SuperLib comments

Bass, sorry but I just don't get it. You're saying you want to talk with the condition that no restrictions will be placed on gun access. You want to preserve 18-year olds buying military weapons online.

And you say you have a solution without GOP legislation to back it up, which makes it seem like just a talking point. And it also makes it seem that you know this and are fine with it.

Bronco: Russians are pressing forward regardless of what people in the West think, which should answer your question.

But another question is if Russians understand the true cost since so much information is hidden.

Bass: banning guns is not the solution

Closing loopholes, which has been my point, is one step in the right direction. You consistently talk about total bans even though I'm not saying that. The GOP opposes any measures, not just a ban.

liberals dismiss it and instead of cleaning up their own States and cracking down on thugs that commit crimes and kill with impunity in their cities

You've exhausted all of your knowledge about the gun issue so you're doing the usual which is to just rant about liberals.

Have a good night.

In fact, when Ted Cruz says (once again) that armed guards are the solution or military type schools, the first thing the reporter should do is ask what legislation he has proposed to that end.

Then wait for the pause.

Bass: We have strict laws, many of them are not being enforced

That wouldn't have prevented this shooting so what's your point?

The GOP will continue to vote against common sense measures like loopholes anyway so they obviously aren't interested in changing anything.

And if the GOP thinks the problem is enforcement of laws and mental health, please list legislation they've introduced to combat that, otherwise it's just useless talking points.

Bass4funk: No, we want to discuss various ways how to decrease gun shootings

Would it be fair to say that you're going to "solve" mental health issues so there will be no more mass killings?

When you do, clear out some space for all the Nobel Prizes you'll win.

Much easier than closing gun loopholes.

TokyoJoe: If this idiot happened to be white it would be a far right, white supremacy issue.

I see you're leaving out the part where he wrote a manifesto and then intentionally shot black people. I think that's probably how the white supremacist angle into the discussion.

You are not a victim.

Gun supporters will make damn sure mass shootings remain a staple of American society.

Dems will propose increased restrictions or loophole closures, and the GOP will vote against all of it.

So, no.

Is it worth the price, Russia? And there's still more to pay.

By the Geneva Conventions, Russia has to keep them safe and taken care of until after the war.

Bass: I did earlier.

Was that the 46 beds in Iowa? I figured you'd have more. Guess I was wrong.

and not the flags about what people seem to have known

Awesome. What red flags should we add to the list? What ways can we follow up on red flags? And the most important question: Are you willing to waive second amendment rights for these people who fail?

the kid was going through a lot of mental challenge

We would be more than happy to extend mental health services, which I believe you typically characterize as "cradle to grave entitlements". You seem to be proposing something where Democrats are against expanded medical care and Repubs are for it? Must be another school shooting.

Bass: They do and they want that and most gun owners are for it

For it? Really? Can you name any national GOP action on mental care due to mass shootings? How about the whole, "enforce existing laws" angle. Lots of GOP legislation to point to?

The GOP can and always do vote down any Drm changes to guns, and they don't present any of their own solutions.

Nothing changes, which is just what the GOP wants. They love their guns and they'll tolerate daily school shootings if it means they get to keep their best friend.

Bass: No, I’m trying to have a dialogue with the left

A dialogue that begins and ends with "more guns," never any comprehensive reform or mental health legislation. No support for closing background check loopholes, no support to "enforce the current laws." All just lip service until the headlines go away.

Meanwhile your Party of Safety tried ro get potential terrorists on the no fly list access to guns.

If you want police officers in every school in order to have your beloved guns, then tax the crap out of guns and ammo to pay for it. Your problem, not mine.

https://www.radioiowa.com/2022/01/18/house-gop-proposes-4-bills-to-boost-mental-health-services/

An article about the state of Iowa increasing their psychiatric beds by 46?

That will solve things in Texas.

Look, the GOP position on guns is to expand access, expand guns on the streets, and keep the broken system we have in place.

There's been no national push for mental health, just more security guards. You're trying to arm you way out of this issue but it will never happen if problems leak to other people.

Bass: The problem is deeper than guns and as I always say, the right is willing to sit down and discuss the issue and try to find possible solutions as to how best to deal with this serious problem effectively

No, you're not. You just want to keep your guns and you simply do not care if dead children are an unintended consequence.

Am I missing something? Did I miss the GOP bills trying to help with mental health? Name any legislation the GOP has offered to put forth for anything related to guns besides easier access.

Keep making Russia pay the price.

This will always be a permanent side effect of guns in America. The GOP will now going into battle mode to defend the gun that killed these children.

The Russian supporters are feeling all kinds of anxiety that the guy who shot a civilian in the head will spend time in jail.

Oh, the humanity!

Black: plus begrudging admissions that Russia is not losing but also not winning fast enough like there is some timer on this.

There is a timer on this, and your Russian boys have reset it several times.

Sucks ro be losing.

I've seen estimates as high as 50,000 troops lost on the Russian side.

It's nice to not have a President who praises Kim.

Sure is taking Russia a long time to wipe out 900 neo-nazis.

Why are right-wing hate groups the biggest threat to America as per the FBI?

Bass: No, you’re just angry because some of us are not willing to listen to one-sided liberal angry attacks

The article is about conservatives killing black people. I guess liberal words are worse?

There can't possibly be a way to link right-wing terrorism to white hate speech.

I mean c'mon.

What's scarry is how so many people support the same theories as this crackpot shooter. It's like they're saying, "Well, he does have a point."

Bass: They’re talking more about the victims families

Not here.

How can conservatives help the problem when they will talk about any other murder except the one right in front of them?

Bass, I was surprised to hear that you believe in WRT. You think there are powers that be who are intentionally thinning out the white race to win elections?