Blacklabel comments

Posted in: G7 toughens Russia stance but Iran deal in the balance See in context

I don’t use foxnews and Breitbart as sources. I research the liberal sources, then compare them with neutral and conservative sites to see what I believe based on evidence or actual documents that I can read on my own. Then develop my own talking points.

says the guy who gets talking points from Snopes?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Posted in: G7 toughens Russia stance but Iran deal in the balance See in context

For example, Iran tested missiles yet it was determined this does NOT violate the deal. One of my points you decided to label “incorrect”.

Most nonproliferation experts would say Iran certainly defied the spirit of the U.N. resolution, but technically didn't violate it — because it contains no prohibition against such testing, as one of its predecessors, passed in 2010, specifically did.

In fact, the Obama administration had argued for keeping in place the stronger prohibitory language of Resolution 1929, but it lost that argument when its negotiating partners wouldn't back the Americans up.

https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/02/03/513229839/did-irans-ballistic-missile-test-violate-a-u-n-resolution

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Posted in: G7 toughens Russia stance but Iran deal in the balance See in context

You saying “incorrect” really means nothing, you know? All these points are supported by researchers and foreign policy experts.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Posted in: G7 toughens Russia stance but Iran deal in the balance See in context

From NY Post:

The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action — President Obama’s Iran nuclear deal — however ironically made any hope that North Korea would forfeit its illicit nuclear program impossible.

The JCPOA reversed decades of precedent. Whereas South Africa and Libya completely surrendered their military nuclear infrastructures, Obama conceded that Iran could keep its underground nuclear facility and more centrifuges than Pakistan had when it built its nuclear arsenal.

The North Korean dictator certainly also wants to relieve economic pressure. Cash at best buys patronage to reinforce his rule and at worst funds terrorism across the region.

https://nypost.com/2018/03/09/beware-mr-president-north-korea-wants-its-own-version-of-the-iran-nuke-deal/

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Posted in: G7 toughens Russia stance but Iran deal in the balance See in context

Because they still have a nuclear program for “research” still have uranium, centrifuges, missions etc and were not forced to denuclearize. So North Korea wanted the same deal Iran got at the time.

Im over Comey, all that was a total dud. See him at his trial.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Posted in: G7 toughens Russia stance but Iran deal in the balance See in context

I’m more than capable and plenty skilled enough. But as the decision will be made without my input I simply say I agree it’s a bad deal. What I wrote is plenty enough for a Japan forum website that doesn’t pay me.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Posted in: G7 toughens Russia stance but Iran deal in the balance See in context

It’s not that important to me. Smarter people than me who are paid to do so can write better papers. I just summarized enough to prove it’s a bad deal.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Posted in: France's Macron visits Trump as Iran nuclear deal hangs in balance See in context

cool story, bro. But its Snopes, come on.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/#46b6715c227f

Plus, I think "the world" would have understood if the USA kept Iran's money, knowing they were just going to use it to fund terrorism and build nukes. The legal ruling had not been made yet, the last guy panicked, showed loser mentality that it was going to go against him and just paid.

Nobody changed their mind on a "whim" except the last President, who desperately needed a foreign policy win, so much that he decided to "pay off" Iran to stop something he had no negotiation skills to get stopped.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Posted in: G7 toughens Russia stance but Iran deal in the balance See in context

I could write a 50 page paper on the benefits of canceling this and making a new deal.

The deal is horribly one-sided in the favor of Iran. It has strengthened them in the short term while hoping to push their nuclear capability down the road for someone else to deal with in 5-10 years.

Iran is promoting terrorism around the world using money they are making due to the lifting of sanctions plus 100 billion dollars that was unfrozen. They now have access to Western banking and can export oil and can get non-military technology from the EU. All this strengthens Iran's power in the Middle East.

The accord did not address Iran's missile program, as they are allowed to just say their missiles cant carry nukes. The accord does not restrict Iran from financing terrorism around the world, that wasnt included either. In fact, it is an accord not a treaty because the last guy was in such a hurry to get it done, he couldnt be bothered to send it to Congress to ratify.

North Korea claims that it also has the right to have nuclear weapons using this accord a precedent. Its an accord not a treaty because the last guy didnt bother. Iran still has uranium and centrifuges, although fewer. But still have more than Pakistan or North Korea have ever had. Iran is still allowed to sell uranium internationally and their infrastructure has not been dismantled, they can still use it for "research".

Bad deal.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Posted in: France's Macron visits Trump as Iran nuclear deal hangs in balance See in context

Snopes? No wonder that read like a bunch of liberal nonsense.

So you have to return money after another countries military takes over your embassy and holds your people hostage for over a year or YOU are called out for “stealing”?

Iran refuses to pay our citizens for what they did. So YES you can take that money and give it to your people who were held hostage at gunpoint and say screw that other country. Which is what we did until the Apologizer in Chief started his Works Apology and Bowing Tour.

Same country that still chanting Death to America in the streets. You get nothing.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Posted in: France's Macron visits Trump as Iran nuclear deal hangs in balance See in context

So to recap, “Iran’s Money” was given to the people who Iran held hostage for 444 days. Should have been given to the families of our military who died trying to rescue them if it wasn’t. So screw “Iran’s money” it’s forfeited for what they did.,

Also btw who was going to “force” the US to give that money back and how was that going to happen? Or was Iran just going to keep taking our people hostage like they have continued since we gave back the money?

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

Posted in: France's Macron visits Trump as Iran nuclear deal hangs in balance See in context

So are there any US citizens being held hostage in Iran right now? So what did this payment accomplish as far as encouraging behaviors?

The USA didn’t steal any money from Iran. That money was for weapons we never delivered before they took our citizens hostage in 1979. That money was then later given to the hostages for their ordeal per US court decision.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Posted in: G7 toughens Russia stance but Iran deal in the balance See in context

Sure if by “lead” you mean decide to fill up a plane with cash in the middle of the nite and fly it over there to Iran. Same “leading” of giving 221 million to Palestine on the way out the door.

New president, new rules thankfully.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: France's Macron visits Trump as Iran nuclear deal hangs in balance See in context

oh that was Russia who had all the people in the streets chanting “death to America” since the late 1970s?

They got a plane load of cash. Of course they are going to pretend to be cooperative in hopes of getting even more concessions.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: 10 dead, 15 injured after van plows into crowd on Toronto sidewalk See in context

Let’s send thoughts and prayers like New York hyper liberal Democrat Bill DeBlasio did.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

Yep thats great, except the Washington Post says the opposite:

It was a drill the agency had started with some regularity last November — around the time Hawaii reinstated its Cold War-era nuclear warning sirens amid growing fears of an attack by North Korea — 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/01/14/hawaii-missile-alert-how-one-employee-pushed-the-wrong-button-and-caused-a-wave-of-panic/

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

Yes you are playing with words. Saying we are all gonna die isn’t “talking about” nuclear war it’s predicting the result of us all dying. This a prediction not just talking about a topic.

why was Hawaii doing nuclear drills in the first place? Why did tourists cancel Guam trips? Cause Trump tweeted mean things to Kim and liberals thought we all gonna die. Seems it turned out a little differently and led to a meeting being set up instead.

Talking about nuclear war is different than predicting it. There's that accuracy issue. Or, am I just playing with words again?

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

I can be accurate. Liberals just have short memories and don’t remember their “we are all gonna die cause of Trump tweets” nonsense. Nuclear attack warnings in Hawaii...Guam tourism trips cancelled? No, still not ringing a bell? How bout this?

http://toofab.com/2018/01/03/the-view-piles-on-trumps-nuclear-north-korea-tweets-he-is-just-going-to-kill-all-of-us/

Washington post talking about nuclear war:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/this-is-how-nuclear-war-with-north-korea-would-unfold/2017/12/08/4e298a28-db07-11e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

So what did we get from Iran exactly? Just because things “belong to” other countries doesn’t mean we have to give it back if we know they will use it to threaten the world, or fund nukes and terrorism, right?

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

Uh how did the last guy make his horrible Iran deal work out? Special diplomacy? Nope! Pallet loads of cash to fund their nuclear program and terrorist supporting activities.

Who wouldn’t accept a deal where you get cash and give up nothing? Trump has the challenge of actually making Kim give up his nukes, that won’t be easy to pull off.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

and no matter what happens the usual liberals will be saying their normal mantra of not enough/too much or too soon/too late for every single thing.

We were all supposed to die in a nuclear conflagration weren’t we? Yet look at all the process that liberals still whining about.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

Even really “trying” blows out of the water anything the previous guy got the Nobel Prize for (he got it for thinking about trying, then giving up to even try)

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

There is no con here. It’s just the liberal media being petty, arguing that someone can commit to something without agreeing to do it. There is no reason for this article to exist, it’s like arguing that something which is “warm” isn’t really “hot”.

It’s a petty attack to make it sound like a total lie that progress is actually going on. North Korea hasn’t ruled denuclearization out, do that means its in.

Both S Korea and Pompeo know what Kim said, liberal journalists can only try to play word games with translations.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

Also you publicly announce someone has agreed to something as a negotiation technique. If they don’t immediately and negatively respond that they have not agreed at all, you know you are getting somewhere.

has NK responded that this is untrue? No they haven’t and if they do, Trump just cancels the meeting because he isn’t accepting anything less then that.

You guys are going to lose your mind when Trump (and Dennis Rodman) are awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

So he had already gotten the assurances of stopping testing, closing the test site and no withdrawal of our troops as well as a commitment to at least the idea of denuclearization. hasn’t even sat at the table yet and got all of that.

3.5 of the 4 things he needs to prevent nuclear Armageddon, still no credit just want to play word games.

Did you forget they Guam and Hawaii were going to be wiped off the face of the earth couple months ago? I would say this is huge progress.

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

This is basically what you have. That comments translated from another language into English were translated as “seeking to” not “agreeing to”.

The NBC News post repeated a Reuters report from April 19 that said, "South Korea's Moon says North seeking 'complete denuclearization'."

In the nuances of diplomacy, the transition from "seeking" to "agrees to" is a big deal.

......

So, no direct statements from North Korea on denuclearization, but the word has been in play and not refuted by North Korea.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

So Korea says they have agreed to denuclearization. So does Trump’s guy he sent for a meeting. But let’s listen to some reporter from the AP who wasn’t even there play word games just so we can criticize Trump. That really helps the situation.

-10 ( +1 / -11 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

Is the liberal media also going to claim they didn’t say no more testing and won’t close the rest site too?

They didn’t sign an agreement in blood in triplicate to do those so Trump is wrong! say liberal media talking heads.

-10 ( +1 / -11 )

Posted in: Trump says North Korea agreed to denuclearize. It hasn't See in context

So now being “committed to the concept” of something doesn’t mean you agree to do it. This liberal media is beyond insane playing with words. Anything to argue against what Trump says.

Being committed to the concept of denuclearization, however, is not the same as agreeing to it, as Trump claims.

-13 ( +0 / -13 )

Posted in: Kim Jong Un tests Trump with latest nuclear offer See in context

You guys were so optimistic that trump was going to be impeached and jailed with no evidence. But so negative about things like this that have evidence of potentially going well.

It’s alnost like you rooting for Trump to fail for political points. At least he almost has them to the table to talk, let’s see what happens and hope for the best for once?

-2 ( +2 / -4 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites


©2018 GPlusMedia Inc.