You'd do just as well to ask the question, "In view of the Brexit chaos, do you think parliaments that can override the democratic will of the people are a good idea?"
The Brexit chaos would be considerably less if the elites in Parliament were not doing everything they could to undermine the referendum and nullify its outcome. "Oh, look, we tried, but Brussels won't agree" is a weak excuse for not following the guidance of the referendum, but that's the line May and her supporters are trying to toe. Rejecting Brexit outright would alienate Conservative voters and could lead to UKIP supplanting the Conservative Party in British politics. Serving up Brexit bills that are unpalatable either to Brussels or else to Conservative MPs is the coward's path. "Oops, we tried, but it's impossible. Maybe we'll just have to stay in the EU" is May's desired outcome. But that's not what the referendum mandated.
So is the real source of the chaos the referendum, or is it the parliament that refuses to carry out the referendum? Or is the deeper source of chaos a Brussels government that attempts to rule Europe by denying anyone a democratic voice?
0 ( +7 / -7 )
Obama's "reset" of Middle East policy saw America withdraw from Iraq without a status of forces agreement, which led Iraq to immediately collapse back into violence and the rise of ISIS. Obama then spent the next good while ignoring what Obama called the "JV team," until ISIS became so powerful and controlled so much land that he was forced to address the threat.
Obama's policies led America into a Libyan debacle that, had it been led by any other president, would still be a loud topic for criticism. Whatever one's opinion of Gaddafi, Libya is now a place with human slave markets, which was never the case before. Meanwhile, Obama's Syrian "red line" hardly needs comment. Obama made threats, never enforced them, and thus allowed Assad and Putin run circles around Obama's military and diplomatic efforts in the region.
Shall we talk about Iran? Obama paid billions to a terrorist state to obtain an empty agreement that was never more than symbolic and that was ignored by Iran from virtually the moment ink started to dry.
Obama rose to the fore of the Democratic field in 2008 and won the primary over Hillary Clinton largely because he was viewed as the anti-war candidate at a time when Bush's wars had grown terribly unpopular. Clinton was punished by her own party for voting in favor of those wars. But, as time proved, Obama didn't really have any positive foreign policy vision for the Middle East beyond a promise to get out of Iraq immediately, which ended up being on the schedule that Bush had already negotiated before Obama took office. The remainder of his two terms swung mostly from one Middle Eastern debacle to the next.
Whatever the shortcomings of Pompeo's speech and Trump's policies behind them, defending Obama's policies and actions is an untenable position from any pragmatic, economic, diplomatic, security, or humanitarian perspective.
-2 ( +2 / -4 )
First, Korea played the victim card in shaming Japanese companies to make capital investments in Korea.
Now, Korea starts seizing those assets as a way of unilaterally obtaining the compensation to which it thinks the country is entitled.
Something tells me that fewer and fewer foreign companies are going to be interested in making capital investments in Korea in the future. Plundering assets is a good way to ensure that nobody parks assets in Korea ever again.
Perhaps the Korean market is lucrative enough and the seizures small enough that Japanese companies will put up with this for now. But how long until more Koreans try to plunder more? And once all Japanese assets are pulled from Korea, how long until Koreans turn their eye to American or other foreign-held assets? When a country has built its national identity around victimhood, it's very hard to stop playing the victim.
8 ( +9 / -1 )
“I don’t think my teacher chaperones partied like that during my field trips.”
Yes, they did. Students are often left unattended past the time they are supposed to be in bed, and all of the teachers typically get plastered during that time. A student probably wouldn't see the teachers drinking, but they almost certainly were on every school trip.
1 ( +5 / -4 )
Akishino better watch his remarks. He keeps this up, and the royal household and Diet will conspire to keep him off the throne. Back when Aiko was born, they were considering a bill to modernize the royal family and allow female succession in certain cases because the royal family had no direct male offspring at the time. Akishino and his wife stepped up (probably with the help of some fertility treatments that implanted only male embryos) and quickly announced a pregnancy, which put the bill on hold. When their child proved to be male, that put an end to the modernization effort. For that, Akishino has the thanks of a lot of traditionalists. But too many stray comments like this one, and the traditionalists might be just as happy to let the throne pass him by.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
It makes perfect sense for a society to establish laws that sustain the society and keep it from decline and collapse. Children who grow up with both parents in the household are significantly more successful over the course of their lives. Two-parent households are much more productive, much less likely to live in poverty, and much less likely to become a burden on the welfare system. Constructing the tax system to reward and encourage behavior that betters society and to discourage dyscivic behavior is precisely what a government ought to do.
The complaints of people who are engaged in dyscivic behavior ought to be ignored. If people demand public rewards for behavior that has negative consequences for themselves and for society, they ought to be roundly mocked.
1 ( +2 / -1 )
In another 40 years, the IOC will have eliminated virtually all real sports from the games (anything involving real physical competition), and what remains will be judged spectacles. Olympic boxing had already devolved into a farcical spectacle, so it's not any great loss to see it removed from the games entirely. Why was boxing hit with a bout-fixing scandal in 2016? Because the Olympic rules have made boxing more about judging than about sport. Having referees and timekeepers to make sure the sport stays fair is fine. Having judges who decide winners means that it's more pageant than sport.
Citius, Altius, Fortius soon needs to be replaced with Fancier, Sexier, More Marketable. The way a lot of the television coverage is, they ought to be called the Pathos Games instead of Olympic Games.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Let's solve a pollution problem...with more pollution!
2 ( +2 / -0 )
Whether Ghosn hid income or not, it's now quite plain that his ouster was orchestrated because other powerful people within Nissan wanted him gone and had grown tired of the Renault alliance. Nissan needed a pretext for getting rid of Ghosn, even if it meant a public and messy parting, and now they are wasting little time stepping into the power vacuum to begin chipping away at the alliance.
Et tu, Saikawa?
I suspect Ghosn probably was trying to shield income from taxes. Whether it was legal or not is the question. That said, if if comes out some months from now that Ghosn didn't actually break any tax laws with his income, but that this all originated with leaks from high within Nissan aimed at ousting Ghosn, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
9 ( +11 / -2 )
Yesterday: We accept your apology and this monetary compensation.
Today: Your apology was not sincere. Pay us more money.
The people abusing these women today are the Korean government, which has proven itself utterly disingenuous in dealing with the past and untrustworthy in respecting agreements. Korea wants a political wrench that it can twist at any time to gain leverage over and money from Japan. A wise Japanese government would simply start ignoring Korea on this issue.
30 ( +43 / -13 )
It would have to be a high caliber rifle. You don’t hunt deer with shotguns. Shotguns are for fowl.
This isn't the case in Japan. Gun permits normally only allow for a shotgun, whether one is hunting boar, deer, or whatever else. The shell fires a single slug, which makes the range considerably shorter than that of a rifle. The shotgun is often a poor tool for hunting big game, but high-powered rifles are much more heavily restricted. You can get one, but you have to possess a shotgun for at least ten years without incident first. The article says "rifle" in the last paragraph, so maybe the hunter had a rifle, not a shotgun, but this wouldn't be the first time a news article confused the type of weapon involved in a shooting.
Hitting a target at 130 meters is actually a pretty impressive shot, on the strong likelihood that this was a shotgun. Even if it was a more accurate rifle with longer range, it's still impressive to turn, fire at a sound, which he could amazingly hear in the forest at 130 meters, without ever seeing the target, and hit anything.
These details make me want to call B.S. on the hunter's story. Forests are typically noisy. Deer don't make that much noise. It would be hard to hear something 130 meters away. It would be even harder to hit something 130 meters away, barring extreme luck, without taking careful aim, which would require seeing the target for at least several seconds. Maybe he saw movement and misidentified the man as a deer, but the hunter had to have seen something, or else that shot would have been highly improbable. Not impossible, but improbable enough that I don't buy the hunter's explanation.
In an ironic twist, the U.S. almost certainly would pursue an involuntary manslaughter charge against a criminally negligent hunter such as this one. Looser gun laws, but stiffer penalties for accidents.
5 ( +5 / -0 )
South Korea seems to be taking diplomacy lessons from North Korea. Make yourself as unreliable as possible by making and tearing up agreements repeatedly...and then demand more money again.
I venture that North and South Korea will achieve reunification long, long before either of the Koreas stops complaining about their history with Japan.
10 ( +11 / -1 )
JET set two main goals for itself: English education and internationalization. It's been marginally successful at internationalization, albeit mostly in ways that keep "international" neatly in a box that Japanese schools can open and shut when they choose. For English education, JET has accomplished very little, particularly for the level of expense. JET still manages to hire and train better than the big dispatch companies, but that's a very low bar.
JET is a hugely expensive program. Nobody can really say how much is actually spent because the cost is spread out over multiple government agencies, each of the prefectural budgets, and thousands of local budgets. Estimates put the total cost at well over 40 billion yen per year ($400 million). For that money, JET has placed mostly inexperienced college graduates into schools, and then the program cuts those workers off after three years (now sometimes five), just as they are beginning to develop into effective teachers. The curriculum was poorly designed from the start to use ALTs, and Japanese teachers were poorly trained to use ALTs. These problems have only marginally improved over time. The program was window dressing, never really designed to accomplish its purported function of improving English. English ability has improved in Japan since JET's inception, but for reasons almost entirely apart from JET.
For the same money, Japan could (and should) have invested in professional teachers. Send Japanese English teachers abroad to study English or enter English language teaching programs. Retrain every current Japanese English teacher in communicative language teaching (instead of grammar-translation). Create more situations for students where they have a need to use English meaningfully. Shrink language class sizes. Send more students abroad. Hire foreign teachers who possess TESOL degrees (not just flimsy certificates, but full M.A. degrees) and teaching licenses. Make foreign teachers regular, permanent teaching staff at schools. Put bona fide language teachers into elementary schools, and start English (including reading and writing) from elementary 1st or 2nd grade.
Granted, the roughly 40 billion yen annually can only go so far when spread out across the entire school system. It would not begin to cover all that I'm suggesting. But there are so many ways to achieve significantly more impact in English education than what JET has accomplished
5 ( +5 / -0 )
Japanese people are brand-loyal, and they like the "Made in Japan" brand even more than Americans like the "Made in the U.S.A." label. This makes American cars a hard sell.
The best American offerings are middle-class, working-class vehicles. When Japanese people buy imports, they want status cars--high-end luxury brands. The luxury cars that America does build are oversized and generally don't have the brand appeal that European cars offer.
American car manufacturers build big cars for wide American roads and big American people. American car makers have been cutting back on their mid-size and small-size offerings in favor of trucks and SUVs. Yes, an F-150 is a workhorse, and it's the best pickup truck on the market. It's also too wide to fit down narrow farm roads built for kei trucks. Some suburban streets built in the last 20 years or so are wide enough to accommodate big cars, but many city streets are so narrow that two full-size American cars couldn't pass on them.
It's not a matter of tariffs (especially as many Japanese cars are built in the U.S. anyway), but of the market. American automakers aren't interested in making the cars that Japanese people will buy. They don't see substantial enough returns in building up expansive dealer networks in Japan. They don't have the brand appeal to sell well as an import.
4 ( +5 / -1 )
A country deeply in debt loans money to another country deeply in debt to help that other country deal with its debt problems.
Yeah, this is going to end well.
Of course, the alternative is that Malaysia takes money from China, which is tantamount to handing China new, additional political leverage in Southeast Asia, plus likely access to large swaths of Malaysia's natural resources should China ever demand payment and start seizing assets. Loaning money Japan doesn't have is preferable to ceding power to chief rival, China.
4 ( +4 / -0 )
How much will this percentage shift negatively when Japanese people face the reality of significant foreign populations living in their neighborhoods? When Japan stops looking and feeling like Japan, attitudes toward foreign workers will sour greatly. It's one thing when it's mainly Tokyo and a few other urban centers that have significant foreign populations. But mid-size cities and rural areas need workers as badly as or worse than Tokyo.
Japan is about 30 years ahead of Europe or America in facing the demographic crisis of low birthrates and an aging population. Europe and the U.S. have sidestepped that crisis by importing massive numbers of foreigners to prop up the population, and thus they are 30 years ahead in dealing with the demographic crisis brought about by high levels of immigration.
-2 ( +2 / -4 )
If the dialogue reported in this article is typical of the scripts built into these robots, then they are worse than useless. The robots are actually harming students.
First, they aren't communicating. They aren't even trying to create a context for real communication. Is the robot answering the student's question? No. It's merely getting the student to say a rote phrase, removed from any context. Language is communicative context. This robot gimmick misses the point of language and isn't going to help students learn English.
Second, the robot is praising students for nothing, which is ultimately going to demotivate the students in the long run. Students need to feel for themselves that English has a purpose, that it gives them power and a voice. Their satisfaction needs to be internal, from the feeling of accomplishment when students wanted to communicate something and found a way to make themselves understood. This robotic superficial praise gives students a temporary, external pat on the head, but it ultimately discourages students from developing that internal motivation.
6 ( +6 / -0 )
Robots...because we all know it is impossible to train school teachers to teach elementary English.
This is a glaring problem in Japanese teacher training. The system, which relies almost entirely on senior teachers training younger teachers, has its strengths. But when a new subject is being introduced to the curriculum, there is no "senior" teacher who can train new teachers in methodology for foreign language teaching. The system isn't set up to send teachers back to school themselves to learn something new, and Japan seems unwilling to invest in hiring hundreds of teacher trainers who are expert in EFL at the elementary level to move around the country and train teachers.
-2 ( +0 / -2 )
Warren's family is from Oklahoma, and the link is an old family legend. Cultural affinity is more important, and Warren's progressive policies are quite in tune with Native American culture.
If Warren's family is from Oklahoma, then this DNA test suggests that her family heritage stories are incorrect. Warren claims Cherokee heritage. Cherokees are not native to Oklahoma. They were relocated there from other parts of the U.S. in the 1830s. Warren's European family and Oklahoma Cherokees would not have crossed paths until long after her earliest possible Native American ancestor. Many of Warren's past claims have hinted at a grandparent being 1/4 Native American, which would make her 1/16. This DNA test establishes that any possible Native ancestry is between 6 and 10 generations removed from Warren. At most, one of her grandparents was possibly 1/16 or even as little as 1/256. If her white family intermixed with a Native American, it would have happened long before the Trail of Tears. The DNA doesn't support the family stories that Warren tells.
As for cultural affinity or being politically in tune with Native American culture, please read the Cherokee Nation's response to Warren's DNA test. The tribe regards her actions and words as an illegitimate mockery. Cultural affinity can be manufactured where there is no biological connection, so whatever affinity Warren may feel is irrelevant. The Cherokee Nation is a self-defining people. Warren has tried to make herself part of that tribe by using colonist definitions of heritage rather than tribal definitions. The Cherokee argument that Warren is undermining and hurting the tribe is echoed by many Native American scholars and leaders. On this, her politics are decidedly out-of-tune. Warren is a colonizer who stole benefits intended for Indians to advance her career. If that's not stereotypical white culture, I don't know what is.
2 ( +9 / -7 )
Trump baited Warren again and again about her "fake" heritage claims, and Warren stupidly responded by giving these DNA test results. What do the results prove? That, possibly, Warren had a distant ancestor who may match with that of native Mexicans, Columbians, or Peruvians. At most, she is 1/64 Native American, and it's just as likely that she's 1/1024.
So why was Warren stupid for trying to prove Trump wrong? Because Warren just destroyed the basis of the affirmative action system in the United States. The test means that Warren is between 98.5% and 99.9% white. A typical white American has 0.18% Native American DNA on average. Warren may have as little as half the national average. And yet for decades she claimed Native status to gain preferential career opportunities. No sane person is going to look at that DNA result and agree that Warren was right to claim affirmative action benefits. But if she can legitimately do it, then so can I and so can the vast majority of Americans. The Cherokee Nation has already responded with the request that Warren stop "undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage." This DNA test is only going to make things worse for Warren.
When Trump baits you to do something, don't play his game.
13 ( +14 / -1 )
JET is not a perfectly good system. It's better on average than many of the dispatch companies in terms of quality and training, to be sure, but it's also hugely more expensive. Salaries are higher, which is good for the ALTs, but overhead costs are massive. For every yen spent on a JET's salary, there's at least another yen being spent elsewhere on the program's administrative costs. Overall, it's a massive burden to taxpayers. This is one reason many BOEs opt for direct hires or dispatch companies. JETs aren't cheap.
Japan would do much better simply to scrap the ALT system. It's a product of an outdated, last-centruy, backwards mentality about English education. Assuming that Japanese people can't speak English, and therefore Japanese teachers can't teach communication, and that native speakers automatically qualify to teach communication by birthright...it's all absurd. Instead, for what is currently spent, hire more and better qualified language teachers to permanent contracts. Whether foreign teachers or Japanese teachers does not matter. For the Japanese teachers, send all of them overseas to study English and language teaching methodology for at least 6 months to a year early in their careers (and don't send them to places where they can group with other Japanese people). A lone teacher in a classroom who is skilled in teaching a foreign language is worth triple a JTE and ALT combination who limp along with a mix of poor methods and inexperience.
0 ( +1 / -1 )
Can't the Japanese government renegotiate their trade deal with the EU like someone else is doing? But wait... cheap cheese is easier on people's wallets.... OK, can't Ochiai figure out how to produce his cheese any more cheaply? Using Japanese technology and all that...
Different farming methods (i.e., larger, industrial-scale farms) would help bring down the cost of milk, but it's also partly a matter of land. Feed for cows needs to be grown somewhere. Dairies themselves take up space, too. That means Japanese producers will always be at a disadvantage in competing against low-cost, barrier-free imports.
4 ( +4 / -0 )
Much of the Japanese cheese industry deserves to rot, considering the bland, sub-par product most cheesemakers give us.
These fretting cheesemakers have the wrong view of the market. They're viewing it as a zero-sum, zero-growth game. While the food market overall may not have a lot of room for growth, especially with a shrinking population, cheese has room to take over a much larger share of people's diets. Partly, this requires getting people eating cheese from a young age, which also means getting their parents eating cheese. Partly, this means putting out better, cheaper products along with high-quality specialty products.
Flooding the Japanese market with cheaper cheeses will be disruptive. That's true across nearly all heavily subsidized Japanese agricultural industries. But, with cheese, the market will grow. Japanese people love specialty, premium products, and cheese is full of those. Cheese has tons of relatively cheap, mass-market products that Japanese cheesemakers won't be able to compete with. The mass-market cheeses, however, are gateway products to get people turned on to the exceptional premium cheeses that exist.
Japanese cheesemakers can excel in the specialty market. The upper boundary for what people are willing to pay for top-grade cheeses is very high. Cheesemakers simply need to realize that their way forward is to accept a mass market that undercuts them, while cultivating from that bigger foundation of cheese eaters a larger market of refined palates.
6 ( +6 / -0 )
Schedule Olympic events whenever the best time for the event is. There is no reason to change the entire nation's clock.
The original arguments for introducing Daylight Savings in other countries proved hollow. There aren't grand electricity savings. There's not any boost to commerce. What happens instead is that everyone gets their Circadian cycles disrupted twice a year, which causes documented negative health effects and lower work productivity. Daylight Savings is a stupid relic of the early 20th century that now has considerable science weighing against it. No sensible government today should remotely consider adopting Daylight Savings.
Sadly, "sensible" and "government" don't generally go together.
-2 ( +0 / -2 )
Suicide by cop.
The guy used handing in money as a pretext to get into the police box and earn trust. Then he attacked and predictably fell in a hail of bullets. It's a quick, dopamine-fueled way to go. This is the best explanation I can fathom given the details we know.
2 ( +5 / -3 )
If schools are hiring largely untrained foreigners whose main qualification is having a native accent, and then using them primarily to read scripts and perform in front of students, then there is very little that those human tape recorders do that the robots cannot.
However, what students need are teachers who can establish clear contexts for language, react to students attempts at language, and foster genuine communication. These are fluid tasks full of unpredictable situations. Robots aren't going to help.
In essence, the Japanese government is investing in a flashy robot program that will make Japan's English education efforts look modern and cutting edge, when, in reality, the robots are merely a veneer that allows Japan to continue down its same outmoded, backward path. What's needed is a change in how English is taught. These robots will only reinforce the negative ways of teaching currently used, to the detriment of students. Pity.
7 ( +9 / -2 )
Japan does not honour (nor does anyone else that I know of) American state legal certification. He'd have to redo the bar.
Japanese companies have legal affairs in America. A lawyer who can practice in New York could find clients in Japan. As long as he stuck to cases that were subject to New York jurisdiction and resolves in New York courts, Komuro could do business.
That said, the probable issue here is that the Japanese bar exam is notoriously difficult to pass. Even after Japan reformulated the exam about a dozen years ago, the pass rate hovers around 25 percent. (Before that, it was 2 or 3 percent.) Japan keeps a tight cap on the number of lawyers in the country because there is barely enough demand for legal services as is. Komuro is probably facing up to the reality that he doesn't have much future in the legal profession in Japan if he goes the Japanese bar exam route. He's unlikely to pass. Even if he did, he'd struggle to make money. I wouldn't be at all surprised if he's failed the bar exam repeatedly already, which might be why the parents are demanding to hear some career plans from Komuro before formalizing the engagement. Passing the bar in the U.S. would be easier, and Komuro might still be able to find enough Japanese clients needing representation in the U.S. that he could make a living.
That said, "Will you marry me? Great! By the way, I'm running off to New York for three years," is not a promising start to an engagement.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
why should they risk qualification by searching for a goal and getting caught on the break just to entertain the neutrals?
Why? Because they had no idea how the last ten minutes of the Senegal-Columbia game would play out. Japan's game ended a minute or two before Senegal's did. Senegal was definitely pressing for a goal. They failed. But had Senegal scored, Japan would have found themselves on a plane home already. Playing that non-aggressive strategy makes sense when one controls one's own fate. Japan, however, didn't control its fate. A goal by Senegal would have been a dagger to the heart. Had Columbia been up 2-0 or 3-0, yes, sitting back and doing nothing would have made sense. With the Senegal result in doubt, Japan needed to keep hunting for a goal.
If Senegal had scored, it would have been just desserts for Nishino, and he'd justifiably be fired. It was a stupendously risky strategy. Yes, it happened to pay off, but any coach who puts his team's fate in the hands of a match hundreds of kilometers away rather than placing faith in his own players to win has no business leading a team.
9 ( +13 / -4 )
Up until that last 10-15 minutes, Japan deserved to advance if they could have scored a goal. And they were creating decent chances. Giving up and spending the last 10 minutes passing the ball around at midfield was cowardly and defeatist. I found myself rooting for Senegal to put in a goal, just to embarrass Nishino and his cynical strategy.
11 ( +14 / -3 )
The main reason for expanding to 48 teams is mainly to ensure that China gets included in the World Cup. On the advertising banners around the stadium sidelines, have you seen how many of those advertisements are written in Chinese for Chinese companies? There's more Chinese advertising than there is Russian, which is astounding given that Russia is host and China isn't even playing. So, yes, expect even more crappy teams in the World Cup field in the future.
The second reason is also money. Teams like Italy, the Netherlands, Chile, and the USA would gain a virtually automatic path toward inclusion. Most of these countries have rabid fan bases with good marketing potential. The USA also has lucrative TV rights, which will go down in value if the USA continues to risk missing out in qualification.
What's exciting about qualification now is that a team like Italy or the USA has to play well or risk watching from their TVs at home. Under current allotment proportions, there would be an extra 6.5 spots for Europe, at least two extra spots each for Asia and South America, an extra 2.5 spots for Africa, probably an extra two spots for Central/North America, and a full spot for Oceania. The World Cup group play and the qualification rounds themselves would become mostly meaningless formalities for top teams. No more "groups of death." Lots of lopsided wins. FIFA is making a bet that people will watch anyway. But if the plan backfires, leading to a drop-off of viewers in Europe and the Americas, FIFA's bet is that the increase in money from China will more than make up any losses.
0 ( +0 / -0 )