Could we also know how many British and Indian soldiers were killed?
0 ( +0 / -0 )
340 billion yen spent for refitting which, as pointed out, will take at least 10 years to pay off. Add to that all the costs of running the facility since 2011 (did they lay anyone off?) and what you have in 2030 is a very old reactor that you still have to decommission and no return on investment.
Hokkaido has huge wind resources and plenty of space for windmills. It makes essentially all of its energy burning coal! That 340 billion should have been used building wind power in Hokkaido and a better connection to the Tohoku Electric grid to supply its surplus to. Britain, Holland and Germany have managed this, why cannot Japan?
1 ( +3 / -2 )
Yes, SK lost face but Japan is losing billions of yen in lost tourism and exports to SK with no end in sight. Guess which of these the real world cares about.
-8 ( +7 / -15 )
This is a very good move by SK. Bringing this into the dispute was a huge mistake as it dragged in the US. Now it is back to economic sanctions that Abe initiated and the US cares nothing about. SK is winning here hands down with the two thirds drop in tourists and similar drop in exports from Japan to SK. Expect major Japanese concessions.
-22 ( +6 / -28 )
This article is completely out of touch with reality. South Koreans make up 24% (7.5 million) of Japan's foreign tourists. Today the JTA said the percentage drop in South Korean visitors, compared with the same month a year earlier, was 48.0 percent in August, 58.1 percent in September and 65.5 percent in October. Doesn't look like the worst is over from those numbers.
And don't think China is not paying attention. The next misstep by this inept government on the China file will dealt with in exactly the same way...and bye bye tourist industry.
@alwaysspeakingwisdom(sic) "Who needs South Korea?"
Please talk to all the hotel, restaurant, shop owners etc. who are losing billions of yen in lost business and report back.
2 ( +11 / -9 )
Maybe nothing to see for you, but that statement was made by the Economy Minister Yasutoshi Nishimura who is surely better informed on this subject than you are.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
If you read the Asahi Shinbun article you will see a major factor completely ignored.
Korea strikes back:
Moreover, worsening ties with South Korea had "a big impact" on already weak exports, Economy Minister Yasutoshi Nishimura told reporters after the GDP data release. "Exports will remain weak due to slack demand for cars and electronics parts. In addition, declines in tourists from South Korea are having large negative effects," he said.
Spending by inbound tourists, which are counted as part of exports in GDP data, was crunched by sharp declines in the number of Korean tourists in August and September. Japanese exports to the country tumbled 16 percent in September, dragged down by shipments of cars, TVs, computers and semiconductor production equipment.
0 ( +1 / -1 )
Precisely! Right next to the depot stands the elevated shinkansen track which was above the flood water level. NHK broadcasted warnings about dam openings and to move to higher ground many hours before, so there was plenty of time to put the trains on those elevated tracks. Just common sense but of course nobody in charge has the guts to make that decision.
18 ( +18 / -0 )
Indeed the Syrian army is the correct military force to secure the border, whether they are "Russia backed" or not. The US backed the wrong side in the Syrian civil war and ISIS grew to fill the void. Trump inherited this bad decision and has made the right move in withdrawing.
-4 ( +6 / -10 )
I was supporting Canada at their game in Kobe against South Africa who won 66-7. The predominantly Japanese crowd immediately felt empathy for the miss-matched Canadians and cheered loudly on the rare occasions that Canada moved the ball. When Canada scored its only try the cheer was enough to blow the roof off and the Japanese lady next to me started crying for joy! Those guys heard those cheers of support for their hopeless cause and were able to repay in whatever small way they could. Oh Canada!
7 ( +7 / -0 )
Please check August figures and report back.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
To see the effects for yourself go to expedia or any similar site and see what unbelievably cheap hotel deals you can get in Tokyo, Kyoto, Sapporo etc. Fine for me as I travel a lot but obviously a financial disaster for a huge number of businesses.
2 ( +2 / -0 )
Unfortunately this is why rugby will never go anywhere as a true international sport. The NZ coach is upset because they didn't win 200-0?
The neutral Japanese crowd supported the Canadians after the first 10 minutes. Empathy.
-1 ( +1 / -2 )
Keep this filthy drugs out of Japan please, all it will do is ensure a whole generation of lazy deadbeats and stoned tourists running amok in Japan.
Hey Mister X have you visited Canada recently. Tons of Japanese tourists here at this time of year. It doesn't look remotely like what you wrote and is doing quite well economically at the moment, thanks. In fact, legalization was basically a big yawn.
7 ( +9 / -2 )
I see, Samsung and Huawei copied 5G from Apple? Please explain.
Also please write your essay on how Japan is leading the world on consumer electronics. Love to read it.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Shoot your second best customer, way to go Abe. You are hurting Japan way more than SK.
-5 ( +2 / -7 )
Oh, and correct me if I'm wrong but Apple's newest iPhones don't have 5G capabilities. Doesn't that mean something?
Yes, it means that Apple is at least two years behind the leaders Samsung and Huawei and why it is in 4th place worldwide. Tokyo better have 5G up and running for the Olympics or it will look like a tech backwater.
1 ( +3 / -2 )
Could someone explain to me how Japan is benefiting from this dispute?
-6 ( +3 / -9 )
Face it, Apple is about 2 years or more behind in terms of 5G and foldable phones. If you like the convenience fine, but the rest of us will move on. Plenty of better cheaper phones out there.
-1 ( +0 / -1 )
Still two years until Apple gets its first 5G phone?
Foldable phone? Not on the horizon.
I remember when they were leaders. Now it's just catch up.
0 ( +2 / -2 )
If the whole world is on Japan's side why is the silence deafening?
-4 ( +8 / -12 )
So Abe sells out Japan to give his pal a "huge" victory. Interesting to see what he gets in return.
2 ( +3 / -1 )
Ok Abe, forget about your 40 million tourists. A quarter of tourists to Japan are from SK and the flights between SK and Japan are being cut continually.
BTW as a long time Kyoto resident, the tourists from SK are by far the best behaved. Why? Because their culture is quite closely related to Japan of course. Many Kyoto and Kansai Japanese have strong Korean roots.
Japan has shot itself in the foot and knows it.
0 ( +3 / -3 )
The last paragraph gives the game away: make Australians panic so the US can come and set up their new intermediate range nuclear missiles in Australia.
Same strategy to be employed in Japan.
3 ( +6 / -3 )
So Chinese and Korean companies sales up, US Apple's down and Japanese companies looking from the sidelines. They would not embrace Android OS, now 89% of the market, until it was too late
-3 ( +0 / -3 )
Yes, but if you had done the same thing in 1988 you would still be way, way behind... 41 years later.
-1 ( +1 / -2 )
Indeed pupil Abe is following his sensei's footsteps, to a similar folly. Trump's war on Hwawei just means that Hwawei will develop its own versions of the technology (eg Google's Android) suddenly forbidden by the US. Every other manufacturer in China will be thinking just how reliable is it to use US imported technology? Now to resolve a wartime dispute Japan is denying exports to Korea.
Korea today, who is it tomorrow? Who can trust the reliability of contracts with a country that suddenly cancels them shouting 'security!'. Answer, no one.
-3 ( +2 / -5 )
I agree with all of commanteer's comments above. G20 is a summit representing the world. If environmentalists want to call for a stop to whaling I am with them 100%. Calling out only Japan is just Japan-bashing. Shame on Jane Goodale.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
No the Guardian article was not good and neither was the JT one.
The reason is that neither article mentions the words Norway or Iceland, the two other major whaling countries. Note that Norway catches more whales than Iceland and Japan combined
yet never seems to get called out. Nor does Iceland. Is it because they are European countries?
By the way I am against whaling.
4 ( +7 / -3 )