world's top expert in the field of radiation from doctors
Novell- Peace Prize nominee Helen Caldicott said:
"Japan has eliminated most of the substances, such as cesium and stromtune 90, so there is no problem with contaminated water discharge. That is not what a radiological expert can say. Radioactive contaminated water does not become clean.
There are many carcinogens in radioactive materials,
Among them, a large amount is called tritium.
Tritium, a cancer-causing substance, can't be eliminated because it combines with hydrogen.This must be acknowledged by Japan."
Japan hides the incidence of cancer patients due to radiation caused by nuclear power damage. In addition, cancer patients that are currently identified are not radioactive damage, referring to the incubation period of cancer. After all, only those who die are unhappy.
I do not understand.
Why do you want to do it this way, rejecting the help of other advanced countries?
Do Pacific ocean waters only travel in the Pacific?
Sea waters roam all over the earth.
Do you have a conscience in Japan?
0 ( +1 / -1 )
Russia Putin even said that the radiation exposure of Russian scientists was due to Fukushima crabs, not Russian missile bombings. This is because the radioisotope found is cesium137.
Abe can't say a word, but hides a knight. How funny is it?
0 ( +4 / -4 )
Who would say if it were just verified by a notified nuclear engineer or organization from a third country and released it? Why don't you do something simple? It seems as if the Japanese government is trying to cover up the lies. A lie can make everything lie. Why don't you do everything publicly?
1 ( +4 / -3 )
It is indeed a low level of action to bring the conclusions back to criticism from Korea and Japan.
It should end with criticism and debate of those who have done this. That's right.
-4 ( +0 / -4 )
It is not possible to compare Germany and Japan.
Germany recognized the war criminals and punished them by setting up a war criminal in an international military trial.
Even now, Germans are brought to trial if they catch war criminals. Japan did not.
And while Germany admitted war crimes and documented everything, Japan did not.
Japan say "It was inevitable because it was at war. "
So instead of apologizing, I used only an expression of regret.
Abe's father was also a war criminal, but he lived in politics.
And don't Abe do politics right now?
So Abe may try to rewrite history.
It cannot happen in Germany. The start is different.
-2 ( +1 / -3 )
It is interesting that, unlike other countries, Japan has territorial disputes with all countries across the border.
-2 ( +0 / -2 )
starpunkSep. 2 12:04 pm JST
How narrow your knowledge of history is to think that Korea was a WWII victim. There was never any war between Korea and Japan leading up to the 1910 annexation. Koreans willingly joined the IJA (
It is funny to justify forced mergers. Indeed, according to Japan's words, why did Korea become the second poorest country in the world after the war? This is inconsistent with the many Japanese saying that Japan should be well cared for and thankful. And Korea wouldn't want independence either. Like Hong Kong
This is not a merger but a forced aggression.
The merger that killed Chosun's mother and threatened him was an invasion.
Which country would favor a peaceful merger with a country that killed its queen and dragged the prince to Japan as a hostage?
-4 ( +3 / -7 )
@SJ: How do you make this stuff up??? The Chinese characters for Dokdo -- 独島-- have nothing to do with rocks. They mean "solitary island."
It is funny to say that a distant rock island is wrong, meaning only distant, but no rock.
-6 ( +1 / -7 )
Of course, Korea has never wanted Japan to be rewarded for serving in the Japanese army. is not it? Why do we associate different problems?
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Simon FostonToday 09:14 am JST
showchinmonoAug. 30 07:56 am JST
Before then, all the Korean soldiers were volunteers. IJA started enlistment of volunteer service in 1938, IJN started it in 1944. It was very competitive for Koreans to become Japanese soldiers before then unless graduated with top scores from IJA military academy and the likes.
People like that are more commonly referred to as collaborators. The Waffen SS attracted quite a few foreign "volunteers" as well. No one respects them very much.
It is too simplistic to call 800ｋ Korean volunteers for IJA as such if you know how many Korean independence soldiers were there in 1919
Why are you talking about the military? I am talking about the fact that there is no information on forced recruitment and comfort women, not military volunteers, in the ROK-Japan agreement. Where is the Korea-Japan agreement about it? Upload it.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
A bomb blast occurred during a test of nuclear missile launches in Russia.
The scientists were exposed.
"It's true that scientists were exposed.
" However, Not because of missile tests, but because they ate Fukushima crab. ”
The reason is that the name of the exposed radioactive material is cesium137.
Why can't Abe say anything? Is that true? Or is Russia a great power?
0 ( +0 / -0 )
in fact, there is no mention of damages in the Korea-Japan Agreement. It is designated as a country development fund celebrating independence. At the time, the Korea-Japan treaty stated that it included the San Francisco Treaty, but the content was completely different. The reason remains documented. 1965. 3. 20. According to the "White Paper on the Korea-Japan Talks" (No. 18) issued by the Government of the Republic of Korea, Article 4 of the San Francisco Convention states that the basis of the claimability issue between Korea and Japan is the basis of the issue. Korea is not a party to the treaty of the San Francisco Treaty and therefore has not been granted the right to claim damages and suffering suffered by the victorious nation pursuant to Article 14.
Have you read the contents of the Korea-Japan agreement? How many contents do you have?
Do not believe that you are the whole thing when you see a corner.
I do not think Japan tells me the truth.
-3 ( +0 / -3 )
Does Japan change the record of past history to suit the taste of modern people?
One content is inconsistent.
Are government documents, administrative records, or any legal documents on file.
Does the government not release records of history?
If we accept history on the basis of individual records or claims, all nations of the world will rewrite history.
There is a difference between reading and understanding a full text and seeing and understanding just one part of a full text.
Who would believe Abe's claim to the Korean-Japanese treaty while ignoring the San Francisco Treaty, the source of the Korea-Japan treaty?
There is too much difference between Abe dealing with Korea and Abe dealing with Russia.
It's like an ugly person who can't say anything to a strong-looking person, ignore a weak-looking person and tell others that it's a strategy.
0 ( +1 / -1 )
In fact, gsomia was signed three years ago by South Korea's continued refusal of what the US and Japan wanted.
Until three years ago, he lived without gsomia.
So Korea doesn't care about gosmia.
-1 ( +0 / -1 )
South Korean First Vice Foreign Minister Cho Sei-young met U.S. Ambassador Harry Harris on Wednesday and asked that the United States' tone down its public criticism of South Korea's decision not to renew the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) with Japan,
This is great. 'Please don't tell anyone how you think we screwed up, we are well aware of it.'
What is clear is that the Korean ambassador called on the US ambassador to "Stop repeating the expression of regret for South Korea, who made the decision of the gsomia. Regrets do not help or contribute to the alliance."
And that's the opinion of the government, but the US knows that the demands of the people are strong.
So he delivered Korean doctors to America.
Certainly after that, the American expression changed. The next day, the Pentagon spokesman said, "I'm disappointed by both Korea and Japan. I hope to bring it back."
And later, "One thing is for sure, it started in Japan's export regulations." Said.
In Korea, public opinion is strongly influenced by politics. The fact is respected because the United States knows.
-1 ( +0 / -1 )
Trump is more like a trader than a president of a mighty nation.
No dignity, no respect.
Even with the corn deal. Obviously, Abe said he would consider importing from the private sector.
But, he told reporters that he was glad that Japan bought all the corn that China did not buy.
Even though he explained that Abe was thinking in the private sector again.
he said "The Japanese country follows everything if the people let it in the government It is. It's different from us."
It's really rude. Nevertheless, Abe said nothing.
What's even more funny is that the US and South Korea have signed a white list today.
What is this?
1 ( +1 / -0 )
In today's trade talks, Trump wanted Abe to import the leftover corn, which China did not import.
Abe was embarrassed and said he would think about private exchange.
But, Trump announced in front of reporters that Japan had decided to buy all the corn.
Abe was embarrassed and said, 'No, it's not a government, but it's private.'
And , Trump say "Japanese civilians do everything the government tells them. It's different from us."
Abe said nothing. The bottom line is that Abe bought corn that the US couldn't reach in China.
And " Korea, Kim Jong-un and Japan is good my friends. Let's see what happens in the future", Trump said.
4 ( +4 / -0 )
South Korea announced that it has caught 156 illegal cases in Korea's export process.
That is to say that Korea is watching for illegals.
Japanese police cracked down on 300 illegal cases.
If so, is it true that Japan has admitted 300 illegalities?
South Korea only announced that it had detected 156 unreasonable exports during the export.
It is said that it prevented illegal export.
The announcement said the Japanese government admitted illegal. Do you know?
Does Japan decide that it is illegal to prevent illegality?
0 ( +0 / -0 )
So why do we ignore the San Francisco Treaty and call the Kurils Japanese territory?
0 ( +0 / -0 )
The export control measures have nothing to do with the ruling in South Korea, and they say security reasons. Do you know? Does this look fair? Korea is a member of the export control system. Taiwan China is not affiliated. Even Korea said that if Japan does not believe in Korea, it will receive a WTO audit. In the meantime, the military agreement says that it should continue as a separate matter. Does this look fair?
Abe's behavior does not fit into common sense, even if Japanese lawyers say it.
According to the ruling of the Supreme Court of Japan, in April 2007, the court rejected plaintiff's claim in the case of Chinese forced labor, but the right of claim for compensation was not extinguished.
Masato Niimura, a former judge of the Tokyo High Court, also claimed in the February issue of the Japanese monthly magazine Sekai that the original Japanese government had maintained that the individual claims were not extinguished.
Mitsubishi Materials made a reconciliation with Chinese victims to pay 100,000 Yuan per person (about 16.54 million won) to 3,765 victims in two years in relation to the compulsory damages lawsuit filed in Chinese court in 2014 .
The Hanaoka incident was a case in which hundreds of people were murdered after the Chinese who had been forced into the Hanaro Mine in Akita Prefecture in the late Pacific War caused a riot in protest against abuse and discrimination.
In 2000, the Tokyo High Court ruled that Kashimagumi Construction, which was the subject of the assassination, ended up paying 500 million yen to the Chinese Red Cross Society, the victim's agent.
In 1991, the Japanese government consistently stated that individual claims did not disappear, including the response of Yanai's deputy foreign policy chief. The Supreme Court of Japan also made the same judgment in April 2007, when a victim of forced Chinese execution targeted a Japanese company. Although the trial itself was lost, Nishimatsu Construction paid the settlement gold to the victim because the claim was granted. But now, the government is blocking the payment of money by Shin Il-cheol, Mitsubishi. The reason is different from China. The victim's human rights remedy should be the same. He contributed:
Abe is a real bad politician. It is not right to hide from the people if it is disadvantageous to oneself.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Japan is distorting facts. Do you know the truth of this thing? Korea discloses all government policies. So I get a lot of complaints and noise, but I do not live like dumb. I do not know whether the contents of this trial were really detailed in Japan.
Japan repeatedly told the Korea-Japan treaty that the compensation was over, but this trial was not to be taken with the Korea-Japan accord. And, in fact, there is no mention of damages in the Korea-Japan Agreement. It is designated as a country development fund celebrating independence. At the time, the Korea-Japan treaty stated that it included the San Francisco Treaty, but the contents were completely different. The reason remains documented. 1965. 3. 20. According to the "White Paper on the Korea-Japan Talks" (No. 18) issued by the Government of the Republic of Korea, Article 4 of the San Francisco Convention states that the basis of the claimability issue between Korea and Japan is the basis of the issue. Korea is not a party to the treaty of the San Francisco Treaty and therefore has not been granted the right to claim damages and suffering suffered by the victorious nation pursuant to the provisions of Article 14. The Korean- Can not be included ". Did the Japanese government tell you all this? To the people?
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Posted in: Asia's first Rugby World Cup set to kick off