US Supreme Court asked to block Biden win in Pennsylvania

Here is where the rubber meets the road. The US AG just stated there was no systematic fraud in the election. We'll see if the Supes choose to bite the bait and what they do with it if they should. Also kind of curious if Herr Bar gets canned in a Tweet in the next 24 hours.

In the state's courts, Kelly and the other Republican plaintiffs had sought to either throw out the 2.5 million mail-in ballots submitted under the law — most of them by Democrats — or to wipe out the election results and direct the state’s Republican-controlled Legislature to pick Pennsylvania’s presidential electors.

This is an entirely unreasonable remedy regardless of the status of the law.

Trump supporters suffering from election denialism.

No, not at all, just know the system is suspiciously off. 

But Trump's lawyers all say in court that "we are not alleging fraud".

Explain that...

Yeah, this isn’t going anywhere.

Once again, the idea that there are 5 votes to overturn a free and fair (fat Bill just said so himself) election is so farcical, it beggars belief.

Besides, what would it change? Biden would be way north of 270. Trump would have to flip 2 more states which isn’t happening.

No, ladies and gentlemen, this is for show. Trump need to keep the base on boil so that he can continue to grift his ignorant, gullible cult.

The Repub Party - trying to turn America into a third-world Banana Republic one court case at a time...

Oooh is this the “uh-oh” bombshell? How exciting!

I wonder how it will all play out.

Trump supporters suffering from election denialism.

No, not at all, just know the system is suspiciously off. The banana republic is here at least for the next 4 or 2 once the GOP retake the House.

AG William Barr has stated there is no evidence of any voter fraud

That he can unequivocally proved, but the man does think that voter fraud did occur.

that would effect the outcome of the election. Trump's own appointed AG

Ok and? What is it with liberals? Barr is not Holder who stated he was Obama’s wingman, the guy is not going to be stupid and accuse or not bring forth substantial proof and he’s not Trump’s personal lawyer. So Barr has to say that for obvious and legal reasons, but again, legal reasons, has nothing to do with what he personally thinks. Trump is the president on the other hand and he can say whatever he wants and he can believe whatever he wants as well as his defense attorneys and legal team, They are getting paid to represent him and to fight on his behalf nut Barr in a personal way.