Cheney will be a distant memory next year.
Maybe. Maybe not. She's currently outraising her opponent.
She is, on everything else.
You're going to have to be a bit more specific. What is "everything?" How exactly is she a RINO?
They did investigate and while China is creating a hypersonic missile and challenging American regional supremacy, the
I'm not talking about the past. I'm talking about the future, and the ramifications are for congress if witnesses can no longer be compelled to sit before congress. Surely you wouldn't be okay with this if the shoe were on the other foot.
Dems are worried only about 1/6 and nothing else.
And they're not wrong to be concerned about 1/6.
6 ( +9 / -3 )
It doesn’t make anything “bipartisan” just because Liz Cheney is involved.
Cheney wasn't the only Republican who voted to hold Bannon in contempt of congress, come on now.
Same RINO names same song.
Love the purity test. Anyone who doesn't suck up to and sing the praises of Trump is a RINO. Get real.
Yet still vote to help the other team to the bitter end.
You know, there may be a point when Congress changes hands, and they'll want to investigate. They're worried about eroding the power wielded by Congress, not just "helping the other team till the bitter end."
4 ( +9 / -5 )
Its irrelevant, the point is that the 74.2 million who did vote for Trump can also sign up. Plus all the haters too.
Can, but one. The fact of the matter is that most people don't care enough to read what an inarticulate, washed-up loser like Trump has to say. Just look at his blog. How'd that go?
6 ( +7 / -1 )
Don't stop there, keep going. The arguments are bit more substantive than what you're trying to make them out to be.
ok, guess that science is "settled".
Science? There is nothing scientific about your claim that the new antiviral treatment is just repackaged Ivermectin.
Or just think critically: Ivermectin is used to treat parasites. Covid-19 is a virus. Therefore Ivermectin is NOT the same thing as the antiviral treatment.
6 ( +7 / -1 )
simple: because you cant stand there to be a place where Trump supporters can talk without your involvement. Example, Parler. #1 download on the App Store, then gone. coordinated effort in tech to deplatform it.
Parler went down because a number of web hosting companies no longer wanted to provide services to their site, because it's become a bastion of racism, xenophobia, bigotry, and rightwing violence.
if there is anti Trump posting capability, you all will be there. Just like here.
Totally. Just like the Trump blog that no longer exists, because people didn't read it.
The sweetest way to make money is from people who hate you.
Ah, so that explains why Trump loses money hand over foot. So sweet. lmao
11 ( +18 / -7 )
because they want to take inexpensive ivermectin, call it something else, repackage it into a different color pill and then sell it for hundreds of dollars each.
lol That is demonstrably false. Ivermectin and the antiviral medicine are not the same. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-ivermectin-molnupiravir-idUSL1N2R32JP
7 ( +7 / -0 )
sure you all will. You cant resist to post your repetitive Trump hating comments somewhere. Even on a Japan based comment board, for example
lmao Nope. Not once did I read Trump's pathetic blog. Indeed very, very few people did. And that is why he stopped his blog. This social media site will be all the same.
16 ( +23 / -7 )
genius marketing. zero dollars spent now we can all go sign up.
Lmao no thanks. I predict this will go about as well as Trump's blog.
19 ( +26 / -7 )
The difference between why Holder was subpoenaed (harassment by republicans) and why Bannon has been subpoenaed (promoting an insurrection) are miles apart.
Also, Bannon wasn't a part of the Trump administration on 1/6. Holder was always a member of the Obama administration.
Additionally, Holder also came to an agreement with the congress, which Bannon hasn't done.
5 ( +5 / -0 )
Lock them both up?
Lmao nope. Not even remotely the same.
3 ( +4 / -1 )
So then that proves this vaccine is not what they claim is should do overall.
Lmao not at all. Imagine being so desperate to prove the vaccine doesn't work that you point out the death of an elderly, cancer-ridden man to show the vaccine doesn't work.
So it also means people really need to properly ask more questions before
Or listen to experts. Actual experts, not rightwing conspiracy theorists
getting the vaccine involving possible physical side effects
Nowhere here does it suggest he of vaccination side effects. Please.
9 ( +11 / -2 )
Is there nothing else going on in the entire workd?
So, we shouldn't be talking about Trump suing to keep yet more things secret. Got it.
8 ( +9 / -1 )
What isn't said here is that he had the Jab.
Oh, and also it does say,
In announcing Powell's death, his family said he had been fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. Peggy Cifrino, Powell’s longtime aide, said he had also been treated over the past few years for multiple myeloma, a blood cancer that impairs the body’s ability to fight infection.
3 ( +6 / -3 )
No, "fascists" is just a label used by AP and those who want to take away people's freedoms.
Lmao nope. They're Fascists. Literal Fascists. Their founders self-describe themselves as Fascists.
Roberto Fiore (born 15 April 1959) is an Italian politician and the leader of the party Forza Nuova. He self-identifies as a fascist
2 ( +4 / -2 )
Well, they don’t want government to tell them what to do. I can’t blame them.
Right, so why'd they smash their way into a labor union's offices? What right do you have to break into a private building?
It doesn't bode well when you're openly supporting the same behavior actual fascists did 100 years earlier.
Landini, CGIL’s secretary general, has compared the assault on the union headquarters to 1921 attacks by the newly founded Fascist party against union organizers. Fascist leader Benito Mussolini came to power the next year and later brought Italy into World War II as an ally of Nazi Germany.
3 ( +4 / -1 )
Exactly. Never give up, never give in, freedom belongs to us all.
Lmao exactly wrong. The Fascists are the one's breaking into union headquarters to protest their mask/vaccination mandate.
Apparently neither of you bothered to actually read the article, because nothing in there has anything to do with governments mandating vaccinations or masks. And the "protesters" you're supporting here are the ones breaking into private property, which is off because I think you believed in private property rights.
1 ( +4 / -3 )
The people are rising up against authoritarian rules and restrictions on freedom everywhere.
LoL do you see the sign the man in one of the pictures is holding? It says, "Si vax." You want to take a guess at what that means?
But good on you for supporting the fascists who broke into the union's building.
7 ( +10 / -3 )
Yeah, well I am pro-life.
lmao How are you pro-life when you support exceptions to abortion bans in instances of rape and incest? Are some lives just worth less? Are some lives okay to abort? Yes or no.
4 ( +4 / -0 )
Nonsense, there’s always an exception, the law is not absolute and is not immune from being challenged in such cases.
Then prove it. Prove there are actual exceptions in the law. There aren't. www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/09/26/texas-gov-abbott-still-refuses-to-add-rape-and-incest-exemptions-to-abortion-law/amp/
Also, I'd like to point out that your insistence that there are exceptions sounds oddly pro-choice.
4 ( +4 / -0 )
Not true, there’s always an exception in those cases
No they're not. There are no exceptions for rape or incest under this law.
3 ( +4 / -1 )
ok so how does that relate to the insistence in calling people insurrectionists and claiming treason to push a false narrative?
False narrative? Lmao this is the definition of insurrection:
**insurrection**, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects;**
Those that participated in 1/6 are definitionally insurrectionists.
3 ( +4 / -1 )
no one has been convicted of insurrection or treason nor even charged with it.
lmao that doesn't meant it's not an insurrection. Again, here is the definition of insurrection:
*insurrection**, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects;*
Now, has January 6th not an insurrection?
5 ( +6 / -1 )
Ok, millions on one Hand don’t believe that, do t trust the FBI given their history, you can say that all day long,
Lmao feels over reals. No one cares. Prove it. You can't.
7 ( +8 / -1 )
It was not an insurrection. f it were they would have been charged with the crime.
An insurrection is defined as:
insurrection, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects;
How is January 6th not an insurrection?
6 ( +7 / -1 )
If he is such a loser, why spendsomuch time attacking him?
Because the lies he spreads undermine Democracy.
Plus, we need to remember that Trump's 2016 opponent ALSO refused to acknowledge her defeat for years after the election
lol No. She conceded the following day. Also, her supporters to storm the capital after she lost.
6 ( +11 / -5 )
Well, millions of people won’t believe it and since the majority of the msm have their finger on the mute and delete button
Yeah, because Fox news, OAN etc., lie and make up phony voter fraud allegations, but what millions of people think doesn't change the fact that there was no widespread voter fraud that caused Trump to lose the election.
The election was manipulated by a large number of traitors who hate Trump more than they love their country.
Rather odd statement considering Trump's campaign slogan was, "make America great again," which suggests America is, in fact, not great.
8 ( +13 / -5 )
GOP has transitioned into a full-on cult.
Just imagine simping for the man who lost more many in one year than anyone else in the country.
4 ( +14 / -10 )
Majority now does not trust Biden on even COVID-19 information.
I wonder why that is? I'm sure it has nothing to do with rightists continue to spread lies and misinformation.
Can’t mention the name of his son, who Biden was in business with. Nor his brother who he was also in Chinese business with.
Because none of that is relevant. If doing business with Chinese firms is so bad, why did Trump's own daughter get numerous trademark approvals while she was working in his administration? Kind of hypocritical.
Also, do you not see anything problematic with Trump, as president, receiving preferential treatment on delayed payments for loans?
3 ( +4 / -1 )
Posted in: Former Prime Minister Abe becomes YouTuber
Posted in: Ghosn determined to restore his reputation