Japan Today
national

Japan destroyer sails through Taiwan Strait after China jet encounter

38 Comments

A Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force destroyer sailed through the Taiwan Strait last week, days after a Chinese fighter jet flew dangerously close to a Japanese patrol plane over the Pacific, diplomatic sources said Thursday.

It was the third known passage through the waterway by an MSDF ship, with all occurring within the past year, apparently aimed at warning China, which continues to pressure Taiwan, the self-ruled democratic island it claims as its own.

The Takanami entered the strait from the East China Sea on June 12 and spent more than 10 hours as it sailed toward the south, the sources said. After the transit, the destroyer headed to waters off the Philippines' main island of Luzon.

The entire transit was tracked and monitored by the Chinese military, according to the sources.

The Takanami conducted a joint maritime exercise with the Philippine Navy on Saturday in a South China Sea area the Southeast Asian country claims jurisdiction over, amid China's intensifying assertions in the waters.

The Japanese government has typically refrained from sending MSDF vessels through the Taiwan Strait to avoid provoking China. But it has shifted its stance amid Beijing's growing assertiveness, joining ally the United States and others in asserting freedom of navigation in what they consider international waters.

The latest transit came after Japan's Defense Ministry said that a Chinese J-15 fighter jet from the aircraft carrier Shandong approached as close as 45 meters to an MSDF P-3C surveillance plane over the high seas in the Pacific on June 7 and 8.

The previous two transits took place in September last year and February this year. The Japanese government has not officially admitted to the activities.

© KYODO

©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.

38 Comments
Login to comment

An unbiased report would state that this is an act of aggression by Japan.

-11 ( +7 / -18 )

That's what we like to see: Japan standing up for Free Taiwan and Freedom of Navigation.

6 ( +12 / -6 )

Mr KiplingToday  06:37 am JST

An unbiased report would state that this is an act of aggression by Japan.

Sailing in international waters can't possibly be an act of aggresion.

9 ( +14 / -5 )

An unbiased report would state that this is an act of aggression by Japan.

Yeah, but from your past comments, it's only aggression.

You reap what you sow!!

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Tai: they are giving the finger China. Is there any need to navigate that course. There is a lot of infrastructure on the sea bed in that strait connecting the Chinese province to the mainland. There no need to sail that course. It an act of stupidity at the lease.

-3 ( +6 / -9 )

An unbiased report would state that this is an act of aggression by Japan.

Absurd notion. That would be the very definition of a biased report.

You must be beside yourself with the Chinese "hostile fleet" sailing around Australia and holding unannounced live fire exercises right under the main international flight path between New Zealand and Australia. In your books that would be what? Close to an invasion? Try as I might I cant see any post from you expressing your outrage over that. But one aging destroyer in international waters near China is somehow an act of aggression? Wow.

6 ( +10 / -4 )

TaiWaniSnotchina

“Sailing in international waters can’t possibly be an act of aggression”

Unless it is done by China, apparently.

This is provocative by Japan. Didn’t the original incident quoted in the article occur in international waters and involve a Japanese surveillance plane flying close to the Chinese aircraft carriers? That’s also provocative.

This disappoints me, frankly. There’s no need for Japan to behave like this.

-4 ( +6 / -10 )

Another provocation and an affront to Beijing's decent territorial integrity, not to mention waters.

-7 ( +3 / -10 )

International waters. Cry more CCP shills. You won’t do anything else about it

3 ( +8 / -5 )

Transit passage is a concept of the law of the sea, which allows a vessel or aircraft the freedom of navigation or overflight solely for the purpose of continuous and expeditious transit of a strait between one part of the high seas or exclusive economic zone and another. - Wikipedia

No loitering allowed.

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

OK that's fine and Chinese fighter jets will chasing closer than ever next time. 45 meters was nothing if comparing with what we have done to Canadian and Australian P3 spy planes !

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

An MSDF P-3C surveillance plane over the high seas in the Pacific

What "Surveillance plane"? Don't try to sway away the true intention of Japan. That P3 plane is a spy plane doing spying activities near Chinese armada. Remember the EP3 incident in 1st April 2001 ? That was also a spy plane, an electronic one flew to spy on Chinese communications. That Japanese P3 is spying on Chinese submarines and so does the Australians and Canadians P3s were doing the same !

-6 ( +2 / -8 )

Canadian and Australian P3 spy planes !

What a joke. Neither nation has spy's on planes, they use reconnaissance aircraft. America used to have spy planes that would fly at high altitude over others territory. Spying is done via satellites these days.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

The entire transit was tracked and monitored by the Chinese military, according to the sources.

Good if they didn't send a plane too close

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

TaiwanIsNotChina

Today 06:50 am JST

Mr KiplingToday 06:37 am JST

> An unbiased report would state that this is an act of aggression by Japan.

> Sailing in international waters can't possibly be an act of aggresion.

Hahahaha expected to hear such things from you but still hilarious

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

The following nations have sent warships to transit the Taiwan Strait. It sends a clear message to the Chinese dictatorship that the world supports Taiwan, and if they choose to take Taiwan by force the world may not sit by and do nothing.

The United States

Australia

Canada

Japan

Germany

New Zealand

United Kingdom

France

1 ( +4 / -3 )

John-SanToday 07:13 am JST

Tai: they are giving the finger China. Is there any need to navigate that course. There is a lot of infrastructure on the sea bed in that strait connecting the Chinese province to the mainland. There no need to sail that course. It an act of stupidity at the lease.

There is no need for the PRC to claim Taiwan, which it has never once ruled, or vast swaths of sea that don't belong to it under a fictitious 9/10-dash line, and illegally occupy and militarize areas.

It's only because China doesn't follow the law that you perceive this as "giving the finger."

Chinese province

No matter how many times you all try the line, Taiwan is not a "Chinese province."

Saying so just marks you out as a CCP reality-denier.

Mr KiplingToday 06:37 am JST

An unbiased report would state that this is an act of aggression by Japan.

Sailing through international waters is not an act of aggression.

Flying jets dangerously close to other nations' aircraft, as China did to Japan, is aggression.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

TamaramaToday 07:45 am JST

TaiWaniSnotchina

“Sailing in international waters can’t possibly be an act of aggression”

Unless it is done by China, apparently.

No-one has accused China of an act of aggression simply for sailing through international waters.

They rightly accuse China for flying/sailing dangerously close to other nations' aircraft/vessels; ramming and water-cannoning legally-operating ships; loitering in other nations' territorial waters (UNCLOS Article 17 only allows innocent passage); and other malign acts.

Of course, PRC fans always try to draw a false equivalence with these very different things, but no-one is fooled by their lies.

Didn’t the original incident quoted in the article occur in international waters and involve a Japanese surveillance plane flying close to the Chinese aircraft carriers? That’s also provocative.

The Japanese plane was surveilling the area -- just as China, and everyone else does. But it was operating lawfully and safely. Then, China committed an aggressive, dangerous act, flying within 45m.

As ever, the aggression is all on the Chinese side.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Important to observe Taiwan lacks valid UN recognition and Beijing's claim has much merit under international law. Not only over the strait but the adjoining island too.

Tokyo needs to start respecting this provable reality if it wants respect.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

JJEToday 10:26 am JST

Important to observe Taiwan lacks valid UN recognition

All due to PRC threats and pressure. The problem here is 100% PRC, 0% Taiwan.

(And, FYI, Ukraine has UN recognition but that didn't stop your Kremlin war criminals invading.)

and Beijing's claim has much merit under international law.

It has zero merit, and Beijing's actions violate the UN Charter:

...

https://untso.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/united_nations_charter.pdf

3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.

4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

Zero merit?

https://thechinaproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Chiang-Kai-shek-and-Mao-Zedong.jpg

-4 ( +2 / -6 )

deanzaZZRToday 11:03 am JST

Zero merit?

https://thechinaproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Chiang-Kai-shek-and-Mao-Zedong.jpg

How on earth would that picture give merit to the PRC's claim?

That's just bizarre.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

nations have sent warships to transit the Taiwan Strait. It sends a clear message to.... take Taiwan by force the world may not sit by and do nothing.

So these eight countries represents the whole world ? They better watch out the Ukraine crisis will spreading to Baltic and Scandinavia....

More countries is supporting China takeover Taiwan because we have a very big navy concentrated in west Pacific. And China has space weapons, the PLA is capable to take the conflict not just in west Pacific but in space outside the atmosphere. Fascist America and her running dogs better watch out !

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

Its international waters, so a big nothing burger. Happy sailing! ;-)

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Sailing in international waters can't possibly be an act of aggression.

Thank you. You are completely correct. But when China does this it is always described as an act of aggression. Which you agree it is not.

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

Beijing's claim has much merit under international law. Not only over the strait but the adjoining island too.

Tokyo needs to start respecting this provable reality if it wants respect.

China never follows international law, it just makes up nonsense and claims everything under "historical rights".

I think there is more respect for Japan than China in the world.

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2025/06/19/world/philippine-china-sea-of-peace/

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Mr KiplingToday 11:51 am JST

But when China does this it is always described as an act of aggression.

This claim is false.

It's certainly not "always described as an act of aggression."

If you can provide articles that call China's innocent passage through international waters -- and doing nothing else untoward -- an "act of aggression" I'd like to read them. If they do exist, the outlet must have pretty poor journalistic principles.

(And, even if some do exist, that's certainly not "always.")

1 ( +2 / -1 )

So did china say anything about this passage?

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Wow, a 'destroyer', and I guess they all shiver now there from fears when seeing those quasi static targets and first to be destroyed swimming coffins.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

I hope Taiwan isn’t relying on USA exceptionalism just ask the Houties who just kick their rare end. Plus this USA exceptionalism worked will for Ukraine. Not.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

I hope China is reliant on Russian military equipment and strategies. How'd that work out in Syria, India, and now Iran????????????????????????? Not to mention Russia.. loLOLZZZ

0 ( +1 / -1 )

deanzaZZRToday 08:17 am JST

Transit passage is a concept of the law of the sea, which allows a vessel or aircraft the freedom of navigation or overflight solely for the purpose of continuous and expeditious transit of a strait between one part of the high seas or exclusive economic zone and another. - Wikipedia

No loitering allowed.

International waters so does not apply. They should test out your theory within 12 nm of China, though.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

John-SanToday 02:34 pm JST

I hope Taiwan isn’t relying on USA exceptionalism just ask the Houties who just kick their rare end.

US defeat ended with the Houthi's agreeing to the US terms back in May.

Plus this USA exceptionalism worked will for Ukraine. Not.

The US will be allowed to use its air force and navy in a defense of Taiwan.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

JJEToday 10:26 am JST

Important to observe Taiwan lacks valid UN recognition and Beijing's claim has much merit under international law. Not only over the strait but the adjoining island too.

Tokyo needs to start respecting this provable reality if it wants respect.

Important to observe that Taiwan has more recognition than russia's disgraces and we need not pay attention to the opinions of countries focused on Yuan.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

台湾是中国 Read it again. Special rules apply.

Not loitering, no spying is allowed.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Tai: no wrong: that just exceptional propaganda for their citizens to take hook line and sinker. You seem to forget The Houties had Israel main airport close for all of may and to date June. Was that part of the deal you let us retreat and we let you keep bombing Israel airport!. Use their Navy and Air Force just like in Korea just like in Vietnam just like in Afghanistan and Iraq lol. Mate you seem to avoid the history of the USA military quests.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

deanzaZZRToday 03:22 pm JST

Article 35

Scope of this Part

Nothing in this Part affects:

(b) the legal status of the waters beyond the territorial seas of States bordering straits as exclusive economic zones or high seas; or

Article 36

High seas routes or routes through exclusive economic zones through straits used for international navigation

This Part does not apply to a strait used for international navigation if there exists through the strait a route through the high seas or through an exclusive economic zone of similar convenience with respect to navigational and hydrographical characteristics; in such routes, the other relevant Parts of this Convention, including the provisions regarding the freedoms of navigation and overflight, apply.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

John-SanToday 03:47 pm JST

Tai: no wrong: that just exceptional propaganda for their citizens to take hook line and sinker. You seem to forget The Houties had Israel main airport close for all of may and to date June. Was that part of the deal you let us retreat and we let you keep bombing Israel airport!.

Sounds like a problem for Israel. The US got its shipping secured.

Use their Navy and Air Force just like in Korea just like in Vietnam just like in Afghanistan and Iraq lol.Mate you seem to avoid the history of the USA military quests.

I know the history of the successful Gulf War and still to be determined Iraq War.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites