What a particularly painful dinner that must have been.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
The author seems to confuse being independent and being left alone.
12 ( +13 / -1 )
In a display of confidence, perhaps they could use the contaminated water from Fukushima instead of releasing it back into the ocean.
4 ( +5 / -1 )
An interesting observation by a Japanese lawyer on Twitter: she was already being followed and filmed in the street by the media the day before the arrest, which leads that lawyer to believe they had been made aware of the pending arrest. That seems unfair at best and quite likely illegal.
18 ( +19 / -1 )
The Jack Black reference is actually quite clever
When he was playing with the duo Tenacious D they had a humorous song called “Tribute” which was a tribute to “the greatest song in the world.”
A funny video, too.
2 ( +3 / -1 )
The first paragraph is truly poorly written.
To phrase it as “taking on” the games as if they volunteered to help half a million refugees out of the goodness of their heart and are now facing difficulties in carrying out such a noble pursuit.
The government ignored every reasonable argument against hosting the games, yet choose to do so for reasons only they know, but I’ll ascribe it to ego and pride.
This is lazy writing and should be edited.
6 ( +10 / -4 )
Japan Today should start a Koizumi Meter: a running tally of entirely uncritical fluff pieces that heap praise on him.
If every article refers to him as a rising star without actually saying why that is, then propaganda mission accomplished.
His father was Prime Minister; he speaks English, and his fiancé is beautiful.
Is there anything of substance in the resume before he is so ordained?
34 ( +37 / -3 )
Adding a touch of regality and class to the whole proceedings will be a musical number by (checks notes, gasps) Arashi.
I shudder to think what cringeworthy entertainment there will be during the Opening Ceremony at the Olympics.
1 ( +2 / -1 )
The majority of Japanese support same sex marriage. A few seconds of google searches will answer that.
-1 ( +2 / -3 )
@TheLongTermer: and what of the Japanese half of the relationship? What rights does he have in his own country?
0 ( +3 / -3 )
@Jcosplay: a fair reply.
Let's reframe the entire story:
Instead of "American man married to same-sex Japanese partner sues gov't for long-term visa" let's rewrite it this way: "Japanese citizen married to same-sex American partner sues gov't for long-term visa."
This is, in fact, what is happening.
If it were, let's say, two American men suing the Japanese government for full rights in Japan, then, for the sake of discussion, I can go along with the idea that they are pushing their western ideals on Japan. Still disagree, but ok, I can concede to a degree.
But one half of this relationship is Japanese. What of his rights in his own country? What of his rights to marry who he wants and live in his home country?
Those supporting this are also saying: if you are gay and lesbian and happen to fall in love while abroad and want to be married, you are forfeiting your right to return to Japan. This is ok with you? Is this not simply discrimination? The supporters here are saying: if you are gay or lesbian and fall in love with a foreigner, you may not live in Japan as a married couple. That's not the West pushing its ideals on Japan. It's the very definition of discrimination.
5 ( +8 / -3 )
Japan is, in fact, trending towards more LGBT rights. This is the right moment in time for such lawsuits to be brought. Japanese nationals have made similar claims; the fact that this particular issue has a foreigner involved is almost secondary. Don't forget one half of this couple is Japanese. What about his rights in his own country? His right to be married in his own country is being denied. Is that the West pushing its ideals on Japan? This is a Japanese citizen protesting something he feels is unjust.
For those saying this is cultural imperialism, then what do you say to Japanese lawmakers and Japanese plaintiffs in similar lawsuits? There are numerous cases.
Here, a Japanese couple with a similar suit:
If you can't accept two adults, in love, wanting their love to be officially recognized, then you are on the wrong side of history.
4 ( +7 / -3 )
It would be easier if all the people supporting this would simply come out and say, "Man, I hate those f*gs." Just be out with your hate and bigotry, because that the end of the day, that's what it comes down to.
@Jcosplay: Is Japan ever wrong in your eyes? Serious question, not sarcasm. Is it possible that on some issues it might be lacking? I'm from the States originally and have lengthy list of things of things that are wrong in my home country. If an "outsider" criticizes it, I owe it to everyone to listen.
2 ( +9 / -7 )
This couple is not asking to be married in Japan; they are asking that their marriage be honored in Japan. It's a huge distinction. As noted in the article there are cases setting legal precedent for same-sex partnerships, so why not this particular case, too?
As an aside, or perhaps it's the main issue, after all: it's time to lose the bigotry.
To those who proclaim it's one country or culture pushing their values on another, well, perhaps it is to a degree. But if you are planting a flag on a hill that says two adults, in love and happy, who happen to be gay or lesbian, can not get married, and can not travel freely, then perhaps your values are indeed flawed.
Every country and culture has its own beauty and its own warts; defending all of it in its entirety benefits no one.
7 ( +13 / -6 )
You write, "Because the laws of foreign countries don’t apply in Japan."
Actually, with regards to marriage they do, insofar as marriages abroad are recognized in Japan, and that is the point of the lawsuit.
A heterosexual marriage from America is recognized in Japan, whereas a marriage between a gay or lesbian couple is not. And that's why they have a legitimate claim that this is discriminatory.
6 ( +14 / -8 )
"a rising political star in Japan" is, quite simply, bad reporting and bad writing.
He may very well be an excellent human being and turn out to be an excellent politician. The latter is not something I expect at all, but I'll focus on the writing itself.
What are the reasons to support such a phrase? Without that, it comes across as nothing but propaganda fluff.
The author should be embarrassed.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
I’m neither lazy nor anti-social and I consider myself quite able in the kitchen, but some days I’d rather have someone else do it for me, particularly if that something else requires ingredients I don’t happen to have at the moment.
No shame at all in ordering something delicious when I’d rather be doing something else.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
Are you happy together?
End of test.
9 ( +9 / -0 )
In related news, the Bansky graffiti is still being celebrated by Yuriko Koike and the city government.
7 ( +11 / -4 )
I’m asking out of wide-eyed bewilderment: can someone please explain the “not indicted” aspect?
Do the police need someone to actually press charges? I’m assuming if I were stabbed by a would-be mugger I surely wouldn’t need to go through the formality of pressing charges. The police would act, regardless of my involvement after the fact. Why should attempted rape or related charges be any different?
Failing that, can the victim herself press charges?
What an awful sham of a justice system.
8 ( +8 / -0 )
@yokohamaries: this exactly. Life through elementary school does seem like a wonderful time, what comes after is the what is troubling and sad to watch. Of course, there are countless exceptions and people find ways to create happiness, but. Just but.
Anecdotes are not the best for evidence, but here is one: a good friend (English father, Japanese mother) wanted to visit the U.K. this past Christmas holiday but did not because their 14 year old son had baseball practice in the week between Christmas and New Year's. They told the coach they wanted to miss practice, but were told, quite clearly, that he would be letting down his team and school by not showing his spirit. Again: practice in the middle of winter, just before the most important holiday on the Japanese calendar, for a summer sport.
The child's grandmother died this past January. They did not see her. They did not say goodbye. All for not letting down the team for a practice of almost no value.
12 ( +16 / -4 )
The moment a new mother and father look at their newly born child surely they will be overwhelmed with happiness and won't be able to conceive of living life without that young life.
This is, however, something my wife and I, mid 40s, have opted never to experience.
The pressure and overwhelming control school has on a child's life here is just too enormous. Yes, there are countless happy families and children, but I do think it's because they know no alternative and make do with what they have. Good for them, truly. But having grown up outside Japan and knowing what else is possible, I just couldn't do it.
1 ( +4 / -3 )
If Bernie Sanders would not join the military on moral grounds, and was open and transparent about it, I have zero objections. The same as Muhammad Ali refusing to serve on moral grounds. Disagree if you like, but they have been open about exactly why they chose to do so.
A world apart from having wealthy and well-connected parents invent medical ailments for missing service.
6 ( +6 / -0 )
Gerrymandering and voter disenfranchisement are, indeed, powerful tools.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
There seems to be unusually high support for Trump on JapanToday. Is this just me, or have others noticed this? Is this American military in Japan voicing conservative opinions? I am open to being proved wrong, but I meet no Trump supporters in daily life. Granted, that is my world that I create for myself and I will be around like-minded people, but over the past two years I seem to recall a surprising amount of support for Trump on this site.
1 ( +2 / -1 )
Some countries do, in fact, claim extraterritorial jurisdiction in certain cases. That is one aspect to debate, granted. But for this particular "crime" how would Japanese authorities even go about deciding who to test, question, arrest?
If Japanese snowboarders in British Columbia post their partying on Instagram and there is photographic evidence for their "crime" then I'll leave it to the lawyers to debate the jurisdiction.
But will every Japanese tourist returning home now fall under the, ahem, cloud of suspicion? Sign your customs declaration and please pee in this cup.
5 ( +6 / -1 )
"Most outsiders wouldn't understand" can be used to justify anything and it completely stops any possibility of conversation.
Imagine a tourist having one's arms cut off for suspicion of theft in a deeply conservative Muslim region. Then imagine the locals telling that person's family to get over it, as "most outsiders wouldn't understand."
18 ( +19 / -1 )
Picture this headline:
Taka Saito, 18, and Ayumi Suzuki, 19, were arrested today at Narita airport upon their arrival for having consumed alcohol while on homestay in London. Each has pled guilty and faces a maximum sentence of three years in prison.
An inconsolable Ms Suzuki, 19, claims she had only one sip of wine at her farewell dinner and usually never drinks alcohol. She has been suspended from her university pending further investigation. Mr. Saito, 18, admitted to having had alcohol before.
Yes, absurd, again, but again, that's the point.
29 ( +29 / -0 )
This is absurd on many levels, so where to begin?
People must follow the laws of the country they are in. People do not follow the laws of their home country regardless of where they are. You have to put aside whether or not you agree with the legalization of marijuana. It is, in fact, irrelevant.
As someone else said, would the American government start arresting 20 year old foreign students returning from Japan for having drunk alcohol?
If the laws of the home country take precedence, well, can Canadians on ski trips to Hokkaido now smoke marijuana as they wish while in Japan? After all, that is the law of their home country. I know that sounds absurd, but that is the point.
Will there now be urine tests administered in at customs at Narita and considering marijuana use spans across every demographic, how could you possibly decide who to test?
I’d love to say something more erudite and insightful, but give me a break will need to suffice.
32 ( +34 / -2 )