Selenio Vasquez comments

I found the article above linked from enenews.com, a place where people discuss linked articles that are daily produced from various news sources (ie NY Times, Kyodo News, etc).

@Gwragged, whenever I see a disaster/armageddon movie (2012, Battle for LA, etc) I now think about how the director left out the fact that the nukes would be ruined and all hell would be loosed upon the world making the movie's disaster comparable to an appetizer, the massive amount of radiation released liken to a huge banquet you are forced to eat all at once.

@Smorkian, you wrote this comment about a plane earlier but I will edit it to talk about nuclear:

"If you were spending billions of yen per [nuke plant] and hundreds [of thousands] of lives are depending on the design of the [nuke plant] being 100% foolproof, wouldn't YOU not assume and test the hell out of it yourself/ I sure would if I had the resources.

There's not really any such thing as a commercial [nuke plant] that's too safe. Check it, check it again, check that again, check it some more"

Smorkian, I agree with you. Nuke plants DO have thick safety standards. Lots of training, inspections, tons of regulations. Why? Because that is caged inside that makes water boil...well, if it got out it would be the most deadly and poisonous and persistently dangerous toxin in the world.

The fact that such a huge and devastating thing like radiation coming out of a nuclear plant non stop for months now and is rarely covered by the media is very telling.

+1 to Sean McGee for doing what the rest of us is not doing, discussing the paragraphs of the article. Well done!

@senseiman as per the moderator's comment, point out those points you agree on and why.

@Smorkian Do you like nuclear? If you do, does that fact make you dislike this article? Can you try attacking the points made in the article then and not the researcher? If not, then the researcher did his job well. I wish I was as good a researcher as him, as good a writer, a for the people, by the people, with the people type of person like him. Quite the opposite of the nuclear companies that are for the money, by the money, with the money.

Don't poison/murder people for $.