kodimirpal comments

Posted in: French Senate passes ban on full Muslim veils See in context

**The French have succeeded in making a tiny little negligible minority women reveal (cover less) more of the physique Let us go a step forward. The same majority French women, assuming that, one day, start a successful campaign demanding that they want freedom to reveal much wider cleavage of their breasts, cleavage of upper buttocks and upper thighs thus bringing an obligatory law making the women cover less and less. The French Govt agrees to conduct a referendum whether such a law has to be passed ( after all France is a democracy and so why not respect the wishes of the majority in a democracy) enforcing all women to dress as they women liberation movement demands on greater exposure of their bodies.

The referendum goes ahead and 85% of the population vote for the law on greater exposure. In fact more men cast their yes vote, their sexually motivated reason being obvious. And French citizens ( the 15% NO VOTERS, the minority belonging to alien cultures) oppose this law and feel that it infringes on their personal rights on what they wish to cover and how much they wish to reveal . What will be the decision of the French Parliament? Will the Parliament and Judiciary force this law on all French women including the alien minority to reveal by law a wider cleavage of their breasts, buttocks and upper thighs. Will the French ban Muslim minority women covering their chest cleavage, upper buttocks, upper thighs, their bellybuttons and so on? Hypocrisy and wanton double standard due to clash of civilization and racial superiority--that is what it amounts to **

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Posted in: Muslim countries seek blasphemy ban See in context

Neither Islam nor any other religion approves the killing of the innocent. Killing the innocent is an unforgivable sin in Islam.

God says in the Quran “ If any one kills an innocent person, it would be as if he slew the whole people, and if any one saved a life it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people, yet many of them continued to commit excesses in the land” Chapter 5 Verse 32.

There is so much of anger on the perpetration of killings and violence on the innocent by the occupying forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. And in Kashmir due to internal insurgency Basically it is true that the responsibility for killing the innocent lies with those who perpetrate it. Many of us are inclined to submit to this.

In the second WW when the British soldiers killed the German soldiers, were the British soldiers responsible for the violence? When a 10 year old young Chechnian girl who witnessed her mother being raped by Russian brutes, did suicide bombing at 17, killing scores of Russian soldiers, would we say that the young girl was responsible for her violence?

In one sense the answers are, must be yes. But in very many cases, whatever the laws say, the moral responsibility for violence is divided between those who perpetrate it and those who provoke it. But many including the Nato forces escape all responsibility for their brutal drone attacks and killing the civilians in large numbers by taking refuge in a kind of political slogan making.

Of course there are occasions when terrorism must be resisted without compromise. But we can not deny the fact that the common cause of terrorism is the denial of natural justice and those who insist on perpetuating such a denial are the ones who are perpetuating terrorism. This has been happening throughout the world among many communities.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Posted in: Muslim countries seek blasphemy ban See in context

Islam recognises all religions, in fact the source of all true religions is the same, and there is not a single community, linguistic group, nation to which a prophet was not sent by God Almighty according to Islam.

In fact Islam recognises that the entire humanity one and the same community of equals.

I quote the Quran " God has created you into nations, clans and tribes so that you recognise each other, and in the sight of God the one closest to God is one who is righteous"

This means that a righteous Hindu, Christian, Jew, is closer to God than an unrighteous Muslim. That much is the tolerance of Islamic teachings.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Posted in: Muslim countries seek blasphemy ban See in context

Many European thinkers ( and quite many among others) feel that they have the new form of fundamentalism. They have absolute fundamental right to write, express, draw, paint what they want without restrictions.

This sort of non-faith based new form of fundamentalism is MORE DANGEROUS than any form of religious fundamentalism ( Islam as well as other religions). If this sort of unrestricted freedom of expression is maintained consistently as in Europe, it will lead to an immoral universe.

By absolute freedom of expression, a novelist may exert his fundamental right to advocate torture, rape, child sex, orgy, murder, genocide and he will defend his rights as resolutely as he advocates liberty, affection and sexual love. No one objects intellectual criticism of religions, but we have to put a stop to deliberate mockery, vilification, insult, hurting the feelings of non-Christians in the west.

There is no freedom without restrictions and there is no independence without discipline

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Recent Comments

Popular

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites


©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.