world

Sanders and Warren defend progressive policies in U.S. Democratic debate

47 Comments
By John Whitesides and Jarrett Renshaw

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2019.

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.

47 Comments
Login to comment

Williamson is interesting. She’s like a swivel-eyed crystal healer with a big heart. Clearly not going to win but fun and useful to have around.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

I like Pete, he's a good honest tough fellow. And I could care less that he's gay. He's a fighter, likable and smart. And loves America like crazy.

2 ( +9 / -7 )

I'd like a Warren presidency with Bernie as VP, but I'd be just as happy with Bernie as president with Warren as VP.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

I like Pete, he's a good honest tough fellow. And I could care less that he's gay. He's a fighter, likable and smart. And loves America like crazy.

He’s impressive.

Intelligent, educated, polite and served his country in the armed forces. Not a dodgy bonespur or any semi-literate trash in sight.

1 ( +7 / -6 )

I'd like a Warren presidency with Bernie as VP, but I'd be just as happy with Bernie as president with Warren as VP.

They would be a good combination.

I'm still holding out for Tulsi Gabbard though. Unfortunately she doesn't seem to be getting the press she needs. I hope she can get more, she's qualified, a patriot, and has some great views that America needs.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Bernie said the dems were afraid of big ideas. I disagree. The candidates were full of big ideas and no real plans to make them materialize. They were like a coach yelling at the team: we gotta get out there and win the big one. But the playbook was empty.

All of them dodged the yes or no question of whether they would raise taxes on the middle class to cover medicare for all when the answer is a clear yes. Instead, especially Bernie and Warren decided to criminalize the act of being rich, and said the wealthy would be taxed, which is Ironic considering Bernie's a proven millionaire; and strange considering Warren thinks crossing the border illegally isn't illegal. They both exposed themselves as either being extremely dishonest or clinically insane.

Then they all lied through their teeth when they said Trump was using immigration as a political stunt. So says the people that first said there wasn't a crisis, then that it was a manufactured crisis by Trump, and finally a humanitarian crisis at the hands of Trump. They made it seem as if Trump was the first to initiate policy to separate families who act criminal, when in fact Obama was doing it way before Trump. Trump hasn't initiated any such policy; he's just enforcing it

."We need to expand legal immigration, we need to create a path for citizenship not just for dreamers but for grandmas and for people who have been working here in the farms and for students who have overstayed their visas."

Blatant support for criminal behavior. Ok students, it's alright to overstay your visa. You'll be rewarded

But no standout moments emerged from the debate.

Of course not. But what do expect from people whose only card to play is the race card, and whose only policy is orangeman bad.

-5 ( +6 / -11 )

Of course not. But what do expect from people whose only card to play is the race card, and whose only policy is orangeman bad.

Fake news.

You clearly didn’t watch the debate. If you break down the time spent on various issues, the time spent on race or the orange moron was very limited.

5 ( +11 / -6 )

Another thing, I lost track of who was in the debate when Don Lemon started asking his spiked and blatantly biased questions. He gave it a way. Doesn't he know the moderators are supposed to be neutral or at least appear to be so? But it is cnn; what can you expect.

-3 ( +6 / -9 )

I lost track of who was in the debate when Don Lemon started asking his spiked and blatantly biased questions.

What supposed questions were these?

1 ( +6 / -5 )

Democrats disunity will be there undoing at the ballot box.

Between themselves, they cannot agree if the lights on or off.

The voters that will have to ultimately pay for Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders so called progressive policies will be middle earning achievers/innovators

-3 ( +3 / -6 )

What supposed questions were these?

When he goes, "Trump has decided to run his campaign for re-election on racial division, blah blah blah."

Whether you agree or disagree with that is irrelevant. As a questioner, you're supposed to remain neutral and let the candidates season their own pots. It's clear Lemon is not mature enough to put aside his own hatred for Trump and suffers too greatly from TDS to qualify as a neutral moderator in a presidential debate.

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

Then they all lied through their teeth when they said Trump was using immigration as a political stunt. So says the people that first said there wasn't a crisis, then that it was a manufactured crisis by Trump, and finally a humanitarian crisis at the hands of Trump.

Exactly.

The Dems are so fake.

And none of them has a chance against Trump.

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

And none of them has a chance against Trump.

Trump won the last election despite losing the popular vote against a terrible candidate. A half decent candidate very probably would have thrashed him.

I don’t think Trump should be considered a shoo-in in 2020. His approval ratings are stubbornly low.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

Any chosen candidate will have a insurmountable task of unifying a credible policy agenda without clear political concurrence.

The key element is conspicuous by it absence, the ideological belief that allows principled political dissent to be debated without disharmony and personal attacks.

The Democrats appear to be two complexly separate politically idealogical parties masquerading as one.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

I love how only in America are words such as "liberal" and "progressive" seen as negatives. And why is free medical care seen as a bad thing? So what if taxes have to rise to pay for it - it's what most advanced countries do.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

I like Pete, he's a good honest tough fellow. And I could care less that he's gay. He's a fighter, likable and smart

He’s impressive.

Intelligent, educated, polite and served his country in the armed forces. Not a dodgy bonespur or any semi-literate trash in sight.

His police force doesn't think much of him. Oh my...

South Bend police warn of 'mass exodus' under Mayor Pete Buttigieg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrlCNTwplEw

Can't wait for Kamala and Sleepy Joe to go at it!

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Then they all lied through their teeth

You must admit it wasn’t at the same level as Trump lying about telling his supporters to check out a non-existent sex tape on a live stage.

These dems just don’t tell it like it is.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

None of these idiots will be President, calling them a joke is a gross understatement.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

None of these idiots will be President, calling them a joke is a gross understatement.

Remember what you said about Trump leading a lunatic fringe and Clinton winning.

Watch those predictions, Bass.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

"Watching that last debate, folks seemed more concerned about scoring points or outdoing each other with wish-list economics than making sure Americans know we hear their voices and will help their lives," said Bullock

Never has the chance or honour of visiting the USA, so it is difficult to convey a grasp of well informed political assent, but this statement make logical sense. At least my view from the armchair.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Remember what you said about Trump leading a lunatic fringe and Clinton winning. 

YES, because I didn’t know he COULD beat Hillary that’s what I was afraid of, but because of the baggage she had and the lack of personality it was apparent to me I was dead wrong. With these idiots they are just so far, far, far progressively left, they come full circle. They’ll never win on any of their moronic policies, especially it was funny when asked if they would raise taxes everyone pretty much dodged the issue.

Watch those predictions, Bass

Been doing that and so far, the liberals have been wrong on all of them.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

You must admit it wasn’t at the same level as Trump lying

No, there’s was far more politically deceptive.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Been doing that and so far, the liberals have been wrong on all of them.

Which predictions and which liberals? I remember some liberals tipping Trump to win while you were calling him the leader of a lunatic fringe and backing Ben Carson.

I don’t think being liberal or conservative plays much of a role in being able to come up with accurate predictions.

Incidentally, who are you tipping to win the Democratic nomination?

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Maryanne Williamson succinctly summed up last night's the Thriller in Vanilla: "Yada, yada, yada".

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

What a parade of deadbeats.

Agreed Harris vs Sleepy Joe part 2 should be fun. She has to keep the initiative over Joe or slip down the polls. Joe cant say anything back or hes “ racist”. I’ll have the popcorn ready!

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

Bernie Saunders is such a decent stand-up guy, it is still a damn shame the Democrats decided to go with that phoney Hilary Clinton in the 2016 presidential elections.

I am not saying he would have won but I would have sure liked to see him debate with Donald Trump instead of Hilary Clinton.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders offered an unabashed defense of their progressive policies during a Democratic presidential debate on Tuesday, as their more moderate rivals criticized their proposals as unrealistic and politically untenable.

What does The Squad have to say about this?

Seriously, can you see any of these Democrats dealing with Kim Jong Un, Xi or Putin?

And they spit in the face of law-abiding legal immigrants.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Last night's democrat socialists "debate" that was the first prime time show on U.S. television in years which had an all white cast.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Bernie Saunders is such a decent stand-up guy

Don’t expect a consensus on that. The partisans can’t handle anything outside the package they swallow whole. The same people like to use the ‘orange man bad’ meme to attack others they see as swallowing a package whole ( they are very predictable with their memes ).

One extreme partisan poster called Sanders Josef Stalin here.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Which predictions and which liberals?

All the networks.

I remember some liberals tipping Trump to win

while you were calling him the leader of a lunatic fringe and backing Ben Carson. 

I used to like Bill Clinton at one point as well.

I don’t think being liberal or conservative plays much of a role in being able to come up with accurate predictions.

Yeah, it really does since Democrats have a serious and vested interest in getting rid of this President and I believe them when people like “Donny the idiot Deutsch” says, Democrats have to fight dirty and use everything at their disposal to get rid of this President, so I know it has a huge role to play.

Incidentally, who are you tipping to win the Democratic nomination.

Personally, it doesn’t matter, for one thing they are all the same and none of them can beat Trump, but I hope Bernie Biden or. Lizzy win.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

All the networks.

No, I watched them, they don't support your claim.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Incidentally, who are you tipping to win the Democratic nomination.

Personally, it doesn’t matter,

Best to steer clear of predictions, Bass. Very wise given your track record.

They are all the same

Partisan nonsense with no basis in reality. Why were there disagreements?

1 ( +2 / -1 )

No, I watched them, they don't support your claim

Ok, I think differently. But don’t worry, I doubt you can vote in our US election anyway.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Best to steer clear of predictions,

I think not, everything seems to have panned out nicely these past 3 years.

Very wise given your track record. 

Proud of it.

Partisan nonsense with no basis in reality. Why were there disagreements

Oh, it’s reality alright. These socialists are real as the sun rising on the East.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

I did not watch the whole clown show, but I caught these two. Their "progressive policies" which this article writer swoons over consist of:

1) free stuff

2) orange man bad.

Excuse me for being underwhelmed.

Actually, there was one clear statement that Sanders made that I 100% agree with. When asked if he would pull out of Afghanistan, he said clearly yes. Easy for him to promise though, as he knows he will not get the job.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Partisan nonsense with no basis in reality. Why were there disagreements

Oh, it’s reality alright

No basis in reality. You were asked why there were disagreements if they are all the same. They are not all the same. They disagreed on healthcare for a start. Your post makes no sense if you watched the debate.

You clearly didn’t watch this debate and just fell into dem/lib/rob Paul to pay Peter/socialist/ROFL mode. Just nonsense.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Bullock and Delaney seemed reasonable. Not far left enough to have any chance of winning.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

No basis in reality.

Not in the liberal reality, but in the real reality, it has a lot of basis.

You were asked why there were disagreements if they are all the same. They are not all the same. They disagreed on healthcare for a start. Your post makes no sense if you watched the debate. 

Yes, it makes perfect sense as a collective wanting higher taxes, free college tuition, decriminalize illegal border entry, more entitlements, bank regulations, the ceiling and how much corporate earners can make, a complete takeover of the healthcare system, robbing Paul to give to Peter, it’s all a glamour of the same socialist rantings that would completely destroy the country.

You clearly didn’t watch this debate

I did, I have to for my job and believe me, it wasn’t easy. Feel itchy.

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

A debate on CNN didn’t mention either Mueller or Russia collusion. Also didn’t mention that the DNC lawsuit for “hacking” was thrown out of court for being the joke it is.

That’s your death throes.

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

as a collective wanting higher taxes, free college tuition, decriminalize illegal border entry, more entitlements, bank regulations, the ceiling and how much corporate earners can make, a complete takeover of the healthcare system, robbing Paul to give to Peter, it’s all a glamour of the same socialist rantings that would completely destroy the country.

Are you saying all people on the stage hold the same policies on these issues?

Why did they disagree? Sanders and Delaney certainly disagree over healthcare.

You are sinking into partisan whataboutthedems/libs/rob Paul to pay Peter/socialist/ROFL nonsense again.

You shouldn’t make partisan claims which are demonstrably false. It lowers the tone to trolling level.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

I like Pete, he's a good honest tough fellow. And I could care less that he's gay. He's a fighter, likable and smart. And loves America like crazy.

I don't mind Pete as much as some of the others. Not only because he is mayor of the city right next to mine, although that doesn't hurt. But being gay is going to matter to a lot of African Americans which could well prevent him from landing the nomination. Calling Trump a racist is a joke when his numbers will black voters are even lower.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

Bernie Saunders is such a decent stand-up guy, it is still a damn shame the Democrats decided to go with that phoney Hilary Clinton in the 2016 presidential elections.

I am not saying he would have won but I would have sure liked to see him debate with Donald Trump instead of Hilary Clinton.

It would have been glorious!

Williamson is interesting. She’s like a swivel-eyed crystal healer with a big heart.

Gotta love Marianne!

Clearly not going to win but fun and useful to have around.

I dunno, Jimizo, she's now the #1 searched candidate from this debate on Google!

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Sanders and Warren defend progressive policies in U.S. Democratic debate

Hard to defend the indefensible. Open borders and free everything! They are loons.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

"I [Elizabeth Dole] don’t understand why anybody goes to all the trouble of running for president of the United States to talk about what we really can’t do and shouldn’t fight for.”

Maybe Delaney wants to see a Democrat sworn in as president on January 20, 2021.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

If you want to see all the regulation return, jobs leave, taxes increase, buffoon inspired health care explode, then vote for one of these clowns.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

The Nielsen numbers have now been released. 10 million Americans tuned in last night. To give that number some perspective, 13 million watched Mueller's appearance on the 24th which aired during the daytime. The democrat socialists clown show Part One aired at night during in prime time.

Another colossal fail for CNN.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Astute analysis, Tex, as always. The open border Dems just can't get any traction.

Wouldnt it be great if all immigrants would leave the US and make their home countries better places, Tex?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites