takeda.shingen.1991@gmail.com comments

Posted in: House Democrats in impeachment trial blast Trump's attempts to sully rival Biden See in context

These could be just things that are within the discretion of a president to act on and the other side is angry about the choice made.

They could, they're not. Read the Constitution you claim to love so much.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Posted in: Democrats accuse Trump at impeachment trial of corrupt scheme to pressure Ukraine See in context

Now look who’s peddling conspiracy theories

You are. Let's post the whole conversation, not just the parts you chose:

HAASS: Before I call—I just want to put one other issue on the floor before I get another question or two, which is Ukraine. This administration, unlike the administration you worked in, decided to provide limited defense articles to Ukraine. Do you think that was a wise decision? And more broadly, do you see any scope for any sort of a deal on eastern Ukraine?

BIDEN: The answer is yes, I think it was a wise decision. But then again, I was pushing that for two years before we left, so. And the reason is I think the more you up the ante, the cost to Russia for their aggression—I mean, as you all know, and you know this better than anybody, you know, the one big lie going on about Ukraine back in—and the rest of Russia is that no Russian soldiers are engaged. They’re not dying. No body bags are coming home, et cetera. Because there’s overwhelming opposition on the part of the body politic in Russia for engagement in Ukraine in a military sense.

DoI think they’re—I think the Donbas has potential to be able to be solved, but it takes two things. One of those things is missing now. And that is I’m desperately concerned about the backsliding on the part of Kiev in terms of corruption. They made—I mean, I’ll give you one concrete example. I was—not I, but it just happened to be that was the assignment I got. I got all the good ones. And so I got Ukraine. And I remember going over, convincing our team, our leaders to—convincing that we should be providing for loan guarantees. And I went over, I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kiev. And I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t.

So they said they had—they were walking out to a press conference. I said, nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You’re not the president. The president said—I said, call him. (Laughter.) I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

Well, there’s still—so they made some genuine substantial changes institutionally and with people. But one of the three institutions, there’s now some backsliding.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

Posted in: U.S. Senate approves Trump impeachment trial plan, rejects Democrats on documents, witnesses See in context

the Hunter/Ukraine issue is going to have to be dealt with at some point anyway.

There is no Hunter/Ukraine issue. Just a convenient lie, sold by Donny and quickly bought up by idiot supporters.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Posted in: Trump's impeachment defense, prosecutors dig in See in context

The topic was supposed illegal contributions from a foreign national. If true that would also apply to the contributions Christopher Steele made. We arent proposing unequal application of the law are we?

Lol no it wouldn't. Apparently you don't know the difference between a market transaction (paying for the Dossier) and an illegal campaign contribution from a foreign government.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Posted in: Ukraine opens probe of possible surveillance of ambassador See in context

So just ignore that HUGE FONT headline on the main page of fake news CNN right now? Ok.

Lol You said "here," Black. You didn't say anything about CNN, I've got no idea what news you are talking about unless you tell me. That aside, no one is blaming Pompeo for the spying; he's being blamed for not doing anything to protect diplomats. If nothing is wrong here, why is Pompeo hiding?

Kinda like thinking “Rudy and his thugs” (a covert group) somehow knew what she was doing 24/7(unexplainable event) so there is that.

lol No, its not a conspiracy theory. We have the texts, and we have Parnas admitting to having her followed. What we don't know is who ordered this, how was it done, and if any laws were broken- but I've got a feeling we're going to find out.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Posted in: Ukraine opens probe of possible surveillance of ambassador See in context

Was she? The articles and commenters here appear to be blaming Pompeo.

Lol No, not once is Pompeo mentioned here in the article, nor do any of the comments.

if it’s an alcoholic Associate or an associate of Trump in a personal capacity, who cares?*

Apparently Ukraine does, which is why they're investigating this. You know, unlike, the nutty Burisma conspiracy theories they're not investigating.

doesnt this meet the definition of “conspiracy theory”? Unproven allegation from untrustworthy person of surveillance (spying).

uhhh no.

Conspiracy theory is a theory that rejects the standard explanation for an event and instead credits a covert group or organization with carrying out a secret plot:

a belief that a particular unexplained event was caused by such a covert group:

the idea that many important political events or economic and social trends are the products of deceptive plots that are largely unknown to the general public:

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/conspiracy-theory

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Posted in: Facebook again refuses to ban political ads, even false ones See in context

Someone should make Facebook, Mr. Zuckerberg, and executives bear the brunt of their decision. I wonder how they'd feel if someone started posting news stories about the Pedo ring running from FB HQ? Lying is totally okay, right?/s

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Posted in: Pentagon distances itself from Trump threat to hit Iranian cultural sites See in context

Who thinks this statement is untrue and why?

lol Because its a hypothetical situation. Who knows what they would do if they could. Silly. And I'd just like to say: If an "evil" state like Iran would blow up cultural sites, why would we engage in the same behavior? lordy.

9 ( +9 / -0 )

Posted in: 3 years in, no sign of Trump's replacement for Obamacare See in context

this article acts like it doesn’t know John McCain screwed us out of having Trump healthcare years ago. 

And thank god for that! Trump healthcare; What is that like Trump steaks? Trump airlines? Trump casinos? Whatever it would have been, rest assured it would have been pure, putrid garbage. Hilarious watching these Trumpies think Donny has a clue. :D

2 ( +5 / -3 )

Posted in: Giuliani brags about forcing out Trump's Ukraine ambassador See in context

Guiliani didnt. Trump did, based on his recommendation

Lol So, why was Rudy bragging about getting her fired if he didn't really?

Which is within his right as an elected official as part of his foreign policy.

Holding up funding in exchange for a personal favor isn't foreign policy. Lol

Now do Biden, without forgetting to consider his son was getting paid millions in that country.

So what? He's a private citizen. Donny on the other hand, how many millions is he raking in? Am so really supposed to believe that a many who admitted to cheating charities is actually concerned about corruption? Hilarious, Black.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Posted in: Giuliani brags about forcing out Trump's Ukraine ambassador See in context

So was Trump. oops.

Durrr,, look at the title of the article: Giuliani brags about forcing out Trump's Ukraine ambassador

Why would Giuliani force out a prosecutor? He holds no government title.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Posted in: Giuliani brags about forcing out Trump's Ukraine ambassador See in context

thought that was a-ok when Joe got the prosecutor general fired, no?

Lol Black, Biden was acting as an elected official, on official foreign policy. Is Giuliani an elected official?

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Posted in: Giuliani brags about forcing out Trump's Ukraine ambassador See in context

An American diplomat with decades of experience and service to our country is the villain and Rudy, currently under investigation and working with two indicted Ukrainians, is the hero.

I will go a step further; Why would the president's attorney get an ambassador fired? That's none of his business.

8 ( +11 / -3 )

Posted in: Trump accuses Democrats of 'attempted coup' on eve of impeachment vote See in context

I think we should just take a vote on installing Donny as king. It seems to be what the right wants.

8 ( +12 / -4 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

So it doesnt benefit Biden that his sons company isnt investigated anymore?

Lol the prosecutor wasn't investigating anyone- that was the problem.

Why was only ONE prosecutor fired, and he just happened to be the one looking into Burisma? Seems such a corrupt place as Ukraine would have tens or hundreds of corrupt prosecutors

Hahahahaha again, you're showing you haven't the foggiest idea. Shokin was the prosecutor general. This position is equivalent to the Attorney General in the US. It wasn't one prosecutor that got fired. He was the top of the Ukrainian legal professional.

Can you name anyone else who was fired by Biden or the USA withholding aid money?

Lolol Irrelevant. Was it just a coincidence that Trump asked Ukraine to investigate Biden's son and Burisma? He's been working there since 2016. Trump's been in office since 2017. Why'd he wait let this corruption go on for so long?:D

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

Durham will determine that, not me or you. But we will know by next year after his report comes out.

No, anyone watching the whole video knows the context. Keep denying and pretending. You look like a genius. :D

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

so am I to assume the Obama/Biden effort to "root out corruption" in Ukraine actually failed then? Or was it a total success just like everything else Obama/Biden ever touched?

Again, you don't have to assume anything. In Biden's discussion on Ukraine, he clearly outlines the progress made and the risk of backslide.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

quid pro quo right there, they said they would take action and in return we give them the money

Lolol not the same. Governments can put conditions on funds for official purposes, doing Donny's laundry serves no public purpose- it only benefits Donny.

I said, "Ol' Joe Biden bragged that he had quashed the investigation into Hunter Biden's employer Burisma."

Lol and I showed how that statement is categorically false.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

Your boy here who always bolds though in the favor line and your Dem politicians and supposed constitutional experts that say “us” (our country in context) really means “we”. Remember the ridiculous “royal we”?

Who is this "your boy?" I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. The word though is irrelevant. It's extortion/bribery with or without the word "though."

the context of Bidens speech is that he is bragging that he personally had the power to get someone fired by withholding money.

Lol no. The context is the VP discussing the actions taken by the Obama administration to root out corruption in Ukraine.

Everyone thought Obama had to approve that but nope, it’s me Joe Biden, I can do that! And he did.

Lol what? You think Biden was just doing some freelance? Again, read the transcript:

They made—I mean, I’ll give you one concrete example. I was—not I, but it just happened to be that was the assignment I got. I got all the good ones. And so I got Ukraine. And I remember going over, convincing our team, our leaders to—convincing that we should be providing for loan guarantees. And I went over, I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kiev. And I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t.

So they said they had—they were walking out to a press conference. I said, nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You’re not the president. The president said—I said, call him. (Laughter.) I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

Say the guys who take one line and one word from the Ukraine transcript and say it justifies impeachment.

Lol what line did I take out of context?

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

Sorry, but Biden can’t rewrite what he said in 2018. This is why, it’s a juicy steak for every lawyer.

What are you talking about? Watch the whole video. You don't get to just take a thirty second clip and pretend it means something it doesn't. No court in the country would uphold such a conviction.

Trump does, the man who’s being impeached

Lol if Donny wanted to take the stand, he could have done so. He chose not. More make believe from the right.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

Well, unfortunately for Biden, video lasts forever and there’s no technology that can change his smile or laughter or his admission. Look, I don’t really care, he won’t be the President and like Bloomberg said, Trump will eat him alive.

Well, unfortunately for rightwingers, your assertionsare nakedly untrue. You don't just take words out of context and pretend they mean something else. Here is the entire transcript, not the parts you chose.

https://www.cfr.org/event/foreign-affairs-issue-launch-former-vice-president-joe-biden

HAASS: Before I call—I just want to put one other issue on the floor before I get another question or two, which is Ukraine. This administration, unlike the administration you worked in, decided to provide limited defense articles to Ukraine. Do you think that was a wise decision? And more broadly, do you see any scope for any sort of a deal on eastern Ukraine?

BIDEN: The answer is yes, I think it was a wise decision. But then again, I was pushing that for two years before we left, so. And the reason is I think the more you up the ante, the cost to Russia for their aggression—I mean, as you all know, and you know this better than anybody, you know, the one big lie going on about Ukraine back in—and the rest of Russia is that no Russian soldiers are engaged. They’re not dying. No body bags are coming home, et cetera. Because there’s overwhelming opposition on the part of the body politic in Russia for engagement in Ukraine in a military sense.

Do I think they’re—I think the Donbas has potential to be able to be solved, but it takes two things. One of those things is missing now. And that is I’m desperately concerned about the backsliding on the part of Kiev in terms of corruption. They made—I mean, I’ll give you one concrete example. I was—not I, but it just happened to be that was the assignment I got. I got all the good ones. And so I got Ukraine. And I remember going over, convincing our team, our leaders to—convincing that we should be providing for loan guarantees. And I went over, I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kiev. And I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t.

So they said they had—they were walking out to a press conference. I said, nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You’re not the president. The president said—I said, call him. (Laughter.) I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

Well, there’s still—so they made some genuine substantial changes institutionally and with people. But one of the three institutions, there’s now some backsliding.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

Yes, it’s true.

No. It's not. You've just posted a 30 second clip of the hour-long discussing I posted. You'll notice not once did he mention his son in that speech.

Also, you'll notice at the beginning of the video, they claim this all happened in 2006. 2006. You know, two full years before Obama and Biden were elected. Not only is the maker of this video dishonest, they're also inept. :D

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Posted in: Democrats lay out case for Wednesday Trump impeachment vote See in context

Ol' Joe Biden bragged that he had quashed the investigation into Hunter Biden's employer Burisma.

No he didn't, that's simply untrue. Stop spreading nonsense. The video you're refrencing is from an event hosted by the Council on Foreign Affairs. Here is the actual video, not the the 30 second clip rightwing conspiracy theorists claim is proof of their claims. Nice try.

https://youtu.be/yKM0Ar6VG64

Skip to minute 50 for the relevant part.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats seek Bolton, Mulvaney for impeachment trial See in context

Trump did the right thing by trying to stamp out corruption in Ukraine.

Lol totally. Donny, a man who admitted in court to cheating charities, is veery concerned about corruption in Ukraine. Is this why he mentioned it 0 times in his perfect call? :D

6 ( +8 / -2 )

Posted in: As House impeachment looms, Senate, Trump grapple over next moves See in context

Well, The liberals are trying to crush this President and his policies by overturning the election of a duly elected President.

Apparently you forgot the 25th Amendment. Congress has the right, indeed responsibility, to remove this self-dealing crook.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

Posted in: As House impeachment looms, Senate, Trump grapple over next moves See in context

New levels of stupidly daily.

Pot meet kettle, mang. lol You don't get to call others stupid when you support a buffoon who has difficulty coherently throwing together any more than two or three sentences.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Posted in: Trump sharply criticizes FBI head after Russia probe report See in context

there was 400 plus pages of wrong doing. Those 17 things will be matched to the people responsible by Durham. Then we will see how many of those are crimes.

Lol No he won't, this is the exact same you Trumpies said about the IG report. When will Trumpies learn that Donny is just a big fat liar?

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats zoom in on Trump impeachment charges this week See in context

Let’s enjoy liberals trying to play with stats. This is the truth:

Let's enjoy moronic Trumpies trying to play with facts. This is the truth.

Donny is a crook; He always has been and always will be. His employment figures do nothing to change or alter this fact, they are utterly irrelevant. Nor will they save his neck from impeachment.

5 ( +7 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats meet to draft impeachment charges against Trump See in context

Impeachment should be by Congress, not by a political party.

Don't worry, Congress will impeach. There's nothing in the Constitution that says all political parties agree. Try not losing elections next time, yeah.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites


©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.