
Attilathehungry
Lots of interesting ideas here. Another one would be to not allow asylum claims at the border. The US has an embassy in Mexico City, plus NINE other consulates scattered throughout Mexico. ALL of them are closer to central America than the border, thus ALL are easier to reach. They all will process asylum claims, none will separate children from parents. There is only ONE reason I can see for people to struggle all the way to the border, and then claim asylum. That is, obviously, that they have no intention to actually seek asylum, but instead are just economic migrants taking advantage of the system.
Also, eventually, a guest worker program could be helpful for seasonal industries that need labor. This would protect the workers' rights and also ensure security of the border area.
bass4funk
How did he treat Blacks bad? And please don't go back about a time in NY that was infested with junkies, mafia and drug dealers. What was it that he did that was of recent bad and how did he discriminate Blacks?
Why do liberals keep peddling these falsehoods? Meanwhile, the left is hounding people from DHS and getting in their faces, I predict someone won't take it and someone will get hurt.
mmwkdw
Just looking at the candle stick in the background I suddenly thought of:
"Anyone who is Anti-Trump is Anti-Semitic"
I'm waiting for that one to be thrown out into the public sphere anytime soon.
Toasted Heretic
You'd have to ask one. I'm not a liberal. They are almost as bad as conservatives.
The kids are in cages and they are being forced to recite the pledge. You read the article, right?
There's also reports of kids being drugged, cuffed and abused.
http://www.businessinsider.com/migrant-children-forcibly-drugged-abused-in-us-government-detention-2018-6
Will you condemn what your government is doing to the children?
Goodlucktoyou
There is a pretty long queue of people suing trump. If start now, expect a 20 year wait.
theFu
Which is why it is a "compromise."
I left off stopping the wall. Need the wall only in populated areas, which already have fences. Electronic sensors (heat/seismic/motion) and balloons with sensors are much cheaper.
Also left off that asylum counts go towards the immigration limits for each country.
Compromise.
Blacklabel
Missed a sentence in your article.
“But many of the allegations of abuse in the filings go back years.”
plus the lawsuit was filed in April and the “trump policy” started in May 2018.
SuperLib
Democrats are the minority party yet are unwilling to concede anything.
Democrats have agreed to end the diversity visa lottery. They have agreed to merit based legal immigration. They have agreed to resources to secure the border. They have agreed to expanding and strengthening eVerify. They have agreed that any path to immigration puts illegals at the back of the line with no rights in the meantime.
All of these things are in various bipartisan bills, which GOP leadership refuse to vote on. Why? Because they would pass, and the hardliners would revolt.
Blame them for obstruction.
SuperLib
Forgot to quote the first line...
Toasted Heretic
Lot of talk about illegality. Not so much talk on inhumanity.
The people who hid Anne Frank were breaking the law. The people who killed her were following it.
Following orders, doing your job, or obeying the law isn’t an excuse.
Period.
SuperLib
Well there was the time in New York when he was sued for discriminating against blacks.
What's next? Will you ask for proof he's a scammer while telling us his fake university scam isn't allowed in the discussion? Or his stealing charity funds?
Yuko Maeda
People claiming asylum because they simply want a better life. Total BS. If that's actually a legit claim, you'd have 1/2 the people you personally know also wanting to claim asylum in their dream country.
Sorry for those born in a poor country, or to poor parents or who just can't make ends meet. Mexicans are supposed to get a free pass because they share a border with the USA?