neowave comments

Posted in: U.S. experts debate: Who should be next in line for vaccine? See in context

VAERS includes everything and anything that happens after a vaccine is used.

There you go again. EXACTLY! AFTER A VACCINE IS USED.

Your family member tells you they just got a vaccine but feeling terrible, feverish, headache, paralysis, fainted, near death, etc. you're just going to tell them that it could be any number of things and would have happened anyway. Just not the vaccine. No need for investigation. No need to report it. Could and would have happened anyway. Big Pharma based science at its best.

-2 ( +3 / -5 )

Posted in: U.S. experts debate: Who should be next in line for vaccine? See in context

Again, that is an imaginary argument, the real one is that vaccines are safer than the infection they protect against, you have not been able to deny this, the same as you were unable to deny the many mechanisms to bring liability to vaccine companies.

Your argument, exactly like Big Pharma is:

“The science on vaccines is settled.”

“Vaccines are safe and effective.”

The science on vaccines IS NOT settled nor will ever be settled. It will never reach 100% safe with the negative adverse events (deaths too) you so eloquently explain away.

Will post this again as you can see over 30 years of DATA of people reporting adverse reactions after a vaccine...and most people do not know where to go to report adverse events:

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS Symptoms):

https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/datasets.html

Look VERY CLOSELY at the details and all the cases of negative adverse events from 1990.

You can download 2020 data from this page:

https://vaers.hhs.gov/eSubDownload/index.jsp?fn=2020VAERSSYMPTOMS.csv

They list SYMPTOMS 1,2,3,4,5 PER PERSON

AreflexiaAtaxiaAutism spectrum disorderDysphagia normal?

How about death? Near death experienceFetal DeathAbortion spontaneousAbortion threatened? All normal?

Loads of data that Mainstream media WON'T REPORT ON. Why? A large portion of their advertising dollars are pharma funded. Any content speaking against vaccines and they will pull advertising until they comply. $$$

30 YEARS OF LONG TERM DATA and with your "Big pharma can do no wrong" based "scientific background" you still manage to explain this away as if it could be anything...um....we simply don't know what could have caused those "adverse events" (Negative event reporting increased each year from 1990. Over 29,000 reports in 2020 even with the lockdowns! 2019 file is HUGE with over 60,000 reports!! NOT ALL SEVERE BUT YOU'LL DEFINITELY SEE THAT VACCINES CAN CAUSE ADVERSE NEGATIVE EVENTS). But you see...people who have had negative side effects after a vaccine are now reporting it. Before that no where to report it. Again...30 years for your scientific background and still in denial.

Um...uh...the science is settled. Those deaths could have come from anything. Could be any number of things...just not vaccines cause vaccines are safe.

-2 ( +3 / -5 )

Posted in: Vaccine carrots or sticks? U.S. businesses grapple with getting employees inoculated See in context

Citing Quackwatch.org? Seems like you are well aligned with these folks...

"Stephen Barrett, founder of Quackwatch, is a delicensed medical doctor. In addition, he failed the medical board exam required for a psychiatrist. His using the "MD" after his name is misleading and even fraudulent. He has never performed scientific research, nor written a scientific paper, but yet discredits Nobel Prize scientists such as Dr. Otto Warburg and Dr. Linus Pauling. Stephen Barrett is one BIG QUACK who is financed by the pharmaceutical industry that makes quack medicine. He was deemed "unworthy of credibility" in a court of law. Therefore, all his writings are medical quackery. There should be a picture of Stephen Barrett beside the words "nutcase" and "con artist" in the dictionary."

In a Canadian lawsuit Barrett admitted to the following:

The sole purpose of the activities of Barrett & Baratz are to discredit and cause damage and harm to health care practitioners, businesses that make alternative health therapies or products available, and advocates of non-allopathic therapies and health freedom.

Oh boy Virusex...here to prime the people for pharma? A little too close for comfort.

When looking at fraud why don't you look into the pharma fraud in each of those companies...let's look at Pfizer:

"Pfizer set a record for the largest health care fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine of any kind with $2.3 billion in 2009."

Source: U.S. Department of Justice

Protonix

"People are suing Pfizer over Protonix. Protonix lawsuits say Pfizer failed to warn about the risk of kidney problems. In 2013, Pfizer agreed to pay $55 million to settle criminal charges. The U.S. Department of Justice said Wyeth promoted Protonix for unapproved uses in 2000 and 2001. Pfizer acquired Wyeth in 2009."

Prempro

"Nearly 10,000 women filed Prempro breast cancer lawsuits against Pfizer. By 2012, Pfizer settled most of the claims for more than $1 billion."

Trovan

"In 1996, Pfizer conducted an unapproved clinical trial. It involved children with meningitis in Nigeria, CBS News reported. The trials led to the deaths of 11 children. Dozens more were left disabled.

Trovan is a drug severely restricted in use because of its potential to cause liver damage. Injury to the liver as a result of taking Trovan can lead to liver failure and death.

In 2011, Pfizer paid $700,000 to four families who lost children during the Trovan trials.

In addition, the company set up a $35 million fund for those affected by Trovan. Pfizer also agreed to sponsor health projects in Kano, Nigeria."

Pfizer's COVID19 Vax will be deemed FDA approved "safe" like their other pharma products until it isn't anymore and they recall...by that time it will be too late. You'll be back to explain the issues away. No big deal. Nothing to see here. When serious adverse events / deaths have occurred to a larger extent then they "Recall". Haven't you figured that out yet?

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Posted in: U.S. experts debate: Who should be next in line for vaccine? See in context

Are they requesting that government testing of their vaccines is forfeited? - no

Are they requesting that approval process be skippend? - no

Are they requesting that no penalties are contemplated for any problem with the vaccine? - no

Virusrex. YOU ARE ACTUALLY CORRECT! The government testing / vaccine trial data /approval process gives me full confidence to move forward now.

It took a while but like yourself am now ready to be injected. Twice within 1 month (Pfizer / BioNTech). Good on you for your efforts in bringing public awareness to the absolute safety of vaccines.

-1 ( +4 / -5 )

Posted in: U.S. experts debate: Who should be next in line for vaccine? See in context

Also your article is not applicable worldwide, 

Correct. It will depend on the country but they will request liability protection from any vaccine injuries and have the government compensate individuals who are injured. This is unfortunate but great for vax companies.

"This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in ... four years the vaccine is showing side effects,” Ruud Dobber, a member of Astra’s senior executive team, told Reuters.

“In the contracts we have in place, we are asking for indemnification. For most countries it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest,” he said, adding that Astra and regulators were making safety and tolerability a top priority.

Dobber would not name the countries."

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-astrazeneca-results-vaccine-liability-idUSKCN24V2EN

-4 ( +2 / -6 )

Posted in: Pfizer files request for COVID-19 vaccine approval in Japan See in context

That is still false, the same as the last time you copy-pasted it and was debunked, you yourself accepted it was false since you did not even tried to defend it. As before, being not the target from particulars lawsuits is completely different from being free from liabilities, they completely are, as sure as their vaccines are still under strict vigilance from the different governments of the world precisely to subject the companies to liabilities for problems.

Unfortunately it is true. If you yourself are vaccine injured (God forbid) you have no recourse (of course you'll claim that you won't need compensation because vaccines are 100% safe...OR ARE THEY?)

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html

The PREP Act also authorizes a United States Treasury (not the vax companies) fund that compensates eligible individuals for serious physical injuries or deaths directly caused by administration or use of a countermeasure covered by the Declaration.

https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/prepact/Pages/prepqa.aspx

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Posted in: U.S. experts debate: Who should be next in line for vaccine? See in context

The manufacturer are shielded from. Lawsuit, they can put vaccination on the market, whether it works or not working

It is unfortunately TRUE and these vaccine companies have applied and are receiving liability protection (short term and long term effects) from multiple countries now...not just in the US. In Japan the government will front the costs from vaccine injury but who wants to take the risk of injury or adverse events...can you imagine your kids getting vaccine injured and having to apply for compensation?

Article: You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won't compensate you for damages either

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html

Looks like you and your family are on your own...inject at your own risk cause 100% of the risk is on the decision you make to vaccinate.

-5 ( +3 / -8 )

Posted in: Pfizer files request for COVID-19 vaccine approval in Japan See in context

2 Alaska Health Workers Got Emergency Treatment After Receiving Pfizer's Vaccine

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/health/covid-pfizer-vaccine-allergic-reaction.html

Looks like there is a risk of ana

...and don't forget that vaccine companies will not be liable for negative adverse events, side effects short term or long term, death, disability, etc. under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986:

https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/about/index.html

Latest CDC stats - Updated Infection Fatality - Survival Rates for COVID19:

Parameter Values vary among the five COVID-19 Pandemic Planning Scenarios.

CDC Scenario 5: 'Current Best Estimate'

AGE GROUP - INFECTION FATALITY RATE - SURVIVAL RATE

0-19 years old - 0.00003% INFECTION FATALITY RATE 99.997% SURVIVAL RATE

20-49 years old - 0.0002% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 99.98% SURVIVAL RATE

50-69 years old - 0.005% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 99.5% SURVIVAL RATE

70 years old - 0.054% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 94.6% SURVIVAL RATE

Whatever happens to you or your family...you're on your own...do your own research for the sake of your own family and friends. Those 70 years and older OR people with comorbidities need to BOOST THEIR IMMUNE system and look into Ivermectin (Pharma can't make money so they're trying to bury it/discredit it):

Listen to their Senate discussing Ivermectin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZhYpw3mqtI&t=7m27s

-3 ( +3 / -6 )

Posted in: Pfizer files request for COVID-19 vaccine approval in Japan See in context

Health-care worker in Alaska has severe allergic reaction to coronavirus vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech)

"The Alaska case echoes two similar cases in Britain in which health-care workers had serious but nonfatal allergic reactions to the vaccine. But the British workers had histories of severe allergic reactions, whereas the Alaska woman had none, state health officials said. She is now stable and was discharged from a hospital where she was kept overnight.

In randomized trials, Pfizer reported no such allergic responses, known as anaphylaxis, but people with a history of such severe reactions were excluded from participating."

"But because of her severe allergic reaction, she would not receive a second vaccine dose in three weeks as is the normal protocol with this vaccine."

"Scientists do not know precisely why the new vaccine is triggering, in rare instances, a severe reaction."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/allergic-reaction-covid-vaccine-alaska/2020/12/16/cf8f5c56-3fcb-11eb-8db8-395dedaaa036_story.html

-1 ( +4 / -5 )

Posted in: Vaccine carrots or sticks? U.S. businesses grapple with getting employees inoculated See in context

You present only half of the story and omit the most important part, that people that are not vaccinated also have negative outcomes and even death, so if something happens whether the person is vaccinated or not then you cannot attribute it to the vaccine.

Lets say that 1 million people are vaccinated against something, and 10 of them die on the same year, it looks bad, as if the vaccine were the cause of the deaths, but if you follow another million people that are not vaccinated and find out that 15 of them died on that year, then the real risk appears. This kind of comparison is done routinely by professional epidemiologist and statisticians and their data proves that vaccines have no elevated risk of important or lethal side effects when properly compared, people do that for a living to investigate the safety and efficacy of the vaccines and their data completely contradicts you.

You have been presenting the exact same argument day in and day out trying to explain away and downplay adverse events in any of the vaccine trials.

Misleading people with half of the data is not valid, you need to understand well first what you want to use, because right now somebody may even think you were trying to this manipulation on purpose for some hidden reason, like profit. It is worth trying to avoid that kind of misunderstanding by correctly using the information.

Exactly what you are doing with these new vaccines. I have never seen someone so pro, pro vax and support news that supports pharma. There is money to be made in keeping the masses calm enough to follow through with the injection...now 2 times per year with a few months apart (Billions upon billions invested to inject 80% of the world's population). Absolutely no money not to. Huge losses if there isn't compliance. Moderna, Pfizer, Astra's stock on the up and up. Gotta keep the shareholders happy right?

Here...I need you to discredit Dr. Mercola or attack him for having a supplement line:

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/08/coronavirus-vaccine-side-effects.aspx

Still on top of that no one knows the long term effects but yet with a scientific background you are so comfortable with that. I could not in good conscience do what you do. It's amazing how many times you post and how quickly you reply to anything vax related or attack anyone vaccine hesitant. Do your spiel within the next 10 minutes I suppose. I'm done.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Posted in: What we know about COVID-19 vaccines and side effects See in context

Yeah, Ivermectin seems very effective. BTW, have you ever notice that those who are constantly pushing the vaccines are perfectly safe and effective narrative are also constantly exaggerating the effects of the infection and downplaying (or outright denying) the effectiveness of treatments or preventive measures (ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D) despite all the evidence (https://hcqmeta.com/).

Raw Beer, I've never seen so much vaccine pushing in my life from one commenter who is on here all day long, every single day there's an article on vaccines.

It's a great way to "prime" the masses to have less hesitancy and ease them into compliance for this unproven and dangerous injection from all the top vaccine candidates (Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Moderna).

When people hear "vaccine" they think "cure". There is always a risk of negative adverse events so you have to dig into the details yourself. For your family's sake ESPECIALLY if you have children because the trials did not use children nor pregnant women.

Adverse events from Astrazeneca's vax that even has NIH worried and THIS was in Sept 2020:

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200914/nih-and-fda-examine-serious-side-effect-that-surfaced-in-covid-vaccine-trial

That's only 1 article but so much more out there. Why are you so keen on injections? It's not going to prevent death, disease, transmission or hospitalization. Just reduction of symptoms in case you get COVID. Liquid confidence through a needle but of course it's your choice. Do your research first and outside the corrupt mainstream news that make a good portion of their advertising dollars from Pharma ads (they would never dare speak out against the hand that feeds them).

Same person will reply: FALSE FALSE FALSE! PERFECTLY SAFE. All vaccines are safe especially these new ones with no long term studies and no data on children and pregnant women. You'll get your data as soon as the injections start on unsuspecting others so follow closely before you decide.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Posted in: Vaccine carrots or sticks? U.S. businesses grapple with getting employees inoculated See in context

Lots of red flags for Astra's vax as well. But 'they' will tell you there is absolutely nothing to worry about and the risks are minimal when they are not when you dig further into the details:

https://www.distributednews.com/481938.html

Where are the long term studies? Wait...we'll get them as you inject over this year...instant data of negative adverse events suppressed by mainstream media.

-4 ( +2 / -6 )

Posted in: What we know about COVID-19 vaccines and side effects See in context

For people at risk worried about the rushed COVID vaccine's dangerous side effects with NO LONG TERM STUDIES (they will be the guinea pig - they will become the data) you can consider looking at Ivermectin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgOAaLmoa68

Dr. Pierre Kory, Associate Professor of Medicine at St. Luke's Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, testified December 8, 2020 at the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Amazing treatment option but you need to hear the doctor's testimony and look at their data.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/

-3 ( +4 / -7 )

Posted in: Japan to begin COVID-19 vaccinations on reservation basis See in context

A Wikipedia link Virusex? “Wikipedia is…broken,” controlled by special interests and bad actors, says co-founder | Sharyl Attkisson

https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/05/wikipedia-is-broken-controlled-by-special-interests-and-bad-actors-says-co-founder/

Sorry but you've been downplaying the warnings, serious adverse events, and dangers from the beginning and pushing vaccines as the ONLY OPTION.

Again, if 'they' are paying you to put food on the table for your family then it's your choice (cause that's all you're doing all day long (Where in the world do you get all that time to reply other than to be employed to do so) - looking for ways to downplay the dangers and find ways to discredit new information). I could not in good conscience do what you do if even if they paid me well. Good on you.

I'm sure you're going to find a way to explain Pfizer's COVID19 Vaccine issue with pregnancy and fertility:

Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former head of Pfizer research, filed a STAY OF ACTION with the European Medicines Agency, together with Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, and he warned them about the potential effects of this vaccine on fertility, as he wrote that the experimental Pfizer COVID vaccine is:

expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” – http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019-against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.

There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.

To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.

According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).

This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed. 

Latest CDC stats - Updated Infection Fatality - Survival Rates for COVID19:

Parameter Values vary among the five COVID-19 Pandemic Planning Scenarios.

CDC Scenario 5: 'Current Best Estimate'

AGE GROUP - INFECTION FATALITY RATE - SURVIVAL RATE

0-19 years old - 0.00003% INFECTION FATALITY RATE 99.997% SURVIVAL RATE

20-49 years old - 0.0002% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 99.98% SURVIVAL RATE

50-69 years old - 0.005% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 99.5% SURVIVAL RATE

70 years old - 0.054% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 94.6% SURVIVAL RATE

-1 ( +4 / -5 )

Posted in: Japan to begin COVID-19 vaccinations on reservation basis See in context

More info reported on Pfizer's vax:

*'*What You Can Expect From the COVID-19 Vaccine

*Dr. Eli Perencevich, a professor of internal medicine and epidemiology at the University of Iowa Health Care, has suggested essential workers should be granted three days of paid leave after they're vaccinated, as many will feel too sick to work.*

*A December 1, 2020, CNBC article, which looked at the frequency of adverse reactions, noted that *10% to 15% of participants in the Pfizer and Moderna trials reported "significantly noticeable" side effects.

*Buried way down at the bottom of the article is a suggestion from a past advisory committee member, who proposes the nomenclature of "serious adverse reaction" be changed to "immune response," so they can reprogram how people think about these side effects, even if they end up having to stay home from work because of them.*

*The article also admits they have no idea what, if any, long-term reactions there might be, which means (as we already knew) that this is a great big public health experiment and, of course, anything that happens post-marketing will be labeled a "coincidence."*

*An October 20, 2020, article9 in the Observer lists the known side effects that have emerged in the various trials. *Chills, fever, body aches and headache are the most commonplace, but at least two cases of transverse myelitis -- inflammation of the spinal cord -- have also occurred.

Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns that the vaccine's side effects are "no walk in the park,"10 and Saad Omer, director of the Yale Institute for Global Health, has stressed the need for a broad-based outreach campaign to discuss the reality of side effects, as patients might not come back for the required second dose if the side effects take them by surprise.

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

Posted in: Japan to begin COVID-19 vaccinations on reservation basis See in context

Specific data collected on the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine trials:

"Solicited serious adverse events — 10-fold increase on second dose in ederly, compared to 3.6-fold for those under 55

Among the 18-55 year-old participants, there were 370 solicited serious adverse events (SSAEs) in the vaccinated group and 73 in the unvaccinated. Of the vaccinated, 18% experienced SSAEs; in the placebo group, only 3% did, implying that SSAEs can be expected at a rate five times greater in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.

These included severe fatigue, headache, chills, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle and joint pain. Whether these conditions represent instances of pathogenic priming, identifying individuals who are now at higher risk of serious morbidity and mortality if they become infected with SARS-CoV-2 is unknown, but given past studies, seems likely.

In the over 55 group, which was a smaller group, there were 60 SSAEs in the vaccinated group and 24 in the unvaccinated. Of the vaccinated, 6.5% experienced SAEs, compared to 1.4% in the unvaccinated, implying a 4.46% increased risk overall of SSAEs due to vaccination.

However, in the older group, the vaccinated group was 10 times more likely to have a SSAE upon receipt of the second vaccine dose than the first dose compared to the 1:1 ratio in the unvaccinated. In the younger group, the vaccinated were only 3.61 times more likely to have second-dose SSAEs than the age-matched placebo group, which had about as many SSAEs in the first and second dose."

-3 ( +3 / -6 )

Posted in: Studies suggest AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine safe, effective See in context

No need to use these unproven, toxic vaccines...already adverse reactions from every single candidate (Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Moderna) it's no wonder people are hesitant.

New data on Ivermectin presented at the Senate hearing this week is incredible news:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuHq12B_Tvk

-4 ( +4 / -8 )

Posted in: COVID-19 patients infect half of household: U.S. gov't study See in context

Latest CDC stats - Updated Infection Fatality - Survival Rates for COVID19:

Parameter Values vary among the five COVID-19 Pandemic Planning Scenarios.

CDC Scenario 5: 'Current Best Estimate'

AGE GROUP - INFECTION FATALITY RATE - SURVIVAL RATE

0-19 years old - 0.00003% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 99.997% SURVIVAL RATE

20-49 years old - 0.0002% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 99.98% SURVIVAL RATE

50-69 years old - 0.005% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 99.5% SURVIVAL RATE

70 years old - 0.054% INFECTION FATALITY RATE - 94.6% SURVIVAL RATE

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Posted in: Taiwan marks 200 days without domestic COVID-19 infection See in context

I believe I read somewhere that they closed off entry from China initially. Then required 2 week quarantine for those arriving from other countries. With body temperature monitoring posts in high traffic areas setup.

For anyone testing positive they required 2 week PAID quarantine. You actually get paid to stay home with support for groceries / basic needs. A basic income support until you recovered from it. They monitored them and kept in contact with them daily.

There may be more but that's what I remember reading. Taiwan did a good job from the start even when WHO ignored them.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Posted in: Tonkotsu ramen potato chips from popular Hakata ramen chain See in context

Anything Tonkotsu Ramen count me in. Ippudo is delicious in Osaka or Tokyo. Will definitely be on the lookout.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Posted in: WHO vaccine drive bedeviled by familiar question: Who pays if things go wrong? See in context

What is wrong with that? it is obvious that effective monitoring systems are required to continuously corroborate safety and efficacy, 

Except her statement much later behind closed doors reveals that they do not have safe monitoring systems she claimed:

"I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don't have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries, and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we're not able to give clear cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine, and this always gets blown up in the media"

Here are her statements at the 3 minute mark (for your convenience - BUT I know you'll write it off as no need to worry. These vaccines are in fact "SAFE")

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=180&v=FIGjQMlLFj8

I know it completely destroys your endlessly repeated argument that any new vaccine will not have long term studies of safety (since the natural infection neither does, and have demonstrated much more risks on the short and medium term), but that is a very poor reason to try and live in denial of the hidden dangers of a disease. Knowledge allows for people to be careful instead of scared, as the antivaxxers would wish. Always with the appeal of the "possible" dangers that lurk over the next immunization and how people would likely die or be left invalid over something that has proved to be much safer than the diseases they prevent.

You talk as if the coronavirus vaccine will be the end to the pandemic. It will not.

The bar has already been set so low for approval:

ONLY reduces cough and headache IF YOU GET COVID-19

What is the goal of a safe vaccine? Prevent infection and transmission (to prevent death) right?!

Well, it's looking like it won't do that. If something changes I will monitoring those details but looks like the bar is already set very low PLUS if you're lucky you have a good chance of getting a wallop of negative side effects (fever over 100 for 5 or more hours, severe headache, expect to take a day off the next day, fainting -whose going to catch you). AND these are healthy volunteers above 18-65 (you said some people above that)

The real kicker? Who of those volunteers had the actual COVID-19 infection? And from phase II & III seeing negative adverse events already and still you're pushing the "Hey...it happens all the time...it will all be fine" cause the 0.1%-0.5% death rate causes you grave concern. You don't look at age, you don't look at comorbidities you keep pushing the pharma agenda that "you never know...asymptomatic people are vulnerable too so you'd better get vaccinated with this new COVID-19 vaccine regardless.

*"*Potential Injuries

*Vaccines are designed to trigger the immune system into fighting off diseases. In rare instances, they can cause it to go into hyperdrive, resulting in severe allergic reactions and even paralysis. With potentially hundreds of millions of people getting vaccinated against one disease, *even a very small percentage can translate into a lot of injured people.

*The potential volume of people affected “will be too much for some unfunded compensation program,”** said Topping, currently chief legal officer of CareSource Management Group Inc., a Dayton, Ohio-based non-profit that’s one of the nation’s largest Medicaid-managed health care plans."*

Once again....no long term studies in children, pregnant women, those who have more comorbidities, seniors 65 and above that this "liquid confidence" is supposed to protect. And now if they are injured they will not be compensated?

Looks like you're on your own so tread carefully and follow the reactions from each of the vaccine manufacturer trials (you could care less about them probably). It's not looking to be fine and dandy like you say it is. You're almost oblivious to any adverse reactions those volunteers have. Which is troubling to see for a vaccine that only reduces cough and headache...with a bar set that doesn't prevent infection, transmission, hospitalization and death. Not a vaccine in my opinion. Just a shot that reduces cold symptoms but gives you a major blast of the flu symptoms for 1 or 2 days (from what I've seen so far).

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Posted in: WHO vaccine drive bedeviled by familiar question: Who pays if things go wrong? See in context

What?!! I thought vaccines were safe and effective!

Vaccines ARE safe and effective with VERY GOOD SAFETY MONITORING SYSTEMS according to W.H.O.'s chief scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan

"Vaccines are safe. That's why they have vaccine safety systems. Robust vaccine safety systems. WHO works with countries to ensure vaccines do what they do best: Prevent disease without risks"

1 week later after that statement...behind closed doors at W.H.O. Global Vaccine Safety Summit Meeting December 2019 she says:

"I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don't have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries, and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we're not able to give clear cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine, and this always gets blown up in the media"

because every week or so a new consequence is found, even on people that were asymptomatic.

You just had to add that last tidbit didn't you virusrex? It's just not safe out there....better get your injections today. Because, because "every week or so a new consequence is found".

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Boy, lot of armchair medics chiming in here.

just make your own decision based on the advice of real doctors.

don’t have to waste more time than that.

Apologies for being one of the armchair medics here. After seeing virusrex pushing the "pharma can do no wrong with their "safe" vaccines" and explaining away all issues as if they were minimal....just had to start putting more info out there for others to decide for themselves. Wouldn't be surprised if he's being paid by pharma to "calm the worries about vaccines" and further push their narrative onto several forums/sites.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 is what concerns me the most for Americans.

"Americans who suffer adverse reactions to coronavirus vaccines that the U.S. is racing to develop will have a hard time getting compensated for injuries from the drugs.

That’s because pandemic-related claims for vaccines will be routed to a rarely used federal program set up to encourage drugmakers to help combat public health emergencies. It spares pharmaceutical and device makers from costly liability lawsuits in exchange for taxpayers compensating injured patients — though it doesn’t guarantee there’s funding to do so."

"Connection between vaxx and autism has definitely not been debunked. And why would we need a fund for injuries if vaccines are safe? Answer: They are not."

Since it began in 2009, the program has paid out less than $6 million, and it has yet to receive any dedicated U.S. government funding for Covid-19." - Basically...you're on your own if you or your family is injured by this COVID-19 vaccine.

We hear "The Science in Settled" and you are no longer allowed to question the safety of vaccines? "Informed consent" rarely exists now among doctors as they aren't aware of the ingredients / possible risks / adverse events in each shot or even the fact that they grow the weakened viruses (depending on the vaccine) in chicken, mice, aborted fetal tissue and even insect cells and then injected them saying that they are totally safe and if you dare question that you are labeled a quack or antivaxxer. Hmmm....something's gone off the rails here.

Not a single vaccine on the CDC’s vaccine schedule has been subjected to “double-blind randomized placebo-controlled” studies. Due to the 1986 vaccine act, vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued for vaccine damage, but they regularly lose lawsuits on drugs that they manufacture, which are tested and approved by the FDA. Why should we trust them with vaccines that are not tested?

The risks of vaccines are very real, and parents are NOT allowed to question their safety.

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

You know what is much worse than having a headache for a few hours? dying from COVID-19. Specially when you don't even know if the headaches have anything to do with the vaccine (because it is still possible each of the people with the side effects got a placebo)

Life is not perfect, but if the worst case scenario is that a vaccine gives you a terribly low chance of having a bad day, that would still be better than a higher chance of spending a couple of weeks on the ICU with who knows what long lasting sequelae or even dying from the infection.

You're absolutely right. We need to vaccinate with this COVID-19 vaccine....for a "deadly" coronavirus.

"*According to the latest immunological studies, the overall lethality of Covid-19 (IFR) in the general population ranges between 0.1% and 0.5% in most countries, which is comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968.*"

https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/

I know you're going to try to discredit that site (like you do every site that doesn't agree with your narrative of pharma does no wrong) so look at their sources in the tables. The links to data by country, charts are all there.

But yeah...let's keep the fear going. It'll help sell the pharma narrative that putting your family through serious negative adverse events (or risk of) is perfect for reducing your cough and headache (even if it doesn't prevent infection, transmission, hospitalization and death from COVID-19).

-2 ( +7 / -9 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

So having a terribly small percentage of people with heavy side effects over a few hours (even if they themselves did not know if they were given the vaccine or placebo) somehow proves that everybody will now have them?

Now you are just dismissing the adverse events as if they were meaningless and that we have nothing to worry about....these severely negative side effects happen...nothing to see here...move along. C'mon son!

Here's some discussion on the Forbes article to help you put things in better perspective:

https://thehighwire.com/videos/cracked-teeth-other-covid-vaccine-side-effects/

-4 ( +5 / -9 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Excerpts from the Forbes article:

"We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols—Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca—do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache."

"The greatest fear people have is dying from this disease. A vaccine must significantly or entirely reduce deaths from Covid-19. Over two hundred thousand people have died in the United States and nearly a million worldwide. None list mortality as a critical endpoint."

"It appears that all the pharmaceutical companies assume that the vaccine will never prevent infection. Their criteria for approval is the difference in symptoms between an infected control group and an infected vaccine group. They do not measure the difference between infection and noninfection as a primary motivation."

" It boggles the mind and defies common sense that the National Institute of Health, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and the rest would consider the approval of a vaccine that would be distributed to hundreds of millions on such slender threads of success."

"It appears that these trials are intended to pass the lowest possible barrier of success."

"It is clear from these studies that the vaccines currently under trial will not be the silver bullet needed to end the pandemic."

I'm surprised at your confidence hasn't wavered one bit in this unreleased vaccine and again NO LONG TERM STUDIES AND NO STUDIES ON EFFECTS ON CHILDREN, PREGNANT MOTHERS and the ELDERLY. Well...if you're that confident then go for it. It'll help you reduce your cough and headache while likely causing more severe side effects (high fever, severe headache, exhaustion, inability to focus, out of commission for at least a day) that will put you out for a day or two (and more than 1 dose each year). Just make sure you have a caretaker present. If you have children make sure you, yourself experience the side effects first before deciding they should be injected a couple times per year on a yearly basis. God forbid everyone gets their injection the same day. 

If this COVID-19 vaccine you are so looking forward to:

Won't stop transmission

Won't stop hospitalization

Won't stop death

Only reduces your cough and headache IF YOU GET COVID-19

With severe side effects in normally healthy people

Untested on children and pregnant mothers (what adverse side effects will they have?)

DOES NOT HAVE LONG TERM STUDIES

you must be getting paid very well to keep parroting the narrative that everyone should be looking forward to this vaccine without hesitation. Good job. Go pharma.

1 ( +10 / -9 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Also, if you need to revisit the current side effects here is the CNBC article published this month:

Side effects from final Phase III:  

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/01/coronavirus-vaccine-trial-participants-exhaustion-fever-headaches.html

I'm sure you'll find a way to say that it'll all be totally safe and we can look forward to giving it to children and pregnant mothers. Go pharma go.

-2 ( +7 / -9 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Completely false. Any vaccine approved is required to do all three things safely.

Pulling out of the air that they have no efficacy is very easy, the difficult part is to prove it. Specially because phase III of the clinical trials is not even finished, so it is impossible to have the necessary data to prove it.

This is just a terribly bad attempt of misinformation.

Here you go:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/09/23/covid-19-vaccine-protocols-reveal-that-trials-are-designed-to-succeed/

Forbes Article Author:

Prof. William A. Haeltine

Professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health

Founded two academic research departments, the Division of Biochemical Pharmacology and the Division of Human Retrovirology

I'm sure you're going to find a way to character assassinate him and try to debunk his expertise.

-3 ( +7 / -10 )

Posted in: Pfizer, BioNTech start combined trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Japan See in context

Frontrunners in the COVID-19 vaccine development: Pfizer (with German partner BioNTech), Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson

PREVENTS DISEASE: NO - Wait, isn't it supposed to prevent COVID-19?

PREVENTS DEATH: NO - Wait, it's not going to save lives of people at risk?

PREVENTS TRANSMISSION: NO - Wait, it will still spread throughout the population?

BUT....REDUCES COUGH & HEADACHE (if you're stricken with COVID-19): YES. Great...just great.

ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS already seen in final phase:

Being bed bound with a fever of over 101 (5 or more hours), shakes, chills, a pounding headache and shortness of breath. Drained for a day and unable to focus. Expect to take the next day off work. 

The bar was set pretty low this time for approval

Oh well...it'll be free and you'll have less cough and headache but you'll still get COVID-19. Liquid confidence in a syringe.

-3 ( +7 / -10 )

Posted in: Fujifilm seeks approval for Avigan as COVID-19 treatment in Japan See in context

BBC reported on it as well:

Covid: Remdesivir 'has little or no effect' on survival, says WHO

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-54566730

They got Trump to take Remdesivir (mixed in with other treatments) to create more demand for it and "say" that it is 'effective'.

https://swprs.org/facts-about-covid-19/

If you look at the details (and their sources) VS what they are presenting to you in the news you'll realize that they're trying to keep people in FEAR for a reason: Pharma product demand / sales

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Recent Comments

Popular

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites


©2021 GPlusMedia Inc.