President Donald Trump’s push to have Egypt and Jordan take in large numbers of Palestinian refugees from besieged Gaza fell flat with the Amman government and perplexed a congressional ally. Trump nonetheless planned to discuss the idea more on Sunday with Egypt's leader.
Fighting that broke out in the territory after ruling Hamas attacked Israel in October 2023 is paused due to a fragile ceasefire, but much of Gaza’s population has been left largely homeless by an Israeli military campaign. Trump told reporters Saturday aboard Air Force One that moving about a 1.5 million people away from Gaza might mean that "we just clean out that whole thing.”
Trump relayed what he told Jordan’s King Abdullah when the two held a call earlier Saturday: “I said to him, ‘I’d love for you to take on more because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now, and it’s a mess.’”
The president said he would make a similar appeal to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi during their conversation while Trump was at his Doral resort in Florida. Trump said he would “like Egypt to take people and I’d like Jordan to take people.”
Egypt and Jordan, along with the Palestinians, worry that Israel would never allow them to return to Gaza once they have left.
Both Egypt and Jordan have perpetually struggling economies. Their two governments and other Arab states fear massive destabilization of their own countries and the region from any such influx of refugees.
Jordan already is home to more than 2 million Palestinian refugees. Egypt has warned of the security implications of transferring large numbers of Palestinians to Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, bordering Gaza.
Trump suggested that resettling most of Gaza’s population of 2.3 million could be temporary or long term.
Jordan's foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, said Sunday that his country's opposition to what Trump floated was “firm and unwavering.” Some Israel officials had raised the idea early in the war.
Trump does have leverage to wield over Jordan, which is a debt-strapped, but strategically important, U.S. ally and is heavily dependent on foreign aid. The U.S. is historically the single-largest provider of that aid, including more than $1.6 billion through the State Department in 2023.
Much of that comes as support for Jordan’s security forces and direct budget support.
Jordan in return has been a vital regional partner to the U.S. in trying to help keep the region stable. Jordan hosts some 3,000 U.S. troops. Yet, on Friday, new Secretary of State Marco Rubio exempted security assistance to Israel and Egypt but not to Jordan, when he laid out the details of a freeze on foreign assistance that Trump ordered on his first day in office.
Meantime, in the United States, even Trump loyalists tried to make sense of his words.
“I really don't know,'' said Sen Lindsey Graham, when asked on CNN’s “State of the Union” about what Trump meant by the ”clean out" remark. Graham, who is close to Trump, said the suggestion was not feasible.
“The idea that all the Palestinians are going to leave and go somewhere else, I don’t see that to be overly practical,” said Graham, R-S.C. He said Trump should keep talking to Mideast leaders, including Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and officials in the United Arab Emirates.
“I don’t know what he’s talking about. But go talk to MBS, go talk to UAE, go talk to Egypt,” Graham said. “What is their plan for the Palestinians? Do they want them all to leave?”
Trump, a staunch supporter of Israel, also announced Saturday that he had directed the U.S. to release a supply of 2,000-pound bombs to Israel. Former President Joe Biden had imposed a hold due to concerns about their effects on Gaza's civilian population.
Egypt and Jordan have made peace with Israel but support the creation of a Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem, territories that Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast War. They fear that the permanent displacement of Gaza’s population could make that impossible.
In making his case for such a massive population shift, Trump said Gaza is “literally a demolition site right now.”
“I’d rather get involved with some of the Arab nations, and build housing in a different location," Trump said of people displaced in Gaza. "Where they can maybe live in peace for a change.”
__
Associated Press writers Samy Magdy in Cairo and Ellen Knickmeyer in Washington contributed to this report.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
48 Comments
TaiwanIsNotChina
He is going to look like the most ineffective US president in recent memory.
Toblerone
He is going to look like the most ineffective US president in recent memory.
The derangers can’t help but whine and scream about every single snippet of info regarding Trump. Accept it, you guys, you lost, Trump is the president of the United States and what happens from here is totally beyond your control.
GuruMick
Brain flatulence also beyond Trumps control.
Does every stupid idea he has , has to be published.
His brain needs an editor....
Concerned Citizen
Which is exactly what Israel has wanted all along.
Trump is on the wrong side of this issue, the side of the murderous ethnic cleansing Israelis.
TaiwanIsNotChina
What happens from here is totally the Failed Businessman's responsibility. FTFY.
Capuchin
“You’re talking about a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing,”
Ethnic cleansing.
The only obstacle to Israel and Trump's plan is the Palestinian people themselves who have resisted occupation, ethnic cleansing and genocide for decades.
itsonlyrocknroll
There is no future for Gaza as a Palestinian state, Hamas 7th Oct Islamic atrocities has rendered any hope of a two state solution inconceivable.
The only option available is to prevent all out war with despot Iran.
Gaza is a dust bowl, a broken legacy to a UN riven, split by a corrupt politically driven cabal.
An ICJ little more than a politically hobbled irrelevance.
Donald Trump made a off the cuff remark little more.
Some dude
OK, so is he going to:
a) threaten tariffs (his current go-to for everything)
b) threaten military action
or c) rename something.
Some dude
Maybe he could have phrased it better then. I mean he does have the best words. Or so he says; analysis says that he speaks with the vocabulary of a grade schooler (not that this is a disadvantage when most of your supporters are allergic to polysyllables).
GuruMick
Itsonlyrocknroll....do the "Hamas atrocities " you reference include all the discredited claims ?
Capuchin
It's not the belligerent oaf's hamfisted use of the word "clean" that is upsetting people.
It's the fact that he's saying a million and a half people should be moved from their homeland and the region depopulated. You can phrase it any way you want. In content and purpose it's ethnic cleansing.
Blacklabel
So they are just “moving”.
but “ethnic cleansing” makes it sound nefarious, so it’s better to use that term falsely.
thanks for the confirmation.
TokyoLiving
Excellent, that monster must be stopped..
wallace
The Palestinians of Gaza are going nowhere.
Ken
Because that's exactly what it is, we know colonizers who aren't part Jewish or a minority can't wrap their heads around what they do to others
lincolnman
So Trump is rounding up immigrants in the US because he says they're dangerous criminals and "eating the pets", and putting them on flights out of the country...
But he's demanding Jordan and Egypt ACCEPT Palestinian immigrants even though they don't want them....
That broke the hypocrisy and stupidity meter...
Welcome to Trump 2.0 - all failure, all the time...
Capuchin
Unless they don't want to move or you've been destroying hospitals, schools, water treatment systems, cultural and religious sites, agriculture, homes and any and all forms of civilian infrastructure required for people to live. When you've purposefully created an environment that is unlivable.
Then it's ethnic cleansing. Not just ethnic cleansing, genocide.
NB
The prevailing attitude regarding the Middle East problem is detached from reality and distorted morally. There are TWO nations between the river and the sea, namely the Arabic Palestinian nation and the Israeli Jewish nation. BOTH nations deserve to live and to exist.
itsonlyrocknroll
GuruMick,
I think you know the answer to that question.
You don't need my input.
Did Hamas ever envisage, ever foresee such devastation?
Such brutal retribution, a vision for the such desolation ahead?
Well it makes little difference now, doesn't it?
For the Palestinian people, they are now for the foreseeable future in a desperate horror no mans land.
Hell on earth, damned to a future without any hope of a recognisable/reconcilable homeland .
So had GuruMick, had 7th October never taken place, how man lives would have been saved?
What this all worth it?
changamangaliay
Trump(Isreal) idea is Ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Palestinian
Zaphod
....as it will with Egypt, which is totally unsurprising, Both governments have to deal with large islamist parts of the population, which forces them to clamour against Israel but at the same forces them to refuse any more influx of Hamas-indoctrinated muslim Arabs into their country.
I have long argued that the only solution to the "Palestinian" issue would be a return of Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan, but both governments unsurprisingly refuse this.
Trump, once again, addresses a real situation, instead of following a phantasy-based policy like the previous admin.
Zaphod
iknowal
Indeed. But as you know, in the islamist vocabulary, a "right of return" is a complete one-way-street.
itsonlyrocknroll
President Trump is not remotely responsible for any middle eastern war.
Neither frankly is Joe Biden.
Hamas, Hezbollah, despot Iran could well sooner or later be subject to a harsh brutal relentless ruthless retaliation.
This/future US President, will simply back Israel with every support, militarily, logistically, until the desired conclusion is reached.
Ken
It's crazy how this is basically a present day holocaust and there are people okay with it and even defending it. If this was the past we already know how desperate you would have been to join the Nazi, rather than fight against it like the decent human beings who actual care about fighting to maintain peace
quercetum
Whiners whine. Can’t change their spots.
Superpowers can demand countries like Colombia and Jordan to do what they say to do. Don’t take any money from the U.S. then if you want to be a completely sovereign state.
plasticmonkey
Miriam Adelson donated $100 million to Trump's campaign. What does she want in return? Trump's support for Israel annexing the West Bank.
Meanwhile, we've got Jared Kushner musing about developing prime real estate along the beaches of Gaza. Presumably to be bought by Israelis once the Palestinians are "cleaned out" of their demolished homes.
This is Trump's peace plan for Israel and the Palestinians.
Transactional and self-serving.
itsonlyrocknroll
To accept the "middle eastern status quo" is condemning the Palestinian people in Gaza to a horror without end.
A compromise exists with a new level of smart diplomacy.
Hamas must leave Gaza permanently.
Firstly, an Arab states peacekeeping force with the full confidence from/of the government of Israel, leading to a full Jewish withdrawal.
A further middle eastern wide search for a Palestinian homeland must begin, it will take decades to come to a full settlement.
Hezbollah must voluntary withdrawn from Lebanon. at the same time every west bank Jewish settlement must vacate.
How this is ever to be achieved will depended on unprecedented political will.
Zaphod
itsonlyrocknroll
Indeed.
Wrong. Remember, Trump had put a lid on the conflict by defunding Hamas/Iran and by getting the the Gulf states into the Abraham accords (for which he should get a Nobel prize in a sane world). The Biden admin ditched all this, opened the money spigots to Hamas and Iran, and we have seen the horrible result. The Biden admin is squarely responsible, in fairness not for the underlying religious conflict, but definitely the for violent eruption during the last few years.
GuruMick
Rocknroll..."brutal retribution " is right on the money.
In your world ,nations should never end wars until the other side is exterminated. ?
Fortunately the whole world disagrees with Israeli conduct in this war.
Hey...isnt the PM and Defence Minister of Israel WANTED ON WAR CRIME CHARGES .
There was a whole history of Israeli aggression and total control of Gaza before Oct7.
Violation of UN Charters and cruelty meted out in gross then miniscule ways.
Denying the entry of "chicks " even....cant have those Palestinians eating too much protein.
Speaking of food....1/the Israeli side calculated just how many calories needed to survive , not thrive, survive.
and 2/one of the war crime charges against the Israeli heads is USING FOOD ACCESS AS A WEAPON OF WAR.
Oh...thats classy behaviour from the worlds most moral army.
BTW...Hamas still standing and Israel now negotiating
itsonlyrocknroll
Zaphod, incompatible religious fundamentalism, poisoned over centuries, now drowning in toxic political quagmire cesspool of hate, can you really envisage a Jew next door to Islamist?
Defunding Hamas/Hezbollah/Iran is beyond any reasonable hope of any semblance of peace.
President Trump best course of action is, first find a middle eastern Arab collision to govern Gaza.
That alone will need another "political water into wine" moment
However any method to stall hostiles could bring about a future reconciliation of sorts.
stormcrow
With no way of knowing which ones were ISIS types, what sane country would want to take the chance of taking them in?
kohakuebisu
If Trump wants to road test crazy ideas, how about "we're not going to give Israel any more money or weapons". Countries should stand on their own two feet right? Why should Americans pay for free healthcare for Israelis?
GuruMick
Zaphod and Rock....funny how you speak of "Islamic fundamentalism "
Illan Pape in 10 Myths about Israel writes of this label being used to dehumanise and discredit legitimate resistance groups.
OK...fair enough to label your enemy.
But Israeli history shows attacks and assassination of secular Palestinian leaders, and indeed, Israel sought to play "Secular and Islamic " off one another, with Netanyahu being a chief supporter of the latter groups.
Sorry if I read more widely.
GuruMick
Plus, Israel wont let the United Nations troops into Gaza....do you think they will have an ARAB nation in defacto control. ?
Israel has a problem....it wants Gaza but the indigenous inhabitants have the hearts of lions.
Fos
Ken
It's crazy how this is basically a present day holocaust and there are people okay with it and even defending it.
This talk or defending Israel actions is truly 'hard to define' amongst rational people
itsonlyrocknroll
GuruMick, I believe the best way forward is an Arab/middle eastern collision to manage peace in Gaza.
As well as the west bank.
However, Hamas, Hezbollah must withdraw, as must all Israeli west bank settlements, a US/global initiative to bring about a political settlement to begin independent negotiations.
UN only to manage humanitarian relief for Gaza, nothing more
GuruMick
Zaphod buddy...no room for an Israel role when you apportion blame for the Middle East in crisis ?
Hmmm...speaks volumes.
Poor Israel...innocent little waifs in a cruel world.
itsonlyrocknroll
GuruMick, I have personally struggled with Catholicism, for twenty years, still do to the point of that a woman must respect premarital sex is a mortal sin.
My faith is my sword and shield, well almost, outside of life working in the financial industry.
I understand Jews cannot live next door to Islamists.
Muslins Arabs its workable, but the histrionics is a mount Fuji to climb.
The deal breaker is when you start to believe "god" bequeathed your faith, for you to then, insist that every human one comes into contact with, must follow your lead without question.
jeffy
This is where the Donald loses points bigly in my book. A real America first, non-interventionist, would treat Israel the same as any other nation. It should be held to the same standards. But it never is.
It is strange to me that while Trump seeks those who would corrupt the system from within, illegal immigrants, those who would undermine his agenda, he has yet, as far as I know, to bar those holding dual citizenship from political office. I find this a more important issue than politicians moving into companies that the formally regulated and vice-versa which has been addressed already by the Donald. Politicians with divided loyalties can never put America first and make America great again.
Israeli’s desire is to reframe the discussion and talk about October 7th as if history started then. No. This problem was going on decades before October 7th. But let us put the blame where it belongs—at the feet of the British who double-dealed and created this situation. And why the double dealing? Because of the fetishization of a people whose kingdom was toppled 2,600 years ago. A people who were given the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in Russia to call a homeland to address their diasporic status. A people who chose instead to work to displace the native population that was now living in their former homeland for the last 2,000 years. It is simply not an intellectually defensible position to support. The Donald should not continue this undue fetishization in America with unwavering support of Israel.
Simon Foston
TobleroneToday 07:06 am JST
Um. No one's actually trying to deny that.
Ken
Exactly, after they blew up their first hospital or school they should have caught off all weapon/financial support because those are literal war crimes
I'veSeenFootage
Big shoutout to a particular subset of far-left doofuses who refused to vote Biden because he was "too soft on Israel". This is what you get now! The proposed eradication of Gaza. Good job!
GuruMick
US has always been "soft on Israel "
Just history.
GuruMick
B'T selem is an Israeli Human Rights group that has yearly reports on Palestinian issues including civilian deaths by the IDF.
Good source and Israeli as well
iknowall
I understand Egypt and Jordan's apprehension.
Egypt for example didn't build a wall on the border with peaceful Israel.
It did build a wall on the Gaza border.
Hmm. I wonder why?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68375460
Capuchin
A bit late to that party I'm afraid. Jordan's King Abdullah was assassinated in 1951 by Palestinians for his illegal annexation of the West Bank. I think that sends a pretty clear message about whether the Palestinians consider themselves Palestinian or a vassal of the Hashemite kingdom.
But ultimately whether the governments of the surrounding Arab countries agree to accept refugees or not is not the point. It's the Palestinian's inalienable right to self-determination that matters.
iknowall
Around 750,000 Arabs from the Palestinian territories decided to become citizens of Jordan in 1948.
https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2023/11/jordans-redline-on-admitting-palestinians-is-unlikely-to-change?lang=en
Capuchin
You're confusing facts. 750,000 was the estimated number of Palestinians that either fled or were expelled by Israel in 1948. i.e. the Nakba.
Most ended up in Gaza and the West Bank with others ending up in surrounding Arab states. The UN partition plan proposed the creation of 2 states with Gaza and the West Bank constituting the Palestinian state. Jordan negotiated with Israel and Britain for the annexation of the West Bank excluding the Palestinians themselves.
Palestinian refugees who ended up in the illegally annexed Jordanian controlled West Bank did not become Jordanian citizens.