takeda.shingen.1991@gmail.com comments

Posted in: House votes to hold Trump ally Steve Bannon in contempt See in context

Cheney will be a distant memory next year.

Maybe. Maybe not. She's currently outraising her opponent.

She is, on everything else.

You're going to have to be a bit more specific. What is "everything?" How exactly is she a RINO?

They did investigate and while China is creating a hypersonic missile and challenging American regional supremacy, the

I'm not talking about the past. I'm talking about the future, and the ramifications are for congress if witnesses can no longer be compelled to sit before congress. Surely you wouldn't be okay with this if the shoe were on the other foot.

Dems are worried only about 1/6 and nothing else.

And they're not wrong to be concerned about 1/6.

6 ( +9 / -3 )

Posted in: House votes to hold Trump ally Steve Bannon in contempt See in context

It doesn’t make anything “bipartisan” just because Liz Cheney is involved.

Cheney wasn't the only Republican who voted to hold Bannon in contempt of congress, come on now.

Same RINO names same song.

Love the purity test. Anyone who doesn't suck up to and sing the praises of Trump is a RINO. Get real.

 Yet still vote to help the other team to the bitter end.

You know, there may be a point when Congress changes hands, and they'll want to investigate. They're worried about eroding the power wielded by Congress, not just "helping the other team till the bitter end."

4 ( +9 / -5 )

Posted in: Trump announces plans to launch new social network 'TRUTH Social' See in context

Its irrelevant, the point is that the 74.2 million who did vote for Trump can also sign up. Plus all the haters too.

Can, but one. The fact of the matter is that most people don't care enough to read what an inarticulate, washed-up loser like Trump has to say. Just look at his blog. How'd that go?

6 ( +7 / -1 )

Posted in: Putin orders most Russians to stay off work for a week as virus deaths rise See in context

two virologists.

Don't stop there, keep going. The arguments are bit more substantive than what you're trying to make them out to be.

ok, guess that science is "settled".

Science? There is nothing scientific about your claim that the new antiviral treatment is just repackaged Ivermectin.

Or just think critically: Ivermectin is used to treat parasites. Covid-19 is a virus. Therefore Ivermectin is NOT the same thing as the antiviral treatment.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

Posted in: Trump announces plans to launch new social network 'TRUTH Social' See in context

simple: because you cant stand there to be a place where Trump supporters can talk without your involvement. Example, Parler. #1 download on the App Store, then gone. coordinated effort in tech to deplatform it.

Parler went down because a number of web hosting companies no longer wanted to provide services to their site, because it's become a bastion of racism, xenophobia, bigotry, and rightwing violence.

if there is anti Trump posting capability, you all will be there. Just like here.

Totally. Just like the Trump blog that no longer exists, because people didn't read it.

The sweetest way to make money is from people who hate you.

Ah, so that explains why Trump loses money hand over foot. So sweet. lmao

11 ( +18 / -7 )

Posted in: Putin orders most Russians to stay off work for a week as virus deaths rise See in context

because they want to take inexpensive ivermectin, call it something else, repackage it into a different color pill and then sell it for hundreds of dollars each.

lol That is demonstrably false. Ivermectin and the antiviral medicine are not the same. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-ivermectin-molnupiravir-idUSL1N2R32JP

7 ( +7 / -0 )

Posted in: Trump announces plans to launch new social network 'TRUTH Social' See in context

sure you all will. You cant resist to post your repetitive Trump hating comments somewhere. Even on a Japan based comment board, for example

lmao Nope. Not once did I read Trump's pathetic blog. Indeed very, very few people did. And that is why he stopped his blog. This social media site will be all the same.

16 ( +23 / -7 )

Posted in: Trump announces plans to launch new social network 'TRUTH Social' See in context

genius marketing. zero dollars spent now we can all go sign up.

Lmao no thanks. I predict this will go about as well as Trump's blog.

19 ( +26 / -7 )

Posted in: 'The stakes are enormous:' Bannon case tests Congress' power See in context

The difference between why Holder was subpoenaed (harassment by republicans) and why Bannon has been subpoenaed (promoting an insurrection) are miles apart.

Also, Bannon wasn't a part of the Trump administration on 1/6. Holder was always a member of the Obama administration.

Additionally, Holder also came to an agreement with the congress, which Bannon hasn't done.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Posted in: 'The stakes are enormous:' Bannon case tests Congress' power See in context

Lock them both up?

Lmao nope. Not even remotely the same.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Posted in: Colin Powell dies of COVID-19 complications at 84 See in context

So then that proves this vaccine is not what they claim is should do overall.

Lmao not at all. Imagine being so desperate to prove the vaccine doesn't work that you point out the death of an elderly, cancer-ridden man to show the vaccine doesn't work.

So it also means people really need to properly ask more questions before

Or listen to experts. Actual experts, not rightwing conspiracy theorists

getting the vaccine involving possible physical side effects

Nowhere here does it suggest he of vaccination side effects. Please.

9 ( +11 / -2 )

Posted in: Trump files lawsuit to block release of Jan 6 documents See in context

Is there nothing else going on in the entire workd?

So, we shouldn't be talking about Trump suing to keep yet more things secret. Got it.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

Posted in: Colin Powell dies of COVID-19 complications at 84 See in context

Fully vaccinated. Died of COVID. Can’t just change the rules when it suits you.

He also had a compromised immune system due to cancer. Why do the anti-vax ghouls keep leaving that out?

9 ( +13 / -4 )

Posted in: Colin Powell dies of COVID-19 complications at 84 See in context

What isn't said here is that he had the Jab.

Oh, and also it does say,

In announcing Powell's death, his family said he had been fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. Peggy Cifrino, Powell’s longtime aide, said he had also been treated over the past few years for multiple myeloma, a blood cancer that impairs the body’s ability to fight infection.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Posted in: Colin Powell dies of COVID-19 complications at 84 See in context

What isn't said here is that he had the Jab.

He also had cancer and a compromised immune system. What's your point?

-3 ( +5 / -8 )

Posted in: Tens of thousands demonstrate in Rome against neo-fascists See in context

No, "fascists" is just a label used by AP and those who want to take away people's freedoms.

Lmao nope. They're Fascists. Literal Fascists. Their founders self-describe themselves as Fascists.

Roberto Fiore (born 15 April 1959) is an Italian politician and the leader of the party Forza Nuova. He self-identifies as a fascist

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberto_Fiore

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NewForce(Italy)

2 ( +4 / -2 )

Posted in: Tens of thousands demonstrate in Rome against neo-fascists See in context

Well, they don’t want government to tell them what to do. I can’t blame them.

Right, so why'd they smash their way into a labor union's offices? What right do you have to break into a private building?

It doesn't bode well when you're openly supporting the same behavior actual fascists did 100 years earlier.

Landini, CGIL’s secretary general, has compared the assault on the union headquarters to 1921 attacks by the newly founded Fascist party against union organizers. Fascist leader Benito Mussolini came to power the next year and later brought Italy into World War II as an ally of Nazi Germany.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Posted in: Tens of thousands demonstrate in Rome against neo-fascists See in context

Exactly. Never give up, never give in, freedom belongs to us all.

Lmao exactly wrong. The Fascists are the one's breaking into union headquarters to protest their mask/vaccination mandate.

Apparently neither of you bothered to actually read the article, because nothing in there has anything to do with governments mandating vaccinations or masks. And the "protesters" you're supporting here are the ones breaking into private property, which is off because I think you believed in private property rights.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

Posted in: Tens of thousands demonstrate in Rome against neo-fascists See in context

The people are rising up against authoritarian rules and restrictions on freedom everywhere.

LoL do you see the sign the man in one of the pictures is holding? It says, "Si vax." You want to take a guess at what that means?

But good on you for supporting the fascists who broke into the union's building.

7 ( +10 / -3 )

Posted in: 'We have to be heard': Texas women travel to seek abortions See in context

Yeah, well I am pro-life.

lmao How are you pro-life when you support exceptions to abortion bans in instances of rape and incest? Are some lives just worth less? Are some lives okay to abort? Yes or no.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Posted in: 'We have to be heard': Texas women travel to seek abortions See in context

Nonsense, there’s always an exception, the law is not absolute and is not immune from being challenged in such cases.

Then prove it. Prove there are actual exceptions in the law. There aren't. www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/09/26/texas-gov-abbott-still-refuses-to-add-rape-and-incest-exemptions-to-abortion-law/amp/

Also, I'd like to point out that your insistence that there are exceptions sounds oddly pro-choice.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Posted in: 'We have to be heard': Texas women travel to seek abortions See in context

Not true, there’s always an exception in those cases

No they're not. There are no exceptions for rape or incest under this law.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Posted in: Jan 6 committee subpoenas former Justice Dept lawyer See in context

ok so how does that relate to the insistence in calling people insurrectionists and claiming treason to push a false narrative?

False narrative? Lmao this is the definition of insurrection:

**insurrection**, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects;**

Those that participated in 1/6 are definitionally insurrectionists.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Posted in: Jan 6 committee subpoenas former Justice Dept lawyer See in context

no one has been convicted of insurrection or treason nor even charged with it.

lmao that doesn't meant it's not an insurrection. Again, here is the definition of insurrection:

*insurrection**, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects;*

Now, has January 6th not an insurrection?

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Posted in: Jan 6 committee subpoenas former Justice Dept lawyer See in context

Ok, millions on one Hand don’t believe that, do t trust the FBI given their history, you can say that all day long, 

Lmao feels over reals. No one cares. Prove it. You can't.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

Posted in: Jan 6 committee subpoenas former Justice Dept lawyer See in context

It was not an insurrection. f it were they would have been charged with the crime.

An insurrection is defined as:

insurrection, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects;

How is January 6th not an insurrection?

6 ( +7 / -1 )

Posted in: No. 2 House Republican refuses to say 2020 election wasn’t stolen See in context

If he is such a loser, why spendsomuch time attacking him?

Because the lies he spreads undermine Democracy.

Plus, we need to remember that Trump's 2016 opponent ALSO refused to acknowledge her defeat for years after the election

lol No. She conceded the following day. Also, her supporters to storm the capital after she lost.

6 ( +11 / -5 )

Posted in: No. 2 House Republican refuses to say 2020 election wasn’t stolen See in context

Well, millions of people won’t believe it and since the majority of the msm have their finger on the mute and delete button

Yeah, because Fox news, OAN etc., lie and make up phony voter fraud allegations, but what millions of people think doesn't change the fact that there was no widespread voter fraud that caused Trump to lose the election.

The election was manipulated by a large number of traitors who hate Trump more than they love their country.

Rather odd statement considering Trump's campaign slogan was, "make America great again," which suggests America is, in fact, not great.

8 ( +13 / -5 )

Posted in: No. 2 House Republican refuses to say 2020 election wasn’t stolen See in context

GOP has transitioned into a full-on cult.

Just imagine simping for the man who lost more many in one year than anyone else in the country.

4 ( +14 / -10 )

Posted in: Trump hotel lost $70 mil despite millions in foreign business See in context

Majority now does not trust Biden on even COVID-19 information.

I wonder why that is? I'm sure it has nothing to do with rightists continue to spread lies and misinformation.

Can’t mention the name of his son, who Biden was in business with. Nor his brother who he was also in Chinese business with.

Because none of that is relevant. If doing business with Chinese firms is so bad, why did Trump's own daughter get numerous trademark approvals while she was working in his administration? Kind of hypocritical.

Also, do you not see anything problematic with Trump, as president, receiving preferential treatment on delayed payments for loans?

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites


©2021 GPlusMedia Inc.