Blacklabel comments

Posted in: Trump wishes Muslims 'warm greetings' for Eid See in context

Yeah if he doesn't say anything he is criticized for silence. and if he does then he is attacked for supposedly not being allowed to make that statement due to reasons and feelings.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

Signed the VA reform bill yesterday, that's something. Nearly every day something is happening. So call it what it is, he is not doing anything......that you personally like.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

CNN and the Hill and Huffington Post and NY Times and CNBC and and...I can google many more if I want.

All said anonymous sources close to Comey said he would testify that Trump lied about being told he was not under investigation. But suddenly when chance of tapes popped up the testimony changed to the truth.

anyway it's the weekend and I don't care. Just can't wait to hear lynch and podesta under oath. The wasserman Schultz lady already lied and said FBI never contacted her about the server. Get her under oath too and then getting somewhere with all this.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

Google CNN retracts Comey story and you get all the links you need. Trump basically announced last night the same reason I said. Speaking of announced, Loretta Lynch is officially being investigated.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

I know he was planning to say something else because every leak and media report told us what he was gonna say days in advance. Remember everyone waiting for Comey to say some bombshell that would get trump impeached? Didn't happen

plus Comey didn't call his bluff he folded and told mostly the truth. Calling his bluff would have been Comey announcing he didn't believe there were tapes and then straight lying like he probably planned. I know he planned to lie because all he testified about was his feelings.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

It didnt match anything that the leaks from all his buddies and all the media outlets said he would say. CNN was still running that he would say he never told Trump he wasnt under investigation even 30 mins after his prepared statement said he did.

Isnt the point of all this that it shouldnt matter if tapes existed or not? Why would the testimony change if there were? I would have simply announced to the public that it didnt matter if he had tapes or not because I was planning to tell the truth. Yet Comey didnt say that.

All the anonymous sources who knew him were insistent that his professionalism would NEVER have allowed him to tell Trump he wasnt under investigation. Especially not 3 times and especially without being threatened. Yet once the existence of tapes came out, there he was testifying that he in fact did tell Trump without even being asked. Who knows what else he said was said only because he thought a tape might exist of him saying it?

Oh and Trump might tweet about John Podesta testifying in private next week too. He and his brother actually got money from Russia, so that should be interesting.

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

I know what Trump will more than likely tweet tomorrow. Why is James Comey visiting the failing NY Times immediately after he finds out there are no tapes?

I always suspected the tapes were a bluff, too bad Comey felt he had to change his testimony just in case there were. I would have hoped existence of tapes or not wouldnt matter because you would just tell the truth in the first place when you testify.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

Oh wow, what I said earlier today has actually already started. Let the leaking begin anew! I was wondering what would be the topic for the weekend, guess we will know soon. Too obvious in this case for NY Times to write the article, so I expect it to come from Washington Post this time.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

Trump is a traitor and so are those who make excuses for him.

yeah, what happened to letting the investigation finish first? I am always told to not prejudge that Trump and his people did nothing wrong, even though there is no evidence of such, and that the investigation is still going on. But the other side is constantly name calling and not only assuming, but deciding already, that there is guilt somehow. So once again, what evidence has been presented that proves that Trump is a traitor?

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

If Trump possibly committed obstruction of justice then it is possible that Lynch did as well. Both are part of the same investigation into the 2016 elections. As are the actions of Clinton and Obama, that is why Jeh Johnson was asked why Obama didnt take any action to stop the supposed Russia hacking and didnt make any strongly worded announcements. They are all involved in this investigation that you guys claim isnt over yet. So ok, criminal acts dont go away simply because you arent in office or because you lost the election.

Trump cant help it if you imply things from his words, and he is probably counting on that. But it is a straight fact that he never said he had tapes.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Posted in: Senate Republicans unveil Obamacare replacement bill See in context

Republicans were supporting it initially based on the fact that their party leaders drafted it. Of course they are not going to say they dont support something they havent read. Now that they have read it, 3 or 4 have already come out and said they cant support it as written. That is fair and will have to be dealt with.

It was the Dems side Pelosi and Schumer giving speeches already about the supposed content of something they had obviously not had time to read yet. It was obvious as Schumer was talking, everything was vague (its meaner) or prefaced by the statement it MAY this, it MAY that. Also, pretty convenient a bunch of protesters had already been prestaged at the location.

Its disingenuous to pretend to talk specifics about the contents of something you havent read.

-7 ( +1 / -8 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

I cant make it any simpler than he never said he had tapes. Immediately my focus went to Comey and why that would matter. Was he not planning on telling the truth prior to that? Because all the leaks at that time said he was going to testify that he never told Trump he wasnt under investigation. Suddenly all the damning facts that were going to be in his testimony according to the leaks changed very quickly to how Comey felt about everything.

So I think the bluff was very effective in this regard, he didnt even try to lie about anything that could have been on a tape. Seems Trump had little to hide, Comey actually hurt himself and Lynch and proved Trump was telling the truth about being told he wasnt under investigation. All that is left now is if Trump criminally obstructed justice and if Comey illegally leaked those memos. Will have to wait and see what Mueller decides on those.

-7 ( +1 / -8 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

Bluffing is neither criminal nor illegal.

Do you think we would have ever heard Comey admit he told Trump three times he wasnt under investigation if he wasnt worried about tapes? Would we have ever heard what Loretta Lynch did? There was also a reason why Comey linked everything to how he felt, that way if tapes proved something different he would still be ok. So basically Trump's bluff allowed us to get the truth about some things. This is still about hearing the truth, isnt it?

Also now that there are no tapes, I am sure we will start hearing additional leaks about things that Comey forgot to bring up in his testimony.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

Posted in: Senate Republicans unveil Obamacare replacement bill See in context

Ok so who has actually read it?

There were protesters in wheelchairs on site with 15 mins of its release and Chuck Schumer was already reading from a prepared statement within 30 mins.

Shouldn't they at least pretend to read and understand it first? That way they can discuss the contents?

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

Posted in: Trump says he did not record conversations with former FBI chief Comey See in context

He never said he had tapes. His statement was simply to remind Comey to tell the truth.

-10 ( +3 / -13 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

All I am still seeing is people trying to make fun of trump or telling me what can't be done. To those of you, what's your plan?

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Posted in: GOP leaders plan to finalize tax bill behind closed doors See in context

Anything you put in the public these days immediately gets a lawsuit attached to it within 24 hours. Every policy has to suit the needs of every single person and every single possible situation. It just can't work like that when no group or individual is willing to not get every single thing they want.

another example is the Travel ban? Nope my Somali grandmother who hasn't visited me in 15 years anyway can't come this summer. Unacceptable!

So let it get finished in private and then present it and make people vote on the bill as a whole without the ability to find one thing about one person to derail the whole thing.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Posted in: Belgium investigates station bomber shot dead by troops See in context

not being from the U.K. I had no idea it was that bad. I wish I had an answer but it seems almost too late. It would require actions that few are willing to take and that none in government will support.

USA not any better off, Trump can't even get a 120 day travel ban much less do things that would be even more impactful.

Politicians and media don't seem to have the will to do anything but pray it doesn't happen today and report on it when it does.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

Everything here is a whole bunch of can't. Ok what CAN we do to stop the flow of illegal immigrants, possible ISIS and drugs into our country from the southern border?

Most of you seem to think everything is fine, but if so where did these 11 million illegals come from in the first place? And how are we going to keep them out for good once we send them back? Just no message at from Dem side everything is just can't.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Belgium investigates station bomber shot dead by troops See in context

Yeah we were so concerned about bending over backwards in sympathy and concern the one time a Muslim was attacked. Unfortunately all that has already been overshadowed by 3 more Islamic terrorist attacks already since then.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

I'm used to it by now. A Columbia professor and a George Washington university professor say a 2,000 mile solar wall can be built for 1 billion dollars. The same 1 billion dollars that Trump saved us just for this year by backing out of Paris Climate accord.

But yeah let's just insult Trump some more and hope and pray Russia collusion is found instead of securing our borders with something 1/20th of the cost that could also generate clean energy.

-10 ( +1 / -11 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

For one, the solar panels would be quickly stolen or destroyed.

Exactly who would be doing that and why would they be allowed to do so?

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

So why do 65 countries have walls/fences if they dont work?

Why is Trump the only one ridiculed for an idea that probably 1/3 of the countries in the world have already implemented and spent money on? Are all these countries stupid too?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/france-and-britain-just-beat-donald-trump-tobuilding-a-border-wall/2016/09/28/345e352a-8000-11e6-ad0e-ab0d12c779b1_story.html?utm_term=.9183d0dc094d

But hey whatever furthers the Trump is stupid/racist narrative that everyone wants to push during lulls in the but Russia! stuff. Yeah, no wall in history has ever worked since ladders and shovels were invented. Sure.

-10 ( +2 / -12 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

@porto: Sure! If you can prove that people from outside your house (country) who are connected to me (my citizens) are coming into your property illegally. If you can prove those same people permanently stay inside your property, never leave, take jobs away from your family, commit crimes, and provide drugs to your family. If you can also prove that my social services bills decrease and yours increase because my citizens on your property use more of your resources than any contributions or payments they make.

Prove that, then sure you are within your rights to protect yourself from me and mine at my expense. Otherwise, if you just want protection from a perceived threat, pay for it yourself. But obviously illegal immigration is a threat to the USA for the reasons I listed above and many more (drugs, etc)

Didnt Obama just finish building a wall around his own house, by the way?

-11 ( +2 / -13 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

Dems want to use cost as their method of obstruction. That way they can hide from the underlying national security and immigration implications. if cost is removed from the conversation, Dems will have to take a position on illegal immigration and how it relates to the security of our nation. They dont want to do that because they get a large portion of their votes from the legal (and sometimes illegal) immigrant population.

-12 ( +3 / -15 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

he has to say that Mexico will pay for it. Otherwise the Dems will use COST as their method of obstruction to prevent it from getting built. The fact is, it is needed for national security, and national security costs money. For those of you who think this wall is NOT getting built, obstruction by Dems in the funding process is your only hope.

But, that is also obstruction of the security of our nation and will be brought up in the 2018 elections, so Dems should be careful. Also Trump is already looking at alternate methods of funding that he controls (such as generating solar power from it as this example says).

-14 ( +2 / -16 )

Posted in: Islamic State blows up historic Mosul mosque where it declared 'caliphate' See in context

Say, wasn't fatso gonna destroy ISIS in a month with a secret plan that only he knew ? 

Yet is ISIS not being destroyed? Let me guess, this is being done despite Trump, not because of him.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

especially since his claim that the Mexicans will pay for it has been found to be entirely empty.

Nothing has even been built, so you have to wait to see if Mexico will pay or not. Mexico has not paid.....YET.....because nothing to pay for.....YET.

So, Mexico is paying for the solar panels then? I wonder how much maintenance costs would increase if the wall was built with solar panels. Of course, nobody that hates the wall would try to break any of the panels.

So we just have to stand by and let people destroy our property and do nothing? I doubt that will happen. Or, charge Mexico with the repair bill too, if its coming from their citizens on their side. Im sure we dont let them just destroy whatever fences or walls are already in existence now, Im sure there are consequences for people who damage those.

-14 ( +2 / -16 )

Posted in: Trump's new idea -- a 'solar wall' on Mexican border See in context

Oh god, please stop the international embarrsment - American leadership, the joke of the world.

So you are saying it is not technologically possible to build a wall with solar panels?

But his true believing followers don't care that 1. it's all talk, and 2. they're going to have to pay for it. They'll just continue to blame Obama, the 'libs' and the 'MSM'. They've been cult-if@cated.

it is obviously not all talk. A request for proposals was sent out and they are obviously being reviewed, as one of them seems to be a solar wall.

-19 ( +2 / -21 )

Recent Comments

Popular

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites


©2017 GPlusMedia Inc.