The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Thomson Reuters 2020.As White House objects to Bolton book, senators pose queries in Trump impeachment trial
By Jeff Mason and Susan Cornwell WASHINGTON©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
83 Comments
PTownsend
Another attack on freedom of speech. What are Trump and ilk so afraid of. What are they hiding.
The excuse used by corrupt regimes hiding something. Who knows whether that's true. Having lied so many times Trump and ilk have zero credibility. Except to their truest true believers and the terminally benighted.
SuperLib
Uh huh. I'm sure Bolton sat at his keyboard and just started typing out classified material then submitted it to the government for review. Makes perfect sense.
And I find it odd they finished the review process all of a sudden after having it since December.
non party
If Bolten testifies and still no abusive of power or anything wrong then What would the democrats do then? Will they call mickey mouse for a witness testimony???? Yes there is a high possibility.
Chip Star
Thsts exactly what happened. Bolton has never been trustworthy.
PTownsend
When Trump supporters and others in the global alt right can't defend their leader, they resort to absurd flames. The above an example.
bass4funk
Says the people that support the people that wouldn’t even allow the President to choose witnesses they want for his defense.
So what are Democrats hiding with Biden
We feel the exact same way about Schiff and Nadler.
Wolfpack
We need to have witnesses to end this case. John Bolton has a book to sell. Subpoena it and put it in the public record. Puff - no need to buy it. He keeps his advance and the foolish publisher gets stuck holding the bag.
We need Hunter Biden put on trial for his expensive drug habit, failure to pay for his offspring and former wife, unseemly swooping in on his dead brothers wife, benefitting from his fathers nepotism in Ukraine and China and his huge pay days for essentially doing nothing. We need the “whistleblower” to get his bias exposed just like the corrupt FBI officials were exposed.
The best part of this impeachment and trial is that it has now become much much easier to impeach and try a president - a crime isn’t a requirement - policy differences will suffice. When a Dem wins this Fall and the House flips in 2022, as always seems to occur to the presidents party, a president Biden or Sanders will readily be impeached with a short six week inquiry all while barring the Dem president a defense - the precedent has been set. It is important to get witnesses - for the sake of the 2022 impeachment and trial of President Warren.
Blacklabel
Top secret and classified info is what they are “hiding”. Plus he signed an NDA.
poor Bolton won’t be getting any of that sweet sweet book money.
meanwhile schiff still lying that he doesn’t know who the whistleblower is and liberals fine with that. How can you protect the whistleblower if you don’t know who he is?
Blacklabel
they got it like Dec 30 and sent him a letter last week. I think they have more important things to do than review Bolton’s book. only reason is got done this fast is likely vindmans brother.
lincolnman
Did you see what Crazy Rudy had to say about Bolton?
Giuliani Swipes Back at John Bolton: He’s a Swamp Character, Backstabber, and an Atomic Bomb
https://www.thedailybeast.com/giuliani-swipes-back-at-john-bolton-hes-a-swamp-character-backstabber-and-an-atomic-bomb
Oh My, the Repub civil war is getting nasty, isn't it.
And what is this fixation that Repubs have with explosives? Bolton calls Rudy a "Walking Hand Grenade", and Rudy call Bolton an "Atomic Bomb"... Guess they're all war mongering NEOCONs...
I actually think both are right - both of them are blowing up Trump-world...
Go Rudy! Go John!
Dump Trump/Pitch Pence/Ditch Mitch 2020!
ClippetyClop
Trumpoids have succumbed to Stockholm Syndrome so completely that crime is now just a ‘policy difference’.
lincolnman
Yea, all the parts written in Black Sharpie...
And the phone call transcript was stored on a "highly classified server"? More blatant obstruction and cover-up...
BINGO! The smoking gun...
And the guidance is; "Every place where Donald Trump uses the word quid-pro-quo must be deleted"...
Well Donnie, pretty much all of your former administration members, you know, "the best", who after working with you, call you an idiot, a moron, someone with the understanding of a fifth grader, and a danger to the republic...you know, your friends...
Blacklabel
Your poor Bolton. His book just got blocked for top secret info. And Trump just posted his tv interview where he said everything about the call and Ukraine was just fine.
plus the 2010 interview asserting he has no problem to lie under oath.
ah well you still have Parnas. Chuckie invited him to the trial, you know?
Chip Star
Trumpophiles can’t help but push conspiracy theories before 9:00.
Pukey2
Just popping out to the shops to get more popcorn!
u_s__reamer
The title of Bolton's book The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir, a cute reference to the rapper musical, sounds like a coming-out of the closet confession of a, or the whistleblower who triggered the revelation of Trump's Ukrainegate "drug deal". It must have rankled the cantankerous " I am the walrus" Bolton bigly to be treated as one of the Dumpster's "apprentices". After having ruffled Bolton's mustache, Trump is now in grave danger, "Sitting on a corn flake waiting for the van to come."
Chip Star
Thag settles it since Donny has zero credibility issues. It’s not like he lies or is widely inaccurate every time he opens his mouth.
Look, another Trumpophile conspiracy theory in the morning.
lincolnman
Don't you just love it when slobbering suck-ups like Lindsey Graham get caught with their own words?
I mean this was a guy who said in 2016; "Trump is a kook, he's a racist, I'll vote for anyone except Trump"... Right Lindsey...
So Lindsey says this in Oct:
Sen. Lindsey Graham told "Axios on HBO" last month that he'd be open to changing his mind on impeachment if he was shown Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo with Ukraine outside of the July 25 phone call.
"If you could show me that Trump actually was engaging in a quid pro quo, outside the phone call, that would be very disturbing"
Well Lindsey, your best bud and fellow NEOCON has said just that; Trump was using the military aid as a condition of Zelinsky announcing an investigation into the Bidens - you know a quid-pro-quo...
Well, Lindsey's mind must changing then, huh?
Fat chance, Graham yesterday: "But from my point of view, I've got all the evidence I need."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/lindsey-graham-says-bolton-has-kind-of-thrown-the-country-into-a-ditch-with-his-book-manuscript
Congratulations Lindsey, you just won the "Lying Hypocrite of the Year" award....
Chip Star
Donny has to talk to Moscow about getting Donny’s witnesses to testify.
Are you steady trying to re-write history and blame the dems for Senate republicans not wanting to allow Donny to present witnesses?
arrestpaul
LOL. Another suspicious, last-minute, leak of a rumored claim supporting some Democrat Party position.
Chip Star
None of this is correct. The impeachable acts need not be crimes, but they have to be more than policy differences. Of course, Trumpophiles aren’t intellectually honest enough to admit these facts.
bass4funk
Democrats fame to claim.
How? Who verified it, not to mention none of it was cleared by the NSA, not good, not good for Bolton book sales.
As Dershowitz said, it’s not a crime or a reason to impeach and remove a President.
Just summed up the Democrats in a nutshell.
Jimizo
Trump is a pathological liar. He can’t even tell the truth about where his own father was born.
SuperLib
Well the good news is that we have conservatives eating each other alive, which is always fun to watch.
What's odd is that Trump fans went around telling us all the evidence was just hearsay and the second someone in the know steps up he's immediately branded as a liar. I guess it really didn't matter after all.
What's funny is that Trump banned people like Pence and Pompeo from talking, then claimed no one had evidence of a direct conversation.....when the only ones who would have had a direct conversation are banned from speaking. That means the only evidence Trump fans will accept is a signed confession from Trump himself or a live recording of the same.
But honestly, we're past that point. The majority of Americans want witnesses. The majority want him removed. And from FoxNews.com's polling: "Among independents, more say Trump should be removed by a 19-point margin (53-34 percent)."
Trump will walk, but we're just going to keep adding to that pound of flesh Republicans will have to donate to keep him. Thanks, Bolton!
SuperLib
OK, then go and arrest him and put him on trial.
Who cares if he or she is biased? Trump's man decided the complaint was credible and relevant. If it's a Trump hater that's pretty cool but it doesn't change the claim or the subsequent impeachment.
Dershowitz has had two opinions: One where Trump's actions are impeachable and another where he's allowed to do what he did. Guess which one came up when he became a paid lawyer for Trump.
Serrano
Bolton
A disgruntled former employee and warmonger who can't prove what he said Trump said.
Just popping out to the shops to get more popcorn!
I've got cheese sticks and Junior Mints!
Trump will be acquitted forever. Trump-Pence 2020 all way, Baby!
PTownsend
That could well be. Trump's definitely got the globe's richest and most powerful backing him. They're paying his legal team, each attorney a lifelong tool for the ruling class, what some call for some reason the 'elite', what others might call deep-swamp creatures. Among them are the .01% who've held global power for decades, some whose families have had power for centuries. (Say, whatever happened to the Trump supporters who'd claimed he was anti-establishment, that he was going to start a new world order. hmmm)
Trump may be acquitted, but by his name there will always, throughout history, i.e. forever, and asterisk by his name denoting he was IMPEACHED.
bass4funk
The Democrats are far, far worse. When they talk, I always hear Joe Jackson singing in the background “You can’t what you want” for some reason.....odd.
I think it’s funnier watching the 3 Democrats fight it out with their party that they might vote to acquit the President, boy was Schumer maaaaad!
But the Dems still didn’t make a case. I mean, how many witnesses do you need? I lost count and still the greedy Dems want more? If you allow these people to continue, they’ll call witnesses all the way up until November. Put a fork in this farce.
Which he can do.
No, half want him removed.
Fifty-four percent of Republicans have a positive view of McConnell, 70 percent of Democrats view Pelosi favorably, while fully 90 percent of Republicans like Trump.
As we do for the Democrats that tried to remove him, thanks Nancy.
WilliB
Wolfpack:
No, we don´t, because there is no case. Dershowitz's statement blew this nonsense clear out of the water. I do not understand why so many politicians on the Trump side want to get down into this illegal mud pit with the details about the shampeachment. As Dershowitz explained clearly, nothing impeachable is even alleged, and if Congress wants to make up new impeachable offenses, they putting themselves above the constitution. That should be the end of it, for anybody who paid attention.
WilliB
On another note:
all big 3 networks ABC, CBC, NBC blacked out Trump defense lawyer Pam Bondi's presentation of Ukraine corruption related to Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and Berisma. Which was pretty stunning (I watched it on Youtube).
(In contrast the Big 3 carried Schiffs pm presentations live, preempting regular programming.)
bass4funk
Schiff is also a lawyer, he said, Trump was guilty without any supporting facts or at least guilty to the point where he needs to be removed, but this is the same man that said Clinton was innocent of any wrongdoing.
plasticmonkey
Yes, odd.
Dershowitz is smart enough to know that his defense of Trump can't rest on the claim that the president did nothing wrong. Dershowitz knows his client is guilty, just like he knew his other über-rich vermin clients Claus von Bülow, Mike Tyson, O.J. Simpson, Jeffrey Epstein, and Harvey Weinstein were guilty.
Dershowitz is also smart enough to realize that Trump supporters are gullible enough/disingenuous enough to swallow the "not-a-crime-so-not-impeachable" defense, which is refuted by virtually all legal precedent and constitutional scholarship.
More bad faith arguments.
stormcrow
Of course the White House objects to the Bolton book. You have Bolton, an honest man who has a reputation for calling it like it is, accusing the president, the lyingest president in U.S. history, of abusing the constitution and not being truthful regarding a specific case in which that president in currently undergoing an impeachment trial for. Who are you going to believe?
Bolton should testify because he was there and knows what the president was thinking and doing. His testimony about Trump's wrongdoings is important.
SuperLib
Not as bad as the Republicans!
I think it's funnier watching Republicans fight.
As we do for the Republicans.
It's been great chatting with you this evening.
bass4funk
Actually it can, we all know how this goes, he’ll be acquitted and not removed.
As a Hillary supporter, he has absolute No reason to represent the President he could have easily stayed out of this farce, but a man of constitutional convictions he wanted to speak out of the dangers of what the Dems are doing, Professor Turley said the same thing, Democrats shouldn’t go down this road, they did and they’ve made Trump more stronger and more difficult to beat. Mad respect to the Democrats for this help.
Comparing oranges to kiwis again? Lol
Ahhh, like Don Lemon did the other day, still reeling from that backlash. When Trump is sworn in again, thank the gullible people. Lol.
Usual liberal retort.
plasticmonkey
Schiff never said that. He was opposed to Clinton's impeachment.
Clinton lied about sexual activity with an intern. Trump used the office of the presidency to solicit a foreign government to help him in his political campaign.
Which is more impeachable do you think?
WilliB
I just find it hilarious how Bolton, who our Trump haters previously (and correctly, actually) lambasted for his non-stop warmongering, now suddenly is their hero. Orangeman bad trumps everything!
WilliB
MSM consumers calling Trump supporter "gullible".... that is pretty rich I must say.
stormcrow
Carl Bernstein stated this today about Bolton:
"(Today) has been about keeping out relevant information about the conduct of the president of the United States. We can't see Bolton's book. We can't have Bolton here. Before they were saying there was no proof the president had violated the law, there's no witness that saw him do it and now there is a witness and they're saying, 'Oh, well, you can't have that witness'. But the most telling thing of all is to listen to the president's defenders say, 'Well, really we can't do this because it's going to take too much time. And bad for the country to take that much time.' . . . The country has time. This is the most important thing that we can do is to find out the truth."
Blacklabel
Bolton is the whistleblower. Or maybe it’s general Kelly. Or Mulvaney. So stop saying their names and expecting them to testify.
plasticmonkey
Who said I was a liberal?
Who said I'm a MSM consumer?
Unsubstantiated assumption.
Haaa Nemui
So... why do they need to classify it all if it’s all lies?
bass4funk
Yes, so he thought Clinton was innocent and it was wrong to impeach him, even for the fact he lied under “oath.” In that case, it would be an impeachable offense, but at least he lost his law license, so some vindication right there.
Clinton used his office for....well, anyway, Trump had every right to dig dirt on his rival, so basically Democrats are making the argument essentially, we Democrats can dig dirt on you, gather information from a foreign source and weaponize law enforcement to do whatever is in their power to thwart your Presidency...yeah, sounds fairly one-sided to me.
the impeachment of 1998
PTownsend
Not one Trump supporter/pro-authoritarianist is able to defend Trump using any intelligible line of reasoning beyond
other-guys-do-bad-things-too;
can't-prove-it;
and/or i
t's-the-media's (i.e. the outlets that dare to question Trump/Putin/Bannon) fault for reporting what Trump does. SMH
bass4funk
You're not a conservative..
You refute any conservative documented analysis, but you want conservatives to accept
Pretty spot on
u_s__reamer
Judging from Dirtshowitz's calculated pleading for a monarchical presidency, he must be auditioning for a spot in Trump's White House Apprentice Revolving Door circus: Attorney General?
Serrano
Trump may be acquitted, but by his name there will always, throughout history, i.e. forever, and asterisk by his name denoting he was IMPEACHED.
Trump may be IMPEACHED forever by the do-nothing Dem controlled House in a totally partisan vote, but he will be ACQUITTED forever, possibly with a few Dem votes.
Not one Trump supporter/pro-authoritarianist is able to defend Trump using any intelligible line of reasoning beyond other-guys-do-bad-things-too; can't-prove-it; and/or it's-the-media's (i.e. the outlets that dare to question Trump/Putin/Bannon) fault for reporting what Trump does. SMH
He didn't do anything wrong.
Too easy!
Wakarimasen
Bolton is an oddball and warmonger. While it seems strange that he might seek to discredit Trump, not beyond the realms of possibility. The Dems have a strong record on starting unjustified wars and he may see them as a better bet for his ongoing crusade in the Middle East. And hiss Russophobia.
Still, my guess is whatever he may write (or even testify), it won't be enough to have DT removed from office.
PTownsend
'Didn't do it'. Said by every criminal, then parroted by the thugs in the criminal's posse.
bass4funk
Why would he? He’s A deep, deep Hillary supporter.
Chip Star
ulysses
The chapter titled 'Donny is a Crook' I suppose!
Toasted Heretic
The regime pushing for censorship and denying its citizens the right to the truth.
Bolton has to testify. After all, it takes a rat to catch a rat.
bass4funk
The NSA didn’t not review the book, apparently there are a lot things in the book that are classed, have the NSA review it and then publish if.
Calls are growing for the whistleblower and even Schiff including the Biden’s.
Like what? Socialism and fascism?
Blacklabel
This is exactly a defense, if you can’t prove it. and you have not proven it.
Blacklabel
It’s amazing that Schiff supposedly doesn’t know who the whistleblower is. but after 17 witnesses deep plus wanting more he is very confident about who it ISNT?
Why?
Toasted Heretic
It's hilarious how Trump (a pathological liar) is asking people to believe him on Bolton. The PotUS lies each and every day. How long before he says he doesn't know Bolton/has never met him?
Lazy and ignorant responses will be met with the contempt they deserve. I suppose it's why Trump's ignorance resonates with his core support - there's no interest in education, analysis or the truth.
LOL
Silvafan
Trump's former chief of staff John Kelly sides with John Bolton and says the Senate should call witnesses in impeachment trial
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-former-chief-staff-john-173049927.html
Toasted Heretic
Basically, the logical conclusion one must draw from Dershowitz and the defence team is that if Trump ordered his election opponent arrested, that would be fine because he’s pursuing the national interest in order to get re-elected.
Zoiks!
Blacklabel
You guys missed where Schiff agreed it’s an impeachable offense to investigate your political opponent or their family, Which is exactly what obama did to candidate Trump and his family. Oops.
plasticmonkey
Trump does not have any right to leverage his power as president to seek a foreign government's help in helping him win an election. The difference between this and a candidate seeking dirt overseas is pretty obvious. It has been pointed out to you numerous times, but you keep coming back with your nonsensical assertion.
Trump was using his power as president for personal gain. That is not politics as usual. That is what tinpot dictators do.
Besides, what's your argument anyway? Democrats have no proof, or the proof against Donny is nothing damning? You seem to toggle between these two positions.
You're not a conservative.
Evidence, please.
Haaa Nemui
So impeach him then. Oh... errr, never mind
bass4funk
Wait a minute, liberals dismissed Bolton as one of the architects of the Iraq war, called him so many names, there’s no way I could print them all without getting scolded by the moderators and now he’s somehow a beloved and sacred man that’s now accepted into the bosom and arms of the Democrats? Funny.
The Democrats lie, that’s the reason why we might have 4 sensible Democrats that might join the Republicans to vote to acquit the President.
No, it’s just liberals can’t defend them and why would they?
I'm not opposed to it, I do want to hear as well from Schiff, the Biden’s and heck, throw in the whistleblower as well for good measure.
plasticmonkey
False. Elements of Trump's campaign were investigated because there was legitimate concern that foreign agents were infiltrating and attempting to sway an election.
Oops.
WilliB
Toasted Heretic:
What I find hilarious is how Bolton, the ultimate neocon warmonger, is now the new hero of the Trump-hating establishment. Too rich!
About Trump, he did not follow Boltons advice (which is invariably "go to war" and ultimately fired him. Actions speak louder than words.
Jimizo
This doesn’t change the fact that Trump is a pathological liar.
You were a big fan of Bolton. I can’t imagine you see him as a pathological liar.
bass4funk
Yes, he does, he has every right to find out what his opponent is all about. Remember, he wants to win, all Presidential candidates want to win, didn’t stop Obama or Hillary or McCain from doing it to Trump and now he has to accept Biden and not dare know anything about his opponent? Give me a break. This is why he will be acquitted, it’s because constitutionally the Dems just have no case. 2 years, hundreds of witnesses and nothing.
Same as you.
That has never been proven or established, see Mueller.
I remember 8 years ago.....
I’m an Independent conservative and darn proud and unapologetic about it.
plasticmonkey
No Democrats or members of the "Trump-hating establishment" have said such a thing. Has this meme been fed to you by Daddy Hannity?
bass4funk
I disagree, I think the Democrats are worse, really.
I do like Bolton and still am a fan, but I also think Bolton has a chip on his shoulder and an axe to grind for whatever reason and when that happens who knows what they might say or do. I don’t put anything past anyone.
Blacklabel
Yes all this flip flopping on loving and hating the same person over and over just proves all the hate was politics and disingenuous.
remember when John Kelly was a liar and a racist? He really wasn’t or you wouldn’t love him now
Jimizo
I don’t know about hero, but he is certainly lies less than Trump. Pretty much anyone who isn’t pathological lies less than Trump.
Silvafan
@Blacklabel
The defense is so weak, and there is so much evidence that a crime has been committed that the GOP doesn't even care anymore.
Dershowitz Delivers Dynamic Defense Despite Bolton Shock Waves
https://www.americanpatriotnewsletter.com/dershowitz-delivers-dynamic-defense-despite-bolton-shock-waves/
Nothing is surprising from the morally corrupted GOP and the trumplings.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine
https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/trump-impeachment-quid-pro-quo-republicans-191813907.html
PTownsend
Exaggerate much? I haven't read anyone on this forum say Bolton's 'a beloved and sacred man'. To me he's a career swamp dweller pushing for more wars in support of big oil so the big war industries, Wall Street and others, i.e. the so-called 'elite' can maintain their power and control. That's why Trump brought him and other neocons into his admin. ; to maintain the status quo. What I want and what I've read other anti-Trump/anti-neonationalsocialists say is let the man speak. Though like Trump he's a known liar (see Iraq has WMD) the American public need to hear from all involved. What are Trump and ilk hiding?
Toasted Heretic
Indeed. But it won't stop the Trump supporters saying such things.
Lies and deceit are their currency.
Toasted Heretic
Nope, literally nobody here has said this, nor believes it. Merely that one needs someone of similar low calibre to catch the criminal.
Why, oh why, do Trump supporters trade in falsehoods, hyperbole and fantastical fantasy?
ulysses
Dershowitz seems to think seeking foreign interference in US elections is not a crime.
I wish he’d used the same defense for OJ, ‘murder is not a crime if you think it’s justified ‘
bass4funk
I really disagree on that one. The Dems are really a pathetic, no wonder Trump will be vindicated soon enough.
The Dems sure think so.
Yup.
Oh, dear lord. The little green aliens....
I don’t know, what are the Democrats hiding? Do you have people like Schiff and Nadler That are habitual liars and have been trying to spit in the eye of the American voter and have been trying to change an election of the president that was duly elected by the people, because they are still upset that they lost in the last election and they don’t want to give up their power and they are very worried also that Trump if he wins a second term could possibly get a third pick for the Supreme Court. But I am glad that they are making this president stronger, keep up the good work, I’m supporting the Democrats lies.
TARA TAN KITAOKA
Abuse of power is abuse of power, it is a pattern with trump during his presidency. No one can deny this.
If all good Americans do not correct this, all americans have to live in shame from the human race.
everyone can see this.
bass4funk
Gosh, where were the Democrats when they were dealing with Christopher Steele? Evidently, that kind of foreign interference to dig dirt on Trump was ok it seems.
Haaa Nemui
Imitation being the sincerest form of flattery?