The answer for New York's poor leadership is as simple as that of Japan's: the failure to shut down public transportation. Virtually everyone in New York takes the subway. If you don't shut down the subway, what good is a quarantine anyway? HALF of all American coronavirus deaths are in New York and New Jersey. If it was truly poor American leadership, then half of all deaths wouldn't be concentrated in an area with less than 1/10 of American population.
-1 ( +0 / -1 )
China is a long ways away from being an influential country on global scale. And the answer lies in its attitude towards other countries. Virtually all democracies (i.e. Europe, Americas, Japan, Australia) despise the CCP because the CCP stands for values that are antithetical to democracy. Authoritarian countries don't mind China since (a) China can (and has) bribed MANY a foreign politician and (b) the bribed head of states can control the media narrative about China.
So, when China throws its usually hissy fit about being criticized (see Australia, America, Brazil), the CCP seems to think that because they cannot be criticized by Chinese citizens, they cannot be criticized by other countries within its 'web of influence.' Newsflash to ethnocentric Chinese: the rest of the world (especially 'the West' which is code for Democracies) does NOT think like you and NO you cannot 'buy' the suppression of a nation's voices.
We have a saying here in America 'if you want respect, you give it.' China's CCP doesn't seem to grasp that concept...and, guess what, in democratically elected countries, the CCP's image is awful.
3 ( +4 / -1 )
It is difficult at a time like this to say anything positive about the CCP. To take pot shots at the U.S. when - once again - the CCP was 'less than forthcoming' about the pandemic at the outset is just petty and pathetic. Apparently, the CCP seems to think that the 'Western media' is either too dumb to remember the SARS debacle (when the CCP withheld information from everybody) or too mean to Chinese because the U.S. feels 'threatened' by China's 'rise'. Personally, I think that the CCP is using the 'foreigner card' again to win support among the rank-and-file Chinese.
6 ( +7 / -1 )
The focus on China is for a reason: what other country do you know might actually try to sell tainted 'Wagyu beef' in an attempt to make a quick yuan?
I am sorry but the last thing the Japanese cattle industry needs is a cheap Chinese knock off.
I know that won't please the Japan bashers on the board here, but thus far Japanese Wagyu beef and the Japanese cattle industry have done a great job in marketing and operations - especially operations. Yes, it's classic Japanese 'uber control' of everything to the point of being anal retentive, but it has worked very well. Americans, Britons and others recognize that Wagyu beef usually entails a higher quality cut of steak (I am not a huge fan of it, but some Americans and Britons are more than willing to pay a premium for it). These consumers are - for now - savvy enough to know that a cheap Chinese knock off is probably (a) not raised in the same manner and (b) probably injected with a ton of growth hormones. However, it won't take long for the Chinese to do what they usually do when they enter a market: compete solely on price, cheat on materials, etc. and take the market down a rabbit hole.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
Speaking as an American and a 'rule of law' country, once a deal/contract is made, the countries should honor it. Otherwise, why do the deal in the first place and second, why would you ever re-negotiate a deal with someone who doesn't abide by the original agreement? Remember, it's not as though the 2015 Korea was in dire straits and was forced to sign the 2015 accord. So, why did Korea sign the 2015 agreement if they were going to re-visit it/re-litigate it?
I haven't really seen an answer to that question.
12 ( +14 / -2 )
One voice, one people, one northeast asia.
Yes, just like one country, two systems. Nobody - outside of those who are Chinese or receiving $$$ from China - wants to be 'unified' with China.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
Episode IX was solid, probably mid-pack in terms of the nine movies. The first three were awesome, obviously. Although the Return of the Jedi was not the best. The second three, the first two (one with Jar Jar Binks) were awful. Episode VIII was pretty awful as well. Given all that was on the plate, Episode IX did the best that it could, considering it had to wrap up many loose ends (since it was supposed to be the 'final' episode).
I agree that the Leia scenes were really forced, however.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Article written by a Chinese-American (or perhaps as many are wont to do: American Born Chinese). Let's do the numbers here:
Asian-Americans represent approximately 5.6% of Americans. Of that, 40% are Christian.
That makes is approximately 2.2%....so about 1 in 50. Which would be the equivalent of a 'rare Asian face'.
The author of this story has a twitter feed, check it out:
My feeling is that the author didn't do too much research before being triggered by the phrase 'diversity' that didn't include Asian-Americans (or more importantly American Born Chinese). Nothing gets Chinese-Americans more triggered and angered than the phrase 'diversity' or 'affirmative action' that does not include Chinese-Americans.
Oh, one other thing, whenever there's a Christmas movie, it's usually snowing. And that would exclude California....and if you exclude California, the percentage of Asian-Americans in the states that have snow is even lower:
Wisconsin= 2.6% Asian-American;
Michigan= 2.6% Asian-American;
North Dakota= 2.7% Asian-American;
South Dakota= 0.9% Asian-American;
Iowa= 2.3% Asian-American;
So, now we're talking about even less...approximately 1% of snowy-state, Christmas celebrating Asian-Americans.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
It's not about the trade imbalance as much as it is about China using the trade imbalance to underwrite and fortify their military ambitions. Supply and demand theories go out the door when one is discussing national security.
-1 ( +0 / -1 )
S. Korea caved. The word was 'reversal'. And that word was used to describe S. Korea, not Japan.
15 ( +18 / -3 )
Very good and a great day for democracy, let’s hope Beijing respects the process, I have my doubts, but I pray that they do.
China listens to no one. If someone says they have an unfavorable opinion of China, China simply says 'you are uneducated about China.'
I have feeling this is simply cover for China in the near future to say 'see, elections were held and there is STILL violence....clearly democracy is not helping anyone in Hong Kong. It's time for China/Beijing to 'help' stabilize things in Hong Kong'.
5 ( +5 / -0 )
South Korea and Moon caved. Simple as that. You don't say 'let GSOMIA lapse' and then turn around and say 'we'll take measures to make it work' within 3 weeks.
For all of their bluster, the South Koreans look impetuous and foolish.
For all of you that say 'Japan hasn't done enough about the atrocities of WWII', I will say this:
In virtually all wars, after a war is complete there are reparations, treaties, etc.. Please tell me which post-war treaty has been constantly referred to as 'unfair' and which said country continues - 70 years later mind you - to refer to that treaty?
Also, why would Japan fork over that much $$ only to have Korea say 'we want more' 70 years (almost 75) later?'. You don't give that much money on the premise that 'well, we will just pay more as time goes by.'
Whenever a South Korean PM gets into trouble, the Japan-bashing commences.
4 ( +6 / -2 )
This will blow over and Korea will look like idiots. Then, just when a high ranking Korean politician is nearing a scandal, back to the well it will go. Not a coincidence that Moon is in trouble politically and - just like that - the Japan-bashing started.
Cooler heads prevailed in this one.
0 ( +7 / -7 )
Yes, the murder rate is incredibly low in Japan and that is why THESE types of murders are reported, because there are so few murders to begin with.
1 ( +2 / -1 )
I just saw the video. This is hilariously obvious. Clearly staged, laughably heavy handed. Notice how PERFECT the Cell Phone Camera angle was, how PERFECT the timing was, how the 'assailant' had spoke a very honorable - but sneaky - way to Ho and then - ta da! - stabs Ho just like in a Hollywood movie. All captured perfectly for the camera.
My goodness the CCP will stop at nothing.
5 ( +5 / -0 )
There's already undeniable proof that the PLA is dressing up as Hong Kong police and beating up protesters. Why shouldn't we believe such a wicked and unrepentant regime as the CCP wouldn't lower itself to assassinating it's own people to control the narrative? I'm not saying this is 100% certain to be true, i'm just pointing out that it wouldn't surprise me if it was revealed that the attack was planned by the CCP to undermine the protests.
This is quite believable. The CCP has long been accused of - by multiple sources including 'non-Western' sources - such awful things as detention camps, organ harvesting and the 'forced bedding' of Uighur women.
Yet, this same CCP government would somehow NEVER stoop to a planned attack? Apparently, the CCP is so principled that it would draw the line at a staged attack.
5 ( +5 / -0 )
Self reflection is not a trait that Chinese are known for. It's a very bad sign when the more people have contact with you, the worse the impression. China is in pretty unique territory in that regard.
4 ( +4 / -0 )
Funny, this article says that China is keeping its rhetoric neutral. Uh, that would be incorrect, to put it mildly. I also remind everyone on board here that China's annual military budget is now at $170 billion. Granted, the U.S. military budget is approximately four times that amount, but, remember, China's military budget dwarfs that of pretty much the entirety of non-Chinese, Asian countries AND that the trade surplus that China enjoys helps to fund that military expansion.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Great business move.
Winning the Olympics for America = Americans will yawn.
Winning the Olympics for Japan in Japan? HUGE endorsements from Japan and virtually ZERO downside from the perspective of her potential American endorsements.
Want to later 'change her mind' and become an American citizen? Far, far, far easier in America than claiming American citizenship and then trying to later on get Japanese citizenship.
Not a difficult decision at all.
5 ( +7 / -2 )
China is interesting and getting more and more brazen by the day. This isn't going away anytime soon. This is heading towards a Cold War and a very long one at that. Silver should know that the CCP controls everything in China and it wouldn't be long before China played this hand. The CCP tries to weaponize everything without actually resorting to violence - provided, of course, that the CCP thinks it can 'win'. Otherwise, they whine like the little brats that they truly are.
2 ( +2 / -0 )
Give credit to Japan, they know how to deal with Chinese very well. I know Abe is ridiculed here, but he has done a very good job of dealing with China. Unlike the U.S., Japanese companies have not suffered nearly the IP theft (yes, I said 'theft') that America has and it's manufacturing base has not been as devastated as America's. Plus, Japan REALLY - quite correctly - cracked down on Chinese 'investment' in Japanese real estate (yes, the AirBnB debacle was centered around Chinese investment in Japanese real estate).
I personally think Abe is correct in wanting to re-start the military here in Japan. Of course, there's a lot of wiggle room about the strategic 'defense' force, but if anybody thinks China has 'good intentions' with respect to ANYTHING they do internationally, I've got a bridge to sell you.
1 ( +2 / -1 )
This works in the long run. And, quite frankly, it's the only real option left on the table. I am waiting for someone (other than Akie) to inform me the last time diplomacy worked with China. It is obvious that China has a huge chip on its shoulder and would clearly like to challenge America and they currently are in terms of remote islands like the Solomon Islands, etc.. China has major, major world ambitions and when a country like China has 'ambitions', bad things are bound to happen. Especially if it continues unabated.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
The #1 reason is Japan's crushing work attitude - and it's the most dominant factor by a long, long way. For women, I would love to know what the weighting of the factors are, but I would think it's the work attitude and the sexism. I live in America, which is one of the bigger destinations for Japanese who want to get away. Virtually all of them say work-life balance and, for the women, they also mention the sexism. The third problem that many stated was that there was no real change/hope for change and far too much 'shoganai' about the work situation. The expatriates knew it wasn't going to change so they basically said 'I'm outta here.'
However, given how fluffy this article is 'it's a trend, says Spa!', it's very difficult to see just how big a trend it is. I can tell you the trend for Japanese students to get their graduate degree in America or abroad has declined dramatically by 30%. So, this is in direct conflict with this story here. Apparently, young students in Japan do not want to go abroad. Notice how this article actually gives numbers.
Granted, 20% decline in the # of students overall, but that still means another 10% decline in the number of students going abroad. Now, what I would like to know is how that 10% decline in both % and sheer number corresponds to the number of Japanese who've decided to live abroad/leave Japan.
2 ( +2 / -0 )
As an American, this is what I hate about Korean-Americans. On the one hand, they complain about their 'perpetual foreigner status', yet, on the other hand, they INSIST on bringing their Korean-related baggage with them to America. If you are truly American, you would've probably left that baggage behind. Same thing with Chinese Americans and how they insisted on putting a comfort woman statue in the middle of Chinatown, San Francisco. Virtually ALL Americans besides the 2% of Chinese and Korean-Americans label the Sea of Japan the 'Sea of Japan'. 98% of Americans (besides the same 2% - at most) also have virtually no idea what the comfort woman issue is and - if they do - know it is high time to put that issue aside.
Cannot have it both ways.
13 ( +17 / -4 )
Not enough detail since a 'cut' in tariffs could be a 5% or 10% or 20% cut. Plus, Japanese car companies are producing an ever-increasing share of their cars for America in America (and I have no idea is those cars are subject to tariffs or if those cars count in the percentage of cars made by Japanese companies and does that lower the overall tariff %).
-1 ( +0 / -1 )
Dear Prime Minister Moon:
Please come to your senses. You have picked a fight with Japan, Japan responded is a civilized but strong manner and....you dig in your heels. Meanwhile, one of your aides is in trouble, the Korean economy is stagnant and....you decided to play the 'anti-Japan' card for the umpteenth time. Sorry, this is really tiresome.
14 ( +33 / -19 )
Again, for those that bash Trump on this issue, what would YOU do about China?
Diplomacy with China is a non-starter. China breaks virtually every contract/international law out there and will continue to do so.
I don't agree with Trump on many issues, but I do agree with his stance on China.
1 ( +8 / -7 )
Japan's international reputation is not tarnished one bit by this latest skirmish. Nobody in America or the Western hemisphere cares about this re-hashing of 'you didn't apologize/yes I did' again and again. Ditto Australia, Europe and Africa. I suppose on could say China might be slightly interested in this, since they likely sympathize with Korea. India could care less and often times think Koreans are being far too petty since India doesn't appear to harbor much resentment towards England.
Move on, quit picking at the scab.
6 ( +9 / -3 )
So, for those that bash Trump and the trade war, what would you do about China?
It's funny how many of the same people who laud Abe for standing firm against Korea, somehow cannot say the same about Trump and his stance on China.
-2 ( +3 / -5 )
Not a fan of Trump, but he's the first U.S. President to recognize China for what it is and for what it is not. He was the first U.S. President to put a spotlight on China's trade abuses and how China leverages its trade to weaken other countries and to strengthen themselves.
-3 ( +5 / -8 )