Posted in: China accuses Japan of interfering in naval drills See in context
@hsien90210
That's because the Senkaku's are Japan's. That means they don't need to got to the ICJ to confirm it's there's. You don't need to go to court over something that isn't disputed. Furthermore China is a member on the Security council if you know anything about the ICJ the International Court's permanent members of the Security Council are able to veto enforcement of even cases to which they consented in advance to be bound. Therefore it is very likely for the member states of Security Council to avoid the responsibility brought up by International Court of Justice, as shown in the example of Nicaragua v. United States. Basically if Japan wins it won't matter China can veto the ruling and doesn't have to abide to them.
6 ( +6 / -0 )
Posted in: Wildfires spread in western Japan; SDF joins firefighting efforts
Most in Japan would far prefer to be able to buy far cheaper rice, while most of the few remaining…
Posted in: Amount of rice bought by Japan households up despite soaring prices
Posted in: Sukiya beef bowl chain apologizes after rat found in customer's miso soup
Posted in: Japan fears Myanmar scammers will lure more youths to crime