Blacklabel comments

Posted in: Pelosi rebukes reporter: 'Don't mess with me' See in context

It was just James Rosen, the one who obama and Holder spied on him and his family. He deserves to be mistreated, according to liberals.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

But that’s ok! pelosi has no hate because she is...Catholic? And that guy used to work for Fox News many years ago.

So it’s all good to scream at him! you can mistreat journos and spy on them and release their phone records if you don’t like them.

Her hateful response and treatment of him disproved her words.

0 ( +4 / -4 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

He can’t be jailed after 2025 if he isn’t impeached for a “crime”. One of your experts said doesn’t need to even be a crime for impeachment because this is political process.

better buy something cheap cause you won’t ever be drinking it.

Lets pop open the bubbly once Donny is out, defeated and then prosecuted.

0 ( +4 / -4 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

Until this call on July 25th [2019], I was an impeachment skeptic.” - Noah Feldman, under oath in Congress.

"What the president did is an outrage. It’s impeachable." - Noah Feldman, May 17, 2017.

dishonesty abounds.

2 ( +6 / -4 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

It’s amazing that there is video of Nadler and Pelosi saying the exact opposite things about impeachment when it was their guy.

musta got “woke” since then.

tolerant, loving, accepting liberals are making threats against Jonathan Turley just for “daring” to testify against the predetermined outcome.

Maybe he can be offered refuge on a military base like was offered to Vindman (who wasn’t threatened at all)

-1 ( +4 / -5 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

It’s sad because I could actually vote for someone like Tulsi or Andrew Yang or John Delaney.

but then you elect them, you elevate the power of the Pelosi, Schumer, Schiffs and other crazed Dems of the Congress get to be in the Cabinet.

So not happening.

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

Make sure to remember that in your book no one in the previous administration committed a “crime”.

so what crimes (plural) has Trump been found guilty of again?

-3 ( +4 / -7 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

This thing went from removing Trump from office to just an insistence that it be written in a history book that he was “impeached”.

CNN pushing this exact narrative too. Strange change in your expectations.

-4 ( +4 / -8 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

Andrew Yang understands what this is and is against it. You know the “smart” guy on your team? One of the few liberals that can do “math”. Might wanna listen to him?

if you can’t get bipartisan support it means nothing. “Most of the Dems in a Dem controlled House impeached a Repub president with no bipartisan support.”

Thats not going in a history book. Maybe in a footnote about why he got re-elected? Or an appendix in the back of the book? Or in a 2030 textbook about why the Dem party ceased to exist by 2025.

-3 ( +5 / -8 )

Posted in: Pelosi rebukes reporter: 'Don't mess with me' See in context

Liberals are in a bind. Either have to admit she is lying about praying for Trump. Or think that she does, but that prayer does nothing. (Thoughts and prayers)

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

Impeachment without removal really means nothing. Most people don’t even remember that Bill Clinton was actually “impeached” and he would have won a 3rd term after that if it were legal.

if you can’t remove him and prevent him from being on the ballot, this all means nothing.

0 ( +7 / -7 )

Posted in: Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump See in context

Dems are angry. Pelosi being agitated and pointing fingers at journalists while demanding no one “mess with” her (threat).

Biden arguing with an 83 year old man and calling him names and challenging him to do push-ups?

Schiff publishing the phone records of a member of Congress, 2 lawyers for the President and a journalist because he is mad nobody buying his story time.

-3 ( +6 / -9 )

Posted in: 'Nasty', 'two-faced', 'brain dead': NATO pulls off summit despite insults See in context

Haha. But uh no. Are liberals so deranged in the #orangemanbad #resistance that you can’t see that a leader of a country mocking Trump is seriously juvenile (and dumb).

why do you think blackface Justin denies it after?

-2 ( +3 / -5 )

Posted in: 'Nasty', 'two-faced', 'brain dead': NATO pulls off summit despite insults See in context

Because your “everyone” is really just Twitter trolls and whining liberals anonymously posting online.

world leaders shouldn’t be mocking the president of the USA as there are actual consequences in real life for their countries.

-2 ( +3 / -5 )

Posted in: Amid impeachment drama, Trump lawyer Giuliani back in Ukraine See in context

No they likely won’t. That’s why it was so critical for Biden to withhold 1 billion of military aid to get that prosecutor fired. So he would have the stigma of being ”fired” to discredit him once he ultimately started talking.

Do you think an American courts are going to take the word of fired Ukraine prosecutors LOL

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

Posted in: Legal experts summoned by Democrats call Trump actions impeachable See in context

And no, he did not put himself before country. What did he get from Ukraine? Nothing. What did they get? What Congress authorized then to have, 3 weeks early.

-5 ( +3 / -8 )

Posted in: Legal experts summoned by Democrats call Trump actions impeachable See in context

Deep state there is one. “Thank god for the deep state” was said. We saw “the deep state” testifying few weeks ago.

MSM collusion definitely. All leaks are Trump negative.

Voter fraud, yes there are people found guilty of that. Spying on Trump? Definitely, through Carter Page and the “two hops” from him.

Trump is innocent until proven guilty, as he is a person not a concept like all these others.

-9 ( +2 / -11 )

Posted in: 'Nasty', 'two-faced', 'brain dead': NATO pulls off summit despite insults See in context

Here we go with the totally debunked “stealing money from vets” again......

he is a billionaire so if he was really bankrupt that means he built himself back from zero to billions all by himself. More than once. That’s impressive.

-9 ( +2 / -11 )

Posted in: 'Nasty', 'two-faced', 'brain dead': NATO pulls off summit despite insults See in context

Gossiping like a bunch of schoolgirls.

gey caught, don’t even own it. That’s weak. And definitely two faced.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

Posted in: Legal experts summoned by Democrats call Trump actions impeachable See in context

Democrat donor law professors. Who supported impeachment years before the phone call and who donated money to his opponent. Yeah sure.

what happened to that vote by Christmas?

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Posted in: Legal experts summoned by Democrats call Trump actions impeachable See in context

Turley said basically what most of us on this side saying. Prove it, then you may have something. You think your proof is “good enough”. We don’t impeach on that.

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

Posted in: Legal experts summoned by Democrats call Trump actions impeachable See in context

Can’t bring up grown men in a phone call.

can’t bring up adult children when Warren lies about her long ago kid going public school.

make fun of a 13 year olds name in Congress? Yep go for it!

-9 ( +2 / -11 )

Posted in: Legal experts summoned by Democrats call Trump actions impeachable See in context

Trump is sooooo stupid, claim liberals.

But now when he said “us” he really meant “me” because he was invoking some made up “royal we that means me” concept? Yeah he is now super smart and fiendishly clever, when it matches your ludicrous narrative, huh?

we know what the word “us” means.

-9 ( +3 / -12 )

Posted in: Legal experts summoned by Democrats call Trump actions impeachable See in context

Not fact witnesses so it’s just an opinion exercise by a bunch of Trump haters.

Biden and Warren’s adult children are totally off limits. A 13 year old son of Trump? Make fun of him it you want. Disgusting hypocritical liberals.

-8 ( +4 / -12 )

Posted in: Democrat Kamala Harris ends 2020 White House bid See in context

That’s what your side is complaining about like it’s the fault of white male conservatives instead of the fact your own voters decided to pick white people instead.

So your thoughts are that we should have kept her in the race because of her race? Um... ok. Gotcha.

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

Posted in: Democrat Kamala Harris ends 2020 White House bid See in context

Yeah at least she doesn’t have to worry about leaving the campaign trail to come back and vote for Trump impeachment anymore. No excuse to not be doing her job now.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Posted in: Democrat Kamala Harris ends 2020 White House bid See in context

no people of color left on the debate stage. Whose fault is that? Kamala was the most identity politics of them all, not surprised she is out already.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrat Kamala Harris ends 2020 White House bid See in context

Word games. Your guy said it is ABSOLUTELY incorrect. It’s not. Acted like nothing even remotely similar was said.

it was.

If others are better on a arbitrary topic, any then you aren’t “the best” because that’s not the only topic someone else is better at.

and I don’t have to “swallow” to pick the best candidate either. Anyway, Dems screaming no people of left. It’s your primary, someone vote for one.

verdict: your guy not telling the truth. That’s the “so” of this.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Posted in: Democrat Kamala Harris ends 2020 White House bid See in context

Not absolutely incorrect at all. Jill Biden:

Your candidate might be better on, I don't know, health care, than Joe is, but you've got to look at who's going to win this election," she said. "And maybe you have to swallow a little bit and say, 'OK, I personally like so and so better,' but your bottom line has to be that we have to beat Trump."

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

Posted in: Democrat Kamala Harris ends 2020 White House bid See in context

Yet she can’t get 2% in her own party. Which she blamed on sexism and racism and anti immigrant sentiment. In her own party.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites


©2019 GPlusMedia Inc.