Impossible to prove. Same goes for the contrary. So he's lying.
0 ( +2 / -2 )
One thing useful to combat misinformation is credibility. I don't know what's left of it with these guys after their "mild weather" and "safe and secure" Olympics lies, just to mention the latest and most obvious ones.
3 ( +4 / -1 )
It is impossible, and somewhat irrelevant already, to track down how many of these cases are directly or indirectly related to the Games. Obviously, delta variant is gaining ground everywhere, Olympics or not. There’s one thing undisputable though: it was the most stupid idea to have them in the middle of the pandemic. Except for those with financial skin in the game.
Hope this shocking number, not so much in absolute terms but rather the doubling in number of cases, will help Koike and Suga to sober up a bit after their disguting self congratulation moment yesterday.
14 ( +18 / -4 )
Agree except for the "excessively massive" cancellation penalty. It was about $5bn = 0.1% of annual GDP. In other words, almost peanuts. And also very hypothetical. Official amount for postponement-related cost is $3bn already. So at country level, the money loss was symbolic. Of course, very different for a few individuals and companies.
Sorry if I sound like a broken record for regular readers here but this point, the relative weight of the hypothetical penalty, is almost never raised, even in respectable newspapers like the Post or the Guardian. Don't know why.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
I learn more interesting stuff each day from @alfie than from the articles themselves :-). Thanks.
2 ( +2 / -0 )
According to a recent international poll by Ipsos, 57 percent of people think the games should not take place this year.
1 ( +4 / -3 )
Couldn't agree more. This is the only reason why Japan is putting up with this mess.
The very hypothetical penalty for pulling out was at around $5bn or 0.1% of the country's GDP. In other words, peanuts. The official, and therefore certainly underestimated, cost of the postponement alone was close to $3bn.
Just follow the money and you'll know why this is happening. I wish there were more investigative journalism here and abroad.
4 ( +5 / -1 )
That's interesting but... Sources?
IOC is not really renown for its financial transparency.
-1 ( +1 / -2 )
I don't think the "safe and secure" crowd is going to have many field days, going forward.
9 ( +12 / -3 )
United by emotion.
3 ( +5 / -2 )
Just for the (not) fun of it, I thought I'd share here the offical reply I just got from the EU on my question regarding their support to "safe and secure" Games.
My question: "Good morning, I have a question for Mr Michel and Ms von der Leyen. How is it possible that the EU makes the following statement: “We support the holding of the Olympic and Paralympic Games Tokyo 2020 in a safe and secure manner this summer as a symbol of global unity in defeating COVID-19”, two days after a publication by top scientist of an article showing that the IOC Playbook for the Games is absolutely insufficient to guarantee "safe and secure" Games? Not to mention the numerous Japanese scientists and doctors\' associations that previously said the same thing. What led the EU to sign such a statement? Looking forward to your reply,"
EU reply (one month later) : "We kindly draw your attention to the fact that the organisers have in the meanwhile taken additional decisions regarding the safe and secure holding of the Olympic Games."
12 ( +15 / -3 )
Find the title a bit odd. "First" Covid-19 case. You mean you were expecting that and there will be more to come?
But, we've been told ad nauseam that the Village, of all places, would be a safe and secure bubble.
In that case, shouldn't the title be "One Covid-19 case found at the Village"?
15 ( +21 / -6 )
Their only consistency in the last months is the absolute contradiction between their declarations and the reality of things. They live in a parallel world.
9 ( +10 / -1 )
Thanks for the WP article link. Particularly like that part:
"The Games will take place “at any cost,” Seiko Hashimoto, president of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Committee, has said, as if she were Churchill and this were 1941."
6 ( +7 / -1 )
The Games do not profit to Japan but to a small number of powerful people in Japan, as they did in each host country since at least the L.A. Games. That's part of the scheme. You need an inside accomplice to rob a bank. The loser is the tax payer.
6 ( +8 / -2 )
Fully agree. That's the bad side of the gambarou work culture.
2 ( +3 / -1 )
Bach is upbeat. Everyone else sad or angry or both. Well done.
14 ( +16 / -2 )
Probably in anticipation to the upcoming fiasco, I’ve seen some posts here lately trying to exonerate JGOV as its hands were supposedly tied by the IOC contract. Well, as it’s been said many times already, I don't think that the IOC would have pressed charges against Japan, as the PR damage would have been very high. I also think it was a very convenient thing to say for JGOV.
But my point is that the financial penalty for Japan to pull out of the Games, roughly $5bn, was only about 0.1 % of its GDP. Why would JGOV not choose that option when experts said there were important risks to the public health? If you scale this 0.1% down to a household making JPY 5 million in annual revenues, that’s JPY5,000, the price of a parking ticket. Would you take ANY health-related risk for you and the rest of your household for so little money? Of course not. They did. Why?
The only reason I can see is that Japanese top politicians and businessmen have huge financial interests. If you rob a bank, it’s always easier with an accomplice inside.
It’s not only Japan, it’s just the IOC business model, repeated every four years.
5 ( +6 / -1 )
I wish I could be as relaxed as you are but I just can't. Even though I am part of the lucky minority that has not been affected by Covid, neither physically nor financially.
I just can't get over the fact that the $30 bn party is financed at 80% by the public for the massive benefit of a few, and forced down on us during a pandemic for that very reason.
You don't understand people like me. Fine, it's reciprocal.
10 ( +12 / -2 )
2 ( +5 / -3 )
Good thing that the Games are going to look like exactly what they are.
2 ( +4 / -2 )
Whether you are pro-LDP or anti-LDP, like any reasonable person should be, this looks like a half empty / half full glass situation.
3 ( +5 / -2 )
You are right. Shigeru Omi said that the committee's first intention was to recommend the cancellation or postponment but, since the government has made clear that these were not options, they focused on recommendations about the number of spectators.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
"Suga said a decision on spectators will have to be made by a meeting with four other involved parties: The organizing committee, Tokyo, the International Olympic, and Paralympic Committees".
And why not NBC and Procter & Gamble while we're at it?
They should not have to consult the IOC on a national and regional public health issue. Just inform them when the decision is taken.
4 ( +5 / -1 )
Really hope they'll have it without. First for safety reasons, just look at what's going on with the Euro.
Second because the IOC and NBC just deserve to show the dullest Games in the history, for having so greedily and stubbornly imposed the Games THIS year. Not to mention the stupid mid-summer dates in the first place.
I hope TV audience will crash and the whole thing leads to an in-depth reform of the IOC.
15 ( +19 / -4 )
Looks like it's going to hit 1,000 a day by the time the Games start.
Bach, Suga & Co. must be brainstorming their head off on how to justify keeping spectators in the stadium.
Expect some creativity.
17 ( +20 / -3 )
The UK, although one of countries with the higher Delta variant presence, will probably exempted from the "tightened" rules. Let's wait and see.
Double standards have been the rule in this mess since they decided to force it down a couple of months ago so I don't see why this would change.
At least they're being consistent there.
3 ( +5 / -2 )
Good luck with that. Delta variant is already present in 80 countries, including Japan.
41 ( +45 / -4 )
Does it matter, really?
I think it's been proven many times already that the Games are for the economic benefit of the happy few rather than that of the host country.
And I'm not talking about Tokyo 2020 only.
19 ( +21 / -2 )
"daily tests, in principle", "measures not necessarily 100% effective" but "safe and secure Games".
Still amazed that she can come and say that without blinking. And without the press in general and the publisher of this article to underline the hypocrisy.
Oh, well, they put "safe and secure" in between quotation marks, I guess that's as far as they'll go.
Anyway, where's Coates hiding? Still in quarantine?
3 ( +7 / -4 )