Japan Today
world

White House accuses Russia of cyberattacks targeting Ukraine

29 Comments
By ERIC TUCKER

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.


29 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

And this administrations response to that is?

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

More important question: and evidence provided by this administration is?

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Lucky USA would never do such a thing.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

If the Russians do invade a peaceful neighbor, then Putin must think it's a gamble worth taking.

If Russia does violently assault and invade Ukraine, then it'll be more important than ever for NATO, the EU and the UN to stand together as one and change Russia's violent aggression towards a peaceful neighbor into a humiliating defeat.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Doping at the Olympic Games, annexing Crimea and now on the edge of invading a peaceful neighbor.

The Russians are demonstrating for the entire world to see why they're not to be trusted one iota.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

And this administrations response to that is?

If they involve themselves in other countries affairs you tell them to mind their own business and focus on domestic matters.

If they do nothing you criticise them for inaction.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

More & more apparently delusive stuff. One just cannot accept such news anymore.

We totally reject war, any kind of military conflict for that matter.

But if war-mongers insist of fighting it out, then let it be, let it be..

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

If they do nothing you criticise them for inaction

Inaction over what, a made up accusation? Nah, I'd rather have them focus on domestic matters.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

Much to the disappointment of the US far-right crowd here, Biden has been laying Putin like a fiddle...

He checkmates him each day - saying what he anticipates Putin's actions to be - to which Putin must then change his plans lest it look like Biden accurately predicted what he would do...

As you can see by the comments by the far-rightists here, this infuriates them, as they revel in their Putin adoration...

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Biden has been laying Putin like a fiddle... saying what he anticipates Putin's actions to be...

What an optimistic view on the situation. I'm not sure he actually remembers what he said a day before, let alone predicting anything.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Inaction over what, a made up accusation? Nah, I'd rather have them focus on domestic matters.

So you’ve nothing to complain about. Good.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Alex

If they do nothing you criticise them for inaction

Inaction over what, a made up accusation? Nah, I'd rather have them focus on domestic matters.

What is a made up accusation? Do you mean they were lying? Ukrainian officials called Tuesday’s distributed denial of service attacks the worst in the country’s history. They happened. It's pretty clear where they came from.

Are you just blindly defending Putin?

3 ( +3 / -0 )

NovemberIsComing!

Russia will not invade, Ukraine might attack and so Russia must be prepared.

Oh, you mean the false flag operation that Putin is planning? There is no reason in the world that Ukraine would ever act aggressively against Russia. They would get flattened, so why would they do it?

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Are you just blindly defending Putin?

Are you just blindly defending the Ukrainian government? Or believing anything they say, for that matter?

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Alex

Are you just blindly defending Putin?

Are you just blindly defending the Ukrainian government? Or believing anything they say, for that matter?

Nope. But Ukraine aren't threatening Russia. Russia is threatening Ukraine. So it's pretty easy to see the aggressor here.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Putin is a guy with a very small sausage so something to prove, a criminal that murders his opponents and that is desperate to be a great dictator. Given we already know all this about him, why are people still defending his massive troop build up on the Ukraine border?

0 ( +2 / -2 )

After the “babies being thrown out of incubators” lie, and the WMD big lie, why are people still believing anything coming out of DC and the MSM.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

FizzBit

After the “babies being thrown out of incubators” lie, and the WMD big lie, why are people still believing anything coming out of DC

Sure, but that was the GOP. Things are different now.

And , to be clear, Biden isn't looking to get into this war. He will impose sanctions.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Nope. But Ukraine aren't threatening Russia. Russia is threatening Ukraine. So it's pretty easy to see the aggressor here.

It's your right to blindly believe whatever you choose to.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Alex

Nope. But Ukraine aren't threatening Russia. Russia is threatening Ukraine. So it's pretty easy to see the aggressor here.

It's your right to blindly believe whatever you choose to.

So I declare a reason for why I believe something, and you offer no evidence for believing Putin.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

The Russian state-controlled media is now all about misinformation, deception, and misdirection....

That the far-right posters here so quickly parrot this same propaganda just shows how easily they can be manipulated and co-opted...

The constant Putin-cheering belies their naivete...or perhaps their true country of allegiance...

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Sadly, there have have been way too many leaders recently demanding belief in their statements without the slightest evidence in support.

Putin, Xi and Trump immediately spring to mind. Tubby Johnson is doing his best to join the group….

3 ( +3 / -0 )

lincolnman

The Russian state-controlled media is now all about misinformation, deception, and misdirection....

That the far-right posters here so quickly parrot this same propaganda just shows how easily they can be manipulated and co-opted...

The constant Putin-cheering belies their naivete...or perhaps their true country of allegiance...

It's freaking embarrassing. They just cannot see it.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

There’s a lot more ceasefire violations by Kiev to list but here’s a few. Please tell me one more time who’s being the aggressor here?

As of 12:00 local time, authorities of people’s republics reported the following ceasefire violations by Kiev regime:

LPR

55:55 Kryakovka – Prishib: mortar 120mm (11 mortar shells);

06:50 Prichepilovka – Zholobok: mortar 120mm (14 mortar shells);

07:35 Stanitsa Lugaska – Zelenaya Roshcha: 120mm mortar (9 mortar shells);

07:40 Svetlodarsk – Molochny: 82mm mortar (4 mortar shells);

08:10 Stanitsa Luganskaya – Veselenkoe: SPG-9 (3 rounds);

09:00 Lugansk – Kalinovka: mortar 120mm (10 mortar shells);

09:25 Lugansk – Sanzharovka: mortar 120mm (6 mortar shells);

09:45 Troitskoye – Kalinovo: mortar 120mm (5 mortar shells);

10:23 Novotoshkovskoye – Golubovskoye: RPG-7 (3 shots);

10:14 Luhanske – Kalinovka: AGS-17 (29 grenades), heavy machine gun, small arms;

11:05 Krymskoe – Sokolniki: RPG-7 (2 grenades), heavy machine gun;

DPR

05:30 – Nikolaevka – Petrivske: 12 shells of 122 mm caliber were fired.

06:15 – Starognotovka – Novolaspa: 3 shells of 122 mm caliber were fired;

06:45 – Chermalyk – Embankment: 5 grenades fired;

06:55 – Nikolaevka – Dokuchaevsk: 10 shots fired from BMP-2;

07:20 – Zamozhnoye – Embankment: 1 ATGM missile was fired;

07:25 – Gorlovka (mine named after Izotov): 2 shells of 120 mm caliber were fired.

08:00 – Verkhnetoretskoye (northern) – Verkhnetoretsk (southern): 6 grenades, 8 RPG grenades, 29 AGS grenades were fired;

08:00 – Bogdanovka – Novolaspa: 12 shells of 120 mm caliber;

08:10 – Dzerzhinskoye: fired 4 shells of 122 mm caliber, 16 shells of 120 mm caliber.

08:25 – Novoluganskoye – Dolomite: 4 shells of 120 mm caliber.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

FizzBit

There’s a lot more ceasefire violations by Kiev to list but here’s a few. Please tell me one more time who’s being the aggressor here?

Any of those against Russia? Didn't think so.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

So I declare a reason for why I believe something, and you offer no evidence for believing Putin.

"Believe something" means you don't clearly understand what the issue is.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

Alex

So I declare a reason for why I believe something, and you offer no evidence for believing Putin.

"Believe something" means you don't clearly understand what the issue is.

Enlighten me.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites