Bigoted? Can you prove that?
Gee Bass, I dunno. Maybe because of Tump's travel ban? Maybe misquoting the Musim mayor of London to make it sound as if the mayor was saying terror attacks were normal? Claiming that perhaps Khizr Khan's wife wasn't allowed to speak because of their religion? Maybe claiming he saw many muslims in the street celebrating 911? Or maybe its Donny's odd silence following terror attacks in which Muslims are called?
Yes, Donny is a bigot.
5 ( +6 / -1 )
Why is it that liberals have to be so melodramatic and all doom and gloom
Oh I don't know bass, maybe its got something to do with throwing 2million people off insurance isnt something that makes me feel particularly cheerful.
, that's why people are sick and tired of Democrats, negativity and hate all the way
Is that why only 13% percent of people approve of the house bill?
No one is saying that, I would be in favor of helping those that absolutely need assistance and can prove it, but if you can physically work, get up, throw some coffee down your throat and get a job like everyone else and stop mooching off the system.
Nonsense, that is exactly what you support if you support this bill.
40% of medicaid patients are disabled. 50% of recipients children. I guess lazy children and disabled need to get off the butts and start working?
When even more conservative groups such as the US chamber of Commerce compare this bill to "treating an already weak patient with leaches," its a safe bet this bill is garbage.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
Yeah, that's what the country needs, less choices and more government intrusion
Yeah! Let the plebs die in the streets. What a great choice!
5 ( +5 / -0 )
I wonder how long it will take Trump and the GOP to comment on this.
12 ( +17 / -5 )
The purpose of terrorism, at least of the ISIS/Islamic variety, is to create conditions necessary to enforce Shraria law throughout the world. To establish a Caliphate.
guess you disn't read where the suspect is a white guy and the victims appear to be Muslim/Arab?
14 ( +16 / -2 )
Reminds me of all the polls that said Hillary was gonna win.
Like the Rasmussen poll Trump is so fond of? That one also said Hillary would win the EC.
11 ( +11 / -0 )
Ohh, if only Democrats would spend more time helping America instead of chasing more rabbits down holes, they might actually be credited with contributing to their country and might win a few elections, but now I think that's asking them way too much. Enjoy the forest.
Obviously not a rabbit hole when there is an active investigation. Rather strange to both criticize the investigation while claiming to reapect the outcome.
13 ( +13 / -0 )
yes, that fact simply tells me it is partisan politics as was stated. If this is all the Dems have, its going to be a rough 2018 election for them
No comment on the actual emoluments clause. I suppose you think its okay for Trump's private business to benefit from his supposed public service?
So if Trump is under investigation as part of this Russia probe, then so are Hillary and all her people too as they were involved in the 2016 election as well. Hey, did you see Hillary is under investigation?
Childish logic, not how this work. Weren't you just a few days ago defending Trump and how he's not under investigation? Guess ya got a bit ahead of youtse there.
6 ( +6 / -0 )
Sadly, I am afraid the culture of violence promoted so joyfully by the left will cause many more deaths in coming years in America
Its cowardly to use this tragic incident to push some sort of narrative that only one side is violent. Further, its absolutely not true. Shame on you.
1 ( +13 / -12 )
Yeah, this batch of Democrats are the whiniest bunch ever. Keep it up and the party will remain in the wilderness it occupies where it belongs.
Yeah! Who are they to get between Trump and an opportunity to make money?!
Keep telling yourself that. Hey, did you see Donny is now under investigation?
12 ( +12 / -0 )
How can I man with a memory as poor as Sessions' possibly be expected to faithfully execute the duties of his office. What an absolute liability!
6 ( +7 / -1 )
yes, so far. Why else has EVERY single Dem judge ruled against it and every single Repub ruled for it? Is it not the same exact law being looked it?
As you've noted, it seems rather silly to single out Democrats for partisanship while ignoring the fact that Republicans have been in favor of the travel ban. Is that not partisanship?
I want the Supreme Court to look at the law as written, look at the Executive Order as written and make a determination while leaving partisanship, feeling and personal interpretation out of it.
Rather hard to do with the President calling it a travel ban, would you not agree? Also, why shouldn't Trump's comments be taken into consideration.
Finally, this ban has been suspended for longer than it was supposed to have beem implemented. If this ban was so essential to American safety, why haven't there been any terror attacks? The ban was supposed to be needed to give the admin time to come up with an immigration strategy? Has that not been implemented yet? Why not?
10 ( +11 / -1 )
Oh so, judges ruling against the travel ban are activist judges, but the judges ruling in favor of the travel ban are not? Again, just brilliant.
Have you ever considered, that after half a dozen rulings against the travel ban, that maybe the travel ban is unconstitutional.
Never counf Trump out until its done.
I know you are a true believer, but what the hell does that even mean?lol
10 ( +11 / -1 )
Oh, so if the SC doesnt rule in favor its a political thing? Brilliant.
9 ( +10 / -1 )
The Russia investigation as it relates to Trump himself never even started. So why not mention that?
How many times do we have to go over this? How many different ways can I say it? The investigation was not finished, Comey specifically said that did not clear Trump publicly for several reasons. For example, publicly stating Trump was not the subject of an investigation at an early stage in the investigation would require Comey to announce an investigation specifically into Trump if that happened later on in the investigation.
That Trump is not under investigation in no way means Trump will not be under investigation, so you're twisting words to say it "never even started."
6 ( +6 / -0 )
Comey was kind enough to lift the cloud from Hillary all by himself but would not do it (nor allow anyone else to do it either) for Trump. So Trump had enough and removed him.
But the investigation into Clinton was done, but the Russia investigation is not. Duhh
8 ( +8 / -0 )
I most definitely think he's a political hack and not to be trusted (ask Hillary) but I do believe him when he said that Trump wasn't the target of an investigation.
Oh, I get it so, Comey testimony regarding Trump not being under investigation is credible, but the rest is not. In other words, you agree with only the parts that align validate your opinion. Its good to see you don't let facts or logic get in the way of your bias.
7 ( +7 / -0 )
Or when the MSM and the desperate Dems persist with this yet, another rabbit hole.
Keep telling yourself that, Bass. Maybe id you say it enough, it'll become true.
16 ( +17 / -1 )
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said on Sunday that Trump was getting in the way of his own agenda.
When you elect a clown, don't be surprised when government becomes a circus
18 ( +19 / -1 )
I do love how the Trumpsters take Comey at his word though. I thought Trump was shifty and untrustworthy? I guess it doesnt matter as long as he "vindicates" the Trumpster.
Donny loves the poorly educated.
8 ( +8 / -0 )
I have to actually pinch myself now, but...whatever, now that it's over, the Dems can sleep well at night and don't have to worry that the president is not under investigation as former FBI director said.
What's over? Yur talking with both cheeks again there bass. Were just warming up. Jeff the Elf has his turn in the hot seat Tuesday. How long till hes canned or resigns?
6 ( +6 / -0 )
Ok, at very least an official complaint has been filed with the Dept of Justice's Inspector General concerning this grossly unethical act.
Oh please, for what? Lol Talking to the media, just like Donny?
The end result is the same; Comey has unwittedly exposed himself as a leaker in cahoots with the MSM who sought to undermine the President, and made Trump even stronger.
Riighhtt, which is why Donny's approval rating continues to drop. I am sure Comey said nothing that Mueller would object to.
But hey, Jeffy the elf is testifying Tuesday, so it looks like yet another dumpsterfire week for the Trumpsters. So much winning!
4 ( +4 / -0 )
I'd also like to add:
Are Trump's tape claims intimidating a witness?
Also, is filing a complaint, as Trump's privately council apparently intends to do, not intimidating a witness?
5 ( +5 / -0 )
Lordy, wtg Donny!
Who am I going to believe, the former FBI director who testified under oath or blithering idiot who claimed Obama wasn't really American? Hmmm...close call.
10 ( +11 / -1 )
Get over it, it's over....really.
Says who? No. Its not. I guess you missed the part about there being an active, on-going investigation.
I guess you missed the part where Comey said Trump lied. I guess you missed the part where Comey stated he wrote notes after each and every interaction with Trump. I guess you missed the part where Comey eluded to a third un-declared meeting with the Russians.
Did Trump collude with the Russians or is he just an idiot who surrounded himself with numerous people with dubious connections to the Russian government? I don't know, but the FBI is looking into it. So no, not over.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
Still not better.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
So he was somehow ok to give a pledge for something he didnt understand and didnt even both to ask what it meant. So it couldnt have bothered him that much or been that important to him.
He did not give a pledge. Nothing in what you quoted indicates pledge. Then combine that with Comey's concerns about Trump's behavior and complaints about the impropriety of meeting one on one with Trump, its quite clear he did not make a pledge, nor was he interested in making a pledge. He clearly wanted to get the hell out of a very awkward meeting.
Ok, for the fifth time this investigation is about BOTH sides of the election, or at least it should be.
No, one side was clearly assisted by the Russians and that was the GOP. Let's find out why they favored the GOP.
The collusion part is a waste of time and politically motivated. Still no one has any proof that any Trump people asked or helped the Russians hack or interfere in anything. The interference part should continue so we know how Russia was able to access, hack, influence, etc.
No, it absolutely isn't political. Nor is it a waste of time. We don't know what happened. Trump may or may not be involved, but someone from his campaign almost certainly is. Which is why we have an investigation.
But still it was never set up. And it was part of his job as a member of the transition team, I would think.
You really are drawing at straws. So its not treason, its conspiracy to commit treason. That's a huge difference!
3 ( +3 / -0 )
Why do most of you have to call people names while you are making your points?
Boohoo. Turnabout is fair play, Trumpsters don't seem to care about any of the racist, xenophobic garbage Trump spews.
Some of that is unfairness and hate of Trump and some of that has been caused by Trump himself by his previous statements that didnt come with proof.
Didn't come with proof. A cute metaphor for lying. So, why do you think this investigation should just go away?
As far as I heard, it was determined this was a one time thing that was discussed specifically for Syria talks. It was not advocated by Kushner but the Russians
You heard setting up a back channel at the Russian embassy to avoid detection by NS was just part of his job? Where did you hear that? And no, whether they established a channel is beside the point that he tried to.
I have never seen the problem with that. Comey didnt as well, because he actually agreed to it and gave it.
Not true. Can you give me a link to where he agreed to giving Trump his loyalty?
2 ( +3 / -1 )
The JR Pass offers discounted train, bus and ferry travel across Japan. Get yours delivered to you within two business days wherever you are in the world with our flexible online booking system.jrailpass.com
Posted in: They ought to be letting our beef in, at least on a temporary basis, in just an effort to get their trade deficit down to show good faith in moving forward and developing a closer relationship.
Posted in: Do you think a man holding a door open for a woman, holding her chair for her when she sits down, or giving up his seat for her are outmoded gestures of politeness or do they still have their place in society?