SuperLib comments

He should just run on the same platform. New NAFTA agreement, new healthcare plan, new Middle East plan, new plan for the environment, a wall, a denuclearize North Korea, new trade agreements, etc. Ya know, everything he promised and didn't deliver on.

But say something like, "But it's really gonna happen this time."

Yeah I think we can pass on the crazy Republican who has a family that punches each other and goes after each other with bats.

Next?

blacklabel: They confessed.

bass: I agree.

I thought you guys were more from the camp that says, "the FBI can make you say anything they want" when people talked about Trump. But for these guys....they confessed and that's it?

Skin color, perhaps?

The GOP deserves their fair share of the blame as well. They fought against a good deal to be on the other side of Obama and to scare up their base with stories of gloom and doom and promises to rip up the deal on day 1.

Day 1 of their reign came and went...and the deal stayed in place. Why? Because it stopped Iranian enrichment and we had verification that it did. Which was the goal. So suddenly this horrible Obama deal didn't quite need to be ripped up just yet...kind of like they were just barking a lot of BS to their base during the election...

They did such a good job that Trump fans are still repeating the talking points even though they are irrelevant now. We can't take this deal! It only binds Iran for 15 years!!!! OK, well now they're starting next week, not in 15 years. Happy? You took something that was working in 2019 and scrapped it because of BS talking points in 2015.

The fact is we had a working deal that stopped Iranian enrichment and provided inspections to verify compliance. Then we threw it all away. Trump and the GOP have no possible explanation as to how their actions made things better for us.

Trump got Iran to start enriching again.

But if you wear and white hood and chant "white power" Trump will say some are nice people.

I just don't see the victory of tearing up the deal and watching Iran enrich again. Now we have to....stop them...again?

Trump will fail. He always fails.

People who engage in conspiracy theories are a cancer on our society. They are toxic human beings.

Serrano: You must be unaware that the Iran nuclear deal thing does not confirm the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program and provides a clear pathway to nuclear weapons.

Their enrichment was severely restricted to stop weapons grade development. Trump came along and stopped all of that, and now they are going to enrich again.

Is that your victory?

bass: I’ll take the word of the Pentagon and intelligence over what the Iranians or the media says.

OK. The US certified Iran's compliance in 2017 and 2018. In fact, there is nothing on record from the US saying Iran was out of compliance at any time.

Aaron Klein quoted a Bible passage: "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female, it is an abomination."

These are the nutballs we are placating.

blacklabel: So how do you know Iran wasn’t already exceeding the cap? They obviously had the capability to do it because they are doing it now.

Because they have inspections that they must submit to. If you read about them you'll see that anything involving radioactive material isn't something you can just sweep under the carpet. It tends to stick around, and they can tell a lot by the levels they pick up during the inspections. So far, every country that is involved in the deal says Iran has been compliant.

That should answer your question.

Really the only thing that's changed is Iran will go back to enriching to higher levels. That was Trump's contribution to the situation. That and driving a wedge between us and our allies. Not very good material to cheer about if you ask me.

the move would be counterproductive because it would more likely increase the number of migrants than decrease it.

Great.

The accord requires Iran to curb its uranium enrichment capacity, capping Iran’s stock of low-enriched uranium at 300 kg of uranium hexafluoride enriched to 3.67 percent or its equivalent for 15 years. That is far below the 90 percent needed for weapons grade uranium and also below the 20 percent level to which Iran enriched uranium before the deal.

Good job, Obama.

Iran's Atomic Energy Organization spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said on Monday: "We have quadrupled the rate of enrichment (of uranium) and even increased it more recently, so that in 10 days it will bypass the 300 kg limit."

Good job, Trump.

Just another nail in the coffin of the peace process.

Trump last year withdrew the U.S. from an international agreement, signed in 2015 by President Barack Obama, to limit Iran's nuclear program. Trump has reinstated economic sanctions and recently ended waivers that allowed some countries to continue buying Iranian oil. That has deprived Iran of oil income and has coincided with what U.S. officials said was a surge in intelligence pointing to Iranian preparations for attacks against U.S. forces and interests in the Gulf region.

Good job, Trump.

I really have no idea what to think of this. Iran's no angel, but I don't trust Bolton.

bass: Sorry, I don’t believe in you punch me, I turn the other cheek, sorry.

Unless it's Russia and election meddling.

FoxNews.com doesn't report on news as often anymore. It's mostly front page opinion pieces (not marked as opinion) and stories to help the culture war they are waging.

Bass:. Not my imagination, tell you what, he wouldn’t just sat there and took it up the chute like Obama, that’s for sure.

Oh, I see.

Ummm....Obama was so strong that 9/11 wouldn't have happened under his watch.

See how tough he is?

Bass: Obama didn’t even try, so to say that is completely disingenuous. There was a lot Obama could have done, he didn’t even try to. There is no way anyone with a straight functioning brain will believe that.

It sounds like you want to credit Trump’s toughness by saying in your imagination he would have stopped Putin in Crimea? Do I have that right? And when asked how he would have done it, you have no answers, correct? Just “Trump wouldn’t have let that happen.”

I suppose we could use our imagination and say that he’s tough because of imaginary things he would have done, but why not use reality where he stood next to Putin and left him off the hook for election meddling? Wouldn’t that wet noodle performance, which you hated, be better evidence than your imaginary Trump victory in Crimea?

And to confirm one more thing, you were the one who has said dozens of times that the US needs to watch our step with Russia because they are a nuclear power and we don’t want to make them angry? How does that play into your imaginary Trump toughness victory?

He has no idea what he's doing.

extanker: I trust him more than I trust anything coming out of the mouths of Iranian officials.

I agree. It just sucks we have to choose a proven scammer and known liar as the alternative.

My guess is The Revolutionary Guard is behind this. As to what end, I really have no clue. Iran recently has become more hostile, especially with the threat to begin enrichment again, something Obama had successfully taken off the table and Trump practically dared them to resurrect.

What makes this whole thing murkier is that the president of the Japanese company that owns the tanker has rejected the US position. But he's not a security expert.

What I'm hoping is that the moderate wing in Iran still has some power. The hardliners got a windfall when Trump was elected, then it doubled with Bolton. It's probably difficult for the average Iranian to have any trust in Trump at all, and it's those people who choose their President.

serrano: Plus - get this - we're taking in billions of dollars from China in tariffs.

Tariffs are taxes on Americans who import Chinese products. China doesn't pay them.

Headline: Putin says U.S.-Russia relations getting 'worse and worse'

This is the problem with liberals

Democrats need to watch it. 69.8% disapproval

Democrats belong to that entity as well.

The Dems are still trying

them marijuana laws are something

Hillary was ahead to beat Trump

Biden has roughly about on average 200 supporters seeing him

it’s funnier how the liberal networks

bass: I would say more importantly she used it to shut Democrats up

But ya see, bass, it's not like her lies only reached my ears or the ears of Democrats. She looked you right in the eyes and lied through her teeth. Knowingly. As she admitted to Mueller.

She walked right up to your face and literally gave you the finger, and she is absolutely unapologetic for doing it to you.

Zero results from Trump.

She's allowed to hate Democrats or the media or anyone she wants to. But she used that as her excuse to keep all Americans in the dark as much as possible, including Trump fans. It turned into "I don't like the media so we will not give any information to the American public."

Oh, and she got caught lying through her teeth, just like to many others close to Trump. She literally stood at the podium as the spokesperson for the President and knowingly lied to the public. Not just Democrats....everyone.

Just pure contempt for Americans' right to know.

Yeah, Obama built a coalition and got concessions from Iran to end their nuclear development. Trump came and destroyed that saying he could do better, but doesn't even have a plan yet.

President No Results.