rlaalswls comments

Japan talks with China, and Korea talks with China.

If this is for the benefit and peace of the country, it cannot be blamed.

The two countries did not meet to gain a lot of visible profit.

Two countries met to discuss peace.

Much better than fighting each other.

 Trump, as an experienced businessman, knows our military capabilities are worth more to our allies than they've been paying. He's got the NATO member countries paying more.

Man, Xi really can't deny Winnie the Pooh. I mean, look at that photo.

You know China banned last year's Winnie the Pooh movie. We know why. lol

It's a pity if the politics of my country makes my people hard.

 What if my country's politics makes other countries and other people harder?

What's better?

The US should not blame Japan for not participating.

It does not disturb or damage the United States.

Avoid war

It's about protecting yourself from damage.

The political direction that the United States and Trump

I was told that the United States first.

World Police Role Gives Away and Sees God Isolated

Someone told me.

It is natural and good for your country. nevertheless..

The US focuses solely on purpose and implements diplomatic methods that do not fit common sense and rationality.

Without thinking, they want to profit from their allies.

To do this, not only give up the role of hegemony that has been enjoyed for a while, but also lay down its status.

Refrain from war with a country that does not invade the United States,

Do not encourage participation, do your own research that will reasonably develop America.

A better way is to replace all the ingredients used in the Japanese Parliament's restaurant and prime minister's residence with Mt. Fukushima. (Of course, it must be public)

First, continue to eat the food until the Olympics.

It will be easy to persuade after that.

The US demanded $ 8 billion to quadruple the cost of US troops in Japan, according to Yahoo News. 

What does an alliance mean to the United States?

In any case, the problem is that Regardless of the outcome of the Supreme Court of South Korea, there was a problem that the export regulation was announced due to the strategic material spill.

It also reported a lot of foreign media.

If it was announced for the trial result, it would violate the WTO by applying the historical issue to trade.

Nevertheless, the announcement on the basis of strategic material leakage shows how ridiculous the Abe government diplomacy strategy is.

Also, did you say that North Korea is the target of strategic material leakage?

GSOMIA is what South Korea and Japan share about North Korean information.

How contradictory claims are?

The US also had to intervene on the issue shortly after Japan first announced export restrictions to South Korea as a matter of security.

It is not even possible to pressure South Korea.

Does it make sense to tell a country that has been neglected for security reasons to continue the security agreement?

Also, South Korea's claims remain unchanged. If they withdraw their opinions on export regulations, they will keep the agreement.

Because opinions on export regulations were a threat to security.

Therefore, the Abe government should resolve it wisely.

Personally, Trump doesn't seem to be president.

He thinks of each country as a business and sells it.

There is absolutely no justice or humanity.

If he continues to do politics, no country will remain.

Trump reminds me of the principle of Peter.

Trump is a good example of the Peter principle.

Personally, Trump doesn't seem to be president.

He thinks of each country as a business and sells it.

There is absolutely no justice or humanity.

If he continues to do politics, no country will remain.

Trump reminds me of the principle of Peter.

Trump is a good example of the Peter principle.

Personally, Trump doesn't seem to be president.

He thinks of each country as a business and sells it.

There is absolutely no justice or humanity.

If he continues to do politics, no country will remain.

Trump reminds me of the principle of Peter.

Trump is a good example of the Peter principle.

Japanese political history is determined by Abe.

Even discussions in comments seem funny.

Has the Japanese government made policy decisions based on public opinion?

Always, everything was decided after the decision, or after the work was done, and informed later.

So don't abuse the keyboard.

It's a great country for politics.

What is the difference between the Korea-Japan Treaty and the San Francisco Treaty?

Should the Korea-Japan Treaty be obeyed and the San Francisco Treaty not?

Abe's behavior does not fit into common sense, even if Japanese lawyers say it.

According to the ruling of the Supreme Court of Japan, in April 2007, the court rejected plaintiff's claim in the case of Chinese forced labor, but the right of claim for compensation was not extinguished.

 Masato Niimura, a former judge of the Tokyo High Court, also claimed in the February issue of the Japanese monthly magazine Sekai that the original Japanese government had maintained that the individual claims were not extinguished.

Mitsubishi Materials made a reconciliation with Chinese victims to pay 100,000 Yuan per person (about 16.54 million won) to 3,765 victims in two years in relation to the compulsory damages lawsuit filed in Chinese court in 2014 .

The Hanaoka incident was a case in which hundreds of people were murdered after the Chinese who had been forced into the Hanaro Mine in Akita Prefecture in the late Pacific War caused a riot in protest against abuse and discrimination.

In 2000, the Tokyo High Court ruled that Kashimagumi Construction, which was the subject of the assassination, ended up paying 500 million yen to the Chinese Red Cross Society, the victim's agent.

In 1991, the Japanese government consistently stated that individual claims did not disappear, including the response of Yanai's deputy foreign policy chief. The Supreme Court of Japan also made the same judgment in April 2007, when a victim of forced Chinese execution targeted a Japanese company. Although the trial itself was lost, Nishimatsu Construction paid the settlement gold to the victim because the claim was granted. But now, the government is blocking the payment of money by Shin Il-cheol, Mitsubishi. The reason is different from China. The victim's human rights remedy should be the same. He contributed:

So Koreans mistranslated the commercial and blame Japan... This sounds like the same mental gymnastics North Korea had to perform to blame Japan for sinking their fishing boat. Wild imaginations must be genetic...

Translation is just wrong. The commercial is nothing wrong. Koreans have kinda sickness that everything is likely going to relate to miserable war time. It seems that they still remain in the miserable past and can't move on from the past.

When Japanese BTS member Jimin wore a shirt to commemorate Korea's Liberation Day, wasn't it noisy that she despised Japan only by looking at the atomic bomb? Is that the same reason?

GaijinjlandToday  

Not sure you can even call South Korea a democracy as it never really was one in the first place.

right.

It was not Korea but Joseon.

Although a tributary of China, most sovereignty was in Joseon.

There was a country called Joseon that had their own language, culture and legal system. Changing the name does not change the country. Just as the Qing Dynasty is China .

Scrote  

rlaalswls: The 1965 treaty between Japan and Korea states that disputes should be settled through arbitration. Japan has asked for this, but Korea has refused. In doing so Korea has violated the treaty.

I don't know why I don't understand

The trial itself is not a matter of state. If a person in another country commits a crime in Japan and is caught, does he not sin? Do you not judge in Japan under Japanese law?

 This is a Korean trial.

 So why go to the International Court of Justice as a domestic case?

If it thinks it harasses a Japanese company by abusing the law in the Korean court, Japan can sue the International Court of Justice. So the lawsuit in the Court of Justice is that Japan should.

Abe also knows that the subject of a lawsuit to the International Court must be Japan.

On this occasion, Korean people grew more. There are people who support certain groups unconditionally, but many middle-class people follow the interests of the individual.

Because they don't believe that what they say is unconditionally right, this time I learned which party thinks more about the interests of the people and the country.

Political parties are just a window to politics.

I'm better aware of who the politicians are working for.

This time, the Korean people

The relationship between the party and the prosecution The prosecution and media relations can change how important one person's testimony can change, how it can divide public opinion, and it can be me, so I can't believe what the media and politicians are saying, so everything needs to be confirmed as a whole. I realized there was.

in short. The Secretary of State is leaving, but he teaches many people.

The Supreme Court answers:     A personal claim

1) This trial is not a national lawsuit against Korea against Japan.

It is a lawsuit against a Japanese national who is doing business in Korea by an individual in Korea.

(2) The issue of private billing states that the contents of the Japan-Japan Treaty refer to the San Francisco Agreement.

The original San Francisco treaty clearly states that Germany is a war criminal and reparates all damages of state and individual for apology. There is no document on criminal activity anywhere in the Korea-Japan treaty document, only the fund for the state and the people, and no specific compensation is mentioned. Therefore, even though the rights between nations are extinguished, the right of individual claim to crime is regarded as alive. So the Supreme Court admitted that if the mistake was made in the method of marking the Korea-Japan agreement and corrected the contents again, it could be legally invalidated.

A solution to the problem must be prepared by South Korea.

If the Blue House supports the Supreme Court's decision, it can only be resolved in the International Court of Justice.

If the Blue House cares about South Korea's national sentiment, moreover, solutions based on international law like Germany and Italy will be necessary.

This is a matter of law. So Japan is in a dilemma.

Korea's Supreme Court ruling was Korea's personal claim. It's a Korean trial in Korea. The lawsuit was filed against a Japanese company, but it was true that Japanese companies had to follow the Korean law because they were still doing business in Korea.

It is the Japan's responsibility to take it to the International Court.

But Abe won't.

Abe protested to the Korean Supreme Court, discussed the law and fell into a dilemma to admit.

It would have found that Japan's arguments were legally contradictory.

But he didn't want to follow the law, so he pulled out a card called export restrictions.

I was told that the seawater increased so that the island used as a boundary point was submerged.

It was originally a thick island, but other local fishermen reported that it had disappeared.

In order to be recognized as an island to claim territories, it is said that there must be a type of island at high tide. But the island that was cloudy Now it is almost invisible at high tide.

 When there is no island at the boundary point, it makes a database because it makes a different sound while invading the sea.

5G for currency only It's not a problem.

There is no difference in 4G or 5G until you see a movie, but it will change a lot when you reach the 3D level. That's not just for mobile phones,

The latest AI, security systems, semiconductors, drones, and everything else in the latest technologies is 5G.

I know that not only Korea, but also many other countries are building and commercializing 5G. It makes no sense that Japan is a technological power and falls behind.

5G for currency only It's not a problem.

There is no difference in 4G or 5G until you see a movie, but it will change a lot when you reach the 3D level. That's not just for mobile phones,

The latest AI, security systems, semiconductors, drones, and everything else in the latest technologies is 5G.

I know that not only Korea, but also many other countries are building and commercializing 5G. It makes no sense that Japan is a technological power and falls behind.

world's top expert in the field of radiation from doctors

Novell- Peace Prize nominee Helen Caldicott said:

"Japan has eliminated most of the substances, such as cesium and stromtune 90, so there is no problem with contaminated water discharge. That is not what a radiological expert can say. Radioactive contaminated water does not become clean.

There are many carcinogens in radioactive materials,

Among them, a large amount is called tritium.

Tritium, a cancer-causing substance, can't be eliminated because it combines with hydrogen.This must be acknowledged by Japan."

Japan hides the incidence of cancer patients due to radiation caused by nuclear power damage. In addition, cancer patients that are currently identified are not radioactive damage, referring to the incubation period of cancer. After all, only those who die are unhappy.

I do not understand.

Why do you want to do it this way, rejecting the help of other advanced countries?

Do Pacific ocean waters only travel in the Pacific?

Sea waters roam all over the earth.

Do you have a conscience in Japan?

Russia Putin even said that the radiation exposure of Russian scientists was due to Fukushima crabs, not Russian missile bombings. This is because the radioisotope found is cesium137.

Abe can't say a word, but hides a knight. How funny is it?

International embarrassment.

Who would say if it were just verified by a notified nuclear engineer or organization from a third country and released it? Why don't you do something simple? It seems as if the Japanese government is trying to cover up the lies. A lie can make everything lie. Why don't you do everything publicly?

It is indeed a low level of action to bring the conclusions back to criticism from Korea and Japan. 

It should end with criticism and debate of those who have done this. That's right.

It is not possible to compare Germany and Japan.

Germany recognized the war criminals and punished them by setting up a war criminal in an international military trial.

Even now, Germans are brought to trial if they catch war criminals. Japan did not. 

And while Germany admitted war crimes and documented everything, Japan did not.

Japan say "It was inevitable because it was at war. "

So instead of apologizing, I used only an expression of regret.

Abe's father was also a war criminal, but he lived in politics.

And don't Abe do politics right now?

So Abe may try to rewrite history.

It cannot happen in Germany. The start is different.

It is interesting that, unlike other countries, Japan has territorial disputes with all countries across the border.

starpunkSep. 2  12:04 pm JST

How narrow your knowledge of history is to think that Korea was a WWII victim. There was never any war between Korea and Japan leading up to the 1910 annexation. Koreans willingly joined the IJA (

It is funny to justify forced mergers. Indeed, according to Japan's words, why did Korea become the second poorest country in the world after the war? This is inconsistent with the many Japanese saying that Japan should be well cared for and thankful. And Korea wouldn't want independence either. Like Hong Kong

This is not a merger but a forced aggression.

The merger that killed Chosun's mother and threatened him was an invasion.

Which country would favor a peaceful merger with a country that killed its queen and dragged the prince to Japan as a hostage?

Trump's standard of rationality is how satisfied his heart is.

@SJ: How do you make this stuff up??? The Chinese characters for Dokdo -- 独島-- have nothing to do with rocks. They mean "solitary island."

It is funny to say that a distant rock island is wrong, meaning only distant, but no rock.

Of course, Korea has never wanted Japan to be rewarded for serving in the Japanese army. is not it? Why do we associate different problems?