The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2019.More Russian military police arrive in Syria under peace deal with Turkey
By Tom Balmforth and Tuvan Gumrukcu MOSCOW/ANKARA©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
22 Comments
Login to comment
PTownsend
The free, for-profit press must be allowed to present info from a full array of perspectives, assuming they don't libel or slander or push fake news stories. The headline to this article calling the Russians 'police' (in the sense that the policemen are our friends) and the use of the word 'peace' shows Thomson Reuters is trying to put a positive spin on Russia's presence. On that note, it's been more than four years since Russia sent its military to Syria. Didn't Russians and others in the global alt right say that war would be over shortly after Russia's 'invitation'? #butyouguys #backatcha
WilliB
ptownend:
Err.... that means you want to put the brakes on the likes of CNN, ABC, BBC, NYT, Daily Beast, Huffpost, MSNBC, and all the other fake news providers that our regular Trump haters are parrotting here?
They are police, which does not mean they need to be YOUR friends (since you have pushing your pathological Russiaphobia here for months, I doubt many will).
And yes, the deal between Turkey, Syria, Russia, and the Americans (don´t be so naive to think they were not involved) will finally bring peace to the area.
Russia has had ties with Syria much longer than that.
LOL, Russia is the "global alt right" now? What does that even mean?
They could have cleaned out ISIS much sooner, if it was not for Obama/Clintons reckless and stupid support for the jihadis. Lots of blood spilled unnecessary. Finally, there is now some belated sanity in the White House. The warmongering swamp, of course, is seething.
lincolnman
The new 2020 Repub election chant...
Trump/Pence 2020 - Russia wins, the US loses...
lincolnman
I would have never thought we would see a US President abandon an ally that stood with us on the battlefield and turn them over to the Russians...
It's a huge act of cowardice and loss - and the humiliation rests right on the shoulders of the the Great Orange Appeaser...
Trump will go down in history for many things, but he'll be best known as America's Neville Chamberlain....
Kestrel
@BurningBush,
@WilliB,
Exactly right.
stormcrow
The U.S. moves out and Russia moves in. A disgraceful handover.
The U.S. looks like a second rate power on the way down while Russia looks like a power on the way up. All because of poor U.S. leadership.
Asakaze
@lincolnman
You forgot about South Vietnam. In the more nearest past the U.S. did the same to the Iraqi Kurds a couple of years ago.
And then what? Russians won't send them to Siberian gulags. The Kurds just will have to forget about a Greater Kurdistan, they'll live as autonomous region of Syria.
@stormcrow
Interesting to note that some posters profusely bemoan the loss of U.S. prestige, but completely ignore the fact that the shooting in the region will stop and many human lives will be saved. Very telling priority list.
lincolnman
Wrong. The US had a signed Peace Treaty with North Vietnam and abided by the provisions. The nV broke that Treaty. Trump had a phone call with Erdogan and made a split-second decision to abandon the Kurds.
And then what? Ask the Georgians and Ukrainians...
The shooting will continue and intensify - and a genocide of the Kurds will occur. That's what Erdogan wants and Putin is helping him.
stormcrow
@Asakaze
But, Asakaze, things had calmed down and were settling down quite nicely in the north-eastern area of Syria. ISIS was gone or on the run and the violence had stopped. Then one day the U.S. military runs on a Trump's sudden and goofy order, and there's a humanitarian crisis. The military didn't even know where to go. As a result, people are being killed or displaced as a result of Trump's mistake.
Something should've been done to help the Kurds and to prevent this humanitarian crisis from happening. The U.S. should've at least set up camps to help the displaced Kurds, but this is not in Trump's cards. Very cruel.
To say that it's U.S. prestige is missing the point and has little to do with it. It has more to do with standing up for basic human rights, or it should be that way. 2020 can't come soon enough.
Asakaze
@lincolnman
And when NV broke the treaty the U.S. did nothing. Very high-principled approach indeed. Ever heard about the Hmong people (tribe) from Vietnam and Laos, who just like Kurds were stupid enough to fight for the U.S.?
And? President of Georgia asks Russian tourists to return, because without them the Georgian economy is sinking. The populace of Crimea is more then happy with the choice they made in 2014, particularly when look at the situation at the Donetsk / Lugansk region, where Ukrainian nazis tried to pull the same trick Erdogan now tried to do with Kurds. What's your point?
Sure Erdogan wants to crush Kurds, but it does not mean Putin is helping him. Otherwise Russians won't interfere to stop the Turkish advance.
@stormcrow
You have a valid point here. Sure Kurds deserve human treatment and their basic rights must be guaranteed. Iraqi Kurds are a part of Iraq now, Syrian Kurds should be a part of Syria. What they are offered now by Syrian government and Russians is the best deal the can get. The problem with the Syrian Kurds was that they considered themselves the smartest, they tried to play Americans against Syrians, Russians against Turks. It turned out they are not the most clever.
You know why the U.S. is actually losing its prestige and moral high ground? Not because of big bad Trump, but because the U.S. long before him used the human rights as pretext to intervene when they considered it expedient, and ignored even massive human right violations when it was profitable. Never heard about U.S. actions against, let's say, massacres of Serbs by Croats or Kosovo Albanians, mass shellings of Donetsk by Ukrainian military. Utmost duplicity is the main threat to the U.S. moral standing, not Trump.
nandakandamanda
BB "The US state department has designated the Kurdish YPG to be a terrorist group."
Turkey, yes, but not the US.
stormcrow
@Asakaze
Well, in regard to the 1st paragraph as directed towards me, it's too bad that the U.S. was there at all. It would have been better had the U.S. military never been there and to leave the way they did. Disgraceful. As for the way the Kurdish men, women and children were chased out of there looked almost like sport for the Turks and Russians, which was also disgraceful. Regardless of how you feel about the Kurds, they fought bravely against ISIS and over 10,000 died in the struggle. They should not have been treated like that.
Regarding your 2nd paragraph towards me, it seemed a bit like the pot calling the kettle black. With Russia's historical track record, do you really believe you have the moral high ground? When Jimmy Carter was president back in the 70s, not a single shot was fired by the U.S. military at any opponent foreign or domestic. Can you say the same for any of the Russian leaders? Anyway, it would be nice to see a flock of Jimmy Carter-like leaders around the world at the same time who respect their neighbors' borders and also respect human rights everywhere. Putin & Trump are quite similar in a lot of ugly ways except Putin is more intelligent and manipulative than Trump.
Serrano
lincolnman: Trump/Pence 2020 - Russia wins, the US loses...
Heh, you've really got Trump on the brain, dontcha, lincolnman?
If Trump colluded with the Russians to help him get elected, wouldn't the Democrat controlled House have already voted to impeach him? What gives?
Serrano
While Trump looks like a loser
Only in the minds of anti-Trumpers. Our troops are happy they are out of Syria, that I can tell you.
Strangerland
Only pretty much every person on the planet. Gotcha.
nandakandamanda
Serrano, didn't you read that those troops were not welcome in Iraq and are being sent back into Syria to protect the eastern oilfields? The other three thousand are off to bolster Saudi Arabia.
nandakandamanda
Updates on US troop movements in Syria.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/troops-armoured-vehicles-syria-oil-fields-esper-191026071626333.html
lincolnman
Trump's abandonment was way worse...he didn't even consult his State or Defense Depts....
My point is I don't regurgitate Kremlin scripted disinformation like some posters do...wonder of they're getting paid for it?
There's a signed an agreement - maybe Putin intends to break his promise also just like Trump - they do think quite similarly...
Are you kidding - if he was on my brain I'd have to rinse it with chlorine to get out all the stench...
Gee, I don't know - maybe its similar to the person that said three years ago he'd build a wall and Mexico will pay for it - mark his words... How's that going?
Sure, that he can tell us...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/mideast/top-special-ops-marine-who-fought-kurds-blasts-trump-move-n1065901
Trumpers - living in the alt-reality world of Orangelandia....
Asakaze
@stormcrow
Absolutely agree. The U.S. military should have never been in Syria, as well as Iraq, because the Daesh crisis is a collateral result of the disintegration of the Iraqi state that began in 2003.
You are right for the Turks and particularly their allies, the so-called "Free Syria forces", but I never heard about the Russians chasing out women and children. Can you provide facts?
All right, tell me about firefights the Soviet military had back in 70s. Any?
@lincolnman
My points was not about which abandonment was better or worse, my point is that it is not the first occurance in the modern U.S. history.
Yawn. The same old trick: when out of logical arguments, call your opponent a Kremlin agent. The chronic inability of some posters to comprehend a simple fact that many people have point of view different from VOA-scripted disinformation is bewildering.
"May be"??? Very hard facts-based opinion!!