cloa513 Making Pedophilia pictures illegal is bad for children- making taboo means they can't draw what they experienced and also compels people leaning that way to only choose real children not pure fantasies.
Are these children that are drawing, finding a publisher, negotiating a contract and distributing these pictures for other children??? I think not. Your argument doesn't hold water.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
This slippery slope argument is nonsense. Child pornography is the end of the slippery slope, you're officially off the deep end and in hell at that point. Some arguments that we read/watch/enjoy stories about theft, revenge, murder etc and that child sex falls into that same category - taboo and illegal, but okay to visualize in a fantasy world. Wrong. I could never see myself ever engaging or seeing a need to engage is anything sexual with a child or rape for that matter. Could I see myself stealing? Yes, if I needed it to survive. What about revenge and murder? If you try to harm my child, draw him sexually, yes I can see myself doing all of those things. There is never a sitation where a child needs to be displayed sexually- in real life or in fantasy. There can be situations where murder revenge theft vandalizism, whatever can be justified. That is why the "slippery slope" argument is null and void.
1 ( +3 / -2 )
Freedom of expression my arse. Who on Earth wants to draw a child sexually or one performing sexual acts! That "artist" has some perversions that need to be addressed. In fact, I think they are just as sick as a purchaser and need to have the same punishment. Drawing or taking a photograph of a child in any sexual context is not natural and should not be tolerated by any society.
2 ( +4 / -2 )