Nine years seem sufficient for the crimes he has been connected to. He has not been linked as an active psrticipant to any murders. Which is probably also why the prosecution only tried to get twelwe years. I would choose to trust the judges sentence, seeing as how I have no knowledge about this specific case, and even less of law practice in general. Even if the crimes are related to a much hated cult. I suggest everybody else do the same.
7 ( +6 / -0 )
I agree with everyone else below, it's thought provoking that this makes the headline. Here someone has to get shot at, as the minimum to make any headlines.
0 ( +1 / -1 )