Japan Today
The Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations (Nihon Hidankyo) wins the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize
Teruko Yahata, who survived the 1945 atomic bombing of Hiroshima, speaks during an interview with Reuters. Image: Reuters/Kim Kyung-Hoon
national

In Hiroshima, Nobel Prize brings survivors hope, sense of duty

4 Comments
By Daniel Leussink and Irene Wang

Almost eight decades after an atomic bomb devastated her home town of Hiroshima, Teruko Yahata carries the scar on her forehead from when she was knocked over by the force of the blast.

The U.S. bombs that laid waste to Hiroshima on the morning of Aug. 6, 1945, and to Nagasaki three days later, changed the course of history and left Yahata and other survivors with deep scars and a sense of responsibility toward disarmament.

The awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday to the Nihon Hidankyo group of atomic bomb survivors, for its work warning of the dangers of nuclear arms, has given survivors hope and highlighted their work still ahead, Yahata and others said.

"It felt as if a light suddenly shone through. I felt like I could see the light," the 87-year-old said on Saturday, describing her reaction to hearing about the award.

"This feels like the first step, the beginning of a movement toward nuclear abolition," she told Reuters at the site of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum.

She was just 8 years old and in the back garden of her home when the bomb hit. Although her house was 2.5 km (1.5 miles) from the hypocenter, the blast was strong enough to throw her several metres back into her house, she said.

Seventy-nine years later, and a day after the Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded the survivors the prize, a long line formed outside the museum, with dozens of foreign and Japanese visitors queuing up to get in.

A bridge leading into the memorial park was decorated with a yellow sheet and other handmade signs against nuclear weapons. Campaigners gathered signatures for nuclear abolition from those passing by.

Nihon Hidankyo, formed in 1956, has provided thousands of witness accounts, issued resolutions and public appeals, sent delegations to the U.N. and peace conferences, and collected signatures advocating nuclear disarmament.

Yahata, who is not a Nihon Hidankyo member, said it was that drive to gather signatures that finally paid off after bearing little fruit for most of a century.

"It's this amount of sadness and joy that led them to this peace prize. I think it's something very meaningful," she said.

Nihon Hidankyo's co-chair, Toshiyuki Mimaki, said he felt the award meant more responsibility, adding that most atomic bomb survivors were more than 85 years old.

"Rather than feeling purely happy, I feel like I have more responsibility now," he told Reuters, sitting in a Hidankyo office in Hiroshima in front of a map showing the impact of the bomb on the city.

In rural areas the group is on the verge of falling apart, the 82-year-old said. "The big challenge now is what to do going forward."

© Thomson Reuters 2024.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.


4 Comments
Login to comment

What a remarkably courageous women, 87 years old, sprightly, sharp quick witted,

"This feels like the first step, the beginning of a movement toward nuclear abolition"

Sadly, without global unprecedented change, the next generation 21st century weapons of mass destruction are soon to be upon a world unwilling, unable to work toward peaceful co-existence

2 ( +2 / -0 )

I’m not convinced at all for the argument that less nuclear weapons will bring more peace. There’s a strong argument to be made that mutually assured destruction has played a huge role in dissuading war between nuclear armed states after World War 2. Does anyone think Russia would have invaded Ukraine in the event Ukraine still had its nuclear arsenal?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

All parties should have nuclear weapons if one party has it. Otherwise we end up in situations like how Israel is acting so disgustingly today in Middle East because none of the other parties have Nuclear Weapons.

A prime example of both parties having nuclear weapons and not using it is: USA - Russia - China relationship. When you have something to lose, you act more responsible.

Japan would not have been nuked in the first place if it had those weapons at that time.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

The imminent danger is war in Ukraine could result in Putin desperate belief the use of tactical nuclear weapons is strategically politically feasible.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites