world

Trump adviser Stone's associate held in contempt in Russia probe

23 Comments

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2018.

©2018 GPlusMedia Inc.

23 Comments
Login to comment

Haha, nobody's even taking Mueller's subpoena's seriously. They can't even get an associate of an advisor (how far down the chain is that) to show up to court.

Mueller's like a crybaby in a schoolyard, just getting ignored.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Stone will sink. Serves him right for being a Russian mouthpiece for stolen American information.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

nobody's even taking Mueller's subpoena's seriously.

It's not Mueller's subpoena, it's the American Justice System's subpoena, and those aren't something you ignore without consequence.

But, I can understand how you Russians wouldn't have any respect for the American (justice or any) system.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

I concur - that old queen Stone is next up the food chain.

Tick tock, Trump....

2 ( +2 / -0 )

I concur - that old queen Stone is next up the food chain

Actually, Mueller is moving down the food chain. He started with Trump and found nothing, now he's grabbing straws with these "associates of advisors" and he's just getting ignored.

Enjoying the humiliation of the left as Trump parades through his term, untouchable while Mueller gets ditched in court.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

I concur - that old queen Stone is next up the food chain.

Tick tock, Trump....

And then what?

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Stone was just so brazen of his knowledge of the emails before they were released. He basically announced to the world that he was connected to the situation.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

If I live to be 120, no one will ever be able to explain to me people willing to go to jail for the likes of Stone and Trump.  Never.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

If I live to be 120, no one will ever be able to explain to me people willing to go to jail for the likes of Stone and Trump.  Never.

Oh, but I do.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

Oh, but I do.

Please tell us.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

They're gonna try and get everyone connected with Trump, but they'll never get Trump. Heck, they can't even get Hillary.

"Tick tock, Trump"

Madverts, you'll be tick tocking all the way to noon Jan.20, 2025. But hey, Sanders/Mueller 2020!

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Sanders/Mueller 2020!

I’d rather see Sanders/Comey. Now that Comey has shown himself to be clean, impeccable, consistent, and a man who can be trusted to think things are well thought out, even if you don’t always agree with his actual decision. In a nuanced world, he has shown extreme competence. And the Democratic Party of today is so far right that it’s almost as far left as the Republican Party of old was.

Or, maybe the same republicans could put together The Sane Party, and be fiscally responsible without the extreme moral mess of the current Republican Party.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

"I’d rather see Sanders/Comey. Now that Comey has shown himself to be clean, impeccable, consistent, and a man who can be trusted to think things are well thought out,"

Hahahahahahahahaha, omg, by far the funniest post on JT ever! Thanks, Stranger!

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Bush,

Actually, Mueller is moving down the food chain. 

Only in your alternate reality buddy. Seems Mueller started with “tea boy” Plopodopolous and he’s been working his way up the slime trail ever since.

Once the queenie Stone is indicted expect Trump’s inner circle - and family - to be next.

Some “dud “ investigation ya got there....

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Only in your alternate reality buddy. Seems Mueller started with “tea boy” Plopodopolous and he’s been working his way up the slime trail ever since.

And nothing to do with Trump or collusion, now it would seem Mueller might not get his interview after.

Once the queenie Stone is indicted expect Trump’s inner circle - and family - to be next.

And then he’ll pardon them and then what?

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Trump will pardon Stone, too?

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Hahahahahahahahaha, omg, by far the funniest post on JT ever! Thanks, Stranger!

Heh, I figured you guys would like that one.

And then he’ll pardon them and then what?

And then everyone knows they were guilty, and the only reason they aren't facing punishment for being guilty is because the president pardoned them. Then everyone looks at why the president would pardon such people if they are guilty, and for each person pardoned, his reputation is tarnished a little further, destroying any chance of, and wait, because Republicans are going to love this, a positive legacy.

Pardon away Donny boy, pardon away.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

And then everyone knows they were guilty

So people can judge without a shred of evidence, they can just assume. Well, it’s ok, people assume a lot of things without evidence, as if it really matters.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Well the assumption is that a pardon would only follow a guilty verdict.

So how many of Trump's criminal buddies will be pardoned? We should start making a list to keep track.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

a Russian mouthpiece for stolen American information

Doesn't information want to be free? I'm sure I read that once.

I still don't get the Russia thing. Americans voted Trump as their president. If you want to point fingers, point them towards America.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

If I live to be 120, no one will ever be able to explain to me people willing to go to jail for the likes of Stone and Trump.  

Sooner or later every one of them will turn on Trump. Whether he manages to finish one term or two, i don’t think it will end well for him. When he’s out all the folks he’s belittled, demeaned , bullied, thrown under the bus will turn on him. Omarosa, just the beginning.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

So people can judge without a shred of evidence, they can just assume.

Um, it seems like you've been throwing out the word 'pardon', while being entirely clueless as to what it means.

There can't be a pardon without a guilty verdict, and a guilty verdict, and guilty verdicts aren't found without a shred of evidence, or based on assumptions, it's a guilty verdict based on the American legal system - which once again you are showing you have no respect for.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe"

This is interesting

Judge Jeanine: I want the Mueller probe to go on and on

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYUZFYa7fLs

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites