takeda.shingen.1991@gmail.com comments

Posted in: Democrats weigh contempt vote after White House defies subpoena See in context

She was 18 yrs old. What supervisory responsibility?

Lol no she wasn't. The article says 18 years experience. I for one, would like to know how/why Donny et Al know more about security clearance and who gets them than the lady with 18 years experience.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Posted in: Hatred of journalists turning to violence, watchdog warns See in context

The paid free press will get an opportunity to be updated, ask questions and report facts. Why do Dems hate that idea?

What purpose does it serve, other than to mislead, does holding a press conference before the thing is even released?

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Posted in: Hatred of journalists turning to violence, watchdog warns See in context

And you forgot none of those people are journalists.

Save the smarmy comments for when you're actually right. The Trump nutter sent a bomb to CNN.

https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/clintons-obama-suspicious-packages/index.html

None of the devices harmed anyone, and it was not immediately clear whether any of them could have. 

So what? It doesn't matter. The fact that Trump nutters tried to intimidate and possibly harm journalists is the problem.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

Posted in: Hatred of journalists turning to violence, watchdog warns See in context

Nothing to do with Trump. I am not aware of any violent acts at all directed at journalists in the United States.

Apparently you've already forgotten about the bombs sent to US journalists. The same folks Trump attacks as enemies of the people, go figure.

1 ( +5 / -4 )

Posted in: Former Obama lawyer Craig charged in Mueller spin-off probe See in context

Let me guess, his actions were personal and he, and only he, is accountable for all of this.

Yeah, because it happened after he worked for Obama. Good grief.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Posted in: No sign yet of Trump's tax returns, increasing likelihood of court fight See in context

On the law

I'll bite. Which law? Which law says Congress does not have the power to subpoena the president's tax returns, just like they can any other citizen?

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Posted in: No sign yet of Trump's tax returns, increasing likelihood of court fight See in context

The Dems will likely loss in court.

And you base this on...your Trump U. law degree? :D Gotta love the Trumpies, they cheer on the lack of accountability for this administration.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Posted in: U.S. House committee seeks Trump tax returns from IRS See in context

So basically; Trump is so rich he won't release his taxes. Trump is so smart he won't release his transcripts. Got it. lolz

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Posted in: U.S. lawmakers blast Trump's plan for diplomatic, foreign aid cuts See in context

Yeah, but Mattis is not the President so it really doesn’t matter what the Gen. thinks with all due respect to the General.

Good on you for finally conceding Donny is an inarticulate moron. That being said, you missed my entire point; Certain posters are under the impression that paying for diplomacy is a waste, but that actual subject matter expert disagree. So, why would one side with the inarticulate moron over the actual experts?

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Posted in: U.S. lawmakers blast Trump's plan for diplomatic, foreign aid cuts See in context

11 to 40 billion. Oh so now Dems want to talk about threats to “national security” when their precious foreign aid is cut.

What are these countries going to attack us if we cut their aid?

"If you don't fund the State Department fully, then I need to buy more ammunition ultimately," - Gen. Mattis

Is Mattis a Dem now? I think I'll take his word over that of the inarticulate moron in the white house.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Posted in: Republicans intensify counterattack after Mueller probe See in context

The Spying on the campaign by using an invalid FISA is a good place to start.

That is your opinion, not fact.

I will say that despite no to few apologies from all the fake media for being wrong,

A) You haven't seen the Mueller report, so you don't know that.

B) When has Donny apologized for claiming Obama was a Kenyan Muslim, or claiming Ted Cruz's father was connected to the assassination of Kennedy, or for any of his other thousands of lies? No one should apologize to the president McPorno- not until he apologizes.

All in all, Republicans seem to be getting a bit ahead of themselves. Maybe try waiting for the report to be released first, yeah?

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats pounce as Trump administration ratchets up attack on Obamacare See in context

Those requirements were removed last year. Our premiums dropped $50/month.

Ah, so 3 months in and you think the price you pay already reflects the removal of the individual mandate? It does not. What do you think healthy people will do if they no longer have to pay? They won't. The pool gets sicker. They will pay more. As small as the chance is, some healthy, uninsured folks will get sick and then everyone else gets to pay the cost of the medical coverage. Brilliant. Its common sense. And don't just take my word for it, here's what the CBO says will happen.

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53300

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Posted in: Democrats pounce as Trump administration ratchets up attack on Obamacare See in context

We aren’t talking about schools and cops, my taxes pay that.

Lol the requirement to buy insurance is a tax.

Health care is a personal responsibility same as the maintenance of my car and home.

You mean the car you're required buy insure for? Assuming you're a safe driver, why should the government force you to buy insurance? I'll bet you don't have a problem with that, do you?

I will pay for my own medical expenses, as should be my right.

Is it a right or responsibility? Anyway, good for you, but I doubt most people have a 100k or so laying around in case they get sick.

And while we're at it, where's the outrage at the government for forcing people to pay absurd prices for medical care. Nary a peep. Again willing to be you don't have a problem with this either.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Posted in: Democrats pounce as Trump administration ratchets up attack on Obamacare See in context

Thats a challenge and it’s not right to force people to pay for something they don’t need just so others can have it.

Oh, I see. So, if you don't have kids, you don't have to pay taxes to fund schools? If I don't call the cops, I don't have to pay the taxes furnish them? This is rather silly logic.

And just because you don't need insurance now, doesn't mean you won't in the future. You almost certainly will, regardless of how good your diet. So, why should everyone else pay jacked up rates so you can game the system?

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Posted in: Democrats pounce as Trump administration ratchets up attack on Obamacare See in context

Now, I'm not against health insurance or more people having it. I am against paying 3x more for less. I am against not being allowed to choose plans that meet our needs, both budget AND for specific coverages.

Not Obamacare's fault. Thank your Republican representatives for that, that was the game plan. What exactly do you think would happen when they removed the requirements for even healthy people to be insured? The insurance pool just got sicker. And more expensive as a result.

9 ( +9 / -0 )

Posted in: Democrats demand full Mueller report; Trump says OK with him See in context

I think I get what you're saying. If I understand what you're saying, he's not saying that making the accusation is treason, he's saying that such an accusation is equal to treason in and of itself, not through the making of it. Is that correct?

Yes, exactly that!

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Posted in: Democrats demand full Mueller report; Trump says OK with him See in context

There is one indisputable fact: Barack Obama was president of the US when the Russians were attacking our political system. He was in charge of the intelligence agencies charged with preventing this. And he did absolutely nothing to prevent it.  This failure is all on Obama--he owns it.

Lolz and what has Trump done to prevent it? Even his own admin admits they're woefully unprepared for the next elections.

And you know why he wasn't so vocal leading up to elections- Trumpies would have screeched about how Obama put his hand on the scale.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Posted in: Democrats demand full Mueller report; Trump says OK with him See in context

I'm not understanding your explanation. How are those two things different?

A bit technical perhaps, but let me attempt to explain a different way: You accuse me of being an agent of a foreign. If true, I would be be a traitor. That doesn't however, make the accuser guilty of treason.

Look again at the full quote:

They are literally, the media and Democrats have called the president an agent of a foreign government. That is an accusation equal to treason, which is punishable by death in this country,”

"That is an accusation that is equal to,.." not "making that accusation is equal to treason."

Small and pedantic as it may be, I feel it's important to point this out, lest our Trump friends accuse the media of bias.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Posted in: Democrats demand full Mueller report; Trump says OK with him See in context

Think about that, for a moment. Political opponents and the media are being threatened with the death penalty for the investigation and reporting on it.

To be fair, I don't read her comment as saying accusing the president of being a foreign agent is treason. She is saying the accusation is equal to treason, not the act of making that accusation.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Posted in: Democrats demand full Mueller report; Trump says OK with him See in context

Well, unless the idea is to conduct a smear campaign in the court of public opinion, based on innuendo and half-truths. Which is not about the law, but about politics.

erm, no. I think it is a fair point to ask just how much Barr/Trump interfered in the investigation. Let's look at a couple of the facts:

1) Trump stated he never would have nominated Sessions if he would have known Sessions would recuse himself.

2) Trump fired Sessions.

3) He nominated Barr.

4) Barr wrote a piece last year, claiming there never should have been a special counsel.

5) A month after being confirmed, the SC is wrapped up.

6) The SC is funded through the end of the year.

What a coincidence!? Trump gets an AG doesn't believe there ever should have been an SC and like magic, its gone.

So, no. Its not over with. Especially when you take into fact we still haven't seen the Mueller report.

5 ( +12 / -7 )

Posted in: Dutch police arrest Turkish man suspected of killing 3, wounding 5 in tram shooting See in context

Exactly, it was the seminar that was conducted over 11 years ago of the rise of radical Islam in the Netherlands and how to combat it. And now we see I more evident than ev before.

yes. One terror attack does prove that terrorism is a huge problem in the Netherlands. ;)

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Posted in: Manafort sentenced to 7 years, faces fresh New York charges See in context

any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation.”

Yeah, numerous members of Trump's dumpster fire have committed purjury- a crime arising from the investigation. Next. Or do we really need to go further?

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Posted in: Manafort sentenced to 7 years, faces fresh New York charges See in context

I know they got paid millions. You were the one claiming otherwise. It benefits mueller and his team to the tune of 1.7 million in salaries to drag this out 4 more months.

Not once did I say the Mueller campaign received millions in funding. That is true. You, however, claimed Mueller got paid millions. Then you backed down and said well, he didn't get paid millions, but his team did. Who cares? Who really cares if a dozen lawyers get paid several million dollars collectively. They still weren't paid millions individual.

Perhaps I'm wrong, but it certainly seems you are trying to paint this whole thing as a money grab for connected lawyers. That couldn't be further from the truth. After all, the lawyers on the case could be making more than they are:

http://money.com/money/5306210/mueller-trump-investigation-pay/

In fact, several lawyers took pay cuts to work with Mueller. Your claim is just silly.

Perhaps, you're more concerned about the amount of money the investigation costs. Well, the investigation has turned up more in penalties and fines than it has cost. Here you go:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/17/mueller-probe-could-turn-a-profit-thanks-to-manafort-assets.html

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Posted in: Manafort sentenced to 7 years, faces fresh New York charges See in context

Oh ok so I proved they got paid millions in salary. So now you are like well of course they would, they are lawyers and there are a lot of them. Yep there are- Mueller and his team.

A team of some of the top lawyers getting paid millions collectively, not individually, is hardly news. Good grief. How much do you think attorneys actually make? $50k? lol Get out of here with that.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Posted in: Manafort sentenced to 7 years, faces fresh New York charges See in context

no different than liberals screaming Trump over and over. then I find its Trumps associate or adviser or campaign manager or lawyer and not Trump himself.

To be clear, it does not bother you that Trump's campaign manager worked for and owed Russian organizations money?

Its gonna stretch out to 2020 when Trump gets reelected.

Other than the fact that you now know you voted for a scumbag, what difference does it matter? Investigations take time.

So 1.7 milllon in salary for 4.5 months.....equals how much for almost 2 years?

lolololol Amongst how many attorneys? A dozen or more?!?! Wow!!!! They really got paid. Hey, how much does an average attorney make in a year? Your claims are just silly.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Posted in: Manafort sentenced to 7 years, faces fresh New York charges See in context

ok Mueller and his team. whatever.

No, no. Not whatever. Conflating and claiming Mueller or his team got paid millions is garbage- don't do it.

We have waited nearly 2 years for them to respond to all your baseless accusations with proof.

Investigations take time. Don't just take my word for it. Here's a link with a list to the average times for special investigations.

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-long-special-prosecutor-mueller-trump-2017-6

Why the rush? Its like you're afraid of what we might find out about a scumbag like Trump.

But now Dems in Congress are just starting the investigation all over. Not a good sign for you guys.

No,no. Its to be expected when Republicans did a half-ass job the first time around. Republicans interviewed no one. Seriously?

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Posted in: Manafort sentenced to 7 years, faces fresh New York charges See in context

Mueller was paid 30 million dollars to answer all your questions.

Lol He was not paid 30 million dollars. Please stop talking nonsense. The investigation may have received 30 million dollars, but Mueller certainly did not receive the money personally. Enough with this nonsense.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Posted in: Manafort sentenced to 7 years, faces fresh New York charges See in context

ok, so what was he convicted of that was related to his only connection to Trump, the campaign for 4 months?

Well first of all, he cheated on his taxes and committed other crimes, which regardless of his political connections, deserve to be punished. Next, does the fact that Trump's campaign manager has worked with Russian operatives and is, in fact indebted to them, not bother you? Consider the sudden change in the Republican platform. Why did the GOP soften its stance towards Russia and why does Trump have such a soft spot for Russia.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, I don't know if Trump colluded with Russia, but it seems someone in his camp did. Its too much of a coincidence that the GOP stance on Russia softened at the same time Manafort just happened to be campaign manager. Its too much of coincidence that Trump refuses to release his taxes at the same time his sons have claimed to borrow from Russian organizations, while Trump continues to praise Putin and trash US intelligence.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Posted in: Trump's 'MAGAnomics' gets a thumbs-down from Democrats See in context

What?https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Democratic-policies-have-made-California-poorer-12253618.php

Cuz if an opinion piece says it, it must be true. ;)

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Posted in: Trump budget boosts military and border wall, targets social programs See in context

Be mad all you want. But Dems are misleading people if socialism doesn’t mean free stuff. That’s what the people who hear it and support it think it means.

Do you come here to discuss things with others, or just talk to yourself?

It was YOU, not the link you posted, who claimed Stalin, Mao etc were socialists. They are not. People aren't just demanding "free stuff." I understand how income redistribution, so spare the lecture on how nothing is free.

As other posters have written, I'd like know why the government shouldn't get involved in regulating the prices of things such as healthcare and education.

The website URL clearly states all those people are “socialists”. Or do socialIsts not practice socialism? Be mad at the website not me if it’s inaccurate. Too bad that the people listed are “bad people” but you own them.

Oh, so you can post a link to any website that says anything and it makes it true? Absolutely ridiculous.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites


©2019 GPlusMedia Inc.