world

U.S., Australia, Japan want coercive acts at sea to be stopped

9 Comments
By JIM GOMEZ and TERESA CEROJANO

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.


9 Comments
Login to comment

The US sees itself as the policeman of the free world, a role once occupied by the Royal Navy in its role as a colonial power, so at least it had some sort of excuse. But the US, being the other side of the world's largest ocean, has much less of a one, and one can't help wondering how much it's activities are motivated by self interest regarding trade.

0 ( +4 / -4 )

International waters by definition, are waters not owned by anyone, and are accessible to all nations.

Meaning all nations can have equal say in what occurs in them and over them. No point saying the US or anyone else should not get involved in a dispute over international waters in the South China sea. They have as much right as China, Malaysia, Vietnam, the Philippines and any other country, to voice concerns and to ensure freedom of navigation and over flight of these waters.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Burning BushToday 07:56 am JSTSpoken by the country who's Navy believes it has the sole right to operate thousands of miles from it's territory while demanding that other countries remain only in their own territory.

The U.S. Navy operates thousands of miles away in International Waters, or at the invitation of host countries. The U.S. makes no demand on any other nation to remain only in their own territory. International Waters are free for all to navigate. It is China's attempt to seize an enormous piece of such International Waters as their own that is the cause of this dispute.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Self appoint global policeman, US government is the worse HYPOCRITE period.

-1 ( +3 / -4 )

Biggest hypocrites ever: The US and Japan

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Hypocrites? Did the U.S. or Japan do anything close to drawing the 9-dash line to claim ownership of a vast area of International Waters? Are either building artificial islands to support such a claim and militarizing them to hold on to them? Is anything the U.S. or Japan doing the top issue at these Asian forums? The centers are out in full force I see.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

@OssanAmerica

Yes hypocrites.

The United States has never been sued under the Law of the Sea only because – unlike China – Washington has not ratified the international agreement and is thus not bound by its rules. However, when Nicaragua sued Washington for mining its harbors during the 1980s, like China, the United States argued that the International Court of Justice did not have the authority to hear Nicaragua’s case. When the court rejected that claim, the United States not only refused to participate in subsequent proceedings, but also denied the Court’s jurisdiction on any future case involving the United States.

For its part, Japan not only unilaterally claims the Senkaku Islands, despite a previous agreement with China not to, they also build islands: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/05/20/the-japanese-islet-of-okinotori-is-the-size-of-a-tokyo-bedroom-but-the-basis-of-a-big-claim/

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites