The 'sad' thing about it all is NZ allowing dangerous individuals into the country.
Also a little 'sad' is the standard of English -
"... The whole gambit of what would otherwise be described as intrusive activity," he (NZ Minister Andrew Little) told the New Zealand Herald.
The correct word to use in the quoted sentence is 'gamut' not gambit.
The gamut of "intrusive activity" he has authorised is a political 'gambit".
0 ( +1 / -1 )
I don't agree,Aly. Japan is a bigger player in the trade world than the Australia, Canada and New Zealand combined. And, if Japan wants UK armed forces support in its region then it should think carefully about its strategic position.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
0 ( +0 / -0 )
High temperatures plus high humidity lead to higher death rates.
The human body needs to sweat in order to dissipate heat.
If not body temperature will rise and when it is above 40C (105F) brain and cardiovascular functions will change for the worse with danger of death if the body temperature is not reduced to normal levels.
A study just concluded by MIT predicts that the North China Plain - the most populous region on Earth and former cradle of humanity - may eventually become uninhabitable in the future due to sustained heatwaves. With humans only able to survive the conditions for 6 hours, even in the shade.
As for those who think the old are "useless mouths to feed" it is not the current generation of old people who are the problem. They mostly lived fairly modest, even frugal, lives and continue to do so.
Those who have consumed at higher levels in the world in recent times, and will do so in the future, are the drivers of the destruction and death of the planet they infest. (Time to rehash Soylent Green, anybody?)
What is the world coming to?
No sweat... a hot and sticky dead end!!
1 ( +1 / -0 )
"They are not Japanese, plain and simple. Russia can GIVE them, but there is no 'back', unless you want to argue Russia 'took them BACK', since Japan had previously taken them to begin with. Russia can do as it pleases with their islands, and them's the breaks."
The original internationally recognised "break" was as follows -
The first official agreement between Japan and Russia regarding the islands was the1855 Treaty of Shimoda and it defined the border between Russia and Japan to be the strait between two of the Kurile Islands - Etorofu (Iuturup) and Uruppu (Urup).
Therefore that initial treaty between Japan and Russia clearly recognised the islands of Etorofu, Kunashiri, Shikotan and Habomai as part of Japan (and the rest of the Kurile archipelago, as Russian).
Therefore "give them back" is a totally appropriate slogan since the Russians agreed from the outset of diplomatic relations with Japan that the "disputed" islands were Japanese.
There can be no dispute about that.
In 1945, after repeated urging to do so by the USA and Great Britain, the USSR abrogated a 5-year neutrality pact that it signed with Japan in 1941.
[That pact had allowed Stalin to move, in December 1941, about 400,000 troops, 5,000 artillery pieces and 3,300 tanks" (cited from the Soviet's own figures) from Siberia to just in front of Moscow - where the Germans were hammering at the gates.]
After abrogating the neutrality pact, the USSR declared war on Japan on 8th Aug. 1945 (2 days after the Hiroshima atomic bomb) and proceeded to invade Japanese held Manchuria, Korea, Inner Mongolia, the southern half of Sakhalin island, and the Kuriles.
[The behaviour of Soviet forces at the end of WWII in Asia and Europe was as almost as bad as that of the Japanese and Germans in the beginning.]
A pity that when in 1987 US President Regan uttered the words, "Mr. Gorbachev tear down this wall." he didn't add, "And, give back those islands."
[Japan would do well to start considering giving Hokkaido back to the Ainu the day Russia returns Siberia to its indigenous inhabitants.]
1 ( +4 / -3 )
Correction to the above leading quote -
"Possession is nine-tenths of the law."
0 ( +1 / -1 )
"Possion is nine-tenths of the law."
Think big to leverage the other one-tenth...
After many years of territorial disputes between Imperial Russia and Imperial Japan the 1855 Treaty of Shimoda defined the border between Russia and Japan to be the strait between two of the Kurile Islands Etorofu (Iuturup) and Uruppu (Urup). It left the ownership of Sakhalin (Karafuto) open to question and unresolved.
In the 1875 Treaty of St. Petersburg Japanese claims to the island of Sakhalin (Karafuto) were dropped in exchange for the northern Kurile Islands. Thereby giving Russia the whole island of Sakhalin and Japan all of the Kurile Islands, northern and southern.
That seemed to be a reasonable exchange at the time based on the political geography of the time.
When the Russo-Japanese War was ended by the Treaty of Portsmouth (Maine) - brokered under the auspices of the US President Theodore Roosevelt - in Sept. 1905 one of the many things agreed was that the southern half of the island of Sakhalin (Karafuto) was to be ceded to Japan by Russia.
That remained the situation regarding Sakhalin and the Kuriles until August 1945 (a few days after the first atomic bomb was dropped on Japan) when finally - after much urging by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill - Stalin's Soviet Russia declared war on Imperial Japan.
One result of that decision by Stalin was the seizure of the whole island of Sakhalin and all of the Kuriles and other smaller islands north of Hokkaido and absorbed them all, de facto, into the USSR.
The1951 Treaty of San Francisco was meant to conclude a lasting peace between Japan and all the allied nations they had fought in WWII and to resolve the situation regarding the islands.
However, agreement could not be reached between the USSR and Japan on the tems of the treaty, so the USSR refused to sign it.
In 1956, when the USSR offered, to return the smaller islands of Shikotan and Habomai but to retain the larger islands of Etorofu and Kunashiri, which were both claimed by Japan, the Japanese were reluctantly preparing to agree.
However, the US government warned Japan that such an agreement would result in Okinawa being retained by the US and not being returned to Japan.
Instead, in the the same year 1956, Japan and Russia did sign a joint declaration ending the state of war that technically still existed between them.
Therefore no final comprehensive peace treaty has yet been concluded between Japan and Russia, nor any real resolution of the status of the disputed islands agreed and they remmain under Russian control to this day.
Japan is the dummy partner of the USA in a global bridge game against Russia and China.
Japan could suggest to the Americans that they try to broker the 'trading' of the Senkaku islands to China in return for the return of the disputed Kurile islands to Japan by Russia.
In return the the US and EU would recognise the Crimea as Russian, provided the Russians evacuate their nuclear-armed enclave of Kaliningrad that is situated just behind NATO's frontline with Russia in the Baltic.
All that might just bring about a tidy end to the loose ends of WWII.
Oh, almost forgot, Taiwan to be returned to China in return for them relinquishing Tibet.
-2 ( +3 / -5 )
Diversity came - unlucky for the Apache.
Japan, like Arizona & New Mexico, was opened up in the mid-to-late 19th century at the point of US guns.
I don't blame the Japanese for being wary of a large influx of foreigners. Look what happened to the native Americans after the Europeans 'discovered' their lands.
There's about a billion Chinese next door that might come knocking once the advanced guard has prepared the ground.
By the way, upstream, it's a troop of monkeys (and a bunch of bananas).
Also, if foreigners live in Japan and own businesses there but have "no intention of changing Japan" then they are deluding themselves.
-3 ( +3 / -6 )
@ Jonathan Prin, Netgrump & others
The UK currently leads the world in universal free healthcare (and has long championed free trade and the movement of people from one part of the world to another for mulifarious purposes).
However, this has started to rankle with the majority of the population and is being seen as unsustainable economically and politically in future. (Hence, in part, "Brexit".)
Japan's ,problems on this front are very small, by comparison with the UK, which has significant "health tourism" (usually free of charge for the medical component) from the African continent, Indian subcontinent and elsewhere.
I regard it all as both a legacy (in terms of all the doctor, nurses and other healthcarerers from Africa & India and elsewhere) and a debt (in terms of all the poor, hungry and sick arriving from Africa, India, and elsewhere) of the relatively long-lived British Empire.
Japan also had its empire - a relatively short-lived one - that at its zenith/nadir (delete one depending on which side of history you are on) included Korea, Manchuria, large parts of China, the Philippines and the lion's share of SE Asia (most of which was 'liberated' from the European imperialists).
Therefore Japan has a similar but smaller legacy (of "guest workers") and debt (to "health tourists") to enjoy.
The real problem is getting the best fit balance right between give and take.
1 ( +3 / -2 )
On 12 July 1918 the Japanese battleship Kawachi was sunk by a magazine explosion, at anchor, in Tokuyama Bay.
In October-November 1914 it had been part of the Allied naval forces at the Siege of Tsingtao.
Other vessels of the Imperial Japanese Navy served in the Mediterranean sea in WW I.
Japan was an ally of France & Great Britain in that conflict and was mainly invited to this Bastille Day on that basis, I should think.
2 ( +2 / -0 )
I toadily agree with whoever says that there should be no public funding of private education, and vice versa.
1 ( +1 / -0 )