Japan Today
U.S. President Trump hosts a business session with U.S. governors, in Washington
U.S. President Donald Trump hosts a business session with U.S. governors who are in town for the National Governors Association's (NGA) annual winter meeting, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 21, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis Image: Reuters/Leah Millis
world

In reversal, Trump says Russia attacked Ukraine

51 Comments
By Nandita Bose and Steve Holland

U.S. President Donald Trump reversed course on Friday and said Russia did in fact invade Ukraine, and that Kyiv would soon sign a minerals agreement with the United States as part of efforts to end the Ukraine war.

Trump had said on Tuesday that Ukraine "should have never started" the war three years ago, prompting a wave of criticism both domestically and internationally. Pressed on the subject in an interview with Fox News Radio on Friday, he acknowledged Russia had invaded Ukraine on the order of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"Russia attacked, but they shouldn't have let him attack," Trump said, adding that Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and then-U.S. President Joe Biden should have taken steps to avert the invasion.

Later, Trump predicted a minerals agreement would be reached soon.

"We're signing an agreement, hopefully in the next fairly short period of time," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office when asked about a possible deal for Ukraine's minerals.

Zelenskyy said separately on Friday that Ukrainian and U.S. teams were working on a draft agreement. "I am hoping for ... a fair result," he said in a video address after sharp exchanges this week between the two leaders.

Trump denounced Zelenskyy as a "dictator" on Wednesday and warned he had to move quickly to secure peace with Russia, which invaded Ukraine nearly three years ago, or risk losing his country.

The change in tone from the United States, Ukraine's most important backer, has alarmed European officials and stoked fears that Kyiv could be forced into a peace deal that favors Putin.

Zelenskyy had said Trump was trapped in a "disinformation bubble", but later toned down his statements and said he was hoping for American pragmatism.

Zelenskyy on Wednesday rejected U.S. demands for $500 billion in mineral wealth from Ukraine to repay Washington for wartime aid, saying the United States had supplied nowhere near that sum so far and offered no specific security guarantees in the agreement.

Ukraine has valuable deposits of strategic minerals that the U.S. wants. These include uranium, lithium, cobalt, rare earths and more and are used in applications such as batteries, technology and aerospace.

Speaking at a White House event earlier on Friday, Trump was critical of Zelenskyy while refraining from negative comments about Putin.

"I've had very good talks with Putin, and I've had not such good talks with Ukraine," Trump said. "They don't have any cards, but they're playing tough."

Separately, the United States on Friday proposed a United Nations resolution to mark the third anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The three-paragraph U.S. draft, seen by Reuters, mourns loss of life during the "Russia-Ukraine conflict" and "implores a swift end to the conflict."

Kyiv and its European allies want their own text to be adopted by the UN General Assembly on Monday calling for de-escalation, an early cessation of hostilities and peaceful resolution to the conflict.

The German government said on Friday that Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Zelenskyy agreed in a phone call that Ukraine must have a seat at the table in peace talks.

Polish President Andrzej Duda, meanwhile, urged Zelenskyy to keep up calm and constructive cooperation with Trump.

Duda, whose term in office expires this year, was one of Trump's preferred international partners during his 2017-2021 presidency and they have described themselves as friends.

Poland's president is due to meet Trump in Washington on Saturday, Poland's state news agency PAP reported.

© Thomson Reuters 2025.

©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.


51 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

Did someone get the paper and crayons out and explain it to him?

Progress of a kind I suppose.

Still absolutely ridiculous.

21 ( +33 / -12 )

Jimizo....no crayons allowed...Trump either eats them or sticks them in his ear.

17 ( +26 / -9 )

Jimizo....no crayons allowed...Trump either eats them or sticks them in his ear

Lol. That’s better than mine - I thought he’d feel they were too nutritious to eat.

9 ( +16 / -7 )

The closer Ukraine comes to the $500 billion in minerals requested, the more the US (Trump) will be able to support Ukraine. Nice mob-style shakedown tactic.

12 ( +19 / -7 )

"Russia attacked, but they shouldn't have let him attack," Trump said, adding that Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and then-U.S. President Joe Biden should have taken steps to avert the invasion.

And what steps would those be?

A rare moment of Trump admitting he was wrong, sort of.

"We're signing an agreement, hopefully in the next fairly short period of time," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office when asked about a possible deal for Ukraine's minerals.

It had better have security guarantees, or Zelensky isn't signing it.

4 ( +11 / -7 )

This whole shocking public insanity, is totally incomprehensible.

There is a war in Europe, the death toll is appalling, horrific loss of life, unspeakable atrocities to Ukraine civilian population.

"Russia attacked, but they shouldn't have let him attack".....

"I've had very good talks with Putin, and I've had not such good talks with Ukraine," Trump said. "They don't have any cards, but they're playing tough."

Its so unhinged, seriously, a deranged episode of the "outer limits" meets reality TV.

12 ( +14 / -2 )

itsonlyrocknroll

"I've had very good talks with Putin, and I've had not such good talks with Ukraine," Trump said. "They don't have any cards, but they're playing tough."

Does he think that Russia has any cards?

-1 ( +5 / -6 )

Duh…At first I thought Russia invaded Ukraine…duh…then I thought Ukraine invaded Ukraine…duhhhh…and now I’m beginning to think that it was probably Russia that invaded Ukraine first, not Ukraine. Duhhhhhh

11 ( +15 / -4 )

But... but... all the commenters telling us Ukraine and the USA and Biden started the war and Russia is a victime in broken English... Are they all... lying?!?

5 ( +10 / -5 )

But last fall, didn't Trump say he'd end the war within 24 hours of taking office?

Yep: https://apnews.com/article/trump-russia-ukraine-war-un-election-a78ecb843af452b8dda1d52d137ca893

At a CNN town hall in May 2023, Trump said: “They’re dying, Russians and Ukrainians. I want them to stop dying. And I’ll have that done — I’ll have that done in 24 hours.”

So he let more people die because he thought firing Federal workers was more important. What a loser.

And the war still isn't over in Ukraine.

I have no problem with minerals being used to pay back all the money given. Since Europe gave more aid, perhaps they should get in on the minerals too? Ukraine does mine uranium which the US can definitely use.

12 ( +14 / -2 )

Where is Europe? It is a perfectly pertinent question to shout out loud.

Get involved, stick your oar in, there is still time.

Arrange a summit of all EU/UK leaders right in Kyiv today.

Be bold, let the dictators despot know you mean business.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

yep and now that Zelensky has lost his silly public “battle of words” with Trump?

he will be signing the minerals deal he told Rubio and Vance he would in their private meeting.

-15 ( +4 / -19 )

Bwahaha!! Mental illness is a terrible thing.

11 ( +12 / -1 )

The closer Ukraine comes to the $500 billion in minerals requested, the more the US (Trump) will be able to support Ukraine. Nice mob-style shakedown tactic

I think that is precisely what Trump is doing. Either way he,ll get what he wants, unfortunately Zelensky has no choice but to sign up to Trump mineral deal.

-6 ( +2 / -8 )

yep and now that Zelensky has lost his silly public “battle of words” with Trump?

Oh yeah he lost so much he had to make a public reversal and say the opposite of what he said two days ago!

No wait, that's Trump.

14 ( +16 / -2 )

Phew! A moment of sanity prevails at last!

4 ( +4 / -0 )

I remember the ‘4D chess’ comments after Trump had an episode of mental diarrhea in the past.

Does he still play that game?

4 ( +6 / -2 )

Oh yeah he lost so much he had to make a public reversal and say the opposite of what he said two days ago!

who Is now signing the minerals deal after that?

-12 ( +3 / -15 )

Zelensky fell for the 2 days of ego fluffing, that’s all he wanted was to be personally praised.

easy win for USA.

-15 ( +3 / -18 )

Blacklabel

Zelensky fell for the 2 days of ego fluffing, that’s all he wanted was to be personally praised.

> easy win for USA.

Whatever makes you feel better about Trump reversing himself.

Zelenskyy was always going to sign the deal, but it had to have security guarantees as part of the deal.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Your boy got fluffed:

“Kellogg played 'a big part' in getting the deal over the line through his flattery in the press of the Ukrainian president and spending three days with him in Kyiv, according to people close to the Ukrainian government. “

-14 ( +1 / -15 )

And I thought Trump had reached the pinnacle of his inane utterings - then this week!

Classic Orwellian double-speak.

From Animal Farm -

"Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad" morphs into "Four Legs Good, Two Legs Better".

"Ukraine invades Russia" morphs into "Russia invades Ukraine, but..."

Paul Simon encapsulates the moment -

Slip Sliding Away. You know, the nearer your destination, The more you're Slip Sliding Away.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Blacklabel

Your boy got fluffed:

“Kellogg played 'a big part' in getting the deal over the line through his flattery in the press of the Ukrainian president and spending three days with him in Kyiv, according to people close to the Ukrainian government.“

Yeah, I'm sure that's how they saw it.

But if the deal has security guarantees, which it didn't before, then it's a win for Zelenskyy...

4 ( +7 / -3 )

I imagine that in his mind, Trump believes that Ukraine didn't do all they could have done to prevent the war, and that equates to Ukraine having started the war (because they didn't avoid it). It was a weird take to begin with but nice to see him coming to his senses on this issue.

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

Ukraine's NATO membership was started by President Bush in 2008.

"Apr 1, 2008 — George Bush this morning said he "strongly supported" Ukraine's attempt to join NATO, and warned he would not allow Russia to veto its membership bid."

7 ( +9 / -2 )

The US needs to give Ukraine the other $350 billion for the $500 billion minerals. So far, the US has given less than $150 billion.

7 ( +9 / -2 )

The US needs to give Ukraine the other $350 billion

Oh so you’ve seen the signed agreement and its contents?

-13 ( +1 / -14 )

Blacklabel

You: hahaha “Trump reversed himself!”

Not really. But it's pretty rare that Trump admits he's wrong.

me: we got 500 billion dollars of minerals because he “reversed himself”.

As I said, Zelenskyy was always going to sign the deal, but it had to have security guarantees.

Who is the winner here?

Hopefully both the US and Ukraine.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

I don't think you get credit for repeating the answer to the teacher after failing the quiz.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

owzer

I imagine that in his mind, Trump believes that Ukraine didn't do all they could have done to prevent the war, and that equates to Ukraine having started the war (because they didn't avoid it).

I wonder what he thinks they should have done.

Apart from having the best dealmaker in the history of the galaxy, Trump, make a deal for them.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Blacklabel

The US needs to give Ukraine the other $350 billion

Oh so you’ve seen the signed agreement and its contents?

There is no signed agreement. Trump stated he wants $500 billion of minerals for the $150 billion given.

11 ( +13 / -2 )

irairaToday 10:23 am JST

The closer Ukraine comes to the $500 billion in minerals requested, the more the US (Trump) will be able to support Ukraine. Nice mob-style shakedown tactic.

Except he's not even offering that. It's more like, "We'll get back to you on the whole security thing."

4 ( +6 / -2 )

BlacklabelToday 10:46 am JST

yep and now that Zelensky has lost his silly public “battle of words” with Trump?

he will be signing the minerals deal he told Rubio and Vance he would in their private meeting.

Oh yeah he lost so much he had to make a public reversal and say the opposite of what he said two days ago!

who Is now signing the minerals deal after that?

Zelensky fell for the 2 days of ego fluffing, that’s all he wanted was to be personally praised.

easy win for USA.

Your boy got fluffed:

“Kellogg played 'a big part' in getting the deal over the line through his flattery in the press of the Ukrainian president and spending three days with him in Kyiv, according to people close to the Ukrainian government. “

Why is your guy so infantile that he can't take honest criticism? We don't know what the revised deal contains but:

You: hahaha “Trump reversed himself!”

me: we got 500 billion dollars of minerals because he “reversed himself”.

Who is the winner here?

Me.

The US needs to give Ukraine the other $350 billion

Oh so you’ve seen the signed agreement and its contents?

you get nothing if Trump doesn't pony up some real dough for defense of Ukraine.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

Russia needs to leave and start paying reparations to Ukraine too.

For the mods: https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=dobre%20vam%20zajebava&op=translate

6 ( +8 / -2 )

Separately, the United States on Friday proposed a United Nations resolution to mark the third anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The three-paragraph U.S. draft, seen by Reuters, mourns loss of life during the "Russia-Ukraine conflict" and "implores a swift end to the conflict."

What a disgusting animal, and that is just the US president.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

Trump stated he wants $500 billion of minerals for the $150 billion given.

that’s correct.

but you said he needs to give Ukraine the “other” 350 billion.

It was kind of phrased as a fact based on an agreement, but seems it was just an opinion.

-15 ( +0 / -15 )

you get nothing if Trump doesn't pony up some real dough for defense of Ukraine.

oh? So we don’t even get back the 150 billion “loan” we already gave?

that doesn’t sound right.

-11 ( +2 / -13 )

I wonder what he thinks they should have done.

Underworld, me too. Hopefully, he can help resolve the conflict, or at least bring it to an end.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

In reversal, Trump says Russia attacked Ukraine

in exchange for Kyiv signing a minerals agreement.

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

BlacklabelToday 12:09 pm JST

you get nothing if Trump doesn't pony up some real dough for defense of Ukraine.

oh? So we don’t even get back the 150 billion “loan” we already gave?

that doesn’t sound right.

Is russia going to make payments? I. don't. think. so!!!!

4 ( +6 / -2 )

bass4funkToday 12:13 pm JST

yep and now that Zelensky has lost his silly public “battle of words” with Trump?

he will be signing the minerals deal he told Rubio and Vance he would in their private meeting.

Pretty much, he doesn't have a lot of options and time is definitely not on this guys side.

If the deal is signed, Trump is on the hook for a whole lot of expensive weapons. Or did you think this was just a magical payment for nothing scam?

7 ( +7 / -0 )

owzerToday 12:13 pm JST

I wonder what he thinks they should have done.

Underworld, me too. Hopefully, he can help resolve the conflict, or at least bring it to an end.

Whenever the apologist says this, we can really read, "I hope Putin can resolve the conflict, or at least bring it to an end."

4 ( +6 / -2 )

The latest, President Trump......

Trump: Starmer & Macron have 'done nothing' to end war - and Zelenskyy has 'no cards' left to play

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_97MA6DOoeU

0 ( +3 / -3 )

If the deal is signed, Trump is on the hook for a whole lot of expensive weapons. Or did you think this was just a magical payment for nothing scam?

That has nothing to do with this coming to an end; this is not sustainable for the US and Ukraine, so Zelenskyy doesn't have a lot of options or the upper hand.

-10 ( +4 / -14 )

Or did you think this was just a magical payment for nothing scam?

it’s a repayment for all the money and weapons and other support already given.

That “loan”- with interest. Plus for our current help in ending the war.

-15 ( +1 / -16 )

Trump had said on Tuesday that Ukraine "should have never started" the war three years ago, prompting a wave of criticism both domestically and internationally. Pressed on the subject in an interview with Fox News Radio on Friday, he acknowledged Russia had invaded Ukraine on the order of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"Russia attacked, but they shouldn't have let him attack," Trump said, adding that Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and then-U.S. President Joe Biden should have taken steps to avert the invasion.

Demented Donald is so far gone he can't even remember what he said the day before...

Someone tell Grandpa what day and year it is - it's clear he has no clue...and maybe remind him who his current wife is since he seems to space that one too...

Get this guy in a "home" - quick - even though he deserves to be in a cell...

6 ( +10 / -4 )

owzer

I wonder what he thinks they should have done.

Underworld, me too. Hopefully, he can help resolve the conflict, or at least bring it to an end.

Oh, I hold no such expectation. Trump lacks the required skills. But we can live in hope.

4 ( +8 / -4 )

Blacklabel

Oh I just found some of Zelensky’s money:

“French police say Zelensky’s defense ministry official stole $46M not the reported $40M, buying a Villa in France for $2,500,000, a vinyard for $6,500,000 and 27 land plots for $1,000,000. How many billions were looted by Zelensky’s other associates?”

Yeah right! Don't believe everything you read on the internet...

10 ( +13 / -3 )

I give Trump a pass on this because Russia didn't invade Ukraine when he was in office.

-11 ( +3 / -14 )

"Russia attacked, but they shoul"dn't have let him attack," Trump said"

Yes, but that would have required Ukraine to have been a NATO member.

But during Trump's 2017-2021 first term he did not not aggresively push for NATO membership as in a 2018 interview, Trump remarked that allowing Ukraine into NATO could provoke Russia. So yes, Trump let Putin attack Ukraine.

10 ( +11 / -1 )

More flip-flopping from this idiot.

it’s amazing how he backflips on comments he’s made when the world shows him he’s wrong.

how many times is this now ?

10 ( +10 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites