As much as I despise the CCP, a little context is in order here. Cena was on Weibo or WeChat - both of which were underwritten by the CCP - to promote his movie. He was an invited guest and Cena took the invitation. He then made the 'faux pas' while on CCP-underwritten media. He issued an apology. It's kind of like being invited to someone's house and then saying something offensive to the hosts.
Now, if Cena was on Jimmy Kimmel's show and said 'Taiwan the country' and CCP demanded an apology and Cena then apologized, Cena would be a total loser/coward.
I don't think Cena could even point to Taiwan on a map.
-2 ( +1 / -3 )
No matter what you say, getting 7 strikeouts in one game and then hitting a 451-foot bomb is impressive....even for an ol' codger like stickman. If it was so easy, how come nobody else has done it?
The fact that the phrase 'good old days' was even used tells me everything I need to know. In the good old days, only Nolan Ryan would throw as hard as Ohtani and he had plenty of walks too. And, Nolan didn't exactly hit 450-foot dingers.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
Isn't that what partnership is all about, the more shares you own the more voting rights you get?
The issue was that Renault was not making much profit but getting to make the lion's share of the decisions. And, to be frank, Renault does not exactly have a sterling record for quality, whereas Nissan's (while not the best) exceeded that of Renault. I can see how the two companies did not see eye-to-eye on issues such as quality, emissions, etc.. My feeling is that Renault executives thought of Nissan as a 'subsidiary of Renault' whereas the Nissan executives didn't feel likewise.
In 2017, Nissan sold about 40% more cars than Renault and also likely had a higher profit margin per car than Renault.
Yet, Renault treated Nissan like a subsidiary.
And...Renault was looking into merging with Fiat during 2017. And, I think we all know that Fiat is not exactly the highest quality car manufacturer out there. If that merger went through, Nissan would have had virtually no say whatsoever in the corporate decisions.
Lots of blame to go around. It's basically like a divorce, except in this case it's two companies.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Ghosn turned around Nissan no doubt. However, he suffered from a very, very common CEO problem of 'Empire Building', which is a function of hubris. I think the Nissan-Renault 'merger' was doomed from the start and there's a reason why there are so few international 'mergers of equals'. This was a very tenuous alliance all along and I am quite sure that the French executives ignored the issues raised by Japanese executives. Ghosn thought he could navigate the two cultures and seamlessly integrate the two companies....or subsume Nissan as part of Renault.
Michael Porter had a great line 'Culture eats strategy for breakfast.'
The strategy of being the one of the biggest car companies in the world and benefiting from scale was more than offset by differences in French and Japanese business culture. Ghosn thought he could overcome those hurdles. He was wrong.
Is he guilty of wrongdoing? I rather doubt it and by American standards his corporate perks were pretty run of the mill. But, you could clearly see Japanese executives being upset at (a) being ignored by Ghosn and his cronies and (b) flaunting his wealth/position. (a) is clearly the reason why this all went down and Nissan is using (b) to try Ghosn in the court of public opinion.
2 ( +2 / -0 )
Go ahead, name a 2 or 3 and contrast that to Asians and their high standard of living, high earners on average, hardworking, most graduating with some of the highest degrees, extremely low incarceration rates, family unite intact, so which Black city can match ANY Asian city in the any rich and prosperous Blue State?
Asian Americans don't have a higher standard of living than White Americans after you adjust for cost of living.
There are no 'Asian' cities in America. Yes, there are Asian enclaves, but not Asian cities.
Propaganda? I understand Trump got the highest black vote yet. How do you explain that?
Yes, I guess going from 6% to 12% of black men and from 4% to 6% of black women means that Trump is wildly popular with black Americans?
And...guess what the #1 reason for that increase in the black vote? Immigration.
-4 ( +2 / -6 )
As an American who's accustomed to contract law, at what point does Japan simply have to say 'hey, no more contracts since S. Korean politicians always seem to nullify any prior agreements'?
I've seen some people on here say 'well...Japan needs to live up to its side of the deal'? Like how? Never going to Yasukuni shrine? Yeah, that's a great idea. Restrict someone's movement in their own home country. Apologize? Hasn't Japan apologized enough already?
It's just such an easy solution for S. Korean politicians to use whenever they need support for flagging poll #'s.
7 ( +8 / -1 )
A 46% decline in 10 years is astounding. Alas, this is Japan. This means that (a) no one wants to talk about an obvious problem (lest the 'wa' gets disrupted) and (b) no one wants to de-romanticize Koshien....even though pretty much every team that wins is a high school that offers 'scholarships' and then proceeds to practice throughout the year (and in the process, destroying far too many young pitcher arms).
I love NPB, but high school Japanese baseball needs a lot of work.
The comment about 'incompetent HS coaches' rings very, very true.
4 ( +4 / -0 )
At least Biden will be consistent and the traditional U.S. allies will be more closely allied with the U.S. than with Trump, who was mercurial and ridiculously undisciplined and unorganized.
I think many on here love to rip on the U.S.-Japan relationship as being one-sided (especially the Europeans) in favor of America, but keep in mind, Japan has run a really big trade surplus with America pretty much forever. Japan gets to keep exporting its goods to America, while 'diplomatically' refusing to buy too much American imports and, in return, gets a bit cowed by the U.S. military presence. The trade surplus with America always hovers around $50bn-$80bn a year.
And, yes, many Japanese would love to get rid of the U.S. military presence here, but at the same time, REALLY don't want any more Chinese aggression either.
2 ( +2 / -0 )
For those who think that Chinese and Vietnamese gangs will 'run the casino' in Japan, I think you're being overly doubtful of Japan, Inc. America continually accuses China of IP theft, yet Japan has managed to keep IP theft to China at a minimum. When Chinese investors threatened to overrun the B-and-B business, Japan did a really good job of curtailing that practice. Yes, of course there will be corruption. But at the end of the day, it's probably a big, net benefit for Japan.
-4 ( +1 / -5 )
Nagasaki/Sasebo would be a boon to that area. Truthfully, this is just another way of increasing government tax revenues on the backs of tourists. When the working population continually shrinks and the retirement community explodes, something has to replace that tax revenue.
Most likely, a casino will be overrun with Chinese tourists...which makes it less attractive to the native Japanese population....which means less to worry about in terms of native gambling addiction.
I know the casino is not exactly popular here, but how else is Japan going to replace the tax revenue that is lost every time 2 Japanese retire (and stop paying taxes) and only 1 Japanese enters the workforce? I know it may not be a 2 to 1 ratio, but I think we can all agree that the # of Japanese new retirees/day is greater than the # of Japanese new workforce entrants/day.
1 ( +3 / -2 )
Message to any Korean-Americans:
You cannot on one hand claim to be a 'perpetual foreigner', yet continue your 'heritage's home country' baggage in America without being a total hypocrite.
Kudos to Germany. Also, for anyone in Germany trying that $hit....goodness don't you have a life to live other than to torment Japan about something that happened 75 years ago?
19 ( +30 / -11 )
China wants to be thought of as a world leader to stroke their ego and the CCP's. They like the spotlight, but can't stand the heat.
As a member of the 'Anglosphere' we have a saying: if you've got nothing to hide, then show me everything.
8 ( +9 / -1 )
So...a neighboring country with a major chip on its shoulder and long, bitter grudge has exhibited the following:
Violent border disputes with India;
Forceful takeover of Hong Kong;
Blocking water flows to its neighboring countries;
Built military bases in Africa (now why might that be?);
Built artificial islands in the SCS;
Has a military budget greater than all other Asian countries...COMBINED;
And...yet Japan is the one with 'so many unrepentant militarists'?
Yikes, I suppose we should all learn Mandarin right now.
3 ( +8 / -5 )
China's goal is simple: to return it to what THEY think is ITS RIGHTFUL PLACE on Earth:
That is, the "Center" of everything. Chinese population, nationalism, restrictions on informational access and ethnocentrism, combined with a fascist government, is a recipe for disaster, if not war. China's action in the South China Seas is Exhibit A of this recent trend of 'We're China, deal with it' attitude, combined with a 'hey, HISTORICALLY we were the greatest empire, so all we are REALLY doing is reclaiming our past empire.'
Exhibit B? The building of artificial islands of the coast of China.
Exhibit C? Choking off the water supply to the Southern neighbors of Viet Nam, Laos, Cambodia.
Exhibit D? The VIOLENT and deadly border dispute with India.
Exhibit E? Hong Kong.
Exhibit F? Uighur situation in Xianjiang (or is that 'Western propaganda', Akie?).
Exhibit G? An unprecedented military buildup because...Japan is going to attack China again, or is it Korea, or is it India? Please be real here.
Say what you will about the U.S., the U.S. actually holds elections and allows its citizens to (a) discover, obtain and inveigh upon different viewpoints (b) CRITICIZE its own government (ha, try that in China, Akie!) and (c) vote out Presidents (and there's that whole 'term limit' deal unlike 'Emperor for Life' Xi).
9 ( +10 / -1 )
Laughably poorly researched article AND extremely misleading:
'Japan has a notably high suicide rate.'
NOT SO MUCH ANYMORE! In fact, the suicide rate in Japan has been DECLINING FOR THE PAST 10 years.
In fact, it's almost gone down FORTY PERCENT IN THE LAST 10 years from 25.7 to 16.
And, guess what Luke? The 16 per 100,000 in Japan is....only about 10% more than the U.S.'s 14.2 in 2018.
But...please change the subject (before too much scrutiny is given to your faulty analysis and misleading verbiage) and focus on teen suicide.
Because 'Between 2016 and 2017, more young people killed themselves than any period since 1986.'
YOU FAIL TO MENTION THAT Young person suicide in Japan is a very small percentage of the overall suicides in Japan with less than 5% (or 4.3%) of the overall suicides in Japan being from those between 10-19. If you want to include those of the Terrace House member the rate is less than 17%.
1 ( +2 / -1 )
This is very lame attempt at PR by the CCP. The CCP can point to this 'attempt' to reduce the wildlife trade - notice how they ANNOUNCED IT FOR THE WORLD TO SEE! - and then have local, corrupt officials look the other way when the wildlife trade systematically returns within a year/after the Western media attention dies down.
The CCP can say 'hey, look at us, we're taking steps to reduce the wildlife trade'....but won't let anybody investigate how effective it is enforced. Kind of like their 'actions' to reduce their emissions. Lots of talk, little results.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
The CHO...err WHO have clearly outed themselves as a corrupt mouthpiece of the CCP. No pun intended, but who cares what the WHO says?
5 ( +6 / -1 )
Nice try China. The PR move is far too late. Everyone knows that within a year or so, the wet markets (or whatever they referred to) will be back. The demand for 'freshness' supercedes a concern for health.
Moreover, interesting how this article came about. I thought China had kicked out all the U.S. reporters? Alas, China is trying to 'show' how they've cleaned up their act (ha, ha, ha!).
Kind of like how China is 'trying' to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. Rather, they are reducing the annual INCREASE in their annual emissions. So, instead of polluting at 70 kph, they are now polluting at 50 kph, but still increasing the overall output of emissions.
CCP, no one trusts you.
2 ( +3 / -1 )
Well, let's see here: China did not allow the CDC access to China, the WHO ignored Taiwan (because of China), the WHO parroted pretty much every line the CCP gave it to say and - sad to say for most non-Americans on this board - the U.S. has footed the biggest portion of the WHO budget for pretty much it entire existence. Yes, that sounds like Yankee boasting. But, apparently, it is more effective to buy votes directly (ala China) than to fund an agency. Since Tedros isn't going anywhere (thanks to China), what is the U.S. to do? 'Cooperate' with the WHO and its 'Chinese characterstics'? What good has that done to date? The WHO is not independent and quite honestly has failed in its mission.
1 ( +2 / -1 )
The answer for New York's poor leadership is as simple as that of Japan's: the failure to shut down public transportation. Virtually everyone in New York takes the subway. If you don't shut down the subway, what good is a quarantine anyway? HALF of all American coronavirus deaths are in New York and New Jersey. If it was truly poor American leadership, then half of all deaths wouldn't be concentrated in an area with less than 1/10 of American population.
-1 ( +0 / -1 )
China is a long ways away from being an influential country on global scale. And the answer lies in its attitude towards other countries. Virtually all democracies (i.e. Europe, Americas, Japan, Australia) despise the CCP because the CCP stands for values that are antithetical to democracy. Authoritarian countries don't mind China since (a) China can (and has) bribed MANY a foreign politician and (b) the bribed head of states can control the media narrative about China.
So, when China throws its usually hissy fit about being criticized (see Australia, America, Brazil), the CCP seems to think that because they cannot be criticized by Chinese citizens, they cannot be criticized by other countries within its 'web of influence.' Newsflash to ethnocentric Chinese: the rest of the world (especially 'the West' which is code for Democracies) does NOT think like you and NO you cannot 'buy' the suppression of a nation's voices.
We have a saying here in America 'if you want respect, you give it.' China's CCP doesn't seem to grasp that concept...and, guess what, in democratically elected countries, the CCP's image is awful.
3 ( +4 / -1 )
It is difficult at a time like this to say anything positive about the CCP. To take pot shots at the U.S. when - once again - the CCP was 'less than forthcoming' about the pandemic at the outset is just petty and pathetic. Apparently, the CCP seems to think that the 'Western media' is either too dumb to remember the SARS debacle (when the CCP withheld information from everybody) or too mean to Chinese because the U.S. feels 'threatened' by China's 'rise'. Personally, I think that the CCP is using the 'foreigner card' again to win support among the rank-and-file Chinese.
6 ( +7 / -1 )
The focus on China is for a reason: what other country do you know might actually try to sell tainted 'Wagyu beef' in an attempt to make a quick yuan?
I am sorry but the last thing the Japanese cattle industry needs is a cheap Chinese knock off.
I know that won't please the Japan bashers on the board here, but thus far Japanese Wagyu beef and the Japanese cattle industry have done a great job in marketing and operations - especially operations. Yes, it's classic Japanese 'uber control' of everything to the point of being anal retentive, but it has worked very well. Americans, Britons and others recognize that Wagyu beef usually entails a higher quality cut of steak (I am not a huge fan of it, but some Americans and Britons are more than willing to pay a premium for it). These consumers are - for now - savvy enough to know that a cheap Chinese knock off is probably (a) not raised in the same manner and (b) probably injected with a ton of growth hormones. However, it won't take long for the Chinese to do what they usually do when they enter a market: compete solely on price, cheat on materials, etc. and take the market down a rabbit hole.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
Speaking as an American and a 'rule of law' country, once a deal/contract is made, the countries should honor it. Otherwise, why do the deal in the first place and second, why would you ever re-negotiate a deal with someone who doesn't abide by the original agreement? Remember, it's not as though the 2015 Korea was in dire straits and was forced to sign the 2015 accord. So, why did Korea sign the 2015 agreement if they were going to re-visit it/re-litigate it?
I haven't really seen an answer to that question.
12 ( +14 / -2 )
One voice, one people, one northeast asia.
Yes, just like one country, two systems. Nobody - outside of those who are Chinese or receiving $$$ from China - wants to be 'unified' with China.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
Episode IX was solid, probably mid-pack in terms of the nine movies. The first three were awesome, obviously. Although the Return of the Jedi was not the best. The second three, the first two (one with Jar Jar Binks) were awful. Episode VIII was pretty awful as well. Given all that was on the plate, Episode IX did the best that it could, considering it had to wrap up many loose ends (since it was supposed to be the 'final' episode).
I agree that the Leia scenes were really forced, however.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Article written by a Chinese-American (or perhaps as many are wont to do: American Born Chinese). Let's do the numbers here:
Asian-Americans represent approximately 5.6% of Americans. Of that, 40% are Christian.
That makes is approximately 2.2%....so about 1 in 50. Which would be the equivalent of a 'rare Asian face'.
The author of this story has a twitter feed, check it out:
My feeling is that the author didn't do too much research before being triggered by the phrase 'diversity' that didn't include Asian-Americans (or more importantly American Born Chinese). Nothing gets Chinese-Americans more triggered and angered than the phrase 'diversity' or 'affirmative action' that does not include Chinese-Americans.
Oh, one other thing, whenever there's a Christmas movie, it's usually snowing. And that would exclude California....and if you exclude California, the percentage of Asian-Americans in the states that have snow is even lower:
Wisconsin= 2.6% Asian-American;
Michigan= 2.6% Asian-American;
North Dakota= 2.7% Asian-American;
South Dakota= 0.9% Asian-American;
Iowa= 2.3% Asian-American;
So, now we're talking about even less...approximately 1% of snowy-state, Christmas celebrating Asian-Americans.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
It's not about the trade imbalance as much as it is about China using the trade imbalance to underwrite and fortify their military ambitions. Supply and demand theories go out the door when one is discussing national security.
-1 ( +0 / -1 )
S. Korea caved. The word was 'reversal'. And that word was used to describe S. Korea, not Japan.
15 ( +18 / -3 )
Posted in: You can now rent 'fat people' in Japan
Posted in: You can now rent 'fat people' in Japan