General under honorable conditions is fine for now.
Especially when it’s publicly known it’s only for refusing COVID vaccine.
once the vaccine mandate push is found unlawful, the discharge can be upgraded anyway.
hundreds of thousands of military will just be released? I doubt it.
-2 ( +18 / -20 )
In recent years magazine critics and others in the industry have criticized the song as "racist," including one writer for New York Magazine who called the track "gross, sexist, and stunningly offensive toward black women."
non concert goers, non fans, who have the media platform.
So ”woke” journalists and Twitter.
No fan would go to the concert hoping they don’t play this song and being angry if they did.
-2 ( +3 / -5 )
Might as well be once people who don’t listen to their music and never will dictate the set list at a concert they won’t attend.
-4 ( +5 / -9 )
Cancel culture, baby.
-1 ( +5 / -6 )
Whatever excuse they can use to censor the “wrong kind of people” more.
0 ( +3 / -3 )
5 police were killed!
Uh no, actually they werent.
they either died of natural causes later on, or killed themselves for unknown and reasons that were never confirmed as related in any way to what happened.
100s of police were hospitalized!
Uh no, they werent. Some of them likely visited a hospital, but that is not the meaning of the word "hospitalized."
-6 ( +1 / -7 )
ok so how does that relate to the insistence in calling people insurrectionists and claiming treason to push a false narrative?
If it is actually so bad, you could call it what it actually was and it would still be bad. Wouldnt have to call it something more than it wasnt to try to convince people how bad you think it was.
arent murder and attempted murder or robbery and attempted robbery quite different in final outcome and severity?
-5 ( +1 / -6 )
no one has been convicted of insurrection or treason nor even charged with it.
Its like an insistence to call someone a robber when nothing was stolen.
I know its good for the narrative, but its misinformation to describe this as such.
The DOJ has such flimsy cases even 9 months later that they are accepting misdemeanor pleas on felony charges.
-8 ( +1 / -9 )
and lastly- liberals propose unvaccinated lose their jobs and are not eligible for unemployment as a punishment for non compliance.
umm...what happens to these people? and their families and their children?
Liberals, the "empathetic" bunch, dont really have an empathetic answer here that I have heard.
Let them all die as punishment for daring to not comply?
Same people who get all upset when an armed criminal who doesnt comply with police gets shot. The actions of that criminal could cause the policeman to die. same as liberals claim about unvaccinated people.
Yet for that criminal after shot: That person had rights! there had to be another way! that wasnt "right"
Empathy is strangely absent in this COVID-19 narrative.
-3 ( +10 / -13 )
I think liberals have forgotten that people who dont have COVID use hospitals too.
lets say Im unvaccinated. A person comes with COVID, Im not a threat to give them COVID.
Because one, I dont have it and two, they already have COVID when they show up.
Lets say Im unvaccinated a person comes without COVID. They are vaccinated and masked. I am masked, as its a hospital. Their vaccination protects them at 95% and our masks are said to "work" as well.
Whats the problem here?
-4 ( +11 / -15 )
Why would you want to be taken care of by a nurse or doctor that doesn't believe in science?
simple. because that is not what the choice to not get vaccinated actually means.
its just a binary, unserious, liberal talking point. No one is saying take your car to the dry cleaner either.
Neither is a representation of what is being thought or said.
0 ( +12 / -12 )
It’s less risky to have an unvaccinated nurse or doctor or staff than to have none at all when I show up to the emergency room.
there a finite number of qualified people to do these jobs and each person fired has an impact.
look at all the airline flights being cancelled every day, they can do that to pretend no impact (the weather!) but a hospital can’t cancel me to come emergency room.
unvaccinated medical person or no person at all. That’s obvious what the choice is.
-3 ( +13 / -16 )
you can still get and transmit COVID while vaccinated.
You can also be unvaccinated and not have COVID.
as vaccination status has no relationship with COVID status....- Isnt there something else that would not put the public "at risk"?
-6 ( +16 / -22 )
yet Dems wouldnt vote for paying the bills previous administrations racked up in 2003, 2004 and 2006.
so kind of hypocritical for them to claim Repubs have to do the opposite of what Biden himself did when he was in the same situation. Again, Biden voted against raising the debt ceiling twice and didnt bother to vote the other time, 3 in total.
its why liberals created "whataboutism". They are really bad answering about why the exact same thing was ok when they did it, but not ok at all when someone else does.
0 ( +5 / -5 )
liberals and their "slogans" presented with lack context and that are a product of binary thinking.
-4 ( +1 / -5 )
Oh I was just "reminded" of President Obama and the national debt he incurred when I re-read this article.
9.3 trillion dollars, wow thats a lot.
Seems Repubs must have voted to increase the debt ceiling all those years, no?
When Obama was sworn in on Jan. 20, 2009, the debt was $10.626 trillion.1 When he left office on Jan. 20, 2017, it was $19.937 trillion. It explains why some would say Obama added $9 trillion to the debt.
2 ( +6 / -4 )
You're probably the only one....
I doubt that. Could you point me to the specific part of this article that "reminded" you of reality TV, only one specific host and his individual bills? I didnt get that from anything I read.
2006 was 15 years ago
Why yes it was. When was this reality show I imagine you are referencing first aired? 17 years ago, wasnt it?
To save time and multiple posts, did anything in this article also remind you of (Jan 6/Chinese neckties/ex Presidents saying to take the safe and effective vaccine, John Bolton/Ann Coulter or anything related to impeachment or Russia)?
0 ( +5 / -5 )
Remind you of a former reality TV star with a reputation as a deadbeat?
No it really doesn’t remind me of any such thing.
Does Remind me that Biden and Schumer voted against raising the debt ceiling when it was time to pay their own bills though.
-1 ( +6 / -7 )
In 2006, every Democrat voted against raising the debt limit.
In 2004, all but two Democrats voted against raising the debt limit.
In 2003, all but three Senate Democrats voted against raising the debt limit.
Including then Senator Biden and Senator Chuck Schumer against raising the limit each time. Biden missed the vote in 2004 but claimed had he voted it would have been NO.
-1 ( +7 / -8 )
Abortions have happened since the beginning of people.
yes so has murder and racism and slavery and so many other things we dont support.
-3 ( +1 / -4 )
The court didn’t rule on the constitutionality of the law.
oh, like when courts ruled only that there was no standing and you made this same distinction?
Oh wait....Except that you didnt do that.
-4 ( +1 / -5 )
Yeah there is no way at all that this meeting could go really wrong or end up costing the USA billions of dollars. Right?
0 ( +1 / -1 )
Let's set aside for a moment that this law is laughably unconstitutional as the law currently stands.
the court didn’t agree with this claim, did it? I didn’t hear that they laughed about it either.
-4 ( +1 / -5 )
Can the Taliban suppress the potent IS threat?
depending on what day it is and which group is getting the aid money, kind of the same group.
Enemies most of the time, but same end goals.
Who are the two groups?
The Taliban and Isis are both Sunni Islamist extremist groups seeking to form authoritarian states under strict Sharia law and prepared to use violence to achieve their aim.
-1 ( +3 / -4 )
yep that stock is up a fat 170%+ year to date.
For Moderna, they know the current Biden administration wont touch them.
So I dont blame them for what they are doing.
If the White House wants to give it away for free, they are going to have to purchase it first.
0 ( +1 / -1 )
The US Govt shouldn't be pre-buying this stuff to help the stupid, unless the it is for military use.
oh for the hundreds of thousands of military who have refused vaccination to date?
Yeah they should have this.
4 ( +7 / -3 )
Oh and by the way, this mandate for private companies.....
Was only announced at a press conference, never written or finalized or signed or announced or published.
Biden is simply hoping that company leaders follow what he wants, without any actual mandate.
we see that the airlines arent really eager to follow it. thousands of cancelled flights per day,
Even the military that has a written order, has hundreds of thousands who are unvaccinated with less than a month to the "deadline".
1 ( +2 / -1 )
so who determines who meets the mandate at 2 shots and who is high risk and really needs 3?
you expect an airport employee or a restaurant host or a guy taking tickets at a movie theater to have some way to know that someone isnt vaccinated anymore because they really needed the 3rd shot to be vaccinated?
0 ( +2 / -2 )
Yes, Chappelle takes on the leftist cancel culture.
Who respond by saying there is no such thing but then proceed to try to cancel him.
3 ( +10 / -7 )