NihonRyu comments

@sakurasuki What wastes more of our taxes in constantly sending ships and airplanes to intercept the constant aggressive Chinese maneuvers and exercises to probe and test our defenses. The Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) has experienced a significant operational burden due to these incursions. For instance, in a nine-month period leading up to January 2022, Japanese fighter jets were scrambled over 700 times in response to Chinese and Russian aircraft activities. Such frequent deployments not only strain personnel and equipment but also incur substantial costs related to fuel, maintenance, and logistics. Need to seriously show some drastic consequences and teach them a lesson or two... They are doing the same thing to Philippines and just loves to be a bully. A bully needs to be taught a lesson..

Great news but now Japan needs to assert control and defend the Senkakus with military retaliation if the aggressive Chinese don't heed our warnings. The U.S. will only defend Japan if Japan is ready to really defend itself first!

President Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S. from the World Health Organization (WHO) highlights the organization’s failures and inefficiencies, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Japan should strongly consider taking similar action to prioritize its own health sovereignty and better allocate its resources.

The WHO’s handling of the pandemic, from delayed responses to questionable vaccine mandates, caused unnecessary economic and personal suffering. Vaccine injuries, coupled with heavy-handed lockdown policies, revealed the organization’s inability to act transparently and effectively. Billions of taxpayer yen were funneled into an institution that has shown more allegiance to political interests than to global health.

Japan must invest those resources into strengthening its domestic health infrastructure, promoting transparency, and supporting evidence-based medical strategies. It should also work closely with trusted allies to build an independent health coalition focused on addressing pandemics effectively without the WHO’s bureaucracy and political entanglements.

The cost of staying with the WHO isn’t just financial—it’s the trust and well-being of Japan’s citizens. It’s time for bold leadership and decisive action to ensure that Japan is prepared for future health crises on its own terms. I can't believe Japan is still advocating the useless and potentially dangerous jabs on TV and elsewhere!! Madness!!! (It's almost as if there is a media blackout on what's going on in the rest of the world with evidence now piling up on the how jabs have done more harm than good in some studies especially for those that are healthy and not vulnerable which make up the majority of the people.)

Japan Must Take Bold Action to Resolve the Abduction Crisis

The abduction of Japanese citizens by North Korea remains a dark chapter in modern history, and it is clear that relying solely on diplomacy or U.S. intervention has not yielded results. For decades, this issue has persisted without resolution, highlighting the weaknesses in Japan’s national security strategy and its inability to act decisively in protecting its citizens.

Japan must stop waiting for others to solve this crisis. It’s time to develop a specialized task force—modeled after elite units like U.S. Special Forces or Mossad—to carry out undercover missions aimed at freeing remaining hostages. Such a capability would not only strengthen Japan’s position but also send a clear message that acts of aggression and kidnapping will not go unanswered.

This issue is compounded by the troubling reality that North Korean operatives and collaborators continue to operate within Japan, often with little consequence. Allowing this to persist undermines national security and emboldens those who seek to harm Japan. A robust counterintelligence and enforcement strategy is urgently needed to root out these threats.

The continued lack of decisive action is not just a humanitarian failure—it is a national embarrassment. The families of abductees deserve closure, and Japan must demonstrate its resolve to protect its citizens and uphold its sovereignty.

The path forward requires courage and innovation. Japan must prioritize its own capabilities while working closely with trusted allies to ensure that the tragedies of the past are not repeated. It’s time for Japan to lead the way in resolving this issue once and for all.

As China seeks to exploit the shifting political landscape to cozy up to Japan, India, and other U.S. allies, it is critical that nations within the Quad—Japan, India, Australia, and the United States—remain united. History and current geopolitics show that China's outreach is not about fostering genuine partnership but about weakening alliances that counterbalance its growing influence in the region.

The Quad nations must stand firm in their commitment to a Free and Open Indo-Pacific, a vision that ensures stability, security, and prosperity. Working closely with the Trump administration provides an opportunity to deepen military, economic, and technological ties, reinforcing the alliance's collective strength.

China's aim is clear: to undermine the cohesion of alliances that challenge its dominance. The Quad and its allies should recognize this for what it is—a treacherous strategy to create division—and instead double down on cooperation to uphold shared values and protect regional sovereignty.

The way forward is clear: stronger alliances, deeper collaboration, and unwavering commitment to mutual security and growth. Let’s not allow short-term overtures to derail long-term stability.

The newly announced partnership between OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank, with an investment of up to $500 billion in AI infrastructure, represents a monumental leap forward in global AI development. This initiative, starting with a $100 billion commitment, underscores the strength of the Japan-U.S. alliance and its potential to drive innovation and economic growth.

For Japan, this collaboration offers exciting opportunities to lead in AI-powered technologies, expand its role in critical infrastructure development, and attract investments that can boost its economy. SoftBank’s continued commitment to U.S. projects demonstrates Japan's pivotal role in this partnership.

For the U.S., this initiative not only enhances its global competitiveness in the AI race against China but also creates jobs, infrastructure, and advancements in data and energy capabilities.

This partnership could pave the way for further investments, foster innovation, and strengthen the economic ties between Japan and the U.S., ensuring both nations thrive in the rapidly evolving tech landscape.

Let’s hope this collaboration sets a benchmark for the responsible and transformative development of AI technologies.

Japan’s move to strengthen its defense capabilities, particularly through projects like the upcoming joint stealth fighter development with trusted allies such as the U.S., UK, and Australia, is a significant and necessary step forward.

In a world where aggression from nations like China, Russia, and North Korea threatens regional stability, it’s critical for Japan to build a more robust and self-reliant defense system. Collaborating with key allies not only ensures technological advancements but also fosters deeper security partnerships, enhancing collective deterrence.

This strategic direction empowers Japan to safeguard its sovereignty while contributing to peace and stability in East Asia. It’s a future-focused approach that balances innovation, collaboration, and national security.

Let’s hope this momentum continues, and we see more domestically built or jointly developed defense initiatives that strengthen Japan’s ability to address modern challenges effectively.

The invitation for President Trump to attend the 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima atomic bombing is both symbolic and controversial. While it is unlikely that he will accept, the prospect of his attendance—and the remarks he might make—could serve as a long-overdue wake-up call for Japan to reevaluate its stance on national security.

If Trump were to frame the atomic bombings as a necessary means to end World War II, showcasing American ingenuity and exceptionalism, it would force Japan to confront some hard truths. Most Americans view the bombings as justified within the context of the war. Japan, on the other hand, has clung to the ideal of a world without nuclear weapons. While this vision is admirable, it remains an unattainable utopia in the current geopolitical reality.

The world is not free of nuclear weapons, nor will it be in the foreseeable future. Countries like China, Russia, and North Korea continue to expand their nuclear capabilities. In such a world, Japan cannot afford to remain passive under the shield of Article 9. Relying solely on the United States for both nuclear and non-nuclear deterrence places Japan in a position of dependency, undermining its sovereignty and the credibility of its defense posture.

It is time for Japan to embrace a “Japan First” mindset and take responsibility for its own security. This includes:

Revisiting Article 9: Japan must amend its pacifist constitution to allow for a robust and proactive defense policy. A military that cannot adequately defend its own nation undermines Japan’s standing as a credible and independent global actor.

Establishing a Nuclear Deterrent: While controversial, a controlled and transparent nuclear deterrent would strengthen Japan’s position against regional threats. It would also demonstrate to allies and adversaries alike that Japan is capable of defending its sovereignty with determination.

Demonstrating Leadership: Japan must step up as a security partner, showing that it is not just reliant on U.S. support but an equal and capable ally. This is essential to maintaining the U.S.-Japan alliance and ensuring that it remains based on mutual respect and shared strategic goals.

Trump’s potential visit to Hiroshima could be a catalyst for a national conversation about these issues. It’s time for Japan to awaken from its post-war stupor and recognize that peace is not ensured by ideals alone, but by strength, preparation, and the resolve to protect its people and its future.

The 80th anniversary of Hiroshima is not just a moment to reflect on the past but an opportunity to chart a new course for Japan’s future—a future defined by strength, independence, and an unshakable commitment to its sovereignty.

A Stronger, Independent Japan: Advocating for a “Japan First” Policy

In an era where global alliances and shifting power dynamics define security and economic strategies, Japan must take a firm and proactive stance in prioritizing its sovereignty and national interests. A “Japan First” policy is not about isolationism—it is about demonstrating to the world that Japan is prepared to defend its borders, protect its citizens, and contribute to global stability as an equal and capable partner.

Defending Sovereignty with Strength

Japan should unequivocally show that it will not tolerate violations of its airspace or territorial waters. Whether it’s Chinese or Russian planes, ships, or drones, Japan must exercise its right to defend itself decisively. Taking such actions not only reinforces our sovereignty but also sends a clear message that Japan is a strong and dependable security partner. Strength garners respect, and respect fortifies alliances.

Rethinking U.S. Bases and Self-Reliance

While the U.S.-Japan alliance has been instrumental in maintaining regional stability, Japan must develop a long-term strategy to reduce dependency on U.S. military presence. This includes building our own robust nuclear and non-nuclear deterrence capabilities. An independent, self-reliant Japan strengthens its position as a credible ally and ensures that we are not seen merely as a dependent state, but as a nation capable of protecting itself and contributing meaningfully to global security.

Building True Alliances Based on Equality

For Japan to maintain and deepen its alliance with the United States, we must demonstrate that we are not just a passive beneficiary but an active partner. By taking responsibility for our own defense, we enhance our credibility and ensure that the alliance is based on mutual respect and shared values. This aligns with the perspective of leaders like former U.S. President Trump, who emphasized the importance of allies taking responsibility for their own security.

A Vision for the Future

Japan’s path forward must be guided by a vision of strength, self-reliance, and proactive leadership on the global stage. A “Japan First” policy is not a rejection of alliances or cooperation; it is a call to rise to the challenges of our time with courage and determination. By prioritizing our sovereignty, investing in our defense, and showing that we are ready to defend our nation, Japan can secure its place as a nation of strength and a true partner in shaping a stable and prosperous future for the world.

The time for action is now. Let us forge a future where Japan stands tall—ready, capable, and resolute. Otherwise Japan will face the hard realities of a Trump administration that would very well easily abandon Japan and that would be a direct result of over pacifist mentality of both the Japanese government and it’s people.

Yoon Suk Yeol’s arrest marks a critical turning point for South Korea’s democracy and its strategic alliances. As one of the few South Korean leaders who actively championed a robust U.S.-Japan-South Korea alliance, Yoon’s ousting under contentious circumstances is deeply troubling.

Yoon stood firm against threats from North Korea, resisted growing Chinese influence, and countered Russian aggression in the region. His commitment to enhancing South Korea's ties with Japan was pivotal, representing a significant step towards reconciliation and regional security. His leadership prioritized a united front against authoritarian regimes and ensured South Korea’s vital role in maintaining peace in East Asia.

Now, his removal appears orchestrated by forces aligned with pro-China, North Korean unification, and Russian interests—groups eager to dismantle the progress made under Yoon. This arrest, coupled with allegations of an illegal investigation, raises serious concerns about the motives behind his impeachment and the future direction of South Korea’s foreign policy.

The implications are stark. A weakened U.S.-South Korea-Japan alliance could embolden regional adversaries, destabilize East Asia, and jeopardize the hard-earned diplomatic achievements of recent years. The potential pivot away from this alliance risks isolating South Korea and aligning it with authoritarian powers, a move that would undermine both its democratic principles and its security.

Regardless of one’s view on Yoon’s declaration of martial law, the broader context of his removal suggests a deliberate effort to undermine a strong pro-Western stance. If these trends continue, it could spell the end of South Korea's alignment with its democratic allies, leaving Japan and the U.S. to face a far more precarious security environment.

South Koreans and the global community must question whether Yoon's arrest represents justice or a calculated political maneuver. The future of South Korea as a vibrant democracy and its role as a key player in regional stability could hang in the balance.

Five years into the COVID-19 pandemic, the narrative surrounding vaccines is starting to unravel. While vaccines were hailed as a game-changer in curbing the virus’s spread and severity, growing evidence suggests that they may have been far less effective than promised—and, alarmingly, they could have caused more harm than previously acknowledged. The reluctance to explore these possibilities has stifled critical discourse and suppressed stories that deserve to be heard.

As Japan reports 70 million COVID cases and 130,000 deaths, it’s worth questioning the role vaccines played in this timeline. Official claims credit vaccines with reducing fatalities, but the virus’s persistence and the repeated waves of infection—despite high vaccination rates—paint a more complex picture. Countries like Israel, with among the highest vaccine uptakes, faced repeated COVID surges. Meanwhile, less vaccinated nations like Sweden managed better outcomes without strict lockdowns or coercive vaccine mandates, challenging the notion that vaccines alone were the solution.

Even more concerning is the growing body of anecdotal evidence and emerging studies pointing to severe vaccine-related complications. Sudden deaths, unexplained illnesses, and accelerated cancer diagnoses have been reported globally. Tragically, I’ve witnessed this firsthand. My father and best friend—both healthy, active individuals with no underlying conditions—passed away suddenly after receiving multiple vaccine doses. Their deaths, along with countless similar cases, demand scrutiny.

While causation is difficult to establish conclusively in each individual case, the suppression of inquiries and dismissal of vaccine injury claims raise red flags. Major pharmaceutical companies and global health authorities have downplayed these reports, often labeling them as “coincidences” or “anecdotal.” Yet, the lack of transparent data on vaccine side effects and the reluctance to investigate these occurrences fuel distrust and skepticism.

Increased rates of myocarditis, autoimmune disorders, and unexplained neurological issues have been observed post-vaccination. Emerging data also suggest a troubling link between mRNA vaccines and immune system compromise, potentially accelerating cancer progression in some individuals. These possibilities warrant open, unbiased investigation—not censorship or ridicule.

This is not an argument against all vaccines but a call for accountability and transparency. Rushing the development of vaccines under emergency authorizations was understandable given the unprecedented crisis, but blindly dismissing long-term consequences is irresponsible. Public health policies should prioritize informed consent, not coercion or blind allegiance to pharmaceutical giants.

The COVID pandemic has been a tragic chapter for the world, but the real tragedy lies in our failure to learn from it. For the sake of future public health, we must have the courage to confront inconvenient truths, listen to those who have suffered, and demand accountability from those in power. Only then can we truly move forward.

The rapid rollout of COVID vaccines was lauded as a triumph of science, but now the long-term consequences are coming to light. It’s imperative to investigate the potential harms caused by these vaccines, particularly when stories like mine and others remain ignored. Suppressing data and silencing dissent only deepens mistrust in public health institutions. Transparency, accountability, and open discourse are the only way to rebuild trust and truly prioritize the well-being of all.

Japan’s Path to True Sovereignty: Strengthening Defense and Building Strategic Independence

As the geopolitical landscape in East Asia becomes increasingly volatile, Japan faces critical decisions about its national security and sovereignty. Incidents like those recently reported in Okinawa serve as reminders of the complexities of hosting foreign military forces. While the Japan-U.S. alliance has been a cornerstone of regional stability, it is time for Japan to take bold steps to ensure its self-reliance and global standing.

The Case for Rearming Japan

Japan boasts one of the most advanced self-defense forces globally but remains constrained by a post-WWII pacifist constitution that limits its ability to act proactively. With rising threats from China’s assertive policies, North Korea’s nuclear ambitions, and Russia’s unpredictability, a reactive stance is no longer sufficient. Japan must transition to a robust, proactive defense posture, including:

Developing Strategic Weapons Systems: Modernizing its military capabilities, including missile defense and long-range strike systems.

Building a Credible Nuclear Deterrent: While controversial, possessing a nuclear deterrent is a logical step in ensuring Japan’s security in a region dominated by nuclear powers.

Evolving the Japan-U.S. Alliance

The Japan-U.S. alliance has been vital in maintaining peace in the Asia-Pacific. However, the relationship must evolve to reflect true equality between partners. Japan should:

Gradually Take Over U.S. Base Operations: Japan can enhance its sovereignty by assuming control of key U.S. military facilities. This phased approach would demonstrate Japan's readiness to lead its defense while maintaining close cooperation with the U.S.

Mutual Basing Agreements: Propose reciprocal base rights, where Japan can establish bases in U.S. territories or participate in joint training on American soil. This would underscore the mutual respect and parity of the alliance.

The Strategic and Moral Imperative

Addressing Historical Sensitivities: Japan’s military resurgence can and should be framed as a defensive necessity rather than a return to militarism. Transparent policies and collaboration with international allies can reinforce this narrative.

Protecting Japanese Sovereignty: Allowing foreign forces to operate with limited accountability undermines Japan’s authority over its territory. Strengthening its own military ensures that Japan retains control over its security decisions.

Global Perspective: Learning from History

Japan must observe the lessons from nations that have relied heavily on external security guarantees. The Philippines, for instance, asked U.S. forces to leave in the 1990s but later invited them back amid rising regional tensions. This underscores the need for balance—cooperation with allies while building self-sufficiency.

Cultural and Economic Benefits

Rearming Japan can invigorate its economy through increased investments in defense technology and research. It also offers an opportunity to unite its citizens around a shared vision of national pride and responsibility, potentially addressing issues like declining population morale and global influence.

Conclusion

The path forward is clear: Japan must take control of its destiny. By rearming, developing a nuclear deterrent, and rebalancing its alliance with the U.S., Japan can emerge as a stronger, more equal partner on the world stage. This strategy not only strengthens Japan’s sovereignty but also ensures regional stability in the face of growing challenges.

Let us not view these steps as abandoning peace but as embracing the responsibility of securing it for future generations.

Japan finds itself surrounded by increasingly aggressive neighbors: China, North Korea, and Russia, all of whom possess nuclear weapons and have shown little hesitation in using coercion to pursue their goals. In this environment, it is no longer sufficient to rely solely on the U.S. nuclear umbrella or outdated ideals of a nuclear-free world.

1. Escalating Threats from Adversaries

China:

Continues to expand its nuclear arsenal while engaging in aggressive military maneuvers near Japan’s territorial waters and airspace. Chinese military simulations targeting U.S. bases in Japan are alarming. (SCMP Article)

Cyberattacks linked to China, such as those by the hacking group MirrorFace, have targeted Japan’s national security and advanced technology sectors, further demonstrating China’s disregard for sovereignty and international norms.

North Korea:

Regularly conducts missile tests, with many landing dangerously close to Japan. Their nuclear weapons program poses a direct threat to Japanese cities.

Russia:

Has openly threatened the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine and continues to project military power near Japan’s northern territories.

2. Japan’s Vulnerability as a “Sitting Duck”

Japan, as the only G7 nation without nuclear weapons, remains an outlier in a world where nuclear deterrence is a reality.

Relying solely on the U.S. nuclear umbrella leaves Japan vulnerable, especially if U.S. interests diverge from Japan’s in the future.

A noncommittal stance, as demonstrated by recent government actions, risks emboldening adversaries who view Japan as weak and unprepared to defend itself.

3. A Responsible Case for a Nuclear Deterrent

While Japan’s tragic history with nuclear weapons must never be forgotten, we must also recognize the evolving geopolitical landscape. Developing a limited, tactical nuclear arsenal for self-defense would:

Deter Aggression: Adversaries are less likely to target a nation with the capability to retaliate.

Strengthen Alliances: A self-reliant Japan would be a more effective partner to allies like the U.S., Australia, and South Korea.

Ensure Sovereignty: Japan must not remain dependent on other nations for its ultimate security.

4. Lessons from Global Examples

Germany, a NATO member, participates in nuclear sharing arrangements while attending U.N. nuclear ban treaty meetings as an observer. Why should Japan shy away from similar pragmatic approaches?

India developed its nuclear arsenal under existential threats, balancing deterrence with global diplomacy.

5. Taking Inspiration from Trump’s Policies

Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s "America First" strategy emphasized self-reliance and prioritizing national interests. Japan must adopt a "Japan First" policy:

Develop its own nuclear deterrent to ensure the safety and security of its citizens.

Restrict adversarial nations like China from buying land and assets in Japan, as they deny Japanese citizens reciprocal rights in their countries.

Strengthen military alliances while standing independently on key national security issues.

6. Addressing the Critics

Nuclear-Free Advocates: While the goal of a nuclear-free world is noble, the reality is that China, North Korea, and Russia are not disarming. Japan must act to protect itself.

Public Opinion: Clear communication and education about the strategic necessity of a nuclear deterrent can shift public sentiment.

7. Japan’s Path Forward

The world has changed, and Japan must adapt to secure its future. A nation surrounded by nuclear-armed adversaries cannot afford to remain defenseless. As Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba emphasized, nuclear deterrence is critical in the face of modern threats.

Japan has the technological expertise, economic resources, and moral responsibility to protect its citizens. Developing a limited, defensive nuclear arsenal is not an act of aggression but a necessary step toward ensuring peace through strength.

This is the moment for Japan to assert its sovereignty and security. Failing to act now risks leaving future generations vulnerable to coercion and aggression. Let us build a stronger, more secure Japan!

Recent revelations about Chinese hacking group MirrorFace targeting Japan’s national security and advanced technology sectors are deeply troubling. With over 200 confirmed cyberattacks in five years, the Chinese government’s blatant disregard for international norms is undeniable. Yet, the issue goes far beyond hacking.

1. Unequal Treatment and Double Standards

Japan continues to allow Chinese nationals to purchase property freely within our borders, while Japanese citizens cannot buy land in China due to restrictive laws. This imbalance is unacceptable and undermines Japan’s sovereignty. Why should we open our doors to foreign investors from a country that actively denies us the same opportunities?

Moreover, the recent arrests of top Japanese business executives, such as those from Astellas, under dubious charges in China, demonstrate a troubling pattern of targeting Japanese individuals without substantial evidence. These actions are not isolated incidents but part of a larger strategy to intimidate and weaken Japan’s global standing.

2. Threats to Japanese Safety

We cannot forget the disturbing reports of violence against Japanese citizens in China, including attacks on schoolchildren. Such actions, coupled with polls showing significant anti-Japanese sentiment among the Chinese populace, raise serious questions about China's commitment to fostering peaceful relations.

3. Cyberattacks as Modern Warfare

The cyberattacks on Japan’s government, businesses, and infrastructure represent a form of modern warfare, aiming to undermine our national security. Allowing this to continue unchallenged is not an option. Japan must:

Strengthen its cybersecurity infrastructure immediately.

Collaborate more closely with international partners like the U.S. and NATO to counteract these persistent threats.

4. Time for Japan to Take a Stronger Stance

Japan should take inspiration from former U.S. President Donald Trump’s "America First" policies and implement a "Japan First" strategy to protect our nation’s interests. This includes:

Restricting Foreign Ownership of Land: Prohibit property purchases by individuals from countries that deny reciprocal rights to Japanese citizens.

Reevaluating Visa Policies: Stop offering free visas to nations that do not respect Japan’s sovereignty or contribute to mutual trust.

Economic Decoupling: Diversify supply chains away from China to reduce dependency on an unreliable partner.

Enhanced National Security Measures: Invest heavily in cybersecurity and intelligence-sharing initiatives with trusted allies.

5. China Is Not Acting Like a Responsible Global Citizen

China’s actions—from cyberattacks to coercive economic practices—are not those of a nation seeking peaceful coexistence. If Beijing continues to act as a destabilizing force, it is Japan’s duty to stand firm and protect its sovereignty, citizens, and future.

Japan has long been known for its diplomacy and restraint, but this must not be mistaken for weakness. By addressing these challenges decisively, we can ensure that Japan remains secure and prosperous in an increasingly uncertain world.

Let’s prioritize Japan’s interests and push back against those who seek to exploit our nation

The tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should forever remind humanity of the catastrophic power of nuclear weapons. Survivors like Terumi Tanaka, who courageously advocate for disarmament, provide moral clarity in a world increasingly shadowed by nuclear threats. However, the harsh geopolitical reality demands a pragmatic approach to ensure Japan’s security and peace in the future.

The Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Nihon Hidankyo underscores the value of dialogue and global disarmament. Yet, as nuclear states modernize arsenals and adversaries like North Korea, China, and Russia issue direct and indirect threats, Japan must rethink its defensive posture. A nuclear deterrent is not a rejection of peace but a necessary means to safeguard it.

Japan’s reliance on the U.S. nuclear umbrella may no longer suffice in an unpredictable world. The regional security dynamics, marked by China’s expansionism, North Korea’s provocations, and Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, illustrate the limitations of treaties and moral appeals. The lesson from history is clear: nations with robust deterrents are less likely to fall victim to external coercion or aggression.

Critics may argue that possessing nuclear weapons contradicts Japan’s pacifist principles and postwar stance. However, the very essence of Japan’s postwar ethos—protecting its people and ensuring peace—justifies the creation of a defensive nuclear program. Such a program would not only deter potential adversaries but also strengthen Japan’s position in international negotiations aimed at eventual disarmament.

To prevent another Hiroshima or Nagasaki, Japan must embrace the paradox of deterrence. By demonstrating the willingness and capability to defend itself against nuclear threats, Japan can help maintain regional stability and discourage nuclear aggression. This step, though difficult, is a pragmatic response to a dangerous world where reliance on the goodwill of others is insufficient.

Japan’s leadership in responsibly managing nuclear capabilities could also set an example for other nations. By maintaining strict safeguards, transparency, and a commitment to defensive use, Japan could redefine what it means to hold nuclear weapons in a morally responsible manner.

Terumi Tanaka’s powerful reminder of nuclear devastation resonates deeply. Yet, to truly honor the victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan must ensure such tragedies never recur—by combining the lessons of history with the courage to act decisively in the present. Peace through strength is not a contradiction; it is a necessity.

President Yoon Suk Yeol’s declaration of martial law has sparked a heated debate about the domestic and international factors driving South Korea’s current political turmoil. While the immediate reasons cited by Yoon center on internal threats and accusations of anti-state activities by the opposition, a deeper look reveals a likely correlation with broader geopolitical dynamics.

Yoon’s presidency has been marked by significant strides in strengthening alliances with the U.S., Japan, and Australia—an alignment that challenges traditional regional power balances. His administration’s support for improving relations with Japan and its firm stance against North Korean provocations have disrupted decades of political norms in South Korea. Furthermore, South Korea’s vocal support for Ukraine in the global conflict against Russian aggression, coupled with reports of North Korea deploying troops to assist Russia, positions Yoon’s government in stark opposition to key regional players like China and North Korea.

Could these alliances and policies have made Yoon a target of coordinated efforts to destabilize his leadership? Critics argue that the opposition’s alleged anti-state activities might be linked to foreign propaganda campaigns aimed at weakening Yoon’s pro-Western stance. Social media and misinformation have emerged as tools for manipulation in similar scenarios globally, raising questions about their potential influence in South Korea’s current unrest.

While Yoon’s declaration of martial law was met with swift backlash and a parliamentary reversal, the situation underscores the challenges of navigating domestic stability in a geopolitically charged environment. If anything, the events in South Korea serve as a reminder of the intricate ties between internal politics and international alliances.

My take Is Yoon’s crisis a result of internal missteps, external influences, or both. Regardless the next president after Yoon could undermine all the progress of building relationships back with Japan and see more comfort woman issues and the like of predecessors.

The survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have every right to demand a world without nuclear weapons, but in the face of today’s geopolitical realities, Japan must ask itself a tough question: Can it continue to rely solely on the U.S. for protection forever? For over 80 years, Japan has depended on the U.S. nuclear umbrella and restrained its own military potential under Article 9 of the constitution. While this was understandable post-WWII, the world has changed, and Japan’s position is more precarious than ever.

Russia, China, and North Korea—all nuclear-armed states—are increasingly hostile toward Japan. Russia regularly flexes its military in the Northern Territories, North Korea launches missiles over Japanese airspace, and China aggressively asserts claims over the Senkaku Islands while increasing its military presence in the region. These nations do not respect international law, and Japan can no longer afford to hide behind an idealistic constitutional clause.

Revoking Article 9 and building a robust self-defense force, including considering nuclear armament, isn’t about warmongering—it’s about ensuring Japan is never a victim again. No one wants another Hiroshima or Nagasaki, but nuclear weapons have become a deterrent against precisely that kind of devastation. Japan needs to face the reality that possessing a strong deterrent would not only protect its own sovereignty but also strengthen its role as a proactive ally to the U.S. in countering authoritarian regimes in the region.

The world is watching Japan, and it’s time to step out from the shadow of post-war constraints. By rewriting its constitution, Japan can finally become a true equal partner in securing peace and stability in East Asia. This isn’t about abandoning the lessons of history—it’s about making sure those lessons are never repeated.

Honestly, the idea that Japan was ever a vassal state to China or will ever become subordinate is just not true. Japan has always maintained its independence. Sure, during the Tang Dynasty, Japan adopted aspects of Chinese culture and government, but that was a conscious choice to modernize—not subordination. And when the Mongols (under the Yuan Dynasty) tried to demand tribute, Japan didn’t just refuse—they defeated them in two invasion attempts. The idea that Japan was subordinate to China just doesn’t hold up to history.

Also, let’s not forget how much China feared Japan during the late 19th century. Japan defeated the Qing Empire decisively in the First Sino-Japanese War (1894–95), showing it wasn’t just independent but a rising power. And even now, Japan’s potential as a regional power is huge. If not for the constraints of Article 9 and U.S. oversight after WWII, Japan would likely be a major military force competing directly with China for dominance in East Asia.

On Taiwan, it’s worth noting that Taiwan wasn’t even historically Han Chinese. It was originally inhabited by indigenous Austronesian tribes—people with closer ties to the Pacific Islands than to China. Taiwan only became part of the Qing Empire in 1683 and even then, it was treated as a remote frontier. Before that, it was under Western colonial powers like the Dutch and Spanish. Japan ruled Taiwan from 1895 to 1945, and modern Taiwan’s identity reflects a mix of these influences. The idea that Taiwan has always been “Chinese” is just misleading.

As for the rising anti-Japan sentiment in China, let’s be real—this is heavily driven by CCP propaganda. They often use Japan as a scapegoat to distract from internal problems. Yet despite all this “hate,” millions of Chinese tourists still visit Japan every year, enjoying the culture, food, and hospitality. If they hated Japan that much, would they really keep coming back?

It seems like China’s leadership knows that a militarily unrestricted Japan would be a serious competitor in the region, just like it was historically. That’s probably why they work so hard to stoke these negative narratives. The real history shows a much more balanced and competitive relationship between these two nations than some people seem to think.

Build the new Aegis Ashor platform on Senkaku, solve two problems at once. If Japan is to buy from the U.S. also make it so that the U.S. patrols and protects the installation from aggressive Chinese incursions in territorial waters and air space.

Japan needs to get behind the times and begin to change the laws for medical and recreational cannabis. It’s actually unpatriotic to adhere to the current cannabis laws forcibly put in place arbitrarily by the U.S. during occupation after the war. Like article 9, cannabis laws need to be revised with the changing times and environment. Cannabis was brought in by the Jomon people’s from Asia tens of thousand of years ago as sacred plant and also part of Shinto religious ceremonies. Japanese have lost their close affiliation with Cannabis and Hemp culture and more medical and scientific research by Japanese Pharmas/cosmetics industries need to happen to not lose ground from their global competitors. Could be the next cash crop that these older Japanese farmers could cash in on as the rest of the world including many global Pharma and cosmetics industries are actively researching and developing many natural and life changing drugs, etc.

Kim is more rational than Moon, he’s 1/4 Japanese after all: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ko_Yong-hui

lol, but no kidding aside, had know idea Kim was 1/4 Japanese and his mother loved Japan and sang him and his sister Japanese folk songs since they were children. Perhaps Abe should meet with Kim after all!

It's a very unfortunate situation but the way Korean government and how many of its population are certainly acting (setting oneself ablaze, cutting their fingers off, burning Japanese flags, spouting untruths and hate about Japan to the world, etc.) are proving the general conception that many Koreans are indeed irrational, overly emotional, stubborn, unforgiving and hard to deal with in a calm and rational manner. This reputation has been around even before the war according to the old-timers and in fact many of my Chinese friends who come from Northern China near the North Korean border where many ethnic Koreans live seem to agree with their Japanese counterparts about our mutual Korean brethren and certainly don't look at them any more fondly than the Japanese population. Having lived in Los Angeles during the Rodney King riots and seeing first hand how the immigrant Korean population also unfairly generalized and prejudiced the black and latino populations and certainly had bad blood between them, it is certainly rich of them to continue bashing and hating on the Japanese for everything and anything, forever and ever... Japan is now aware over the last several decades is that constant apologizing and placating the Koreans only emboldens them to ask for more unreasonable requests...and can never keep their end of their commitment or international treaty.

Thus: (1) Koreans (North and South) in general hate Japan and always will...2) they will never truly want friendly relations based on mutual trust and civility. (they only want to see Japan crumble into the sea.) So, it's time now to take a more direct and aggressive approach to deal with their immature leaders and treat them the way they treat us... Seriously, the way South Korea is acting only vindicates Japanese nationalists that they were right all along to arm back up, even potentially nuke-up as well. Thank you, Korea for a great job to turn the populace to accelerate a more independent and united Japan that may quickly dump the pacifist constitution and re-arm to become a more powerful force together with the U.S. to keep Russian, Chinese, and NorthKorean aggressive ambitions in check!

@gambare Japan https://www.google.co.jp/amp/s/www.globalresearch.ca/the-secret-history-of-cannabis-in-japan-2/5479996/amp as a pro-Japanese you should be for the legalization and rightful legitimization of Cannabis for the sake of Japan’s culture and soul which was robbed and neglected during GHQ occupation after the war. As with article 9, the Cannabis eradication program should also be reconsidered in light of current environment and understanding of the medicinal and spiritual qualities long associated with Japanese Cannabis culture.

Finally! About time Japan began to finally counter years of S.Korea's constant Japan Bashing and victimhood vitriol while reneging on mutually agreed international accords. While there at it, they should force Korea's hand to finally agree to resolve the Takeshima/Dokdo Island dispute at the ICJ so all pending disputes between Japan and Korea can be finally cleared so they can both start a new chapter of "real" friendship and mutual cooperation.

Perhaps Japan should execute them as the Chinese have done to Japanese smugglers for far smaller quantities.

Agreed should be legalized. It was part of Japanese religious Shinto culture and was taken away and demonized during American occupation. Now that the U.S. is starting to legalize for recreation in majority of the states and Canada as well not to mention the many health benefits of CBD oils. Japan really needs to repeal the archaic laws in 大麻 and think would help with the depopulation and other social ills such as recluses and suicides and depression. Also, Japan makes some of the best agricultural produce, imagine the economic revitalization opportunity in the country side if shifting focus on making high quality orgamic 大麻 second to none.

Simply, Korea has no intention to settle the matter once and for all at ICJ in a civil professional manner as recommended by the U.S. Japan perhaps should just re-take Takeshima by force if necessary as that seems to be the only course of action to bring Korea to the table. Unfortunately, this is probably the only cards left that Japan has for Korea to understand the seriousness of this matter and if it escalates so be it... (Its not like South Korea wants friendly relationships with Japan anyways...nor do they want to consider historical academic evidence to discuss any issues be it comfort women, Takeshima/Dokdo, or East Sea renaming of Sea of Japan, or complaining about the Japanese rising sun flag on clothing art, etc..) Seriously... Japan has been too lenient and calm hoping that Korea could take a more mature, calm stance on any historical perspectives between the two countries.

@RealCDN There is plenty of dolphin to eat if you know where. Sotobo Chiba is the easiest from Tokyo. However, I would stipulate that dolphin is a bit gamey/smelly to be served sashimi style like whale IMO and better in stew and personally prefer whale over dolphin. I've had dolphin maybe a dozen times in various places in Chiba in (hidden menus) at various eateries concentrated along the coast in the last 15yrs on the way back from surf trips. They actually used to sell them in the back of trucks like sweet potatoes in some fishing village locales hawking them over speaker announcing イルカ, イルカ！ FYI: If the whale meat is rather inexpensive and tastes a bit more pungent than you remember, it might likely be dolphin. (Dolphin is edible but wouldn't quite say its good while whale is generally delicious!) I would compare dolphin to dog meat I ate in Seoul, and as is typical there they don't generally advertise it widely and need to go with local person to find dog meat specialty restaurants and generally cooked in stews masked by spices/garlic, etc.

Living on the Pacific coast of Chiba prefecture: there is plenty of historical and archaeological evidence of Japanese people's close relationship with both Dolphin and Whales from the Jomon period and have had both Dolphin and Whale cuisine celebrated by many that have lived out here for generations. http://www.gepr.org/en/contents/20140217-01/ Having also heavy Native American heritage (BlackFeet) and influence as well on my American side of heritage, the traditional Japanese were much more similar to Native Americans in terms of respect and spirituality with the animals they hunted. As many Native Americans now who have been devastated culturally by the loss of the West by the Europeans sitting on reservations collecting welfare and eating processed foods getting overweight, etc. Unfortunately, too few Native Americans now can even practice hunting in their traditional areas and prey. (Buffalo herds devastated by building of the railroads, Macah Indians on WA coast being harassed for their annual whale hunts, etc..) I pray Japan resists the cultural imperialism and bullying of the western nations to lose their traditions of sustainable and respectful whaling practices. Japan's culture is unique and loved by many from around the world because they modernized on their own without being colonized and retained a unique Japanese aspect to their culture and traditions. In the grand scheme of things there are so much larger world and Japan issues to tackle besides a few small whaling dolphin hunting traditions being kept alive in isolated villages in Japan.

It's about high time Japan returns in kind instead of turning a blind eye as usual considering all the espionage the Chinese do to Japan and the U.S. Also, where is the facts and proof on the espionage charges on this Itochu guy?