Japan Today
Trump Inauguration Day 1
FILE - Rioters storm the West Front of the U.S. Capitol, Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File)
world

Trump offers bountiful batch of campaign promises on Day 1

68 Comments
By CALVIN WOODWARD

After Donald Trump becomes president again on Monday, he's on the hook for achieving a hefty chunk of his promises even before the day is out. One of those promises is to make you dizzy.

“Your head will spin when you see what’s going to happen.,” he said of Day 1.

Steady yourself. This is some of what he promised voters he would get done on his first day in office:

— Launch the largest deportation in U.S. history to remove all people in the country illegally.

— Close the border.

— End automatic citizenship for everyone born in the U.S., known as birthright citizenship.

— Sign pardons for some or many of those convicted or charged in the Jan 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.

— Impose a 25% tariff on everything imported from Mexico and Canada and add a 10% tariff to duties already imposed on goods from China.

— Even before Monday, end the Russia-Ukraine war.

All of that — and more — on Monday?

Not likely.

Trump simply can’t accomplish all he said he will do on Day 1 because there are two more branches of government — Congress and the courts. (Moreover, in 2017 he considered Jan. 21 — his first full day on the job after the Jan 20 inauguration — to be his Day 1.)

But as other presidents have done — and as Trump did aggressively and with decidedly mixed results in his first term — he will quickly test the limits of his executive power. He's told lawmakers to expect more than 100 executive orders out of the gate.

Some will be consequential, others will be cosmetic. Some will be tied up in courts.

All will display the bravado of a president reaching for maximum solo power. Trump, a Republican, won't be alone in this. When Republicans cried foul about President Barack Obama's expansive executive actions in 2014, the Democrat met the uproar with a curt response: “So sue me.”

Here are some things to know about Trump's promises:

The constitutional right to birthright citizenship, for example, cannot be ended with a stroke of his pen. On many other fronts, Trump's most contentious executive actions are sure to meet a thicket of court challenges.

The power to pardon is within his grasp, and he can steer border enforcement efforts, tweak tariffs and find ways to spur energy production without Congress necessarily having to pass a law. Yet many of his executive orders will essentially be statements of intent — stage setters for struggles to come.

In the campaign, he vowed repeatedly to “close the border” on Day 1. Post-election, his advisers said he wasn't speaking literally. He intends to take administrative action to tighten enforcement against illegal entry, not shut borders.

Trump also vowed to end the Russia-Ukraine war even before taking office. Now, he's bending to the reality that he couldn't solve the conflict on the timetable he'd promised, telling Time magazine in a post-election interview: “I think that the Middle East is an easier problem to handle than what’s happening with Russia and Ukraine."

On birthright citizenship, he appeared to concede after the election that ending that may not be so easy, either: “We’ll maybe have to go back to the people," Trump said on NBC's “Meet the Press” in December.

Trump posted on social media after the election: "On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States." He added that all products from China will be hit with an additional 10% tariff right away.

As definitive as that sounded, Trump later said of the tariffs, "We adjust it somewhat” if they are merely passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices, as is usually the case. And he gave the three countries an opening to avoid or minimize the tariffs if they show enough progress in reducing the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S.

Should he go ahead with the tariffs as laid out — and draw trade penalties from the targeted countries in turn — the economy would be subject to a seismic shock, given the decades of U.S. dependence on goods from China and of free trade within the integrated North American market.

Under his core promise on immigration, Trump would unilaterally declare a national emergency to set the stage for tracking down millions of people in the U.S. illegally and holding them in detention centers until they can be removed from the country.

Domestic police forces and the National Guard in some states could be empowered to help federal agents in an extraordinary effort to track down and deport millions of people. As a disincentive to cross into the U.S. illegally, it's untested. Illegal crossings surged during the Biden administration before dropping recently and hovering near a four-year low.

Trump also vowed to declare a national energy emergency and approve new energy projects “starting on Day 1.”

A national emergency might give him more authority to act unilaterally. It remains questionable how much can be accomplished on this front without action from Congress. But he can reverse President Joe Biden's ambitious executive orders on renewable energy, environmental protections and climate change.

On pardons, presidents have a free hand when it comes to federal crimes, and Trump will be closely watched Monday to see how he uses it. Through the campaign, he held up those imprisoned for attacking the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, as patriots and vowed, “I will sign their pardons on Day 1.”

Yet he has vacillated on who and how many in that crowd will be pardoned and on what grounds.

© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.


68 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

Trump couldn’t even keep his 2016 campaign promises after 4 being in office for four years

5 ( +12 / -7 )

Much prefer someone proactively working to get things done

-1 ( +7 / -8 )

and don’t forget the promises that prices are going to drop instantly and americans are going to be so rich from tariffs.

and drill baby drill, but oil companies will be cutting drilling this year because there’s plenty now and it can’t be used.

i’ve never seen a more screwed up, laughable situation in the u.s. in my 72 years.

7 ( +14 / -7 )

Anyone who voted for Trump and expects him to achieve any of his promises will be disappointed. The lone promise he achieved last time was tax cuts.

5 ( +10 / -5 )

Felon on the first day for sure

0 ( +8 / -8 )

Trump is clinical insane

-4 ( +4 / -8 )

Trump couldn’t even keep his 2016 campaign promises after 4 being in office for four years

He will this time without the obstacles of the establishment blocking him, with the largest support and mandate behind him.

Anyone who voted for Trump and expects him to achieve any of his promises will be disappointed.

Why? Because Democrats are going to block him?

*The lone promise he achieved last time was tax cuts.*

Last time the establishment was in power, not this time.

-9 ( +5 / -14 )

Yes, we know he is going to deport 20 million on day one. Too bad that will result in a constitutional crisis.

1 ( +6 / -5 )

He will this time without the obstacles of the establishment blocking him, with the largest support and mandate behind him.

Obstacles or not, he made campaign promises he failed to uphold. I remember Trump saying specifically “We're going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay” not “We're going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay unless there are obstacles”.

-1 ( +6 / -7 )

Last time the establishment was in power, not this time.

How is Trump not the establishment at this point? He’s a former president , now president elect, and head of the Republican Party. That’s as establishment as it gets

1 ( +7 / -6 )

Trump fear Democrats,he attacks only mainstream Republicans

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Yes, we know he is going to deport 20 million on day one. Too bad that will result in a constitutional crisis.

He will deport as many people as they can, especially now that every law enforcement agency is behind him.

How is Trump not the establishment at this point?

The establishment was designed to stifle conservative access, dissent to the Washington authority, not allowing conservatives to speak out, canceling, blocking them, deleting or moderating their speech, pushing gender and woke politics, forcing people to take vaccines, forced lockdowns, pushing disastrous progressive failed policies.

He’s a former president , now president elect, and head of the Republican Party. That’s as establishment as it gets

Not at all because the majority of Republicans that were against American first conservatives are out of power now, thankfully. New party, new congress, new direction.

-9 ( +3 / -12 )

@bass4funk,

Last time the establishment was in power, not this time.

Wrong.

Trump and his cronies re the establishment.

3 ( +8 / -5 )

Obstacles or not, he made campaign promises he failed to uphold.

Like I said, he only got certain things partial done because he had the establishment blocking him at every turn, that includes the Pentagon, Feds, both parties, the Generals will not be there, Pelosi, Ryan, Cheney, Romney, none of these people will be there to hinder him, so he won’t fail this time having a pro MAGA cabinet and Congress.

I remember Trump saying specifically “We're going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay” not “We're going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay unless there are obstacles”.

I really don’t care who pays for it as long as it’s built, and that will commence once he’s in office again.

-9 ( +2 / -11 )

Anyone who voted for Trump and expects him to achieve any of his promises will be disappointed. The lone promise he achieved last time was tax cuts.

Trump's tax overhaul that he signed into law late 2017 was anything but “pro-American.”

Its biggest winners were wealthy foreign investors.

The Trump tax law has given larger tax cuts to foreign investors than it has to middle- and working-class Americans in all of the states that Trump carried in 2016—combined.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

Wrong.

No, no one from the anti-Trump politicians are in Congress anymore, no one with significant power to stop his agenda

Trump and his cronies re the establishment.

No, because no one will be silenced or canceled because of their political views.

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

bass4funkToday  07:53 am JST

Yes, we know he is going to deport 20 million on day one. Too bad that will result in a constitutional crisis.

He will deport as many people as they can, especially now that every law enforcement agency is behind him.

Only the law enforcement agencies in red states. The rest will do as their governors say.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

“Your head will spin when you see what’s going to happen.,” he said of Day 1.

My stocks are hedged. I'm good.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

@bass4funk

No, no one from the anti-Trump politicians are in Congress anymore, no one with significant power to stop his agenda

The fact remains that Trump and his cronies are the establishment.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

End automatic citizenship for everyone born in the U.S., known as birthright citizenship.

Apparently constitutional amendments are now subordinate to royal decree. Who knew?

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Trump's tax overhaul that he signed into law late 2017 was anything but “pro-American.” 

Small businesses and most minorities thought differently that’s why they voted for him overwhelmingly.

Its biggest winners were wealthy foreign investors. 

Yes, you want and need rich people, without them, you’re not going to have a job or give you the benefit and opportunities that allow all of us to have a good life. Poor people can’t offer that.

The Trump tax law has given larger tax cuts to foreign investors

Here we go again

than it has to middle- and working-class Americans in all of the states that Trump carried in 2016—combined.

If that were true, he wouldn’t have won the way he did.

https://youtu.be/hZGAS0kg5iY?si=yiKOu3RKyYIOWAxx

-7 ( +2 / -9 )

bass4funkToday  08:00 am JST

Wrong.

No, no one from the anti-Trump politicians are in Congress anymore, no one with significant power to stop his agenda

Collins, Murkowski, Cassidy, and McConnell. And those are just the ones we know about.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

bass4funkToday  08:00 am JST

Wrong.

No, no one from the anti-Trump politicians are in Congress anymore, no one with significant power to stop his agenda

And 47 Democrats who can block anything that isn't a financial measure.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

The fact remains that Trump and his cronies are the establishment.

No, not a shadow government that won’t allow dissent, sorry, those days are over. Speaking of over….

FBI closed DEI office in December, agency says

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-closed-dei-office-december-agency-says

Another one bites the dust….

Only the law enforcement agencies in red states. The rest will do as their governors say.

Wrong! Every law enforcement agency supported Trump on this, all of them. Show me which agency supported Kamala or Biden? One?

-9 ( +0 / -9 )

Collins, Murkowski, Cassidy, and McConnell. And those are just the ones we know about.

Yes and they won’t make a difference now because the Republicans can lose 3 and still comfortably pass their agenda, pheeew!

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

And 47 Democrats who can block anything that isn't a financial measure.

They can try and continue to further decimate their party, fine by me, fine by me. I hope and pray they do.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

The establishment was designed to stifle conservative access, dissent to the Washington authority, not allowing conservatives to speak out, canceling, blocking them, deleting or moderating their speech, pushing gender and woke politics,forcing people to take vaccines, forced lockdowns, pushing disastrous progressive failed policies.

Can you be more specific on what you mean by “stifle conservative access and dissent to the Washington authority”? What would be an example

As for canceling and speech moderation: Elon Musk, the owner of the largest media platform in the U.S. is a devout Trump supporter and worlds richest man. That sounds like the definition of “establishment”.

pushing gender and woke politics

What does this have to do with Trump not being establishment. You can be establishment without pushing those politics, no?

forcing people to take vaccines

I don’t believe the federal government ever pushed vaccines. Again, there are plenty of establishment politicians who didn’t push them so I’m not sure what this has to do with establishment vs non-establishment.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

I really don’t care who pays for it as long as it’s built, and that will commence once he’s in office again.

That’s fine if you don’t care, but you do acknowledge that he didn’t follow through with that campaign promise, right?

0 ( +3 / -3 )

No, not a shadow government that won’t allow dissent, sorry, those days are over.

You believe that Trump is not the establishment?

AND you believe that he will tolerate dissent?

Good luck.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

Like I said, he only got certain things partial done because he had the establishment blocking him at every turn, that includes the Pentagon, Feds, both parties

The secretary of defense is head of the Pentagon, who reported directly to Trump

Trump as president was head of the “Feds”

Trump was head of the Republican party

To me it sounds like Trump was unable to be a leader who can actually lead.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

If that were true, he wouldn’t have won the way he did.

Actually, it is true.

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/foreign-investors-big-winners-trumps-tax-law/

1 ( +2 / -1 )

As for canceling and speech moderation: Elon Musk, the owner of the largest media platform in the U.S. is a devout Trump supporter and worlds richest man. That sounds like the definition of “establishment”.

Musk his a huge supporter of cancellation and speech moderation when it suits him personally.

https://variety.com/2022/digital/news/elon-musk-bans-twitter-elonjet-account-1235461331/

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Can you be more specific on what you mean by “stifle conservative access and dissent to the Washington authority”? What would be an example

I already outlined that.

As for canceling and speech moderation: Elon Musk, the owner of the largest media platform in the U.S. is a devout Trump supporter and worlds richest man. That sounds like the definition of “establishment”.

Not at all, liberals can have any opinion on any political issue which was not the case when libs controlled social media heavily

What does this have to do with Trump not being establishment. You can be establishment without pushing those politics, no?

Well, no. This current administration promised to be transparent at every single angle they weren’t, that will change.

I don’t believe the federal government ever pushed vaccines.

They did, many companies pushed their employees to take it, many hospitals wouldn’t even take you in if you didn’t take the shot, all that is gone and no one will ever forget that either.

Again, there are plenty of establishment politicians

They have no say now in the next incoming administration

who didn’t push them

Who?

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

The secretary of defense is head of the Pentagon, who reported directly to Trump

Every General under the first Trump administration opposed him. If you don’t like what your boss says and does, step down or run for office.

Trump as president was head of the “Feds”

Trump was head of the Republican party

Yes, and the establishment heavily opposed him back then

To me it sounds like Trump was unable to be a leader who can actually lead.

It does make it extremely harder when you are being opposed by the establishment, but that was yesterday, today it’s a different day.

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

Actually, it is true.

Gee, how progressive do you want to get. Lol

Yes, he can block anyone he wants particularly if they are personally attacking him, but overall, you are not being silenced. If you think the J6 are criminals, I can say the opposite and push back without worrying about being silenced. You have your opinion and I have mine, that’s the difference

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

Not at all, liberals can have any opinion on any political issue which was not the case when libs controlled social media heavily

Elon recently implemented a warning system for use of the words ‘CIS’ and ‘Cisgender’ stating that these words constitute as slurs and could be breaking X’s terms of service. Do you think that’s okay if someone got banned for using the word CIS or Cisgender? Trump also asked Twitter to take down ‘derogatory’ tweet from Chrissy Teigen.

Do you think that’s okay if someone got banned for using the word CIS or Cisgender?

I already outlined that.

I don’t see it.

They did, many companies pushed their employees to take it, many hospitals wouldn’t even take you in if you didn’t take the shot, all that is gone and no one will ever forget that either.

Companies aren’t the federal government and I’m going to need a source on your claim that “hospitals wouldn’t even take you in if you didn’t get the shot” because I think that’s not true

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

Every General under the first Trump administration opposed him. If you don’t like what your boss says and does, step down or run for office.

The president is commander in chief of the military, he could have replaced them any time he wanted. He has no excuse. He’s either a bad leader who can’t get their consent or he’s incompetent for not replacing them.

Yes, and the establishment heavily opposed him back then

What establishment? Trump is head of the Feds he could fire anyone that was opposing him

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

Remember: Trump promises made - Trump promises broken.

Why don't so many understand: Donald takes care of himself and his clan only!

He is the least educated, least understanding president the US had and will have.

As are those who will be in his administration.

They don't know which countries belong to ASEAN.

Trump during his previous presidency making about 21 erroneous claims a day.

And so on.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Welcome to MAGA-hustle 2025...

Just like in 2017, the Moron will make a bunch of promises that he won't keep - and are just distractions from those he definitely WILL KEEP - to his rich Top 1% buds....

Tax cuts for the uber-rich? Check...

Increased cheap immigrant workers to replace US workers? Check...

All the rest? Well, just go to the border and look at that new wall that Mexico paid for...the one that stopped all the illegals from crossing after he left office...

The MAGA little guy will have his job replaced by an Indian or Chinese, no unemployment or healthcare which the Repubs will cut, and the rich bankers will foreclose on his house... He won't even be able to declare bankruptcy because the Repubs will gut that...for poor people...

Relaxing in the WH with Elon and Vivek, Trump will laugh at them - once again calling them the "Great unwashed" and "basement dwellers"....

4 ( +6 / -2 )

“Bountiful”!

that’s what I’m talking about, let’s go!

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

"Obstacles or not, he made campaign promises he failed to uphold."

Just like every other president in history. Everybody knows and accepts that not everything will be done 100%.

No biggie.

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

Only the law enforcement agencies in red states. The rest will do as their governors say.

Wrong! Every law enforcement agency supported Trump on this, all of them. Show me which agency supported Kamala or Biden? One?

One? OK.

From September 23rd, 2024:

Police Leaders for Community Safety, a nonpartisan organization of law enforcement leaders from across the nation, today announced its endorsement of Kamala Harris for President.”

6 ( +6 / -0 )

"Trump and his cronies re the establishment."

Nah, but Biden and his cronies were.

-11 ( +0 / -11 )

Just like every other president in history. Everybody knows and accepts that not everything will be done 100%.

What promise did Biden not uphold?

Trump’s promise about the wall and Mexico paying for it was probably his most renowned promise and a huge boost in his popularity. I don’t think a president other than him has failed to deliver on such a major promise

2 ( +4 / -2 )

Nah, but Biden and his cronies were.

Can you please explain how the former president, now president elect, and head of the Republican Party is not part of the establishment?

3 ( +5 / -2 )

What promise did Biden not uphold?

not to pardon his son.

-6 ( +2 / -8 )

Blacklabel

What promise did Biden not uphold?

not to pardon his son.

That wasn't a campaign promise.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Was the question about “campaign” promises?

Ok, he promised to be a President for ALL Americans. Was not, most divisive in history.

he promised to he a transitional president, wouldn’t run for re-election. Then he did.

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

none of these people will be there to hinder him, so he won’t fail this time having a pro MAGA cabinet and Congress.

Sounds like a dictatorship. Which is what true MAGA believers want.

Just look at them bending over for Trump. Begging for a führer.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

Ok, he promised to be a President for ALL Americans. Was not, most divisive in history.

He was president for all Americans.

he promised to he a transitional president, wouldn’t run for re-election. Then he did.

He literally never said that. Find me a source of him saying that. You can’t which is why you’ll avoid engaging with this conversation at all.

6 ( +6 / -0 )

Blacklabel

Was the question about “campaign” promises?

Yes.

Ok, he promised to be a President for ALL Americans.

He was.

Was not, most divisive in history.

He wasn't divisive at all.

he promised to he a transitional president, wouldn’t run for re-election. Then he did.

Again, not a campaign promise.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Find me a source of him saying that. You can’t which is why you’ll avoid engaging with this conversation at all.

I can’t?

https://www.axios.com/2024/07/03/biden-campaign-democrats-pledge-one-term

“President Biden's insistence on staying in the 2024 race has seemingly defied his own pledge to serve as a transitional president to a younger generation of Democratic leaders.”

-3 ( +3 / -6 )

“President Biden's insistence on staying in the 2024 race has seemingly defied his own pledge to serve as a transitional president to a younger generation of Democratic leaders.”

I’m sorry, do you have difficult reading? That isn’t a quote of Biden stating he’d be a one term president. I’ll give you another chance.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

Blacklabel

https://www.axios.com/2024/07/03/biden-campaign-democrats-pledge-one-term

Literally from your own article:

”Biden never made an explicit public promise to serve just one term”

Maybe you should try reading these before posting them. I know reading is hard for trump supporters but you’re embarrassing yourself.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

I don’t see it.

Scroll up, I was specific

Companies aren’t the federal government and I’m going to need a source on your claim that “hospitals wouldn’t even take you in if you didn’t get the shot” because I think that’s not true

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/03/business/vaccine-mandate-employees-microsoft.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/03/business/vaccine-mandate-employees-microsoft.html

https://search.yahoo.co.jp/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1275808%3Fusqp%3Dmq331AQGsAEggAID

So yes, they did.

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

Again, not a campaign promise.

incorrect. He literally made it during his campaign in 2019 while running for president. to deflect from fears if elected he would try to run again in 2024 Want a video?

i don’t accept the false premise that we only talking “campaign” promises anyway,

-6 ( +2 / -8 )

So yes, they did.

No, they didn’t. Those are private companies, not the federal government. Private companies are allowed to set their own policies. You’ve still yet to provide any proof that the federal government mandated vaccines

6 ( +6 / -0 )

incorrect. He literally made it during his campaign in 2019 while running for president. to deflect from fears if elected he would try to run again in 2024 Want a video?

Yes, please post a video so I can continue dog walking you throughout this discussion

5 ( +6 / -1 )

isn't being "Diverse, Equal, and inclusive"?

no it’s an increase in legal immigration.

immigration, good- isn’t it? Cause you are supposedly “racist” if you don’t fully support immigrants, your team rules.

the left supports illegal immigration. but not legale who are evaluated, vetted and issued visas for a limited stay then go back home?

im all for that type.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

Sign pardons for some or many of those convicted or charged in the Jan 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.

That will take a long time as Trump uses a Sharpie to write an over-sized and elaborate signature and then turns the document around for it to be photographed.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Biden never made an explicit public promise to serve just one term”

that’s far left media’s supportive interpretation in 2024 of what he clearly said in 2019.

To support his running again when he clearly said he would not.

next you will disingenuously claim he didn’t “run again” cause he dropped out? lol

This kind of word play cost your team the election.

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

"Sounds like a dictatorship. Which is what true MAGA believers want. Just look at them bending over for Trump. Begging for a führer."

Great, please keep pushing this fuhrer / fascist dictator nonsense that worked out so well for your camp in November. It will ensure another Rep victory in 4 years time. Just stay the course.

-9 ( +0 / -9 )

that’s far left media’s supportive interpretation in 2024 of what he clearly said in 2019.

Why did you post that article to support your argument if it’s a far left article full of lies?

If he said it why have you failed to post his actual quote despite posting multiple times since originally being asked?

To support his running again when he clearly said he would not.

Why do you keep saying this while simultaneously never post the quote? Just post the quote of him saying this. You can’t which is why you’re trying to desperately to back yourself out of the corner you’re in now.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

The deflections, prevarications, and outright denial of Trump so-called campaign promises are coming from everywhere in MAGA-world...the most classic today...

The president-elect made an attention-grabbing promise during a May 2023 town hall to "settle" the Russian-Ukraine war within "24 hours" of taking office, which was actually his campaign's most consistent promise, but the Georgia Republican told NOTUS the media had simply gotten that oft-stated position wrong.

OK, pretty easy to understand - "within 24 hours"....got it...

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R-GA) walked back one of Donald Trump's many Day One promises with a condescending remark. “I think you need to understand language,” Greene said, "and everyone else in America understands that language.”

Uh...don't understand language? I guess in MAGA-world "within 24 hours" can also mean "maybe within 4 years"...

Of course, given previous "promises" like "I'll build the wall and Mexico will pay for it"...it could also mean "Welcome to the MAGA-hustle, suckers"....

2 ( +3 / -1 )

please keep pushing this fuhrer / fascist dictator nonsense that worked out so well for your camp in November. It will ensure another Rep victory in 4 years time.

Losing an election does not invalidate what is fact.

And dictators most often come to power with popular support. Your man Putin, for example.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

that’s far left media’s supportive interpretation in 2024 of what he clearly said in 2019.

Biden never publicly promised not to run for a second term. The origin was this:

“Biden’s top advisers and prominent Democrats outside the Biden campaign have recently revived a long-running debate whether Biden should publicly pledge to serve only one term, with Biden himself signaling to aides that he would serve only a single term. . . . . . While the option of making a public pledge remains available, Biden has for now settled on an alternative strategy: quietly indicating that he will almost certainly not run for a second term while declining to make a promise that he and his advisers fear could turn him into a lame duck and sap him of his political capital.”

--Politico, December 2019

Whether or not you think this is a bit of deception politics, it's certainly not a broken campaign pledge. Like ending birthright citizenship on Day 1 (not possible). Or ending the war in Ukraine within 24 hours and before inauguration (also not possible).

3 ( +3 / -0 )

bass4funkToday 08:12 am JST

Only the law enforcement agencies in red states. The rest will do as their governors say.

Wrong! Every law enforcement agency supported Trump on this, all of them. Show me which agency supported Kamala or Biden? One?

What they do in private is not what they will be doing on the job.

Collins, Murkowski, Cassidy, and McConnell. And those are just the ones we know about.

Yes and they won’t make a difference now because the Republicans can lose 3 and still comfortably pass their agenda, pheeew!

The educated will note I listed four names and there are very likely others. These are just the ones on the record voting for impeaching Trump (minus McConnell).

4 ( +4 / -0 )

he promised to he a transitional president, wouldn’t run for re-election. Then he did.

It’s been 4 hours and you STILL haven’t proved a quote or source on this.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites