Short answer, the GoP is upset because there is too much voting going on, by voters and companies, and it is hard for the GoP to remain relevant and regain power if people can vote.
Can't say that I ever liked Citizens United, but corporations making decisions to move out of places like Georgia makes me feel a little better about the decision.
Of course Citizens United isn't directly working here, it allowed corporations to contribute to campaigns as a legal "person."
Corporations are only doing this because of the current cancel culture and hedging against the risk of being black balled by internet activists. One potential positive of social networks.
3 ( +5 / -2 )
never ever again will China be humiliated again.
Very childish to use humiliation to justify committing atrocities and abuse of its citizens and its international obligations.
Would have thought China was an adult by now.
6 ( +11 / -5 )
Yes, why is she still in Canada? An extradition hearing should be a relatively simple affair, isn't it up to the Americans to prove her guilt?
She's been at home (in a very large mansion) on bail while she exercises her rights under Canadian law to contest the extradition. It should be a simple affair, but she keeps appealing the extradition, which is her right. If she loses, she will be sent to trial in the U.S. where she will also have rights.
These Canadian men were afforded absolutely no rights.
It shows how dangerous China is to foreigners.
If Biden wants to look tough on the Chinese, then give him a shot.
Biden will have nothing to do with the trial and will not interfere with the proceedings.
The Department of State in conjunction with the Department of Justice requested extradition before Biden became president. Assuming she is extradited, DOJ prosecutors have to present the case in front of a federal judge, and she will have ample opportunity to defend herself and hire legal counsel. She has more rights and more opportunities to defend herself than any person in China.
11 ( +11 / -0 )
Taiwanese law bans import of Chinese vaccines made for human use.
Almost laughed after reading that one.
8 ( +12 / -4 )
I can only guess who is filling these people's minds with the idea that they would be put in jail or be held down in order for the vaccine to be forced on them.
According to a poll last week, 41 percent of Republicans nationally said they would not get the vaccine, compared to just 11 percent of Democrats.
I thought the number of Pubs would be higher.
10 ( +16 / -6 )
The loser, whatever his motives, also killed 2 white women.
But they don't rank on the victimology totem pole these days
All those attacked were victims.
The right has been focusing on the victimization of the killer and the above White victimization.
Tucker is just a well spoken white supremacist. David Duke was the one who said that he is the new face of white supremacism and should have been Trump's running mate because he can talk about it without using the same words that get the KKK and neo nazis in trouble.
The problem here the president is trying to address is the current trend of attacks on Asians. The orange guy would have made it all about him and the victimization of whites by the "Chinese flu", which would only rile up the base by scapegoating a group of Americans.
3 ( +4 / -1 )
The US cannot compete with China. Period.
Agreed, the average income in China is about USD10k compared with USD30K in the US. Hard to compete with that as a cost base. That is even excluding the spill over costs of pollution that companies there don't need to pay, the stolen technology, and disposable workforce.
2 ( +4 / -2 )
Cowardly acts by a lawless tyrant government.
Western governments have been warning its citizens against travelling to China, as if I needed any warning.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Oh to be a fly on the wall at that meeting. The problem for the United States is that China is too big to be dictated to, too strong be to dealt with by military means, and too important economically to be ignored. The US is in a quandary.
US businesses have allowed the economic quandary you mentioned. They sought cheap labor and freedom to pollute so that they could have lower costs and higher profits. It was a bad bargain. China has never really opened its economy as it promised.
I am not as worried about the military quandary right now. Their navy is getting larger and more professional, but it is still not good enough to compete with the U.S. Navy.
5 ( +5 / -0 )
Anchored down in anchorage. Probably the most popular song about Alaska.
China must have really wanted to talk if they came to Anchorage.
The U.S. sent them a message, enjoy Anchorage. Probably still a nicer place than they are used to.
You can see Russia from Alaska if you squint hard enough....
4 ( +4 / -0 )
Finding good beef in Japan is difficult.
I've never cared for the overly fatty beef prized in Japan or the cheap/affordable beef.
I may try to go hunting again since this article has made me hungry.
2 ( +4 / -2 )
He was absolutely amazing and unforgettable.
2 ( +2 / -0 )
Tucker is saying his as a curious and skeptical critic. healthy for a robust dialogue.
Tucker isn't curious, skeptical, or seeking dialog.
Maybe you missed the recent John Oliver episode focusing on that troll and fell into PTownsend's trap.
6 ( +9 / -3 )
Such inconsistency of Japanese and American actions vs words are so glaring that the authoritarian leaders in China must be giggling so hard each time they hear Washingjing's and Tokyojing's da-kine 'international order' , blah-blah-blah speeches! Lol!
The risks China poses to Taiwan are not overlooked by the U.S. Expect support for Taiwan to increase from the more subtle support in the past.
As it stands, Taiwan attended Biden's inauguration, and the U.S. military knows that the timetable for China to invade Taiwan has shortened substantially. All it would take is Taiwan to declare independence or some perceived slight on the Chinese government.
Frankly, Taiwan is likely one of the biggest reason for these talks.
4 ( +5 / -1 )
"I would recommend it to a lot of people that don't want to get it and a lot of those people voted for me, frankly."
After reading the headline, my first thought was, how will he make it about him?
Maybe Rupert Murdock will also tell his Fox conspiracy theorists to stop making baseless statements about whether the vaccine has been tested or that no one is answering questions.
Rupert got the vaccine quickly and like Trump secretively, but his network is still pushing conspiracies about the virus.
3 ( +5 / -2 )
they desperately need the help and protection from a west country,U.S.
Japan, the U.S. and other allies need to work together.
Allies share the risk and costs, and China has to bear the risks and costs alone.
12 ( +14 / -2 )
From the beginning and up to now, the Chinese government has not been forthcoming.
During this recent UN investigation, information on the earliest cases was not released, and this could have pointed to a source of the outbreak.
I believe that the source is rather mundane though. It started in the wet markets and spread when the Chinese government lied about it. The Wuhan wet market has been closed, similar to how the Chinese bullet train that crashed was immediately buried before an investigation could be conducted.
The problem is that wet markets are an ongoing risk and will likely continue to operate and put everyone at risk. China will continue to lie about these kind of events and put many at risk again.
3 ( +6 / -3 )
OWH wrote that laws should be designed narrowly to stop the "bad [person]" otherwise the law will eventually fail by being overbroad or not broad enough. I don't see the bad [person] this law is trying to address.
Don't you think parents would pull their children out of a sport if they learned that a trans-female wanted to compete? So, it will not be a widespread problem.
-12 ( +3 / -15 )
Male to Female Transgender athletes would have far too much advantage in most sports competing against women. It would be grossly unfair and put back womens sport by decades.
If it were actually true.
I don't think that they should compete cross-gender, but I also don't think the law was necessary outside of placating the faux outrage.
-15 ( +5 / -20 )
This does look like legislation in search of an issue that doesn't exist.
-18 ( +9 / -27 )
Now the legislature should move to get rid of the filibuster and pass election reforms.
That would remove the power the minority party has exerted over U.S. national politics.
8 ( +8 / -0 )
An ambitious Chinese government has been bad for everyone.
Accelerating that ambition is even worse.
The US should take a side here and stop expecting China to change its abusive actions.
10 ( +10 / -0 )
Except for Trump republicans in the US. Those people eat up all information from Russia.
True. Barry Goldwater would be freaking out at the current state of the GoP.
4 ( +5 / -1 )
Kitao's comments are unlikely to go down well with Beijing.
Extremely bold to express the reality of the situation.
I worry that Beijing will consider this a violation of the restrictions to think freely.
He is right, why pay the high cost of living in HK.
2 ( +3 / -1 )
Sounds like battered wife syndrome. Tragic.
Always amazed at the horror people can inflict on each other.
0 ( +0 / -0 )
Anything that makes a woman feel uncomfortable constitutes harassment.
There is certainly a lot of truth to this statement.
If the advance is accepted or just welcomed, then there are no problems.
If the advances is not accepted, then what? Is is automatically harassment?
It is a complicated topic, and I don't know all of the facts. However, Cuomo sounds like an idiot rather than a predator.
Liss told the Journal she initially thought of Cuomo’s behavior as harmless and never made a formal complaint about it, but it increasingly bothered her and she felt it was patronizing.
Not to victimize her, but Liss could have made a formal complaint or at least had a venue to discuss what, upon later reflection, bothered her.
3 ( +3 / -0 )
1) Governments often have a hard time bringing in high level IT, as it can be hard to compete with the salaries offered by the private sector.
It depends on the government agency.
The NSA is notorious for competing with the private sector for talent. However, their operations become so secret that nearly nothing leaves the agency. Worse still is the operational security that could prevent the use of intelligence or know-how gathered.
RF will almost always create leaks even in the most secure systems. RF espionage has been the "hack" for nearly a 100 years.
2) Smaller software teams, building custom built solutions, have a harder time writing secure systems, as they have less manpower for doing testing, and a smaller user base for testing upon.
Linux is open source and easier to adapt and control than say a MS OS, which is using Facebook business models of treating the users and their information as the product. As it stands, large software teams are a necessity at large corporations to modify IT to be less leaky.
1 ( +1 / -0 )
Posted in: Spread out