neowave comments

Posted in: Tonkotsu ramen potato chips from popular Hakata ramen chain See in context

Anything Tonkotsu Ramen count me in. Ippudo is delicious in Osaka or Tokyo. Will definitely be on the lookout.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Posted in: WHO vaccine drive bedeviled by familiar question: Who pays if things go wrong? See in context

What is wrong with that? it is obvious that effective monitoring systems are required to continuously corroborate safety and efficacy, 

Except her statement much later behind closed doors reveals that they do not have safe monitoring systems she claimed:

"I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don't have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries, and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we're not able to give clear cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine, and this always gets blown up in the media"

Here are her statements at the 3 minute mark (for your convenience - BUT I know you'll write it off as no need to worry. These vaccines are in fact "SAFE")

I know it completely destroys your endlessly repeated argument that any new vaccine will not have long term studies of safety (since the natural infection neither does, and have demonstrated much more risks on the short and medium term), but that is a very poor reason to try and live in denial of the hidden dangers of a disease. Knowledge allows for people to be careful instead of scared, as the antivaxxers would wish. Always with the appeal of the "possible" dangers that lurk over the next immunization and how people would likely die or be left invalid over something that has proved to be much safer than the diseases they prevent.

You talk as if the coronavirus vaccine will be the end to the pandemic. It will not.

The bar has already been set so low for approval:

ONLY reduces cough and headache IF YOU GET COVID-19

What is the goal of a safe vaccine? Prevent infection and transmission (to prevent death) right?!

Well, it's looking like it won't do that. If something changes I will monitoring those details but looks like the bar is already set very low PLUS if you're lucky you have a good chance of getting a wallop of negative side effects (fever over 100 for 5 or more hours, severe headache, expect to take a day off the next day, fainting -whose going to catch you). AND these are healthy volunteers above 18-65 (you said some people above that)

The real kicker? Who of those volunteers had the actual COVID-19 infection? And from phase II & III seeing negative adverse events already and still you're pushing the " happens all the will all be fine" cause the 0.1%-0.5% death rate causes you grave concern. You don't look at age, you don't look at comorbidities you keep pushing the pharma agenda that "you never know...asymptomatic people are vulnerable too so you'd better get vaccinated with this new COVID-19 vaccine regardless.

*"*Potential Injuries

*Vaccines are designed to trigger the immune system into fighting off diseases. In rare instances, they can cause it to go into hyperdrive, resulting in severe allergic reactions and even paralysis. With potentially hundreds of millions of people getting vaccinated against one disease, *even a very small percentage can translate into a lot of injured people.

*The potential volume of people affected “will be too much for some unfunded compensation program,”** said Topping, currently chief legal officer of CareSource Management Group Inc., a Dayton, Ohio-based non-profit that’s one of the nation’s largest Medicaid-managed health care plans."*

Once long term studies in children, pregnant women, those who have more comorbidities, seniors 65 and above that this "liquid confidence" is supposed to protect. And now if they are injured they will not be compensated?

Looks like you're on your own so tread carefully and follow the reactions from each of the vaccine manufacturer trials (you could care less about them probably). It's not looking to be fine and dandy like you say it is. You're almost oblivious to any adverse reactions those volunteers have. Which is troubling to see for a vaccine that only reduces cough and headache...with a bar set that doesn't prevent infection, transmission, hospitalization and death. Not a vaccine in my opinion. Just a shot that reduces cold symptoms but gives you a major blast of the flu symptoms for 1 or 2 days (from what I've seen so far).

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Posted in: WHO vaccine drive bedeviled by familiar question: Who pays if things go wrong? See in context

What?!! I thought vaccines were safe and effective!

Vaccines ARE safe and effective with VERY GOOD SAFETY MONITORING SYSTEMS according to W.H.O.'s chief scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan

"Vaccines are safe. That's why they have vaccine safety systems. Robust vaccine safety systems. WHO works with countries to ensure vaccines do what they do best: Prevent disease without risks"

1 week later after that statement...behind closed doors at W.H.O. Global Vaccine Safety Summit Meeting December 2019 she says:

"I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don't have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries, and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we're not able to give clear cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine, and this always gets blown up in the media"

because every week or so a new consequence is found, even on people that were asymptomatic.

You just had to add that last tidbit didn't you virusrex? It's just not safe out there....better get your injections today. Because, because "every week or so a new consequence is found".

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Boy, lot of armchair medics chiming in here.

just make your own decision based on the advice of real doctors.

don’t have to waste more time than that.

Apologies for being one of the armchair medics here. After seeing virusrex pushing the "pharma can do no wrong with their "safe" vaccines" and explaining away all issues as if they were minimal....just had to start putting more info out there for others to decide for themselves. Wouldn't be surprised if he's being paid by pharma to "calm the worries about vaccines" and further push their narrative onto several forums/sites.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 is what concerns me the most for Americans.

"Americans who suffer adverse reactions to coronavirus vaccines that the U.S. is racing to develop will have a hard time getting compensated for injuries from the drugs.

That’s because pandemic-related claims for vaccines will be routed to a rarely used federal program set up to encourage drugmakers to help combat public health emergencies. It spares pharmaceutical and device makers from costly liability lawsuits in exchange for taxpayers compensating injured patients — though it doesn’t guarantee there’s funding to do so."

"Connection between vaxx and autism has definitely not been debunked. And why would we need a fund for injuries if vaccines are safe? Answer: They are not."

Since it began in 2009, the program has paid out less than $6 million, and it has yet to receive any dedicated U.S. government funding for Covid-19." -'re on your own if you or your family is injured by this COVID-19 vaccine.

We hear "The Science in Settled" and you are no longer allowed to question the safety of vaccines? "Informed consent" rarely exists now among doctors as they aren't aware of the ingredients / possible risks / adverse events in each shot or even the fact that they grow the weakened viruses (depending on the vaccine) in chicken, mice, aborted fetal tissue and even insect cells and then injected them saying that they are totally safe and if you dare question that you are labeled a quack or antivaxxer. Hmmm....something's gone off the rails here.

Not a single vaccine on the CDC’s vaccine schedule has been subjected to “double-blind randomized placebo-controlled” studies. Due to the 1986 vaccine act, vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued for vaccine damage, but they regularly lose lawsuits on drugs that they manufacture, which are tested and approved by the FDA. Why should we trust them with vaccines that are not tested?

The risks of vaccines are very real, and parents are NOT allowed to question their safety.

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

You know what is much worse than having a headache for a few hours? dying from COVID-19. Specially when you don't even know if the headaches have anything to do with the vaccine (because it is still possible each of the people with the side effects got a placebo)

Life is not perfect, but if the worst case scenario is that a vaccine gives you a terribly low chance of having a bad day, that would still be better than a higher chance of spending a couple of weeks on the ICU with who knows what long lasting sequelae or even dying from the infection.

You're absolutely right. We need to vaccinate with this COVID-19 vaccine....for a "deadly" coronavirus.

"*According to the latest immunological studies, the overall lethality of Covid-19 (IFR) in the general population ranges between 0.1% and 0.5% in most countries, which is comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968.*"

I know you're going to try to discredit that site (like you do every site that doesn't agree with your narrative of pharma does no wrong) so look at their sources in the tables. The links to data by country, charts are all there.

But yeah...let's keep the fear going. It'll help sell the pharma narrative that putting your family through serious negative adverse events (or risk of) is perfect for reducing your cough and headache (even if it doesn't prevent infection, transmission, hospitalization and death from COVID-19).

-2 ( +7 / -9 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

So having a terribly small percentage of people with heavy side effects over a few hours (even if they themselves did not know if they were given the vaccine or placebo) somehow proves that everybody will now have them?

Now you are just dismissing the adverse events as if they were meaningless and that we have nothing to worry about....these severely negative side effects happen...nothing to see here...move along. C'mon son!

Here's some discussion on the Forbes article to help you put things in better perspective:

-4 ( +5 / -9 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Excerpts from the Forbes article:

"We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols—Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca—do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache."

"The greatest fear people have is dying from this disease. A vaccine must significantly or entirely reduce deaths from Covid-19. Over two hundred thousand people have died in the United States and nearly a million worldwide. None list mortality as a critical endpoint."

"It appears that all the pharmaceutical companies assume that the vaccine will never prevent infection. Their criteria for approval is the difference in symptoms between an infected control group and an infected vaccine group. They do not measure the difference between infection and noninfection as a primary motivation."

" It boggles the mind and defies common sense that the National Institute of Health, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and the rest would consider the approval of a vaccine that would be distributed to hundreds of millions on such slender threads of success."

"It appears that these trials are intended to pass the lowest possible barrier of success."

"It is clear from these studies that the vaccines currently under trial will not be the silver bullet needed to end the pandemic."

I'm surprised at your confidence hasn't wavered one bit in this unreleased vaccine and again NO LONG TERM STUDIES AND NO STUDIES ON EFFECTS ON CHILDREN, PREGNANT MOTHERS and the ELDERLY. Well...if you're that confident then go for it. It'll help you reduce your cough and headache while likely causing more severe side effects (high fever, severe headache, exhaustion, inability to focus, out of commission for at least a day) that will put you out for a day or two (and more than 1 dose each year). Just make sure you have a caretaker present. If you have children make sure you, yourself experience the side effects first before deciding they should be injected a couple times per year on a yearly basis. God forbid everyone gets their injection the same day. 

If this COVID-19 vaccine you are so looking forward to:

Won't stop transmission

Won't stop hospitalization

Won't stop death

Only reduces your cough and headache IF YOU GET COVID-19

With severe side effects in normally healthy people

Untested on children and pregnant mothers (what adverse side effects will they have?)


you must be getting paid very well to keep parroting the narrative that everyone should be looking forward to this vaccine without hesitation. Good job. Go pharma.

1 ( +10 / -9 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Also, if you need to revisit the current side effects here is the CNBC article published this month:

Side effects from final Phase III:

I'm sure you'll find a way to say that it'll all be totally safe and we can look forward to giving it to children and pregnant mothers. Go pharma go.

-2 ( +7 / -9 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Completely false. Any vaccine approved is required to do all three things safely.

Pulling out of the air that they have no efficacy is very easy, the difficult part is to prove it. Specially because phase III of the clinical trials is not even finished, so it is impossible to have the necessary data to prove it.

This is just a terribly bad attempt of misinformation.

Here you go:

Forbes Article Author:

Prof. William A. Haeltine

Professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health

Founded two academic research departments, the Division of Biochemical Pharmacology and the Division of Human Retrovirology

I'm sure you're going to find a way to character assassinate him and try to debunk his expertise.

-3 ( +7 / -10 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Frontrunners in the COVID-19 vaccine development: Pfizer (with German partner BioNTech), Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson

PREVENTS DISEASE: NO - Wait, isn't it supposed to prevent COVID-19?

PREVENTS DEATH: NO - Wait, it's not going to save lives of people at risk?

PREVENTS TRANSMISSION: NO - Wait, it will still spread throughout the population?

BUT....REDUCES COUGH & HEADACHE (if you're stricken with COVID-19): YES. Great...just great.

ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS already seen in final phase:

Being bed bound with a fever of over 101 (5 or more hours), shakes, chills, a pounding headache and shortness of breath. Drained for a day and unable to focus. Expect to take the next day off work. 

The bar was set pretty low this time for approval

Oh'll be free and you'll have less cough and headache but you'll still get COVID-19. Liquid confidence in a syringe.

-3 ( +7 / -10 )

Posted in: Fujifilm seeks approval for Avigan as COVID-19 treatment in Japan See in context

BBC reported on it as well:

Covid: Remdesivir 'has little or no effect' on survival, says WHO

They got Trump to take Remdesivir (mixed in with other treatments) to create more demand for it and "say" that it is 'effective'.

If you look at the details (and their sources) VS what they are presenting to you in the news you'll realize that they're trying to keep people in FEAR for a reason: Pharma product demand / sales

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Posted in: New global lab network will compare COVID-19 vaccines head-to-head See in context

And do you know what is even less risky than covid for healthy people under 60?

every single vaccine in use today!

Do you know what has a much less fatality rate than even the 0.1%? every single vaccine in use right now. Illogical to choose something hugely worse such as the natural infection with SARS CoV 2

Now I know you're just trying to push big pharma's agenda.

As an example Fluzone High Dose for seniors has a mortality rate of 0.6% (check the insert page 11):

Grouping ALL vaccines as TOTALLY SAFE? C'mon son. Each and every vaccine is different with different ingredients / adjuvants from different vaccine companies.

Wait...Measles vaccine kills more people than measles?

Again, since 1986 vaccine companies themselves have enjoyed liability free vaccines.

"NCVIA's purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims in order to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims."

The law preserved the right for vaccine injured persons to bring a lawsuit in the court system if federal compensation is denied or is not sufficient. By 2018, the U.S. Court of Claims had awarded nearly $4 billion dollars to vaccine victims for their catastrophic vaccine injuries, although two out of three applicants have been denied compensation"

And don't forget that they are pushing Remdesivir. A cheap drug tied to Dr. Anthony Fauci marked up 347%

Because of the patent and control of the market: $3000+

Actual cost: $9

No money (or market control) in saving lives with HCQ. No money or market control in Ivermectin. Absolutely no money in natural treatments with Quercetin.

Something fishy going on here but trying to bank HUGE PROFITS with unaffordable, ineffective treatments in the name of "saving lives"? Now with no liability to vaccine companies being pushed in other countries outside the US for this COVID-19 vaccine? Conspiracy theory? C'mon son. Something's not right and you're still trying to push the narrative.

With no long term safety studies it's just Russian roulette. I'm surprised that with your "scientific" "science based" background you see no issues at all. You want to inject? Feel free to do so. It's your choice. No one's stopping you but for everyone else considering it do a little more digging first away from mainstream big pharma controlled news sites.

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

Posted in: New global lab network will compare COVID-19 vaccines head-to-head See in context

Yeah, as I said many times, I would very much rather catch the virus than get the vaccine. But the big pharma cheerleaders are constantly exaggerating the risks of the virus and downplaying (or completely ignoring) the risks of vaccines.

Same here Raw Beer. There's much, much less risk to those under 60 and generally healthy. Extra precaution should be taken for those older or with comorbidities (obese, high blood pressure, diabetic, heart disease, stroke history, cancer history) but you can reduce the risk by boosting your immune system ("they" would have you believe that there's nothing you can do about it and to wait for their rushed "product" that supposed to be at least 30% effective with multiple injections per year) .

Big Pharma and those who are trying to maintain the narrative would like us to stay in fear, lockdown and wait for their vaccine product.

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Fatality rate: 0.1%-0.5%

SARS-CoV Fatality rate: 9.6%

MERS Fatality rate: 34.3%

For those who want the vaccine...not trying to stop you. Your choice. Just do your research and step outside mainstream media's narrative push. There will be a portion of the population who'd gladly take the vaccine (they will provide the data for the world to see). Look for reports of any adverse events short term and long term. Don't rush to get it as the you can manage the risk if you are healthy.

But I'm gravely concerned about the vaccine mandate they are trying to push in the states. If "they" had their way they would force you to vaccinate because the virus is SO INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS at 0.1%-0.5%. Even worse is that after injecting there is no recourse for negative side effects or injury. Their green light is the golden goose that keeps on giving every year. IF they pass the vaccine mandate they are in the money regardless.

I don't care about Trump or Biden. People who hate Trump want him to be wrong. Hydroxychloroquine keeps coming up as safe at recommended doses 400mg. The studies were meant to discredit HCQ but IT IS EFFECTIVE as well as IVERMECTIN in helping patients recover at normal safe doses. Those studies were overdosing unsuspecting volunteers: 2400mg MEGA TOXIC dose in the 1st 24 hours.

Self Gates funded study on Hydroxychloroquine were designed to kill those volunteers for the study FOR DATA to show HCQ is deadly and not effective:


BUT you can switch HCQ with natural supplement Quercetin 500mg - 1000mg (of course "they" will disagree with you and say it does not work / false) + Chelated Zinc. Like HCQ, Quercetin is a zinc ionophore that increases uptake of zinc to combat the virus and deliver zinc across cell membranes. Higher levels of zinc (75mg-150mg / day) are effective in reducing the symptoms, reducing chances of infection and improving speed of recovery. Again "they" will disagree and say it does not work / false information. Do your own research. Look into this yourself but expand upon your search yourself to learn more.

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

Posted in: New global lab network will compare COVID-19 vaccines head-to-head See in context

Since they are being tested in the phase III trials that would not be a worry, short/mid term effects are more likely to be detected then, repeating myself again, your idea that they were not tested comes from not understanding clinical trials.

We're in Phase III for Moderna / Pfizer / Johnson & Johnson / AstraZeneca and they're still having these side effects for qualified healthy individuals? (They're certainly not going to take unhealthy volunteers and risk their data). Phase III trial specifically for Safety and Efficacy? Real safe. Real effective remains to be seen. Don't forget we'll need multiple doses so you'll need to take a day or two off multiple times per year. These are not side effects you want to be experiencing short term and we still do not know about long term...

Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Trials

Bed bound - Hutchison, a 44-year-old computational biologist in Utah (healthy, physically fit)

"After getting the first shot on Aug. 18, he said he felt a little under the weather for several days with a low-grade fever. He got his second shot at a clinic on Sept. 15. Eight hours later, he said he was bed bound with a fever of over 101, shakes, chills, a pounding headache and shortness of breath. He said the pain in his arm, where he received the shot, felt like a “goose egg on my shoulder.” He hardly slept that night, recording that his temperature was higher than 100 degrees for five hours." 

Short-term pain - North Carolina woman 50s

"she didn’t experience a fever but suffered a bad migraine that left her drained for a day and unable to focus. She said she woke up the next day feeling better after taking Excedrin, but added that Moderna may need to tell people to take a day off after a second dose"

Worth the risk Maryland man 20s

"experienced nausea after the first shot, but it wasn’t until the second that he “really felt things.” He said he woke up at 1 a.m. with chills and a 104 fever. He said the fever went down after he took Advil and Tylenol but it lasted until around 8 pm"

Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trial

"A physician in Baltimore participating in the Pfizer study is due for his second dose on Saturday. While he said his symptoms were “very mild” for the first dose, he wouldn’t be surprised if others experienced symptoms more serious than a flu shot and said people should be prepared for that. 

Another participant in Pfizer’s trial said he was up all night after the first shot from the pain of the injection. The booster injection he received caused more of that same pain in his arm, followed by intense flu-like symptoms that hit him around 1a.m. He couldn’t sleep that night without an electric blanket, and shook so hard that it became uncontrollable and he cracked part of his tooth from chattering them."

Of course we do, but that can wait until we find out we need to vaccinate them, it is perfectly possible a vaccine safe and effective in adults (with and without comorbidities) is enough to solve the most important part of the problem. At least now we know we are testing more than just healthy adults as you mistakenly said.

Just recently you were telling another commenter to NOT WAIT and make sure to vaccinate their children because of heart problems in children (relating to Kawasaki's disease) but that was shown to be false.

You are pushing the vaccine angle non-stop as if it were the ultimate, can do no wrong, no risk solution as if this were ebola.

When you look at the lethality data (infection fatality rate) by country:

I know you're going to try to discredit them like to do with websites that differ from your "narrative" but check their sources. The data is there. Break it down by gender, age, comorbidities, area, etc.

You're trying to push a vaccine for a lethality rate of between 0.1% and 0.5% in most countries, which is comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968.

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

Posted in: New global lab network will compare COVID-19 vaccines head-to-head See in context

Because they are, you have failed to prove every single one of your points, you want people to believe everything has to end up wrong without proof, just because that is what you want to believe.

People only have to see the world today, how vaccines have increased the quality of life, a world where COVID is the disease to be feared, because polio, measles, rabies, etc. are no longer the death sentences they were in the past. Your point requires vaccines to fail all the time (so they would of course fail the next one) that is simply false and easy to demonstrate.

Sigh....OK. All types of vaccines are 100% safe and risk free.

We can now inject away with this rushed mRNA vaccine without a worry in the world. Long term studies? No need. Studies on infants, children, pregnant women with these negative short side effects? No need. Non-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines? Seniors more than likely to have comorbidities (high blood pressure, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, stroke history, cancer history) will be totally fine even with short term negative side effects let alone the long term ones.

The mainstream media news isn't manufacturing FEAR and we can fully trust governments along with BIG PHARMA to help us for the good of society during every "plandemic" or "pandemic". Whichever one you believe.

Nothing to do with rushing the first to market for the bottom line profits to make their shareholders happy and to establish a strong foothold globally (for years to come) among the hundred vaccine companies.

Can't wait to get a I (HEART) mRNA license plate.

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Posted in: New global lab network will compare COVID-19 vaccines head-to-head See in context

Look for the information on clinical trials, basing you opinion of specific cases only on a too generalized piece of information will only make you make mistakes, like in this case.

You are pointing to one company and saying it applies across the board to every other vaccine company. You have nearly 100 vaccine companies rushing to market and the average age group is still 18-55/60 years and healthy.

"All six of these experimental COVID-19 vaccine programs have at least three things in common. First, they have all moved into the Phase 3 clinical trial stage in which tens of thousands of healthy adults are being recruited to continue testing the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Second, many of the people who participated in the trials experienced adverse events after getting the vaccines. Third, all of the participants were healthy adults."

there is absolutely no specific risk that is higher from a mRNA vaccine, no external proteins, no long lasting expression, no risk of genomic integration, no need of external chemicals for inactivation. If anything mRNA strong advantage is safety (against efficacy which is the one that may suffer).

Again, you seem incredibly confident in this newly rushed to market mRNA vaccine. If anything its strong advantage is safety? You don't even have any long term studies let alone on those younger than 18 and those older than 60 that may not be healthy as the volunteers (although you did point out AstraZeneca's trial example it doesn't mean it applies to all vaccine companies - most of them are taking 18-55~60 years of age healthy).

"Five risks of mRNA vaccines

The big problem with mRNA vaccines is that human biochemistry is incredibly complex, and the body’s synthesis of tens of thousands of different proteins is remarkably delicate and easy to throw out of balance. Many people don’t realize this, but proteins are not merely structural components of the body (such as muscle tissue), they are also messengers (such as hormones), transport vehicles, enzymes, antibodies and many other types of molecules necessary for good health.

Injecting the body with mRNA strands — which are essentially protein synthesis instructions — could theoretically unleash catastrophic unintended consequences in the body, which could include causing destructive self-reinforcing feedback loops that either diminish necessary protein synthesis or cause runaway excessive protein synthesis. These side effects can potentially lead to at least five negative outcomes:

1) Sudden onset of autoimmune disorders that cause the body’s immune system to attack its own cells. (See more details below.)

2) Heightened inflammation in the body, resulting in a hyper-inflammatory response in some people, leading to secondary effects such as neurological damage, organ failure or cancer. This is also sometimes called an “enhanced” inflammatory response.

3) A heightened risk of blood clotting in response to mRNA strands circulating in the blood outside the body’s cells. This can lead to potentially fatal episodes of stroke or serious cardiovascular events.

4) Immune response interference due to the presence of unintended RNA fragments being translated into unintended proteins, leading to a vast array of negative possible outcomes including molecular deficiencies that can result in various diseases and syndromes including hormonal / endocrine disorders, infertility, cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders and many more.

5) In the case of self-replicating mRNA vaccines using viral components, an inability to stop a runaway process that’s replicating out of control in the body. This could theoretically occur when the mRNA snippets are pushed into cells via virus replicon particles (VRP), for example, or using other viral delivery methods that rely on viral replication machinery. On the other hand, self-replicating mRNA vaccines allow for injection doses to be incredibly small, since the mRNA coding material is self-replicating, and this could lead to safer vaccines with far smaller dosing requirements compared to traditional vaccines."

No, I am confident that there is no real reason why everything will turn out bad as you say. There are plenty of reasons and antecedents that strongly indicate at least a few of the candidates will be safe and effective enough to be used in the general population. Statistically speaking there is no real chance only bad vaccines will be developed from the more than 100 candidates being studied now.

No, you are incredibly confident that these "issues" are normal and it is all safe and you have absolutely nothing to worry about as these vaccine companies are there to "protect you" where I say, looking at their necessarily:

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Posted in: New global lab network will compare COVID-19 vaccines head-to-head See in context

As with every vaccine ever approved, including people inoculated with placebo controls. The people interviewed are not the only included, you really need to read what is the objectives and methods for a phase III trial, not all volunteers are healthy young adults, that is phase I.

Trials are for volunteers (which they will hand pick as not all of them are approved) between the ages of 18 to 55~60 years old depending on the vaccine company.

SHORT TERM: Adverse reactions AND there will NO LONG TERM STUDIES (on these healthy individuals):

These are short term studies on those age ranges. Unhealthy individuals can apply but doesn't mean they will get approved for Phase I:

"If you look at the human clinical trials that have been conducted this year by drug companies developing experimental vaccines for COVID-19, the participants in those trials have all been “healthy adults.” Take, for example, Moderna’s Phase 1 clinical trial for its mRNA-1273 vaccine, which included 45 healthy adults 18 to 55 years old. The same is true for the Phase 1/2 clinical trial for the BNT162b1 vaccine being developed jointly by Pfizer and BioNTech. That trial also involved 45 healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 55 years."

And what happens long term will not be known until negative effects start to show up later. There is a huge financial incentive to BE FIRST TO MARKET. With no risk or liability then there are HUGE financial incentives to rush and get approval:

Since 1986 vaccine companies themselves have enjoyed liability free vaccines.

"NCVIA's purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims in order to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims."

"The law established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), which was created to to ensure vaccine supply, stabilize vaccine costs, and establish a no-fault compensation alternative for those injured by vaccines. Currently the U. S. Court of Federal Claims decides vaccine injury claims and three Federal government offices jointly work to administer in the NVICP:

But they include people of advanced age and with comorbidities, which is very different from what you said, children have a much less severe reaction to most febrile diseases and their vaccines as any pediatrician could tell you. So it is expected that side-effects will be much less frequent than in young adults, the same as with the natural disease.

No. 18-55, 18-59/60 years of age. No age ranges above that although they may apply. They were not accepted.

Children have a much less severe reaction to most febrile diseases

CORRECT in regards to diseases as their immune systems are stronger at an earlier age but deteriorate with age / environment - air / water/ food (fresh vs processed) / stressors / exercise BUT you cannot say that about vaccines. ESPECIALLY THIS ONE as this is a first ever mRNA vaccine they are trying to roll out. We simply DO NOT KNOW the long term effects...those who plan on being injected are just injecting to "feel safe" not knowing the long term effects. You seem incredibly confident with your explanations that these things are typical and everything will be "just fine".

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

Posted in: New global lab network will compare COVID-19 vaccines head-to-head See in context

MORE than 30% for all we know any of the candidates can have over 90% efficacy.

Did you read the article?

Expect to take a day off cause you will be out the next day experiencing those symptoms. Now...these are healthy volunteers who were approved for the trial now in Phase III and they are STILL EXPERIENCING these outcomes.

What will happen when you mass vaccinate unhealthy individuals with COMORBIDITIES (high blood pressure, diabetes, obese, heart disease, cancer history, stroke history, older age)?

You're going to have a vaccinated population in A LOT of hurt. You say it'll all go away in a day as if it's just saline solution. You don't even have long term studies.


If you already have these negative side effects in healthy adults what about the children being injected? You talk as if it'll all be fine and dandy, birds will be chirping, flowers everywhere. Just a'll pass...don't worry.

There is absolutely no evidence that there will be needed multiple reinforcement of the vaccine, that is coming just from your imagination and discredited by the evidence collected both from preclinical and clinical trials.

Self-proclaimed vaccine expert and "philanthropic" funder (bless his heart) of these vaccine companies Bill Gates already mentioned that 1 dose isn't effective enough:

"None of the vaccines appear that they will work with a single dose....we hope just two..."

-4 ( +2 / -6 )

Posted in: Trump-touted hydroxychloroquine shows no benefit in COVID-19 prevention -study See in context

Hydroxychloroquine is already approved for SAFE USE by the FDA and it's been in use for over 65 years at low doses for Malaria (400mg)

Self Gates funded study on Hydroxychloroquine were designed to kill those volunteers for the study FOR DATA to show HCQ is deadly and not effective:


Personally don't support Trump OR Biden. People that HATE Trump want him to be wrong but he is right in this case. The studies were meant to discredit HCQ but IT IS EFFECTIVE as well as IVERMECTIN in helping patients recover at normal safe doses. Those studies were overdosing unsuspecting volunteers: 2400mg MEGA TOXIC dose in the 1st 24 hours.


Why? The $$$$BIG MONEY$$$$ is in the patented VACCINE where HCQ's patent is already expired and any country can manufacture it on its own without paying royalties to any one company. But the price is incredibly LOW that there is NO MONEY to be made with HCQ. Again...there is absolutely NO MONEY / NO PROFIT in Hydroxychloroquine. Gates himself has said that we must lockdown until 80% of the world is vaccinated (and most likely 1 dose won't be effective so multiple doses = $$$$). Good old Billy has also stated that investing in vaccines (philanthropically through the Gates Foundation - bless his heart) was the best investment he's ever made.

"In one international poll3 of 6,227 doctors in 30 countries, 37% rated the antimalaria drug hydroxychloroquine as “the most effective therapy” for COVID-19. The poll was done by Sermo, the world’s largest health care data collection company and social platform for physicians.

In Spain, where the drug was used by 72% of doctors, it was rated “the most effective therapy” by 75% of them. The typical dose used by a majority of doctors was 400 milligrams per day.

French science-prize winning microbiologist and infectious disease expert Didier Raoult, founder and director of the research hospital Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection,4 reported5,6 that a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, administered immediately upon diagnosis, led to recovery and “virological cure” — nondetection of SARS-CoV-27 in nasal swabs — in 91.7% of patients.

According to Raoult, the drug combination “avoids worsening and clears virus persistence and contagiosness in most cases.” No cardiac toxicity was observed using a dose of 200 mg three times a day for 10 days, along with 500 mg of azithromycin on Day 1 followed by 250 mg daily for the next four days. The risk of cardiac toxicity was ameliorated by carefully screening patients and performing serial EKGs.

July 2, 2020, Raoult is quoted as saying failure to prescribe hydroxychloroquine to a COVID-19 patient “should be grounds for malpractice.” Meanwhile, University of Oxford investigators claim the drug is useless and shouldn’t be prescribed at all in hospitalized patients.8


Australian Politician Calls for Criminal Trials of Health Bureaucrats who Banned Hydroxychloroquine as COVID Cure

"Craig Kelly MP, a member of the Australian House of Representatives, has claimed that Health Bureaucrats have "engaged in crimes against humanity and they should be taken to the criminal court in the Hague," for their ban on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which has been shown to cure COVID patients by thousands of doctors in the U.S. and around the world. Sky News Australia has published an interview with the MP: "Liberal MP Craig Kelly says the ban placed on COVID-19 treatment hydroxychloroquine by Australian bureaucrats violates the Hippocratic Oath taken by doctors and is based on a study since proven false. Mr Kelly said health bureaucrats interfered in the doctor-patient relationship by prohibiting the use of hydroxychloroquine even if the doctor thought the treatment would save the patient’s life. Health bureaucrats have 'violated the very first principle of the hypocritic oath' which is to ‘do no harm’, he said. Mr Kelly told Sky News technically bureaucrats should only ban the use of hydroxychloroquine if the evidence shows beyond all reasonable doubt that firstly, hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work and secondly, that it is dangerous. 'Recent studies show that proposition is no longer sustainable … and they must lift their bans otherwise they are engaged in crimes against humanity and they should be taken to the criminal court in the Hague,' he said. 'They are withholding medical treatment from Australians that the evidence shows can save their lives.'""

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

Posted in: Soundproof isolation boxes double down on peace of mind for work from home See in context

Hmmm...same size as the restroom at home. 何かトイレの場所と同じ大きさ。

For those who wanted to focus on work it's been a tough 2020 for those who became teleworkers. Especially those with kids during the soft lockdown.

But for those who wanted to be home with family it this situation provided them more family time while still being able to work without wearing business attire all day long AND not have to be packed like a sardine during rush hour every morning.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Posted in: Japan considers offering COVID-19 vaccines for free to all residents See in context

antibodies are just one single part of the immune system, recent articles have proved that memory cells are able to mediate long lasting immunity,

ABSOLUTELY CORRECT and 18,664,286 have recovered from COVID-19 WITHOUT a vaccine. Because they can produce antibodies themselves naturally. Memory cells can and are able to produce long lasting immunity EVEN when the antibody count drops BUT mainstream media once again will have you believe that IS NOT THE CASE so you will need to be injected as antibody count drops 3-4 months later.

Did you forget to mention that this vaccine is used for people at advanced age? and that this death rate is on the same level from people without any vaccination?

Especially for people at that advanced age (seniors) to whom Fluzone is heavily marketed to.

Shame on people that get profits from saving lives and economies, if people could just make money by spreading fear like antivaxxers do, right?

Not so sure about the saving lives and economies though. Maybe better peace of mind.

They cite all their sources but I'm sure you will continue to character assassinate people in their organization.

Some vaccines have some effectiveness while others do not. Every vaccine is different. Some have live viruses while others do not. Some use chicken, insect, cow cells to grow the viruses while others may use aborted fetal tissue.

I make no money in having these discussions nor will I ever. Just see SO MUCH CENSORSHIP and CONTROL of the NARRATIVE BY BIG PHARMA & their DRUG / VACCINE COMPANIES which you believe can do no wrong, are absolute angels of society and do no harm to anyone. You did mention however there are risks involved but downplay them as if they are minimal.

Vaccines in the US are liability free for the companies since 1986. You cannot sue them for injuries to you or your family. Instead the US government pays out in vaccine court leaving the Vaccine producer whole. WIN-WIN for the vaccine company.

H.R.5546 - National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986

NVIC's co-founders worked with Congress on the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which acknowledged that vaccine injuries and deaths are real and that the vaccine injured and their families should be financially supported and that vaccine safety protections were needed in the mass vaccination system. 

COVID-19 Symptoms across the population:

"About 80% of all people develop only mild symptoms or no symptoms. Even among 70-79 year olds, about 60% develop only mild symptoms. About 95% of all people develop at most moderate symptoms and do not require hospitalization."

Sorry but your source of information has been characterized as a conspiracy theorist source, with many falsehoods and mistaken information

It has been proved repeatedly to promote false information regarding many kinds of topics, it is not a source that can be trusted.

They cite CDC data. Are you saying that CDC data is incorrect? How about or They've cited their data as well. State provided data is false?

Also sorry but Wikipedia? It is now strictly controlled by special interests to maintain the mainstream narrative. Especially for anyone that speaks out against "Big Pharma can do no wrong" narrative.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Posted in: Japan considers offering COVID-19 vaccines for free to all residents See in context

Immunological and serological studies show that most people develop no symptoms or only mild symptoms when infected with the new coronavirus, while some people may experience a more pronounced or critical course of the disease. Note: Patients are asked to consult a doctor.

13 ( +15 / -2 )

Posted in: Tokyo reports 148 new coronavirus cases; nationwide tally 600 See in context

The number of cases will go up and down depending on how much testing they do.

Just follow the death rate and the details surrounding it.

Japan cases during the August 1st - August 30th time period:

~32,000 New cases in Japan

~250 deaths for the entire country during that time period

Death rate for Aug 1st - Aug 30th: ~0.78% or less than 1%

Then look at AGE, HEALTH, COMORBIDITIES (high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, stroke, cancer history) to have a better picture of what you are up against.

Those with healthier immune systems are more likely to recover faster or have little to no symptoms. Those who are less healthy may have more complications and will need to have hospital care but with the right support can recover without any issues.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Posted in: Japan plans to buy AstraZeneca's experimental COVID-19 vaccine See in context

"AstraZeneca to be exempt from coronavirus-vaccine liability calims in most countries" - Reuters July 30th 2020

"You can't have a 3 month safety trial and know what the long term effects are"

But vaccine companies already are free of liability from any negative short term or long term effects of vaccine injury within the USA:

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act - Wikipedia

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34) was signed into law by United States President Ronald Reagan as part of a larger health bill on November 14, 1986. NCVIA's purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims in order to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines,...

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Posted in: Japan plans to buy AstraZeneca's experimental COVID-19 vaccine See in context

A pharmaceutical company profits much more from people getting sick than vaccinated, if a company is only looking for profit it will simply not make any vaccine.

Exactly what you mean but the pharmaceutical company (which may or may not be producing the vaccine) profits even more from producing products specific to counteracting the negative side effects that arise from FILL IN THE BLANK. is there to discredit anyone that does not fall in line with Big Pharma's narrative.

"Science Based Medicine, founded by Yale neuroscientist Steven Novella, was launched to advocate for a reductionist scientific rationality, founded upon Skepticism’s principles and strategies. In 2009, the Society launched its Institute for Science in Medicine, a non-profit organization with a mission to influence public health policies and establish standards based upon its medical determinism at the exclusion of other medical options that the Institute criticizes. High on both the Society’s and Institute’s priority list is the condemnation of Complementary-Alternative Medicine (CAM), which is today offered in most university medical schools. It also accuses naturopathy, homeopathy, massage, chiropractic medicine, nutritional medicine including supplements, and all faith-based and Mind-Body healing modalities of quackery.[8]  Practitioners of these non-drug based therapies are categorically labeled as irrational, charlatans, conspiracy theorists or quacks. Followers of SBM operate solely in the state of its absolute authority, hyper-diligence and ultra-orthodoxy. Medical research favoring conventional medicine is framed as unwavering facts, which leave no room for open discussion and debate."

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Posted in: Japan plans to buy AstraZeneca's experimental COVID-19 vaccine See in context

Don't be so keen on getting a vaccine for the coronavirus / COVID-19:

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Posted in: Japan reports record new coronavirus infections for 3rd straight day See in context

The virus will slowly make its way through no matter what (takes about 1-2 years). It's virtually impossible to stop unless you have a full lock down for 2-4 weeks (no movement - which isn't realistic). The important thing is that there are enough available resources to support those who have severe symptoms. They are not ventilating every single patient like they did in NYC (9 out of 10 people died). Gov. Cuomo made it illegal to reject seniors who were already infected back into the nursing homes which killed even more. Search "gov Cuomo sends elderly to nursing homes" and you'll wonder "what was he thinking?".

Focus on the number of deaths / death rate. Extremely low in Japan (we should be the epicenter for the kind of rush hour we have here packed like sardines every morning) and 95%+ of the people infected recover but those with comorbidities (age, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, stroke history, cancer history) must take extra precaution to protect themselves as they are at higher risk.

There are outliers but children have the strongest immune systems and are basically 99.9% asymptomatic with no issues. When you start getting into the age 60+ that's when you start to see much higher risks but it all depends on their lifestyle. But there are always outliers that make the headlines which in turn create more fear through the media.

Be wary of the vaccine unicorn. They couldn't even develop a safe vaccine for the 1st coronavirus SARS and still don't have one yet. During the animal studies with ferrets they had developed antibodies only to have organ failure / overactive immune system / death when exposed to the actual live virus later. Now they are to fast track one from Moderna with no placebo backed by billions $$$. They are only using "healthy" people in the vaccine trials who are already getting sick in phase 2. What happens when they start injecting Joe bag O donuts who's overweight and diabetic or on statin drugs for high cholesterol?

Strengthen your immune system so if you do get infected you will be asymptomatic and or slightly symptomatic and recover faster. All things being equal in terms of health, some people will feel like crap and some people will have virtually no symptoms but majority of them will recover.

MSS says and wants you to believe that the natural antibodies don't last (just disappear) so you need the vaccine with multiple booster shots per year $$Huge Profits$$ for big pharma and more control of society - NO. Once you are able to produce antibodies specific to this virus your body will produce them when needed (blueprint is there) in case you get infected again. Notice how they keep reporting on vaccine development (but NEVER healthy, immune boosting solutions) and how "optimistic" they are (company share value$$$ go up the same day)?

Don't take my word for it. Do a little more digging beyond what's being presented in the mainstream news.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Posted in: 33% of parents in Japan delayed vaccinating kids due to coronavirus fears See in context

Hey Virusex,

Appreciate the response. Should have posted the discussion in the interview with one of the authors of that report where they dig deeper into the data:

They specifically discuss the data with younger age groups from time index 12:48

In reality this year has been extremely different from the past in many other things, the changes in mortality may be explained by something as obvious as parents being more time in their houses or infants being less exposed to other respiratory diseases (because social distancing measures also work preventing those) at least these reasons have an advantage over vaccination and that is that they do not require time travel.

CDC was warning that there would be an increase in deaths due to not vaccinating (even during the pandemic lock down) but there was a drop in infant deaths. An increase in deaths did not occur but a decrease...specifically SIDS.

Up until now SIDS has always been an unexplained phenomenon and blamed on the parents or their genetics even with a healthy child. Now there is a relationship with a significant drop in SIDS deaths during the lock down. If you are saying lower deaths due to staying home, parents being at home and less exposure to respiratory diseases then why are deaths specifically due to "SIDS" down? The CDC would have classified those drop in infant deaths due to respiratory diseases and NOT SIDS yet it was a specific drop in SIDS.

So there was a significant drop in SIDS deaths (not respiratory disease deaths) due to social distancing and staying at home? If that is true then SIDS is caused by contact with people and going out.


There is a significant relationship with vaccinations and SIDS.


You can prevent SIDS by providing more hugs at home while locking down the infant

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Posted in: 33% of parents in Japan delayed vaccinating kids due to coronavirus fears See in context

Same thing happened in the US due to their lockdown (parents didn't take their infants to get vaccinated). Data from the CDC showed 30% fewer deaths due to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome - SIDS (COMPARED TO 2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019) during the exact same time period of the nationwide lock down.

Maybe a good thing if parents delayed but the death rate will return to normal unfortunately come 2021 going forward if there is no lock down. This data would not have been possible if not for the lock down spread nationwide.

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.