michanhere comments

im not saying that just because the mom did it first that it makes it okay for the father to do it back. im not even arguing for either side. my argument is purely against yuriotani, because she seems to think the mother was right in doing what she did FIRST and is blaming the father for depriving the mother of her child. when in fact, the mother was the one that caused this whole thing. you are right that we don't know either way whether the mom or dad was right or good or had reasons etc. but, their case was heard in front of the judge and the judge must have listened to all the evidence and decided the ruling, but it was the mom that decided not to obey it. bottom line is yuriotani is siding with the mom purely because she is japanese and that's just wrong.

yuriotani- you talk about how bad it is that the father is now depriving the mother of her child, but the mother was trying to deprive the father of his child FIRST. and you think that was okay just because she is japanese. oh, the poor japanese woman. of course she's got to be the victim in this case right? you are so biased in your thinking that you cant even see straight. the real victim is the child. they could have tried to keep things civil for the sake of the child, but it was the mother that decided to take matters into her own hands and screw the father over FIRST. if the mother were not japanese, im sure you would be singing another tune. your comments are so one sided and delusional that it is infuriating to read. its truly best you not comment on these sorts of issues.