Why loot though? If a white person were unjustifiably shot by police in this Japanese city (in the video in question, Wallace was definitely approaching the officers in a threatening manner- that said, 10 times?) I would insist that those police were brought to justice, protesting if necessary, but I certainly wouldn't break into my local sports shop and help myself to new Pumas.
(I'm sure there were peaceful protesters aswell)
12 ( +13 / -1 )
*sorry, not conflate. Confuse.
4 ( +4 / -0 )
was fine for Kamala Harris to stand right next to a polling place with a microphone and try to intimidate voters?
I'm not aware of the incident, but isn't that conflating the right to free speech with the right to keep and bear arms?
3 ( +3 / -0 )
Sorry, it’s already illegal to carry a firearm in such a place...try again:
In, or near?
2 ( +2 / -0 )
“There are dozens — we’ve had numerous complaints,” Meingast told the judge. “There are voters who are afraid. There are election workers who are afraid to go to work on Election Day.”
Screw 'em. Let Bubba hold his toy.
0 ( +3 / -3 )
So you advocate basically registering every last thing that can be used as a weapon with the government, or only the things you can find used in a completely oddball case, even if the weapon of choice could have been replaced with just about anything?
You questioned the existence of mysterious crossbow related crimes. I gave an example.
Have you ever noticed that most attacks in this country are done with knives?
And some with crossbows. But to your point, guns are harder to get. Due to regulations.
-1 ( +0 / -1 )
Well this will certainly help track down all those mysterious crossbow killers out there, except, (checking) there aren't any.
Right. They've all been found.
Another question; do the bolts also require registration? Anyways, regarding Japan, hasn't happened doesn't equal won't happen. Elsewhere, mysterious crossbow-related crime is not unheard of.
BERLIN — The shock of the rare burst of violence was multiplied by its odd circumstances: In a picturesque and normally placid little German city, three bodies lay in a hotel room, each one killed with a crossbow.
More than 300 miles away, another gruesome discovery made the case still more confounding. Searching the home of one of the three people who had died in the hotel, the police found two more bodies.
The German authorities are now trying to piece together a mystery that has attracted international attention for the unconventional weapon used and the lack of clear motive or motives behind five deaths ...
Police responding to a report of a stabbing - which allegedly took place around 12pm local time at a Toronto home - were stunned to find a woman and two men dead with crossbow bolts in their bodies.
Two other men were injured in the attack; one of them was arrested at the scene. A crossbow was found on the floor of the garage close to the victims.
-2 ( +0 / -2 )
Finally, society internalises laws and norms over time and individuals become less likely to go against them
Sorry, no edit function. Please disregard that point.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
The ordinance, believed to set the first regulations in Japan on crossbow owners, requires residents to report ownership of the bow-like weapon to the prefectural government or face a fine of up to 50,000 yen.
I agree with posters above. Just because a crossbow is registered, it doesn't mean it will never be used in a crime.
The law requires registration to an owner and address. Are there any restrictions on ownership? Can a crossbow be removed from a person if they commit other crimes? Is there punishment for the owner if someone else uses their lost, stolen or borrowed bow in a crime?
There are a few arguments to support registration. If a registered crossbow has been used in a crime, and is found at the scene, the owner can be quickly traced. Also, owners of registered crossbows will be much more likely to take steps to keep them out of the wrong hands and less likely to allow others to use them. Further, if a registered owner commits any other type of violent crime, their weapon could be confiscated. Finally, society internalises laws and norms over time and individuals become less likely to go against them. A lot of the same arguments for gun registration, really.
2 ( +3 / -1 )
So for a week, while cars at a major intersection 100 metres away run red lights, left hook cyclists and fail to clear the intersection with their usual vigor, about a dozen officers'll stand at quiet, out of the way crossroads, and politely ask drivers to follow traffic regulations.
2 ( +2 / -0 )
You didn't, the guy in the article did. So what ?
1 ( +2 / -1 )
He was complaining that he couldn't breathe even before he was put on the ground.
Complaining that he can't breathe, so kneel on his neck for nine minutes. Yeah, nothing wrong there. Jeez.
3 ( +8 / -5 )
A city in America with strict gun control is like a no peeing section in a swimming pool.
6 ( +7 / -1 )
Decades of employment, mortgage-market, housing, judicial, employment discrimination, mass incarceration and segregation have robbed these communites of many opportunities to accumulate any wealth, get out of the poverty cycle and actually affect change. They can only ask for /demand it.
I wish them every success.
4 ( +5 / -1 )
Well, she certainly got the attention of the tournament’s organisers, the WTA and the USTA. Good for her. In originally conceding the semifinals she was also giving up her chance at the final.
Mods: Please steer the conversation back to Osaka and her actions. Most of the above thread has been a repeat of many previous ones, which never resolve anything. It’s getting tiresome.
0 ( +4 / -4 )
It goes a little beyond that.
Elijah McClain, black, unarmed, killed by police:
On June 29, the interim police chief announced that multiple officers had been placed on administrative leave and were under investigation after photos of them surfaced that had been taken near the site where McClain died. The photos, taken in October 2019, show police officers posing inappropriately and reenacting the carotid restraint used on McClain before his death.
Michael Brown, black, unarmed, killed by police:
Soon, police vehicles reappeared, including from the St. Louis County Police Department, which had taken control of the investigation. Several officers emerged with dogs. What happened next, according to several sources, was emblematic of what has inflamed the city of Ferguson, Missouri, ever since the unarmed 18-year-old was gunned down: An officer on the street let the dog he was controlling urinate on the memorial site. ...
By then, police had prohibited all vehicles from entering Canfield Drive except for their own. Soon the candles and flowers had been smashed, after police drove over them.
So yeah, for me personally, obey the police and don't resist. If you feel you've been wronged, fight it in court. But these and similar acts of simple indecency are really what needs to stop.
8 ( +15 / -7 )
I’m really not sure. I mean, it can’t be race because cops aren’t racist in America, right? I think it was because the officers dealing with Blake hadn’t had their morning coffees. Yeah. That’s probably it. Definitely not race.
11 ( +16 / -5 )
Jacob Blake was shot seven times in the back for walking away from police officers (four of whom together couldn’t subdue him by other less lethal methods, apparently) but this guy is clearly seen on video approaching police officers while holding a semi-automatic rifle after having shot three people, and other people yelling “he just shot someone,” and the police let the gunman walk past them and leave the scene. I can’t help but wonder what the difference was.
24 ( +30 / -6 )
Eliminate is a rather strong word for any government. To me personally NZ government , the NZ scientist and everyone involved in the decision making process right now seem a bit fake and delusional.
'Eliminate' was the word used by Director General of Health Bloomfield and PM Ardern, which caused confusion in the media. Bloomfield later clarified, saying, "I can just clarify we haven't eliminated it, and we haven't eradicated it.''
"He said elimination is about having a low number of cases, and a knowledge of where they're coming from and identifying people early."
2 ( +3 / -1 )
some unbelievable move local parents voted to oppose this claiming it made children weak.
Probably the same people who rush to the air conditioner or heater the second the temperature goes beyond their +/-1 degree comfort zone.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
Now people cannot even support one of the Bill of Rights amendments to the Constitution.
Of course they can. They don’t need the NRA to do that. Particularly if it’s taking their subs and charitable donations and spending them on private travel, security and other interests.
12 ( +14 / -2 )
Are you happy with that as an argument, or would you like to put some thought into it? It's such a cop-out.
6 ( +7 / -1 )
Didn’t look very hard.
The only damage was to a gate but I can't find any video's or photos of that
I've seen some pictures of a damaged gate. And also this video of protesters walking through the UNdamaged gate.
-1 ( +1 / -2 )
The other side of the story:
5 On Your Side’s Morgan Young spoke to two organizers from Sunday’s protests, Ohun Ashe and Reverend Darryl Gray.
They said no protesters were armed at the time the couple came outside with weapons.
“For them to come out there with their guns drawn, there was absolutely no reason at all,” Reverend Darryl Gray said.
“To be very clear, the gate was open. When we came off Kingshighway, the gate was open. As soon as protesters came through the open gate, the man and woman came out of their home. He came out first and was on the balcony.”...
Gray had a megaphone and said he told people to stay off the property and stay on the sidewalk during the protest. He said people complied with those orders.
I guess it comes down to who you want to believe. Personally, I'd be skeptical of the lawyers who are defending their possibly illegal actions that were caught on video.
-4 ( +3 / -7 )
They were not on the private property of the McCloskey's. The road would be a community ownership or owned by a separate company and the residents pay a service charge. Like other gated communities.
Further, according to a St. Louis School of Law Professor, “People have a right to threaten force if they are threatened,” Ammann told the outlet. “However, if a group of protesters is walking by a home and not doing anything to the homeowners specifically, then they don’t have the right to threaten lethal force without an imminent threat.”
In fact, Under Section 571.030(4) of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, it is a crime when a person “[e]xhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner.”
6 ( +8 / -2 )
The law of Missouri allowed the home owners to shoot any of these people. They broke the gate and entereed private property
I'm not sure that's true. Does castle doctrine include a front yard, or just a dwelling? Also, would 'deadly force' have been justified, if neither of the couple were under direct physical threat or attack? Finally, were they infringing on the protesters' first amendment rights? All that said, Missouri's castle doctrine laws are very extensive.
It must be remembered also, that they are both lawyers, and any statement they give to media after the event could certainly be skewed towards a possible defense of their actions.
5 ( +9 / -4 )
five people were hit by vehicles
As well as the 2 killed, and seven injured by gunfire.
"The conditions of the 12 people hospitalized with injuries weren't immediately clear."
0 ( +0 / -0 )
The fact remains that the overwhelming majority of gun crimes are NOT committed by legal/lawful gun owners.
Well that's a tautology but OK. Surely that means we need better laws, in order to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them. Any suggestions?
0 ( +1 / -1 )