Here we have a young person facing the truth of the climate emergency and acting when too many adults, including some of the commentators here, do far too little or even participate in denialism. Yet she is scrutinized by the likes of Burning Bush and held to standards far beyond what is expected of political leaders, corporate heads, the media... Give Greta a break and either cheer her on or just keep all the hating to yourself.
-3 ( +31 / -34 )
Should these symbols of the Japanese state be legitimizing the extreme right, authoritarian government of Poland with such a visit? Though maybe that is the message from the Abe government, which itself would lurch further to the right given the chance.
-1 ( +2 / -3 )
She also said research shows that states with higher female participation are less likely to use violence or military force to resolve international conflict.
Did she bother to think this through? The US has a high labour force participation rate for women and just loves the use of violence to create international conflict.
And is she talking about promoting "participation" in the race-to-the-bottom, sweat-shop industry that produced her line of clothing?
3 ( +4 / -1 )
If we consider historically the extreme population rise in Japan and how this led to the colonization of neighbouring countries and war and to Japan's continued subservience to the US Post WWII to sustain access to food and other resources, then the government would be wise to promote depopulation to a level of much greater self-sufficiency. Though this is not a call to maintain the draconian neoliberal labour standards.
-1 ( +3 / -4 )
It launched the #beWHITE project on Tuesday as part of marketing efforts for a detergent, urging an equitable distribution of chores at home.
The terminology deserves scrutiny, but also shouldn't we be questioning the legitimacy of any huge corporation that rails against unequitable distribution? It would be interesting to know what the pay ratio of CEO to average employee is and if the company uses cheap Asian labour to expand profits. Also, to what extent does the company redistribute its profits sufficiently to address the environmental damages caused in the production and use of its products, or is this cost not born by the company? Just how off-white is this corporation that moralizes about home life to boost profits?
3 ( +5 / -2 )
Organic growth is a very slow and stable way to grow, as your 10% yearly revenue increase suggests, but I can't see any downside to a loan with the low interest rates here in Japan and no penalty for early repayment. For cash flow for some businesses this is essential. Also, why operate a company with your own money if you can do this with the banks?
As for this news, seems like a smart idea for these banks to diversify and at the same time support their region.
4 ( +4 / -0 )
Interesting how this article doesn't mention wage decline and precarity under the abenomics approch to neo-liberalism.
The link below has some charts and statistics that can provide some structural content to the far too anecdotal and cheer-leading tone of the news article.
15 ( +17 / -2 )
Burning Bush writes
The scientific "community" has been wrong countless times in history, and they're wrong again.
And you are right because...? Sorry, but denial is not a rational and evidence based counter-argument. Nor is an appeal to tradition (wrong in the past so wrong now) acceptable as it is acknowledged as one of the most common logical fallacies. So what is your argument? Why not point out specifically where these 6,000 members of the scientific community have got it wrong and offer proof, and not just that from a handful of scientists flush with fossil fuel company money.
7 ( +9 / -2 )
Manager Nishino announced the list of players of the squad for the World Cup.
But let's be realistic. 5 were chosen by Kirin, 5 by Adidas, 4 by Family Mart, 4 by Mizuho and 3 by Dentsu (one each by Kawahara, Ozawa and Juji).
3 ( +3 / -0 )
OK, let's get more serious, considering the true conditions climate scientists report. Here are the needed "lifestyle" changes if we actually wish to address GG emissions:
1) Have fewer or no children and pets
2) Eat little or no meat, especially beef
3) Switch from an automobile to a bicycle
4) Change our political "lifestyle" of voting for politicians who don't even talk about climate change in major speeches and politicians who use our taxes to invest in fossil fuel developments and in fossil fuel guzzling weapon systems instead of alternative energy technologies.
5) Get in the habit of joining groups such as 350.org and put more pressure on politicians and industry to do the right thing, such as financial institution divestment from fossil fuels.
4 ( +6 / -2 )
Of course these LDP election pledges fail to address the two most critical issues of our time, climate change and inequality, and yet this antiquated lot is likely to return to power. What does this say about the state of civic awareness and engagement in Japan?
5 ( +9 / -4 )
Authorities are not calling this terrorism, but can't we say that this is industry and government sponsored terrorism, since these institutions, by mass producing and selling and by not seriously banning assault weapons, directly give licence to killers?
22 ( +23 / -1 )
bass4funk Today 07:12 am JST
I agree, but until we find a permanent and alternate fuel source, the world will continue to use fossil fuel, that's just how it's going to be.
The news is not whether we will use or not, this is about research and investment, the funds for which should not be going into further fossil fuel extraction but rather into renewable energy.
2 ( +3 / -1 )
Victimizing convenience stores. This is raw.
1 ( +2 / -1 )
The lying war criminal vs. the lying shady tax evader: a script right out of Hollywood. Only problem is that there are life and (lots of death) implications for whichever is elected as the head of the US imperialist project.
-9 ( +7 / -16 )
This assumes that something won't change, which is neoliberal capitalism. But the contradictions of capital are already becoming very difficult to manage and as we are informed above "Freedom to change implies an obligation to change – fast."
1 ( +1 / -0 )
When they pass and actually enforce the law fairly, then we can say they've done something.
6 ( +9 / -3 )
So nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles are just "fear cards" to you? Hmmm...more like it's reality, Kim is going to keep this up until at least the end of the US election, and hopefully no one gets hurt or worse killed because of it.
With your Americentrism, why would you understand that the with the far superior weaponry that the US, Japan and South Korea have, the state that is under the greater threat is NK.
0 ( +2 / -2 )
So the question with "dotakyan" is whose heads are going to roll?
0 ( +1 / -1 )
Isn't he in a way just following the policy of the government, which is steamrolling whistleblowers and free speech?
0 ( +2 / -2 )
What is the true cost of Mac cheapness to the environment and health of consumers, especially children? And what is the true cost to democracy when "news" becomes advertising?
-4 ( +2 / -6 )
Japan pledges Y45 bil to bolster Japanese military and security companies under the guise of Asia's anti-terrorism steps. Just another example of corporate welfare dressed up as assistance.
3 ( +5 / -2 )
Duerte should just follow the Obama/Bush doctrine. Identify anyone you want killed as a terrorist you are at war with and then send a drone to bomb them and their village, and who cares if this is a war crime.
-1 ( +3 / -4 )
Something is amiss in a democracy if 1) there is still an imperial system; 2) only males are considered; and 3) there is a ranking system based on age.
-2 ( +1 / -3 )
The No-brand that brands and advertising dressed as news: what a world of contradictions.
4 ( +7 / -3 )