But that’s ok! pelosi has no hate because she is...Catholic? And that guy used to work for Fox News many years ago.
So it’s all good to scream at him! you can mistreat journos and spy on them and release their phone records if you don’t like them.
Her hateful response and treatment of him disproved her words.
0 ( +4 / -4 )
He can’t be jailed after 2025 if he isn’t impeached for a “crime”. One of your experts said doesn’t need to even be a crime for impeachment because this is political process.
better buy something cheap cause you won’t ever be drinking it.
Lets pop open the bubbly once Donny is out, defeated and then prosecuted.
0 ( +4 / -4 )
Until this call on July 25th , I was an impeachment skeptic.” - Noah Feldman, under oath in Congress.
"What the president did is an outrage. It’s impeachable." - Noah Feldman, May 17, 2017.
2 ( +6 / -4 )
It’s amazing that there is video of Nadler and Pelosi saying the exact opposite things about impeachment when it was their guy.
musta got “woke” since then.
tolerant, loving, accepting liberals are making threats against Jonathan Turley just for “daring” to testify against the predetermined outcome.
Maybe he can be offered refuge on a military base like was offered to Vindman (who wasn’t threatened at all)
-1 ( +4 / -5 )
It’s sad because I could actually vote for someone like Tulsi or Andrew Yang or John Delaney.
but then you elect them, you elevate the power of the Pelosi, Schumer, Schiffs and other crazed Dems of the Congress get to be in the Cabinet.
So not happening.
-2 ( +4 / -6 )
Make sure to remember that in your book no one in the previous administration committed a “crime”.
so what crimes (plural) has Trump been found guilty of again?
-3 ( +4 / -7 )
This thing went from removing Trump from office to just an insistence that it be written in a history book that he was “impeached”.
CNN pushing this exact narrative too. Strange change in your expectations.
-4 ( +4 / -8 )
Andrew Yang understands what this is and is against it. You know the “smart” guy on your team? One of the few liberals that can do “math”. Might wanna listen to him?
if you can’t get bipartisan support it means nothing. “Most of the Dems in a Dem controlled House impeached a Repub president with no bipartisan support.”
Thats not going in a history book. Maybe in a footnote about why he got re-elected? Or an appendix in the back of the book? Or in a 2030 textbook about why the Dem party ceased to exist by 2025.
-3 ( +5 / -8 )
Impeachment without removal really means nothing. Most people don’t even remember that Bill Clinton was actually “impeached” and he would have won a 3rd term after that if it were legal.
if you can’t remove him and prevent him from being on the ballot, this all means nothing.
0 ( +7 / -7 )
Dems are angry. Pelosi being agitated and pointing fingers at journalists while demanding no one “mess with” her (threat).
Biden arguing with an 83 year old man and calling him names and challenging him to do push-ups?
Schiff publishing the phone records of a member of Congress, 2 lawyers for the President and a journalist because he is mad nobody buying his story time.
-3 ( +6 / -9 )
Haha. But uh no. Are liberals so deranged in the #orangemanbad #resistance that you can’t see that a leader of a country mocking Trump is seriously juvenile (and dumb).
why do you think blackface Justin denies it after?
-2 ( +3 / -5 )
Because your “everyone” is really just Twitter trolls and whining liberals anonymously posting online.
world leaders shouldn’t be mocking the president of the USA as there are actual consequences in real life for their countries.
-2 ( +3 / -5 )
No they likely won’t. That’s why it was so critical for Biden to withhold 1 billion of military aid to get that prosecutor fired. So he would have the stigma of being ”fired” to discredit him once he ultimately started talking.
Do you think an American courts are going to take the word of fired Ukraine prosecutors LOL
-8 ( +0 / -8 )
And no, he did not put himself before country. What did he get from Ukraine? Nothing. What did they get? What Congress authorized then to have, 3 weeks early.
-5 ( +3 / -8 )
Deep state there is one. “Thank god for the deep state” was said. We saw “the deep state” testifying few weeks ago.
MSM collusion definitely. All leaks are Trump negative.
Voter fraud, yes there are people found guilty of that. Spying on Trump? Definitely, through Carter Page and the “two hops” from him.
Trump is innocent until proven guilty, as he is a person not a concept like all these others.
-9 ( +2 / -11 )
Here we go with the totally debunked “stealing money from vets” again......
he is a billionaire so if he was really bankrupt that means he built himself back from zero to billions all by himself. More than once. That’s impressive.
-9 ( +2 / -11 )
Gossiping like a bunch of schoolgirls.
gey caught, don’t even own it. That’s weak. And definitely two faced.
-8 ( +3 / -11 )
Democrat donor law professors. Who supported impeachment years before the phone call and who donated money to his opponent. Yeah sure.
what happened to that vote by Christmas?
-5 ( +2 / -7 )
Turley said basically what most of us on this side saying. Prove it, then you may have something. You think your proof is “good enough”. We don’t impeach on that.
-8 ( +2 / -10 )
Can’t bring up grown men in a phone call.
can’t bring up adult children when Warren lies about her long ago kid going public school.
make fun of a 13 year olds name in Congress? Yep go for it!
-9 ( +2 / -11 )
Trump is sooooo stupid, claim liberals.
But now when he said “us” he really meant “me” because he was invoking some made up “royal we that means me” concept? Yeah he is now super smart and fiendishly clever, when it matches your ludicrous narrative, huh?
we know what the word “us” means.
-9 ( +3 / -12 )
Not fact witnesses so it’s just an opinion exercise by a bunch of Trump haters.
Biden and Warren’s adult children are totally off limits. A 13 year old son of Trump? Make fun of him it you want. Disgusting hypocritical liberals.
-8 ( +4 / -12 )
That’s what your side is complaining about like it’s the fault of white male conservatives instead of the fact your own voters decided to pick white people instead.
So your thoughts are that we should have kept her in the race because of her race? Um... ok. Gotcha.
-1 ( +2 / -3 )
Word games. Your guy said it is ABSOLUTELY incorrect. It’s not. Acted like nothing even remotely similar was said.
If others are better on a arbitrary topic, any then you aren’t “the best” because that’s not the only topic someone else is better at.
and I don’t have to “swallow” to pick the best candidate either. Anyway, Dems screaming no people of left. It’s your primary, someone vote for one.
verdict: your guy not telling the truth. That’s the “so” of this.
-2 ( +1 / -3 )
Not absolutely incorrect at all. Jill Biden:
Your candidate might be better on, I don't know, health care, than Joe is, but you've got to look at who's going to win this election," she said. "And maybe you have to swallow a little bit and say, 'OK, I personally like so and so better,' but your bottom line has to be that we have to beat Trump."
-1 ( +2 / -3 )
Posted in: Man arrested for abusing 4-month-old son